Reduced Fracture Rates Observed Only in Patients With Proper Persistence and Compliance With Bisphosphonate Therapies:

Knowledge and compliance towards alendronate therapy among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Palestine

Background

Postmenopausal women compliance to alendronate therapy is suboptimal due to the complex dosing requirements. The poor compliance may increase their potential of fractures and the prevalence of side effects. In this study, the compliance of osteoporotic women on bisphosphonate therapy to the complex dosing instructions and their knowledge of alendronate-interactions were assessed.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study, using self-administered questionnaire involving 224 osteoporotic women on alendronate therapy, who visited the orthopedic clinics and community pharmacies in the West Bank. Data was collected using a validated questionnaire consisting of 4 sections and analyzed by descriptive statistics. Moreover, associations between patient's socio-demographic characteristics and the extent of compliance and knowledge of alendronate interactions are established in this study.

Results

A total of 300 questionnaires were distributed and 224 were completed. The median compliance score to alendronate dosing instructions was 5 out of a possible maximum 7, and the median knowledge score about alendronate interactions was 7 out of a possible maximum 14. Factors found to affect either or both the knowledge and compliance to alendronate dosing instructions were, residency, and the source of instructions.

Conclusion

This study identified the importance of compliance and knowledge gaps among postmenopausal women treated with alendronate. Therefore, appropriate knowledge about the importance of proper compliance to dosing instructions and avoidance of interactions is of a great benefit for maximizing clinical effectiveness, lowering fracture risk and prevention of adverse effects of alendronate among patients treated with alendronate in Palestine.

Comparing the efficacies of bisphosphonates' therapies for osteoporosis persistence and compliance: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Osteoporosis is the most prevalent metabolic bone disorder worldwide. This review was undertaken to compare the efficacies of bisphosphonates therapies for patient persistence and compliance for the treatment of osteoporosis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the available reporting items. MEDLINE and Cochrane library databases were applied for literature searched up to January 2020. All major studies such as prospective, retrospective and reviews articles that examined patient persistence or compliance to bisphosphonates for osteoporosis were included.

RESULTS

Literature search found 656 relevant published reports, out of which 87 were included. The 10,712,176 osteoporotic patients were studied for patient persistence and 5,875,718 patients were studied for patient compliances. Analysis of all studied bisphosphonates showed almost similar patterns for patient persistence rates as it was decreased over the time following initial prescription but persistence length was found to be significantly high for alendronate therapy as compared to the other studied bisphosphonates (p<0.001), whereas the length of persistence of all other bisphosphonates (other than alendronate) were almost same (p>0.05). Analysis of patient compliances with etidronate therapy showed the highest percent medication possession ratio (MRP) at 12 months, followed by the MRPs of ibandronate, alendronate, risedronate, and clodronate.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first systematic review that shows the comparison of the efficiencies of bisphosphonates for patient persistence and compliance for the treatment of osteoporosis. The data showed that the length of patient persistence was highest for alendronate therapy, whereas patient compliance was highest for etidronate therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Cost-effectiveness of denosumab for high-risk postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Thailand

Aims: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of denosumab for treating postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (PMO) at high risk of fracture in Thailand.Materials and methods: A published Markov cohort cost-effectiveness model was populated with country-specific data as available and other published data as needed. The model used a societal perspective, lifetime horizon, efficacy data from network meta-analysis of trials, and included costs for direct medical and non-medical care, informal care, and osteoporosis treatments to compare denosumab to no pharmacologic treatment (calcium and vitamin D supplements only) and to oral weekly alendronate. The base case (high-risk population) included postmenopausal women with femoral neck T-score ≤-2.5, mean age 65 years at entry, and history of vertebral fracture.Results: High-risk women with osteoporosis using denosumab had the greatest number of life years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with higher reductions in hip and vertebral fracture incidence compared with patients with no pharmacologic treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 119,575 Thai Baht (THB) per QALY for denosumab versus no pharmacologic treatment and 199,186 THB per QALY for denosumab versus alendronate. Among Thai postmenopausal women with high-risk of fractures, denosumab was cost-effective compared with no pharmacologic treatment at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 160,000 THB per QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis showed models were most sensitive to changes in denosumab pricing.Limitations: Data from other countries used when country-specific data were unavailable may not accurately reflect the true experience in Thailand. The model focused explicitly on hip, vertebral, and wrist fractures, and therefore provides a conservative estimate of the overall potential impact of osteoporosis-related fracture. The fracture risk was not adjusted to reflect potential changes in risk after denosumab treatment discontinuation.Conclusions: In Thailand, denosumab offers a cost-effective osteoporosis treatment option versus no pharmacologic treatment in postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture.

Oral bisphosphonate prescription and non-adherence at 12 months in patients with hip fractures treated in an acute geriatric unit

A poorer functional status at the time of fracture is a predictor of non-adherence to oral bisphosphonates initiated after a hip fracture, and suggests further opportunities for optimization of secondary fracture prevention in this high-risk population.

INTRODUCTION

Low adherence to treatment is a problem in post-fracture secondary prevention. We aimed to analyze the prognostic factors (related and predictive) associated with non-adherence to oral bisphosphonate prescription for hip fracture due to bone fragility (HFBF) 12 months after discharge from an acute geriatric unit.

METHODS

Prospective study of bivariate data analyzing related and multivariate factors predicting non-adherence of oral bisphosphonates at 12 months after treatment for HFBF. The statistical study was performed with SPSS 19.0.0.

RESULTS

We attended 368 patients with HFBF. At discharge, oral bisphosphonates were prescribed to 226 (61.42%) patients. At 12 months, we followed up 160 (70.7%) patients, 104 (65%) of whom had non-adherence to oral bisphosphonates. Bivariate analysis (adherent vs. non-adherent): age (83.79 ± 5.82 vs. 85.78 ± 5.80, p = .029); Lawton and Brody Index (4.29 ± 3.40 vs. 2.67 ± 3.31, p = .004); baseline Barthel Index (BI) (85.89 ± 21.99 vs. 74.18 ± 26.70) (p = .004); BI at admission (18.84 ± 10.00 vs. 14.47 ± 11.71, p = .004); BI at discharge (34.20 ± 15.40 vs. 27.45 ± 16.71, p = .011); baseline Functional Ambulation Classification (5.66 ± 0.98 vs. 5.43 ± 0.99, p = .025). Multivariate analysis: BI 0.980 (0.965-0.995, p = .007). Discriminatory capacity of the AUC model (± 95% CI): 0.634 (0.545-0.722).

CONCLUSIONS

At 12 months, there was low adherence to treatment with oral bisphosphonates in our model. A lower BI prior to treatment is a predictive factor for non-adherence treatment with oral bisphosphonate.

Persistence with denosumab therapy in women affected by osteoporosis with fragility fractures: a multicenter observational real practice study in Italy

BACKGROUND

Persistence is commonly considered a key factor for the successful management of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Denosumab is the first biologic agent developed for the treatment of osteoporosis with satisfying data regarding the persistence with this therapy.

AIM

The purpose of this multicenter observational real practice study was to evaluate the persistence with denosumab treatment in post-menopausal women affected by osteoporosis.

MATERIAL/SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Women were recruited in four specialized centers for the management of osteoporosis in North, Center and South of Italy. We included women with a diagnosis of post-menopausal osteoporosis, aged >50 years, able to obtain a prescription according to the Italian reimbursement criteria in force during the study period for anti-osteoporotic pharmacological treatment. They initiated a treatment with subcutaneous denosumab (Prolia^®) 60 mg/every 6 months between November 2011 and May 2016. Women who had received aromatase inhibitors were excluded. Patients were assessed at baseline and every 6 months for all treatment length. Persistence data were evaluated for a total of 36 months.

RESULTS

Eight hundred seventy women were enrolled; mean aged 70 years, with a mean body mass index of 24.8 ± 4.1 kg/m². At the Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment, the mean lumbar spine T-score was -2.76 ± 1.14 standard deviations (SD) and the mean femoral neck T-score was -2.49 ± 0.80 SD. During the study, the total persistence was 91.4%. Total dropouts were 75 (8.6%), higher within the initial 6-month period of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistence to denosumab treatment in our observational real practice study was very high. These results suggest that factors such as frequency of visits, pharmacological schedule, and opportunity to call the doctor might play an important role in the persistence and adherence to treatment to obtain maximum therapeutic effect and avoid further fragility fractures.

Non-adherence with bisphosphonates among patients with osteoporosis: impact on fracture risk and healthcare cost‏

Osteoporosis-related fractures at the spine and hip have a substantial impact on mortality, morbidity, and quality of life in older adults worldwide. Adherence to bisphosphonates is essential for effective treatment and fracture prevention. Nevertheless, numerous studies from various populations and study designs clearly indicated that adherence and persistence are poor with more than 50% of patients discontinuing therapy within one year. This is primarily explained by mild adverse effects, dosing regimens, and costs. Studies have also shown that good adherence is associated with reduced osteoporosis-related and non-related healthcare costs as soon as 2 years from therapy initiation. Nonetheless, we found only little improvement in adherence rates over the years. In light of the importance of medication adherence and the limited success of previous programs, other than reducing dosing frequency, new directions should be explored to engage patients and care givers in order to improve adherence and prevent fractures.

Compliance and persistence with treatment with parathyroid hormone for osteoporosis. A Danish national register-based cohort study

Medical intervention is important in the treatment of osteoporosis, and compliance with medical treatment is essential for an optimal outcome. Based on Danish national registers, we found that compliance with parathyroid hormone (PTH) treatment is high and associated with marital status, working status, and type of PTH treatment.

PURPOSE

Compliance and persistence are essential for an optimal outcome during medical treatment of osteoporosis. We aimed to evaluate compliance and persistence with treatment with PTH in daily clinical practice in Danish patients and to describe factors affecting compliance.

METHODS

Register-based nationwide cohort study on all patients in Denmark initiates PTH or analogue treatment for osteoporosis in 2003-2010 (n = 4281). PTH drugs included were the PTH analogue teriparatide(1-34) and recombinant human PTH (rhPTH(1-84)). Compliance with treatment was calculated by using medication possession ratio (MPR).

RESULTS

In the study period, 3702 patients were exclusively treated with teriparatide and 579 were exclusively treated with rhPTH(1-84). We found that for patients persistent with therapy for at least 18 months and with MPR >0.8, 83 % of the patients in the teriparatide group were compliant versus 72 % in the recombinant PTH group (p < 0.01). Being married/cohabiting, still in the labor market, and taking teriparatide were significantly associated with higher compliance, whereas age, gender, level of education, income, alcoholism, and Charlson comorbidity index were not associated with compliance.

CONCLUSION

Compliance with PTH treatment overall is high, with teriparatide compliance higher than rhPTH(1-84), in patients persistent to therapy for 18 months. Compliance is associated with marital status, working status, and type of PTH treatment.

Persistence with denosumab and persistence with oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a retrospective, observational study, and a meta-analysis

The objectives of this study were to estimate persistence with denosumab and put these results in context by conducting a review of persistence with oral bisphosphonates. Persistence with denosumab was found to be higher than with oral bisphosphonates.

PURPOSE

This study had two objectives: to analyse persistence in Swedish women initiating denosumab for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) and to put these findings in context by conducting a literature review and meta-analysis of persistence data for oral bisphosphonates.

METHODS

The study used the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and included women aged at least 50 years initiating denosumab between May 2010 and July 2012. One injection of denosumab was defined as 6-month persistence. Women were considered persistent for another 6 months if they filled their next prescription within 6 months + 56 days and survival analysis applied to the data. A literature search was conducted in PubMed to identify retrospective studies of persistence with oral bisphosphonates and pooled persistence estimates were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

The study identified 2,315 women who were incident denosumab users. Mean age was 74 years and 61% had been previously treated for PMO. At 12 and 24 months, persistence with denosumab was 83% (95% CI, 81-84%) and 62% (95% CI, 60-65%), respectively. The literature search identified 40 articles for inclusion in the meta-analysis. At 12 and 24 months, persistence with oral bisphosphonates ranged from 10% to 78% and from 16% to 46%, with pooled estimates of 45% and 30%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and literature review suggest that persistence was higher with denosumab than with oral bisphosphonates.

Improving adherence to and persistence with oral therapy of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis treatment has low adherence and persistence. This study evaluated if greater patient involvement could improve them. At 12 months, only 114 out of 344 participants were "fully adherent and persistent" (all drug doses taken throughout the study). Only frequency of drug administration had a significant influence on adherence.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis affects millions of individuals worldwide. There are now several effective drugs, but adherence to and persistence with treatment are low. This 12-month multicenter, prospective, randomized study evaluated the efficacy of two different methods aimed at improving adherence and persistence through greater patient involvement, compared with standard clinical practice.

METHODS

Three hundred thirty-four post-menopausal women, receiving an oral prescription for osteoporosis for the first time, were recruited and randomized into three groups: group 1 (controls, managed according to standard clinical practice) and groups 2 and 3 (managed with greater patient and caregiver involvement and special reinforcements: group 2, instructed to use several different "reminders"; group 3, same "reminders" as group 2, plus regular phone calls from and meetings at the referring Center). All enrolled women had two visits (baseline and 12 months).

RESULTS

Of 334 enrolled women, 247 (74%) started the prescribed therapy. Of those who started, 219 (88.7%) persisted in therapy for at least 10 months. At final evaluation, only 114 women were considered as "fully adherent and persistent" (all doses taken throughout the 12 months). There were no significant differences regarding "full adherence" among the three randomized groups. The frequency of drug administration had a significant influence: weekly administration had a >5-fold higher adherence and monthly administration an 8-fold higher adherence (p < 0.0001) than daily administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The special effort of devising and providing additional reminders did not prove effective. Additional interventions during the follow-up, including costly interventions such as phone calls and educational meetings, did not provide significant advantages.

Decreased bone mineral density and periodontal management

The definition of osteoporosis has evolved beyond low bone mineral density to include impaired bone morphology and matrix properties. As such, the subsequent bone density insufficiencies extend beyond the skeletal risks of fracture and have implications for oral health management patients. As our population ages there is a worldwide increase in the risk of decreased bone mineral density and its subsequent morbidity. This makes age an independent risk factor for fracture and decreased bone mineral density. Multiple examinations and diagnostic tests are currently used in combination to develop an algorithm to assess osteoporotic risk. Oral health care professionals should follow these principles and caution should be used in applying a single independent assessment to determine a patient's osteoporotic or bone metabolism risk. Therapeutic approaches for osteoporosis are often divided into nonpharmacological interventions and pharmacological therapies. The periodontist and other oral health care professionals should have a full understanding of the therapeutic options, benefits and implementation of preventive therapies. Bone turnover is a coupled event of bone formation and bone resorption and it is the imbalance of this homeostasis that results in osteoporosis. Based on this uncoupling of bone resorption and formation, osteoporosis or decreased bone mineral density and osteopenia, may be a risk factor for alveolar bone loss in periodontitis. The role of prevention and maintenance with a history of periodontitis and oesteopenia extends beyond biofilm control and should include management of bone mineral density. The chronic periodontal infection in a patient with osteopenia may place the patient at greatly increased risk for alveolar bone loss, gingival recession and root caries. A key component in the management is the oral health professional's knowledge of the interrelationship between skeletal health and periodontal health.

Association between refill compliance to oral bisphosphonate treatment, incident fractures, and health care costs--an analysis using national health databases

SUMMARY

The study estimates the cost of poor and suboptimal refill compliance by estimating fracture costs and assessing the association between refill compliance with oral bisphosphonates and incident fractures using Danish health registers. Patients with poor and suboptimal refill compliance had more major osteoporotic fractures, and the direct costs related to hospital care, primary care, and pharmaceutical treatment for these excess fractures reached almost 14 M DKK (2.5 M USD) for the study population which compares to a national annual excess cost of around 17 M DKK (3.1 M USD) using 2011 prescription prevalence.

INTRODUCTION

Adherence to oral anti-osteoporosis treatment has been shown in several studies to be relatively low and the potential impact on fracture burden is high. The aim of the study was to assess the association between refill compliance and all-cause health care costs.

METHODS

A national dataset was extracted with all treatment-naive patients who began oral bisphosphonate (BP) treatment for osteoporosis in Denmark between 1997 and 2006 (N = 54,876, 87 % women). Patients who survived for at least 2 years (N = 47,176) were divided into groups based on Medication Possession Ratio (MPR). Logistic regressions were used to derive difference in the probability of incident fractures between the three MPR groups. Fracture costs (related to medication use, primary care practice, specialists, and hospitals) were derived by comparing cost 12 months before and after fracture.

RESULTS

For alendronate, the adjusted risk of major osteoporotic fractures was significantly reduced (OR 0.768; 0.686-0.859), including fractures of the hip (0.718; 0.609-0.846) and humerus (0.54; 0.431-0.677) with MPR ≥ 0.8. The risk reduction was lower with etidronate. Over 2 years, a total of 171 hip fractures and 53 other major osteoporotic fractures were attributed to suboptimal or poor refill compliance, with an excess cost of 13.7 M DKK (2.5 M USD).

CONCLUSIONS

Poor refill compliance is not unusual in patients on oral bisphosphonates, and we demonstrate that this is accompanied by excess major osteoporotic fractures and health care costs at the societal level.

Evaluation of persistence and adherence to teriparatide treatment in patients affected by severe osteoporosis (PATT): a multicenter observational real life study

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis is a chronic condition leading to an increased risk of developing fractures, with high morbidity and mortality in aging population. Efficacy of anti-osteoporotic treatment is based on drug potency but also on compliance and persistence to treatment regimen, which is very low, as already described for other diseases. Teriparatide (TPTD) is the first anabolic agent developed for the treatment of osteoporosis. Since it appears that persistence to Teriparatide declines over time, aim of this pilot multicenter observational study was to evaluate persistence and adherence to TPTD (20 μg daily injection regimen for 18 months) treatment (PATT) in patients affected by severe osteoporosis in an every day clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients affected by severe osteoporosis were selected among those who referred to 5 different specialized centers for osteoporosis in North, Center and South of Italy. A sample of 475 women with severe postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with TPTD in accordance to the Italian osteoporosis guidelines was included. At the beginning of TPTD treatment patients were instructed on the use of the device by the referring specialist of the center, a resident fellow or a nurse. Bone biochemical markers were evaluated the same morning and after 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. Patients were visited at time 0 and after 6, 12 and 18 months for clinical follow up.

RESULTS

The results included observations of 441/475 patients (98% women) who completed the 18 months treatment; mean age for women was 73±8 and for men 65±9. After 6 months of TPTD treatment persistence was of 89,79%, 87,75% after 12 months and 86,85% after 18 months. Adherence was of 100% at 6,12 and 18 months. Total dropouts were 13,15% (71/441), which was usually higher within the first 6 months of TPTD treatment. Most common adverse events (arthralgies 2,7%, dizziness 1,8%, migraine 1,8%, depression 1,6%, hypertension 1,1%) were reported in 62/441 patients (14%) of patients, but were not reason for stopping treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The persistence and adherence to TPTD treatment obtained in this multicenter observational real life study was very high as compared to studies performed by others. These encouraging results suggest that different key factors such quality of information, frequency of visits, motivations given to patients, opportunity to call the doctor might play a pivotal role in the high persistence and adherence to TPTD treatment obtained in our study and need to be carefully considered before prescribing chronic anti-osteoporotic therapy.

Economic burden of osteoporotic fractures in Austria

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporotic fractures impose a huge economic burden on society. Though several cost of illness studies from other countries exist, no equivalent study has been conducted in Austria. Our study aims at assessing costs resulting from osteoporotic fractures in Austria in the year 2008 from a societal perspective.

METHODS

We took both direct and indirect costs into consideration. Direct costs encompass medical costs such as expenses for pharmaceuticals, inpatient and outpatient medical care costs, as well as other medical services (e.g., occupational therapies). Non-medical direct costs include transportation costs and medical devices (e.g., wheel chairs or crutches). Indirect costs refer to costs of productivity losses due to absence of work. Moreover, we included costs for early retirement and opportunity costs of informal care provided by family members. For our analysis, we combined data of official statistics, expert estimates as well as unique patient surveys that are currently conducted in the course of an international osteoporotic fracture study in Austria.

RESULTS

For the year 2008, the total annual financial burden incurred by osteoporotic fractures in Austria amounted to approx. €685.2 million, the largest fraction of which was due to the opportunity cost of family care (30.2%), followed by costs for hospitalization (26.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The financial burden of osteoporotic fractures in Austria is substantial. Our findings may have implications for future economic analyses, and also support health care authorities in their decision making.

Impact of a phone follow-up program on persistence with teriparatide or PTH(1-84) treatment

A follow-up program to help patients suffering from severe osteoporosis during their therapy with teriparatide or PTH(1-84) has been designed and performed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the 18-month persistence on these therapies in patients participating in the program. We enrolled 382 patients who started teriparatide or PTH(1-84) following this program and compared them with a historical cohort of 398 patients treated with the same therapies but who did not participate in any follow-up program. At the beginning of the therapy, nurses trained patients on self-injection. Patients received one phone call per week during the first month, then one phone call per month and per 3 months during the following 5 and 12 months, respectively. In every call, nurses helped patients to resolve any possible issues and collected adverse event information. The persistence rate of the group following the program was 85.6%, 8.2% higher than that of the group not following any program (77.4%). The log-rank test on persistence rates on therapy in patients enrolled and not enrolled in the program was performed; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.006). Discontinuation in the follow-up program group occurred mainly at early stages of the treatment due to adverse events. Our results show that patients suffering from severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide or PTH(1-84) and enrolled in a follow-up program have higher persistence rates than patients not following the program.

Adherence and persistence in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with raloxifene

OBJECTIVE

A major impediment in osteoporosis care is poor therapeutic adherence. Real-life surveys show that adherence and persistence with oral bisphosphonates decrease to 30-60% within 1 year. The aim of this study was to analyze the adherence and persistence with raloxifene in patients visiting our outpatient clinic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 342 patients were evaluated from the conventional osteoporosis practice receiving treatment with raloxifene. Patient self-reporting was combined with the medication possession ratio (MPR) assessed via prescription refill counts. In addition, persistence and other self-reported and patient file-based data were assessed.

RESULTS

The final analysis comprised 300 patients with a mean age of 66.3 years (standard deviation ± 7.2 years). At 6 months 84%, at 12 months 81%, at 24 months 78% and at 36 months 77% of patients were persistent with therapy according to patients' self-reports. If MPR and self-reported data were combined, 56%, 48% and 35% of patients remained on therapy at 12, 24 and 36 months, respectively. The mean duration of therapy was 19 months with a mean MPR of 52.8%. Finally, 31.7% of all patients were classified as adherent. Significant correlation to adherence was found for tolerability and motivational factors.

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that approximately half of the patients treated with raloxifene in regular clinical practice stay on therapy for the first 2 years. Furthermore, the patients do not adhere sufficiently to the recommended dosage, and reduced clinical efficacy in clinical practice is presumable. The reasons for non-adherence comprise tolerability and motivational factors but further investigation is needed.

Persistence to medical treatment of osteoporosis in women at three different clinical settings - A historical cohort study

Purpose: This study was undertaken to assess persistence with bisphosphonates and raloxifene and to identify determinants of adherence (patient age, level of information, educational status, etc.) among women with osteoporosis in three different clinical settings in Denmark. Methods: We compared persistence to therapy in three historical cohorts of women diagnosed with osteoporosis starting therapy between January 1999 and January 2004. The study comprised 878 patients treated and followed at Odense University Hospital, 285 patients diagnosed and followed at the Hellerup Osteoporosis Clinic (private practice), and 343 patients diagnosed at Aarhus University Hospital and followed by the referring general practitioner. Data on persistence and possible confounders were collected using a mailed questionnaire. Reminders were issued after 1—2 months to non-respondents. Results: Persistence at 2 years as estimated from Kaplan—Meyer analysis was 0.87, 0.84 and 0.88 in the three cohorts, respectively. There were no significant differences between the clinics. Level of persistence was not related to patient assessment of the adequacy of the clinical information provided by the prescribing doctor, presence of prior fractures or a family history of osteoporosis. However, patients who read the information leaflet on their osteoporosis medication tended to be more persistent with treatment (p < 0.09). Conclusions: Women’s persistence with bisphosphonates and raloxifene was surprisingly high and similar between treating centres. This may be due to a high level of public information available on osteoporosis in Denmark.

Adherence and persistence in patients with severe osteoporosis treated with teriparatide

INTRODUCTION

Medical intervention plays a key role in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and patients' adherence to therapy is essential for optimal clinical outcomes. While adherence in RCTs is usually around 70-90%, a previous study showed that in clinical practice only 27.8% and 46.5% of the women on oral daily vs. weekly alendronate were still on treatment after 12 months. Data on adherence to teriparatide (TPTD) treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis are available from only few countries. This study assessed adherence and persistence with TPTD in Germany.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A sample of 50 women with severe postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with TPTD in accordance to the German osteoporosis guidelines was included. Treatment was initiated 12-24 months before recruitment. Patient self report was assessed using a validated questionnaire. In addition medication possession ratio (MPR) was calculated by counting prescription refills, and therefore all physicians who were treating the patients for any disease were contacted. Patients were classified adherent at 12 months of therapy if self-reported adherence and an MPR of > or =80% were achieved. Persistence was calculated in months and analysed with a Kaplan-Meier estimate.

RESULTS

Apart from a significantly lower age at menopause in the adherent group (46.1 vs. 50.0; p < 0.006) there were no significant differences in baseline demographics between adherent and non-adherent patients. After 12 months, 80% of the patients treated with TPTD were adherent, while 20% were non-adherent. A significant correlation with treatment adherence was found for self-reported medication tolerability (p < 0.001). Furthermore 79% of patients were persistent after 12 months.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that more patients seem to be adherent and persistent with TPTD than with oral treatments of postmenopausal osteoporosis. As these patients suffered from severe osteoporosis and sustained several fragility fractures, the generalisability of our retrospective study analysing a small sample is limited. The major factor that reduced adherence and persistence was tolerability. These findings are of practical relevance as numerous studies on antiresorptive therapies have shown that high adherence and persistence were needed to ensure an optimal therapeutic outcome.

Relationship between compliance and persistence with osteoporosis medications and fracture risk in primary health care in France: a retrospective case-control analysis

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to treatment is an important determinant of long-term outcomes in women with osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to investigate the association between adherence and osteoporotic fracture risk and to identify optimal thresholds for good compliance and persistence. A secondary objective was to perform a preliminary evaluation of the cost consequences of adherence.

METHOD

This was a retrospective case-control analysis. Data were derived from the Thales prescription database, which contains information on >1.6 million patients in the primary health care setting in France. Cases were women aged >or=50 years who had an osteoporosis-related fracture in 2006. For each case, 5 matched controls were randomly selected. Both compliance and persistence aspects of treatment adherence were examined. Compliance was estimated based on the medication possession ratio (MPR). Persistence was calculated as the time from the initial filling of a prescription for osteoporosis medication until its discontinuation.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) MPR was lower in cases compared with controls (58.8% [34.7%] vs 72.1% [28.8%], respectively; P < 0.001). Cases were more likely than controls to discontinue osteoporosis treatment (50.0% vs 25.3%; P < 0.001), yielding a significantly lower proportion of patients who were still persistent at 1 year (34.1% vs 40.9%; P < 0.001). MPR was the best predictor of fracture risk, with an area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve that was higher than that for persistence (0.59 vs 0.55). The optimal MPR threshold for predicting fracture risk was >or=68.0%. Compared with less-compliant women, women who achieved this threshold had a 51% reduction in fracture risk. The difference in annual drug expenditure between women achieving this threshold and those who did not was approximately euro300. The optimal threshold for persistence with therapy was at least 6 months. Attaining this threshold was associated with a 28% reduction in fracture risk compared with less-persistent women.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, better treatment adherence was associated with a greater reduction in fracture risk. Compliance appeared to predict fracture risk better than did persistence.

Impact of osteoporosis treatment adherence on fracture rates in North America and Europe

Fragility fractures associated with osteoporosis constitute a significant public health concern. Clinical trials have shown that a variety of agents--bisphosphonates, raloxifene, calcitonin, hormone replacement therapy, teriparatide, and strontium ranelate--can reduce the risk of osteoporosis-related fragility fractures. However, low levels of compliance and persistence in the real-life setting mean that efficacy benefits observed in clinical trials with these agents may not translate into equivalent effectiveness in daily practice. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of compliance and persistence data from retrospective/observational studies, with particular reference to studies that consider the effects on fracture rates. PubMed of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and Web of Science databases were searched for publications detailing observational or retrospective analyses of adherence, compliance, and persistence with osteoporosis therapies. In addition, authors provided relevant studies that were not retrieved using the search criteria. In total, 17 unique publications were identified. Analysis of the publications indicated that low compliance and persistence rates for osteoporosis therapies in the real-life setting result in increased rates of fragility fractures. The results emphasize the importance of good treatment compliance and persistence with osteoporosis therapies in order to achieve a significant therapeutic benefit and thereby reduce the burden that osteoporosis and associated fractures place on individuals and healthcare systems.