Entecavir therapy in a hepatitis B-related decompensated cirrhotic patient

Polymorphism of estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) is associated with virological response to entecavir (ETV) in nucleoside-naïve adult patients with chronic hepatitis B

INTRODUCTION

Polymorphisms in estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) are reported to be associated with the susceptibility to persistent HBV infection, HBV liver cirrhosis and HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To test the hypothesis that polymorphisms in estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1) might influence the virological response to entecavir (ETV) therapy, we examined two polymorphisms (PvuII and XbaI) in 76 nucleoside-naïve chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. All of the patients (52 HBeAg-positive and 24 HBeAg-negative) were treated with ETV 0.5 mg daily and followed up for a median time of 96 weeks (range 48-96). Polymorphisms were determined using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment-length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method.

RESULTS

Under an additive model, the univariate analysis showed that patients carrying the PvuII T/C genotype might have higher virological responders than those carrying the T/T and C/C genotypes at week 48 (87.7 vs. 57.1 vs. 58.3 %; P = 0.012) and week 96 (96.7 vs. 64.3 vs. 24 87.5 %; P = 0.018), although this difference disappeared with the multiple analysis at week 48 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.687-3.841; P = 0.269] and week 96 (95 % CI 0.861-18.016; P = 0.077). Conversely, the univariate analysis suggests statistical significance between the recessive model of PvuII (TT vs. TC/CC) and virological response at week 48 (57.1 vs. 81.1 %; P = 0.033) and week 96 (64.3 vs. 94.7 %; P = 0.017). Multiple regression analysis affirmed the significant and independent association between the recessive model of PvuII and virological response. In other words, patients carrying at least one PvuII C allele (TC/CC) had a better likelihood of achieving virological response compared with those carrying the T/T genotype at week 48 (95 % CI 1.026-14.785, P = 0.046) and week 96 (95 % CI 1.456-57.509; P = 0.018). XbaI polymorphisms were not significantly associated with virological response.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the PvuII polymorphism may play an important role in determining ETV efficacy after 48 and 96 weeks of treatment, at least in this study population.

Simple nucleos(t)ides as HBV prophylaxis regime of post-liver transplantation: Six-year followed up

A combination of nucleos(t)ides and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) has been found to be effective for the prevention of hepatitis B viral (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation (LT), but its administration is costly, and not always available. We report the case of a male, 33-year-old cirrhotic patient who has tested positive for serum HBsAg, and HBeAg, with 9.04 × 10(7) copies/mL of HBV DNA. He suffered from acute liver failure and was near death before undergoing emergency LT. No HBIg was available at the time, so only lamivudine was used. He routinely received immunosuppression medication. Serum HBV DNA and HBsAg still showed positive post-LT, and the graft re-infected. Hepatitis B flared three months later. Adefovir dipivoxil was added to the treatment, but in the 24(th) mo of treatment, the patient developed lamivudine resistance and a worsening of the hepatitis occurred shortly thereafter. The treatment combination was then changed to a double dosage of entecavir and the disease was gradually resolved. After 60-mo of post-LT nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, anti-HBs seroconverted, and the antiviral was stopped. By the end of a 12-mo follow-up, the patient had achieved sustained recovery. In conclusion, the case seems to point to evidence that more potent and less resistant analogues like entecavir might fully replace HBIg as an HBV prophylaxis and treatment regimen.