Surgical Treatment of Lung Cancer in Octogenarians:

The effect of age on the opportunity to receive cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with cancer may not receive the same opportunities for treatment as younger patients. In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we explored whether age was an independent predictor of receiving specialist consultation and treatment.

METHODS

Patients age 45-99 were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry having a primary solid tumor diagnosed between 01/Jan/2010 and 31/Dec/2019. We used logistic regression adjusted sociodemographic and clinical characteristics to compare the likelihood of consultation or receipt of treatment using linear splines at critical ages of 65, 80, and 90 years.

RESULTS

A total 168,232 (42%), 165,205 (41%), 57,360 (14%), and 7810 (2%) patients were diagnosed age 45-64, 65-79, 80-89, and 90-99, respectively. The likelihood of surgical consultation decreased as patients reached 65 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.86 (0.84-0.89)], which decreased further among octogenarians [aOR 0.63 (0.59-0.67)]. Similar results were observed for consultation with a medical oncologist and radiation oncologist. Receipt of surgery also decreased with age. Three-month post-operative mortality was higher among older patients [aRR 1.38 (1.26-1.50) per 10 years, p < 0.0001], an effect that remained similar as patients reached age 65 + years of age (p = 0.09 for change). For stage I patients, 3-month post-operative survival was high across all age groups, ranging from 99.8% in 45-64 year-olds, 99.4% in 65-79 year-olds, and 98.1% among octogenarians and nonagenarians (lung, colorectal, breast, cervical cancer patients).

CONCLUSION

Older patients were less likely to have specialist consultations. More comprehensive data collection on clinical factors and referral patterns is needed to improve care for elderly cancer patients.

Safety and Feasibility of Thoracoscopic Lung Resection for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Octogenarians

OBJECTIVE

Octogenarians comprise an increasing proportion of patients presenting with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study examines postoperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term survival in octogenarians undergoing thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection for NSCLC, compared with younger cohorts.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database of all patients ≥60 years old undergoing elective lobectomy or segmentectomy for pathologic stage I, II, and IIIA NSCLC between 2009 and 2018. Results were compared between octogenarians (n = 71) to 2 younger cohorts of 60- to 69-year-olds (n = 359) and 70- to 79-year-olds (n = 308). Long-term survival among octogenarians was graphically summarized using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to identify preoperative risk factors for mortality.

RESULTS

A greater proportion of octogenarians required intensive care unit admission and discharge to extended-care facilities; however, postoperative length of stay was similar between groups. Among postoperative complications, arrhythmia and renal failure were more likely in the older cohort. Compared to the youngest cohort, in-hospital and 30-day mortality were highest among octogenarians. Overall survival among octogenarians at 1, 3, and 5 years was 87.3%, 61.8%, and 50.5%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression analysis of baseline demographic variables, presence of stroke (hazard ratio [HR] = 28.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.1 to 132.7, P < 0.001) and coronary artery disease (HR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2 to 5.3, P = 0.02) were significant predictors of overall mortality among octogenarians.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoscopic resection can be performed with favorable early postoperative outcomes among octogenarians. Long-term survival, although comparable to their healthy peers, is worse than those of younger cohorts. Further study into preoperative risk stratification and alternative therapies among octogenarians is needed.

Outcomes of pulmonary resection in non-small cell lung cancer patients older than 70 years old

BACKGROUND

An appropriate treatment of older lung cancer patients has become an important issue. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short and long-term surgical outcomes in lung cancer patients using 70 years as a cut-point, and to identify prognostic factors of cancer-specific mortality in patients older than 70 years.

METHODS

Medical records of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent pulmonary resection at Chiang Mai University Hospital from January 2002 through December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into age less than 70 years (control group) and 70 years or more (study group). Primary outcomes were major post-operative complications and in-hospital death (POM); secondary outcome was long-term survival. Multivariable regression analysis was used.

RESULTS

This study included 583 patients, 167 for study group, and 416 for control group. There were no differences in POM, both at univariable and multivariable analyses, however, for long-term cancer-specific mortality, the study group was more likely to die (HR_adj = 1.40, 95%CI = 1.03-1.89). Adverse prognostic factors for long-term mortality in study group were having universal coverage scheme (HR_adj = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.03-2.79), the presence of intratumoral lymphatic invasion (HR_adj = 2.83, 95%CI = 1.28-6.29), perineural invasion (HR_adj = 2.80, 95%CI = 1.13-6.94), underwent lymph node sampling (HR_adj = 2.23, 95%CI = 1.16-4.30) and higher stage of disease (HR_adj = 2.02, 95%CI = 1.06-3.85 for stage III, HR_adj = 3.40, 95%CI = 1.29-8.94 for stage IV).

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital mortality and composite post-operative complications are acceptable in pulmonary resection for NSCLC patients older than 70 years. However, these patients had shorter long-term survival, especially who have some adverse prognostic factors. Further studies with larger sample size are warranted.

High Risk for Thoracotomy but not Thoracoscopic Lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary lobectomy is the standard of care for resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with compromised lung function who are considered high risk may be denied surgical treatment; thus, proper identification of those truly at high risk is critical. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) may reduce the operative risk. This study reviews our institutional experience of pulmonary lobectomy by open thoracotomy or VATS techniques in patients deemed to be high risk.

METHODS

A retrospective review of an institutional database was performed for all patients undergoing lobectomy from 2002 to 2010. Patients were grouped into high-risk (HR) and standard-risk (SR) cohorts according to the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4099/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1021 criteria.

RESULTS

From 2002 to 2010, 72 HR and 536 SR patients underwent lobectomy. Mean age was 73 years for HR and 66 years for SR (p < 0.0001). Rates of overall (p < 0.0001) and pulmonary complications (p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in the HR group. However, when HR patients were resected by VATS, there was no significant difference in overall (p = 0.1299) or pulmonary complications (p = 0.2292) compared with the SR VATS group. Moreover, overall survival was significantly lower for HR patients who had an open operation compared with VATS lobectomy or SR open (p = 0.0028).

CONCLUSIONS

VATS lobectomy offers patients who are considered to be at increased risk for open lobectomy a feasible procedure, with no difference in overall survival compared with SR patients, and decreased morbidity compared with open lobectomy. VATS lobectomy should be considered for patients who historically may not have been considered for surgical resection.

Limited resections in high-risk patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of limited, sublobar resection in patients with early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Alternative treatments for surgical resection include stereotactic radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation. In this review, the role of limited resection is discussed in patients presenting a s high-risk for s surgical intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clear definitions of high-risk patients are currently lacking, as well as, randomized prospective studies indicating which treatment to offer in this population. Awaiting results of two major ongoing trials, at this moment the decision-making process is heavily dependent on retrospective analyses. For selected patients sublobar resection may be a valid oncological option for clinical stage IA NSCLC.

SUMMARY

Surgery remains the gold standard for NSCLC. In case of high-risk patients, a multidisciplinary consultation should advise the patient which treatment option to choose. In early-stage NSCLC, sublobar anatomical resection is preferred over nonsurgical procedures to determine nodal status and prognosis. In case of patients unfit for surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy is a good alternative. A randomized prospective study is necessary to determine survival in high-risk patients allocated to surgery (lobectomy or sublobar resection) or radiation-based treatment.

Lung cancer surgery in patients aged 80 years or older: an analysis of risk factors, morbidity, and mortality

INTRODUCTION

As the population ages, the age of patients undergoing thoracic surgery increases, and elderly patients often have more comorbidities than younger patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study observed preoperative comorbidities, surgical procedures and postoperative morbidity and mortality after lung cancer surgery in patients 80 years of age or older. The medical records of lung cancer patients 80 years of age or older who underwent surgery from January 2003 to December 2012 were reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 49 patients (27 males, 22 females), with a median age of 83 years. Thirty patients underwent major pulmonary resection and 18 patients underwent limited pulmonary resection. The median Charlson comorbidity index was 3. Although approximately two-thirds of the patients (20 patients; 40.8%) experienced some kind of postoperative morbidity, more than 80% of the complications were grade 1 or 2 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Cerebrovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were significantly associated with moderate-to-severe complications. Postoperative death was observed in two cases (4.1%). In addition, an increased American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score and past history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure and/or diabetes mellitus with end-organ damage were significantly associated with mortality. The overall survival rate was 79.6% at 3 years and 53.1% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic surgery shows acceptable morbidity and mortality in patients 80 years of age or older. Patients 80 years of age or older should be offered the best treatments, including surgery, with careful patient evaluation and selection.

Results of Lung Cancer Surgery for Octogenarians

PURPOSE

Growing number of elderly lung cancer patients reflecting a lengthening life span has become a serious problem. Purpose of this study was to elucidate the short and long-term outcome of the surgery for octogenarians, and to evaluate the role of lung cancer surgery for this high age group.

METHODS

The patients with lung cancer aged 80 years or more who underwent the surgery at our institute from January 1998 through December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed by chart review, and the operative mortality, morbidity and the long-term survival were assessed.

RESULTS

Out of a total of 1107 patients with primary lung cancer who received surgery during the study period, 94 were octogenarians (8.5%). Sixty-nine patients (73.4%) had preoperative co-morbidity including hypertension in 50 (53.2%), coincidence of other malignancy in 35 (37.2%), anti-coagulant therapy in 29 (30.9%). Twenty-six patients (27.7%) had major or minor postoperative morbidity, and one (1.1%) died due to bronchopleural fistula. Overall-5-year survival rate was 57.5%. Univariative and multivariative analysis using Cox proportional hazard model revealed that male gender and non-adenocarcinoma histology were significant risk factors for poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Gender and histology should be taken into account in preoperative evaluation of indication for lung cancer in octogenarians.