Pearls and pitfalls in SILS colectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22:183-188. [PMID: 22678310 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e31824e2814]

A learning curve in using organ retractor for single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has the potential to improve perioperative outcomes, including less postoperative pain, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, SILS is technically difficult and needs a longer learning curve. Between April 2016 and September 2019, a total of 198 patients with clinical stage I/II right colon cancer underwent curative resection. In the case of the SILS approach, an organ retractor was usually used to overcome SILS-specific restrictions. The patients were divided into two groups by surgical approach: the SILS with organ retractor group (SILS-O, n = 33) and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (LAC, n = 165). Clinical T status was significantly higher in the LAC group (p = 0.016). Operation time was shorter and blood loss was lower in the SILS-O group compared to the LAC group (117 vs. 197 min, p = 0.027; 10 vs. 25 mL, p = 0.024, respectively). In the SILS-O group, surgical outcomes including operation time, blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between those performed by experts and by non-experts. Longer operation time (p = 0.041) was significantly associated with complications on univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 2.514, 95%CI 1.047–6.035, p = 0.039). SILS-O was safe and feasible for right colon cancer. There is a potential to shorten the learning curve of SILS using an organ retractor.

Review of 500 single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases - Lessons learned

Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a minimally invasive platform with specific benefits over traditional multiport laparoscopic surgery. The safety and feasibility of SILS has been proven, and the applications continue to grow with experience. After 500 cases at a high-volume, single-institution, we were able to standardize instrumentation and operative steps, as well as develop adaptations in technique to help overcome technical and ergonomic challenges. These technical adaptations have allowed the successful application of SILS to technically difficult patient populations, such as pelvic cases, inflammatory bowel disease cases, and high body mass index patients. This review is a frame of reference for the application and wider integration of the single incision laparoscopic platform in colorectal surgery.

SILS v SILS+1: a Case-Matched Comparison for Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is safe and feasible for benign and malignant colorectal diseases. SILS has comparable or improved outcomes compared to multiport laparoscopy but technical limitations when operating in the pelvis. To address these limitations, we developed an innovative SILS+1 approach using a single Pfannenstiel incision for pelvis access with one additional umbilical port. Our goal was to compare outcomes for SILS and SILS+1 in lower abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients who underwent an elective reduced port laparoscopic lower abdominal/pelvic colorectal procedure from 2009 to 2014. Cases were stratified by approach: SILS versus SILS+1 then matched 1:2 on age, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidity, and procedure. Demographic, perioperative, and postoperative outcome variables were evaluated. The main outcome measures were operative time, conversion rate, length of stay, complication, morbidity, and mortality rates.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-two reduced port AR/LAR patients were evaluated-44 SILS and 88 SILS+1. The groups were similar in age, gender, BMI, and ASA class. The primary diagnosis in both cohorts was diverticulitis (90.9 % SILS, 87.5 % SILS+1), and main procedure performed an anterior rectosigmoidectomy (86.4 % SILS, 88.2 % SILS+1). Significantly more SILS+1 patients had previous abdominal surgery (p = 0.01). The operative time was significantly shorter in SILS+1 (mean 166.6 [SD 48.4] vs. 178.0 [SD 70.0], p = 0.03). The conversion rate to multiport or open surgery was also significantly lower with SILS+1 compared to SILS (1.1 vs. 11.4 %, p = 0.02). Postoperatively, the length of stay across the groups was similar. SILS trended towards higher complication and readmission rates (NS). There were no unplanned reoperations or mortality in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

SILS+1 facilitates pelvic and lower abdominal colorectal surgery, with shorter operative times and lower conversion rates. The additional port improved visualization and outcomes without any impact on length of stay, readmission, or complication rates.

Dual-port distal gastrectomy for the early gastric cancer

Background

Although recent trends in laparoscopic procedures have been toward minimizing the number of incisions, four or five ports are normally required to complete laparoscopic gastrectomy because of the complexity of this procedure. Multi-channel ports, such as the SILS port (Covidien, JAPAN), are now available and are crucial for performing single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) or reduced port surgery (RPS). We carried out reduced port distal gastrectomy (RPDG) using a dual-port method with a SILS port.

Methods

Ten patients who were diagnosed as early stage gastric cancer were offered the RPDG. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 68.1 and 21.4, respectively. No distant metastasis or regional lymph node swelling was seen in any case. A 5-mm flexible scope (Olympus, JAPAN) and SILS port were used and a nylon ligature with a straight needle, instead of a surgical instrument, was available to raise the gastric wall.

Results

The average operative time was 266.9 ± 38.3 min and blood loss was 37.8 ± 56.8 ml. Patients recovered well and experienced no complications after surgery. All patients could tolerate soft meals on the first day after surgery and the average hospital stay was 8.1 days. Past conventional LAG cases were evaluated to compare the short-term outcome and no difference was seen in the mean operative time or operative blood loss. The length of hospital stay after surgery was shorter for the RPDG group than the conventional operation group (p < 0.0001). Interestingly, the trend of serum CRP elevation after surgery was lower in the RPDG group than the conventional LAG group (p = 0.053).

Conclusions

Although the benefits of RPS have not been established, this type of surgery may be expected to have some advantages. Cosmetic benefits and shorter hospital stays are clear advantages. Less invasiveness can be expected according to the trend of serum CRP elevation after RPDG.

The application of McBurney's single-incision laparoscopic colectomy alleviates the response of patients to postoperative wound pain

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) is one of several promising operation choices. Our previous study demonstrated that SILC with a self-made glove-port system both improves the feasibility of SILC and decreases the cost expense of surgery. Because the incision site for SILC could be made at either the umbilicus or McBurney's point, we are interested in whether the incision site affects the outcomes of patients, which is a less explored topic. The purpose of this study is not only to show the results of SILC with a self-made glove-port system for supporting its feasibility, but also to compare the short-term surgical outcomes between SILC with the incision made at the umbilicus and at McBurney's point.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We collected and reviewed the medical records of patients who received SILC with a self-made glove-port system for tumors in the left side of the colon from August 2009 to March 2011. All operations were performed by a single surgeon. Comparisons of the demographic characteristics, perioperative data, and clinical outcomes between umbilical and McBurney's SILCs were performed. Postoperative pain was assessed by a visual analog scale and opiate demand.

RESULTS

In total, 61 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Five of 48 (10.4%) tumors in the umbilical SILC group and 5 of 13 (38.5%) tumors in the McBurney's SILC group were located below the peritoneal reflection. The tumor location was significantly different between these two groups (P=.015). Patients in the umbilical SILC group had significantly higher frequency of opiate demand than those in the McBurney's SILC group (0.4±0.7 versus 1.4±1.8, respectively; P=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This study further provides evidence for supporting the safety and feasibility of SILC in treating colorectal diseases. More important is that McBurney's SILC not only alleviates the patient response to wound pain, but also provides the same site for a diverting enterostomy to avoid creating an additional wound.

Critical appraisal of learning curve for single incision laparoscopic right colectomy

BACKGROUND

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) has emerged as a viable minimally invasive surgical approach with benefits and limitations yet to be fully elucidated. Although shown to be safe and feasible, characterization of the learning curve has not been addressed. Our aim was to identify a learning curve for SILC right hemicolectomy and to determine the incidence of operative failure and complication rates during this phase.

METHODS

Over a 2-year period, data from 54 consecutive SILC cases performed by the same surgeon were tabulated in an institutional review board-approved database. A learning curve was generated utilizing cumulative sum (CUSUM) methodology to assess changes in total operative time (OT) across the case sequence. A separate learning curve was generated utilizing risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis, taking into account patient risk factors (i.e., age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, prior abdominal surgeries, and tumor size for malignant cases) and operative failure (i.e., prolonged OT, conversion to open surgery, intraoperative and 30-day postoperative complications, prolonged length of stay, reoperation, readmission, and mortality).

RESULTS

Patients had a mean age of 63.6 ± 11.5 years, mean body mass index of 27.3 ± 3.9 kg/m(2), and median American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 2. Mean OT and length of stay were 123.5 ± 28.9 min and 3.9 ± 2.4 days, respectively. There were no conversions or oncologic failures. Six patients developed 30-day postoperative complications. CUSUM analysis of OT identified achievement of the learning phase after 30 cases. When taking into account both analyses, the rate of operative failure was not statistically different between the initial 30 and the final 24 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, the learning curve is achieved between 30 to 36 cases. Offering this minimally invasive surgical approach does not result in increased complications or harmful results even in the early phases of the learning curve.

Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: short-term outcomes and comparative analysis

Introduction. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) is a viable and safe technique; however, there are no single-institution studies comparing outcomes of SILC for colon cancer with well-established minimally invasive techniques. We evaluated the short-term outcomes following SILC for cancer compared to a group of well-established minimally invasive techniques. Methods. Fifty consecutive patients who underwent SILC for colon cancer were compared to a control group composed of 50 cases of minimally invasive colectomies performed with either conventional multiport or hand-assisted laparoscopic technique. The groups were paired based on the type of procedure. Demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes were assessed. Results. With the exception of BMI, demographics were similar between both groups. Most of the procedures were right colectomies (n = 33) and anterior resections (n = 12). There were no significant differences in operative time (127.9 versus 126.7 min), conversions (0 versus 1), complications (14% versus 8%), length of stay (4.5 versus 4.0 days), readmissions (2% versus 2%), and reoperations (2% versus 2%). Oncological outcomes were also similar between groups. Conclusions. SILC is an oncologically sound alternative for the management of colon cancer and results in similar short-term outcomes as compared with well-established minimally invasive techniques.

Single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid resection: a technical video of a standardized approach

BACKGROUND

Initially described in 2008, single-incision laparoscopic colectomy has evolved into a safe and feasible surgical approach. Noted advantages include elimination of trocar-site incisions and improved cosmesis. Additional benefits including reduced abdominal wall trauma, diminished pain, and shorter length of hospitalization have been proposed. Following utilization in over 150 colectomies, we present a standardized approach and describe our technique for single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid resection through a single-port access device.

TECHNIQUE

A 2.5-cm umbilical incision is used for insertion of the single-incision access device. A 30° 5-mm camera with a right-angle light cord adaptor and 2 bowel graspers are inserted through the access device. Exploration and lysis of adhesions are performed before placing the patient in a steep Trendelenburg position with 20° left-sided elevation. Dissection commences in a medial-to-lateral fashion, developing the presacral avascular plane while ensuring nerve preservation. The retroperitoneal plane is established from the sacral promontory to the lateral peritoneal reflection. After identification of the left ureter and isolation of the vascular pedicle, the inferior mesenteric artery is isolated and ligated. The lateral attachments of the left colon and rectosigmoid are then divided, followed by additional pelvic dissection along the presacral avascular plane. The mesentery of the distal resection margin is divided before transection of the corresponding bowel using a stapling device. The bowel is then extracted and resected at the site of the single-incision access device. An intracorporeal primary end-to-end anastomosis is fashioned.

CONCLUSION

We present a dynamic article with video illustrating a standardized medial-to-lateral approach for single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid resection. The technique effectively avoids the use of multiple trocar sites, maintains basic oncologic principles of resection, and affords the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic wedge resection for gastric submucosal tumors: technical challenges encountered in initial experience

PURPOSE

To report the initial clinical experience with single-incision laparoscopic gastric wedge resection for submucosal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 10 patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic gastric wedge resection between July 2009 and March 2011 were reviewed retrospectively. The demographic data, clinicopathologic and surgical outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean tumor size was 2.5 cm (range, 1.2~5.0 cm), and the tumors were mostly located on the anterior wall (4/10) or along the greater curvature (4/10), of the stomach. Nine of ten procedures were performed successfully, without the use of additional trocars, or conversion to laparotomy. One patient underwent conversion to multiport laparoscopic surgery, to get simultaneous cholecystectomy safely. The mean operating time was 66.5 minutes (range, 24~132 minutes), and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (range, 4~7 days). No serious perioperative complications were observed. Of the 10 submucosal tumors, the final pathologic report revealed 5 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 4 schwannomas, and 1 heterotopic pancreas.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-incision laparoscopic gastric wedge resection for gastric submucosal tumors is feasible and safe, when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. This technique provides favorable cosmetic results, and also short hospital stay and low morbidity, in carefully selected candidates.