Preemptive dilatation gives good outcome to early esophageal stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20:e25-e27. [PMID: 20173605 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e3181c922a7]

UK guidelines on oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice

These are updated guidelines which supersede the original version published in 2004. This work has been endorsed by the Clinical Services and Standards Committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) under the auspices of the oesophageal section of the BSG. The original guidelines have undergone extensive revision by the 16 members of the Guideline Development Group with representation from individuals across all relevant disciplines, including the Heartburn Cancer UK charity, a nursing representative and a patient representative. The methodological rigour and transparency of the guideline development processes were appraised using the revised Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool.Dilatation of the oesophagus is a relatively high-risk intervention, and is required by an increasing range of disease states. Moreover, there is scarcity of evidence in the literature to guide clinicians on how to safely perform this procedure. These guidelines deal specifically with the dilatation procedure using balloon or bougie devices as a primary treatment strategy for non-malignant narrowing of the oesophagus. The use of stents is outside the remit of this paper; however, for cases of dilatation failure, alternative techniques-including stents-will be listed. The guideline is divided into the following subheadings: (1) patient preparation; (2) the dilatation procedure; (3) aftercare and (4) disease-specific considerations. A systematic literature search was performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Develop-ment and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and decide on the strength of recommendations made.

Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established treatment for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms (SESCNs) with no risk of lymphatic metastasis. However, for large SESCNs, especially when exceeding two-thirds of the esophageal circumference, conventional ESD is time-consuming and has an increased risk of adverse events. Based on the submucosal tunnel conception, endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) was first introduced by us to remove large SESCNs, with excellent results. Studies from different centers also reported favorable results. Compared with conventional ESD, ESTD has a more rapid dissection speed and R0 resection rate. Currently in China, ESTD for large SESCNs is an important part of the digestive endoscopic tunnel technique, as is peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia and submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection for submucosal tumors of the muscularis propria. However, not all patients with SESCNs are candidates for ESTD, and postoperative esophageal strictures should also be taken into consideration, especially for lesions with a circumference greater than three-quarters. In this article, we describe our experience, review the literature of ESTD, and provide detailed information on indications, standard procedures, outcomes, and complications of ESTD.

Systematic review: the prevention of oesophageal stricture after endoscopic resection

BACKGROUND

Extensive endoscopic resections for the treatment of early oesophageal neoplasia can result in fibro-inflammatory strictures that require repeated interventions, which significantly alter the patients' quality of life.

AIMS

To review current evidence about the prevention of oesophageal strictures following endoscopic resections.

METHODS

Systematic search of PubMed and Embase from inception to March 2015 using appropriate keywords. All original publications in English were included, and articles on the treatment of oesophageal stricture were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 461 hits, 62 studies were included in the analysis. Among the wound-protective strategies, polyglycolic acid sheets showed the most convincing evidence with a 37.5% stricture rate and excellent safety. Regenerative medicine, using cell sheets of autologous keratinocytes, resulted in a 25% stricture rate, although with cost and availability concerns. Among anti-proliferative treatment modalities, steroid treatment, either endoscopically injected triamcinolone in the resection wound or orally administered prednisolone, proved effective with an overall stricture rate of 13.5%, with safety concerns regarding late oesophageal perforations and infectious morbidity. Among mechanical treatment options, poorly effective and high-risk preventive balloon dilation tend to be replaced by prophylactic covered stent, with 18-28% stricture rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Although oral or locally injected steroids are promising options, no currently available technique is sufficiently efficient and devoid of significant safety concerns to recommend its routine use for the prevention of strictures after extensive endoscopic resection. Improving our knowledge in the mechanisms of oesophageal wound healing will guide the development of novel methods for stricture prevention.

Tunnel endoscopy: Research progress and measures for prevention of complications

With the development of digestive endoscopy, tunnel endoscopy (TE) comes into being. TE as a product of NOTES surgery and ESD technology, plays an increasingly important role in digestive disease treatment. TE refers to creating an artificial tunnel by using digestive endoscopy treatment technology between the gastrointestinal mucosa and the muscularis propria, through which appropriate diagnosis and treatment operations can be performed. It provides a new avenue for treatment of many diseases and has good clinical effects. However, TE also has its own defects, such as application limitations, lower complete tumor resection rate and more complications. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the research progress of TE and the measures for prevention of complications associated with TE.

Advances in prevention and treatment of esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is one of endoscopic minimally invasive techniques, referring to submucosal dissection of lesions greater than 2 cm using a variety of electric scalpels. At present ESD has become the most common choice of treatment for early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. With the wide application and development of esophageal ESD technology, post-ESD esophageal stenosis, as a major complication of esophageal ESD, has affected endoscopic treatment for the larger scope of early esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions and has plagued digestive endoscopy experts. For this complication, there have been no universally accepted treatment guidelines in the world. Scholars of different countries are taking efforts to develop different treatment or prevention strategies, looking forward to finding a better solution to the treatment or prevention of this complication. In this paper, we focus on the recent progress in the prevention and treatment of post-ESD esophageal stenosis.

Complications of endoscopic dilation for esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic dilation (ED) is used for the treatment of benign strictures caused by reflux esophagitis or anastomotic stenosis after esophagectomy. Esophageal stenosis is a major complication after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of large superficial esophageal cancer, but little is known regarding the incidence of complications of ED for stenosis caused by esophageal ESD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted at a single institution. From September 2002 to December 2012, a total of 1,337 ED procedures were performed for stenosis after esophageal ESD in 121 patients. The incidence of complications of ED and related clinical characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of bleeding was 0.8 % (1/121) per patient and 0.07 % (1/1,337) per procedure. The incidence of perforation was 4.1 % (5/121) per patient and 0.37 % (5/1,337) per procedure. Perforation occurred at a median of third time of ED procedures (range 2-9 procedures) and at a median of 18 days (range 8-29 days) after ESD. There were no significant characteristics correlated to perforation, such as location, circumferential extent, or diameter of mucosal defect after ESD. The total number of ED procedures was significantly larger among perforation cases (37, range 6-57) compared with those without perforation (7, range 1-70) (p = 0.01), and the treatment duration tended to be longer (190 vs. 69 days, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of bleeding caused by ED for esophageal stenosis after ESD was very low. Relevant risk of perforation should be considered for patients requiring multiple ED procedures.

Prevention and treatment of esophageal stenosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early esophageal cancer

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of esophageal mucosal lesions is associated with a risk of esophageal stenosis, especially for near-circumferential or circumferential esophageal mucosal defects. Here, we review historic and modern studies on the prevention and treatment of esophageal stenosis after ESD. These methods include prevention via pharmacological treatment, endoscopic autologous cell transplantation, endoscopic esophageal dilatation, and stent placement. This short review will focus on direct prevention and treatment, which may help guide the way forward.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgical treatment for gastrointestinal cancer

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely used in Japan as a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer. The application of ESD has expanded to the esophagus and colorectum. The indication criteria for endoscopic resection (ER) are established for each organ in Japan. Additional treatment, including surgery with lymph node dissection, is recommended when pathological examinations of resected specimens do not meet the criteria. Repeat ER for locally recurrent gastrointestinal tumors may be difficult because of submucosal fibrosis, and surgical resection is required in these cases. However, ESD enables complete resection in 82%-100% of locally recurrent tumors. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-developed surgical procedure for the local excision of rectal tumors. ESD may be superior to TEM alone for superficial rectal tumors. Perforation is a major complication of ESD, and it is traditionally treated using salvage laparotomy. However, immediate endoscopic closure followed by adequate intensive treatment may avoid the need for surgical treatment for perforations that occur during ESD. A second primary tumor in the remnant stomach after gastrectomy or a tumor in the reconstructed organ after esophageal resection has traditionally required surgical treatment because of the technical difficulty of ER. However, ESD enables complete resection in 74%-92% of these lesions. Trials of a combination of ESD and laparoscopic surgery for the resection of gastric submucosal tumors or the performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy after ESD have been reported, but the latter procedure requires a careful evaluation of its clinical feasibility.