Minimally invasive myotomy for the treatment of esophageal achalasia: evolution of the surgical procedure and the therapeutic algorithm

Esophageal motility disorder achalasia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although not a common disease, the last several years have had exciting breakthroughs in better defining the pathophysiology of achalasia, classifying the disease with high-resolution manometry and potentially exciting new treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

The introduction of high-resolution manometry with detailed assessment of lower esophageal sphincter function and peristalsis has made it possible to classify achalasia into three subtypes. This becomes clinically important as patients with type II achalasia do best with both pneumatic dilation and surgical myotomy, whereas type III achalasia may respond better to surgery. The first multicenter randomized controlled trial published by the European Achalasia Trial group reported similar excellent outcomes over a 2-year follow-up with both pneumatic dilation and laparoscopic myotomy in a study involving nearly 200 achalasia patients. Although longer follow-up is required, this supports the continued use of pneumatic dilation for treating achalasia. Finally, the novel endoscopic technique of peroral endoscopic myotomy is a promising new treatment option for achalasia, but it requires increased experiences and careful evaluation before widespread application.

SUMMARY

These are exciting times in the diagnosis and treatment of achalasia, which will definitely improve patient treatment outcomes. However, we still await breakthroughs in the basic science arena to identify the actual cause of achalasia.

Effectiveness of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the treatment of achalasia: a pilot trial in Chinese Han population with a minimum of one-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcomes of Chinese Han patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia.

METHODS

Patients undergoing POEM for achalasia at the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School were prospectively enrolled in this study, with a follow-up duration of at least one year. Their outcomes were evaluated by analyzing esophageal manometry, timed barium esophagogram and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), which were performed before surgery, 5 days after surgery and at the last follow-up. Patients' symptom relief was considered the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, esophageal emptying, patients' quality of life (QoL) and procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were included in the study. Eckardt score after POEM was remarkably lower than the preoperative score (0.4 ± 0.7 vs 7.1 ± 2.1, P = 0.001). The preoperative LES pressure was 32.4 ± 15.3 mmHg, which was decreased to 3.8 ± 3.9 mmHg immediately after surgery. The height of the barium column at 1 min after barium swallow was significantly reduced after treatment (11.7 ± 1.2 cm vs 3.2 ± 1.6 cm, P < 0.001). The patients' QoL was also improved, as indicated by obviously increased physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores of the SF-36. Complications occurred during POEM included cutaneous emphysema, mucosal injury and pneumothorax.

CONCLUSION

POEM is an effective approach for treating achalasia, which can relieve the symptoms of achalasia by improving esophageal emptying and lowering LES pressure.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is safe and effective in the setting of prior endoscopic intervention

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in the setting of prior endoscopic interventions.

PATIENTS

This study involves 40 consecutive patients undergoing POEM.

INTERVENTION

POEM was performed for esophageal motility disorders, including achalasia, nutcracker with nonrelaxing lower esophageal sphincter (LES), hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, and diffuse esophageal spasm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures include length of procedure (LOP), intraoperative complications, and dysphagia relief.

RESULTS

Forty patients, with a mean age of 54 ± 19 years, underwent POEM. The pre-POEM intervention group consisted of 12 patients (nine achalasia, two nutcracker with nonrelaxing LES, and one diffuse esophageal spasm) who also had previous endoscopic treatment, while the pre-POEM non-intervention group consisted of 28 patients (22 achalasia, 3 hypertensive LES, 2 nutcracker with nonrelaxing LES, and 1 diffuse esophageal spasm). Ten patients had botox injections and two patients had large caliber balloon dilations prior to POEM. The median preoperative Eckardt score was 5 in the pre-POEM intervention group vs 6 in the pre-POEM non-intervention group (p value = 0.4). There was no statistical difference in the mean LOP (134 ± 43 vs 131 ± 41, p = 0.8) or the incidence of intraoperative complications (17 vs 3 %, p = 0.2) between the two groups. There was also no difference in the 6-month postoperative median Eckardt scores between the two groups (1 vs 1, p = 0.4).

CONCLUSION

POEM is safe and effective even following preoperative endoscopic large caliber balloon dilations or botox injection. These interventions do not seem to contribute to increased adverse intraoperative or postoperative clinical outcomes.

Laparoscopic treatment for esophageal achalasia: experience at a single center

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is a not frequent esophageal disorder characterized by the absence of esophageal peristalsis and incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Its cause is unknown. The aim of treatment is to improve the symptoms. We report the results of the treatment of this condition achieved in one center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients with esophageal achalasia. In the period 2010-2012 we observed 64 patients, of whom 19 were referred for medical treatment. Three of the remaining patients underwent botulinum toxin injection, 17 underwent multiple endoscopic dilation procedures and 25 underwent laparoscopic surgery.

RESULTS

There were no complications in the group undergoing endoscopic therapy, but symptom remission was only temporary. Patients undergoing surgery showed a significant improvement in symptoms and no recurrence throughout the follow-up period, that is still ongoing (3 years). There were no major complications in any case and no morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of esophageal achalasia with laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication gives the best and longest-lasting results in suitably selected patients. The extension of the myotomy and reduction in LES pressure are the most important parameters to achieve a good result.