Inhaled nebulized and intranasal opioids for the relief of breathlessness

Nebulized medications in the emergency department: A narrative review of nontraditional agents

PURPOSE

This article summarizes emerging nontraditional therapies administered via the nebulization route for use in the emergency department (ED).

SUMMARY

Although traditional routes of medication administration (eg, intravenous) have been the mainstay of administration modalities for decades, these routes may not be appropriate for all patients. Nowhere is this more readily apparent than in the ED setting, where patients with a variety of presentations receive care. One unique route for medication administration that has increasingly gained popularity in the ED is that of aerosolized drug delivery. This route holds promise as direct delivery of medications to the site of action could yield a more rapid and effective therapeutic response while also minimizing systemic adverse effects by utilizing a fraction of the systemic dose. Medication administration via nebulization also provides an alternative that is conducive to rapid, less invasive access, which is advantageous in the emergent setting of the ED. This review is intended to analyze the existing literature regarding this route of administration, including the nuances that can impact drug efficacy, as well as the available literature regarding novel, noncommercial nebulized medication therapy given in the ED.

CONCLUSION

Multiple medications have been investigated for administration via this route, and when implementing any of these therapies several practical considerations must be taken into account, from medication preparation to administration, to ensure optimal efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. The pharmacist is an essential bedside team member in these scenarios to assist with navigating unique and complex nuances of this therapy as they develop.

Put It in the Air? Nebulized Opioids in the Emergency Department

The emergency department (ED) is a frequent utilizer of alternative routes of medication administration (e.g., intranasal) for a variety of indications. Over the last several years, investigations into the use of medications via the nebulization route have greatly increased, with varying degrees of efficacy identified. This route has multiple theoretical advantages. Medications affecting bronchopulmonary function or secretions can be administered directly to the site of action, possibly utilizing a lower dose and hence minimizing side effects. It is also possible to have a faster onset of action compared with other routes, given the enhanced surface area for absorption. One group of medications that has been explored via this route of administration, and is frequently administered in EDs across the nation, is opioids, most notably fentanyl, hydromorphone, and morphine. However multiple questions exist regarding the implementation of these therapies via this route, including efficacy, dosing, and the functional aspects of medication administration that are more complex than that of more traditional routes. The intent of this review is to explore the supporting literature behind the use of nebulized opioids, most specifically fentanyl, hydromorphone, and morphine, in the ED for the treatment of acute pain presentations and provide the most up-to-date guidance for practitioners.

Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Placebo for Treatment of Episodic Breathlessness in Hospice Patients With Advanced Nonmalignant Diseases

CONTEXT

Episodic breathlessness is a distressing and difficult to treat symptom because of its short duration. Fast actioned intranasal fentanyl (INF) is potentially more suitable than oral opioids.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the feasibility, preliminary efficacy, and safety of INF for the treatment of episodic breathlessness from advanced nonmalignant conditions in hospice patients.

METHODS

Phase IIB, double-blind, randomized controlled, multisite, INF citrate solution vs. placebo crossover feasibility study. Opioid-tolerant patients were to treat six episodes of breathlessness using INF spray. The primary outcome was change in the Visual Analogue Scale for dyspnea (VAS-D) score from baseline to 15 minutes after study drug's administration (VAS-D₁₅). Other outcomes were to collect demographic data and determine the use of rescue medications, safety, and feasibility of the study design.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of 49 eligible patients were enrolled, and 19 (90%) patients completed the study. The mean difference in VAS-D₁₅ between fentanyl and placebo was -3.37 mm (95% CI = -10.35 to 3.61 mm; P = 0.337). There was no statistically significant or clinically meaningful difference between INF and placebo in relieving the sensation of discomfort in episodic breathlessness. No significant drug-related adverse event or detrimental effect on vital signs was observed.

CONCLUSION

We found no difference between INF and placebo in relieving episodic breathlessness in nonmalignant conditions. INF was well tolerated, and the study design proved to be feasible in hospice patients with advanced diseases. Future study using higher concentration of fentanyl solution may be warranted.

Buccal Hydromorphone Syrup for Managing Dyspnea in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Context:

Dyspnea is a highly distressing symptom that characterizes idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a common idiopathic interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a high symptom burden, poor quality of life, and early mortality. Though opioids are mentioned in guidelines for dyspnea management, guidance on how and when to initiate opioids is lacking. Different pharmacologic strategies are needed to address different types of dyspnea (baseline, incident, and crisis). Due to a longer onset of action, the oral route (swallowed) may be less effective for prevention of incident dyspnea or for rapid relief of crisis dyspnea, prompting the use of alternative drug delivery strategies for self-management. We inadvertently discovered the efficacy of buccal administration of low dose, low volume hydromorphone oral syrup for dyspnea management in ILD, which has not been previously reported in the literature.

Case Series:

We describe our approach to dyspnea assessment and management in IPF, including use of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Scale (MDDS), a novel instrument yet to be validated that we developed to better identify and categorize dyspnea into the types experienced by a patient with IPF over the course of a day. We then describe how buccal hydromorphone oral syrup is initiated and titrated for dyspnea management in 3 patients at different points in their disease trajectory.

Conclusion:

Buccal hydromorphone oral syrup is effective for dyspnea management across the spectrum of IPF. When integrated into a patient-centered algorithm for symptom assessment and management, it allows for rapid and easy self-management of dyspnea by patients and their caregivers.

Fentanyl nasal spray in a patient with end-stage COPD and severe chronic breathlessness

Chronic breathlessness syndrome, defined as breathlessness that persists despite optimal treatment of the underlying pathophysiology, resulting in disability, is a major problem for patients with advanced chronic lung disease, and can be difficult to manage [1, 2]. Opioids should be considered for treatment of these patients [3]. Episodic breathlessness is severe worsening of breathlessness intensity, which can be predictable or unpredictable [4]. Episodic breathlessness can have a major impact on activities of daily life, but ∼90% of episodes last for 20 min or less [5]. Therefore, the selection of appropriate palliative pharmacological therapy is a complex issue. Indeed, the onset of action of short-acting oral opioids is between 15 and 30 min [6]. The rapid onset of action (between 1 and 4 min [7]) is the major advantage of fentanyl nasal spray. This case report relates the experience and insight gained when fentanyl nasal spray was prescribed to a patient with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the lessons we have learned. Written informed consent for publication of the clinical details was obtained from the deceased patient's spouse.

Insufficient control of chronic breathlessness may induce excessive use of fentanyl nasal spray in COPD patients. Prescription of fentanyl nasal spray for breathlessness should only be done as part of palliative treatment and requires close follow-up.http://bit.ly/2YdOjJ1

Intranasal fentanyl for respiratory distress in children and adolescents with life-limiting conditions

Background

Respiratory distress is one of the most common and frightening symptoms of children with life-limiting conditions. Because treatment of the underlying cause is frequently impossible or insufficient, in many children, symptomatic treatment is warranted. The purpose of this study was to describe the circumstances of the use of intranasal fentanyl in an acute attack of respiratory distress (AARD) in children receiving palliative care, as well as to describe outcomes and adverse events after its use.

Methods

Children and adolescents treated in a pediatric palliative unit or attended by a specialized home care team between 2010 and 2016 were included in this study. A retrospective chart review was conducted of those who were treated with intranasal fentanyl for an AARD.

Results

During the study period 16 children (0.5–18.6 years) with various life-limiting conditions were treated with intranasal fentanyl for AARD. In total, 70 AARDs were analyzed. In 74% of all AARDs, a single dose of intranasal fentanyl was used. Frequent causes for an AARD were excessive secretions and acute respiratory infection. The median starting dose of intranasal fentanyl was 1.5 μg/kg body weight. Labored breathing (96%), tachypnea (79%) and related suffering (97%) improved after treatment. An adverse event occurred in one child.

Conclusions

Intranasal fentanyl may be a safe and effective medication for the treatment of acute attacks of respiratory distress in children with life-limiting conditions. However, prospective studies with larger sample sizes and a control group are needed to validate these findings.

Opioids for management of episodic breathlessness or dyspnea in patients with advanced disease

BACKGROUND

Episodic breathlessness (EB) or dyspnea is a common symptom with a very negative impact on the quality of life of patients with cancer and with non-oncological advanced diseases, mainly cardiorespiratory and neurological.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this non-systematic review is to ascertain the role played by opioids in the management of episodic breathlessness.

METHODS

A non-systematic literature review was done in the databases MEDLINE, COCHRANE, and DATABASE, and articles of greater scientific rigor, mainly reviews or prospective studies/randomized clinical trials published to date (August 2015), were selected. Terms used in the search included episodic breathlessness, acute breathlessness, episodic dyspnea, opioids, morphine, fentanyl, oxycodone, and breakthrough dyspnea.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the pathophysiology and mechanism of action of opioids for management of breathlessness, and specifically EB, are not fully known, there is scientific evidence, and particularly great clinical evidence, of the benefit of this drug class for dyspnea management. It is important to differentiate hospitalized patients from outpatients because venous or subcutaneous access is easier in hospitalized patients, but use of transmucosal fentanyl, especially in faster formulations like intranasal application, opens up new possibilities to manage outpatients due to its fast onset of action. The main problem is the lack of data available and the multitude of unanswered questions about opioid type, administration route, safety, and dose titration.

Nebulized Fentanyl in Acute Pain: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To provide a systematic review of the current role of nebulized fentanyl in acute pain and potentially other conditions.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE literature search inclusive of the dates 1946 to May 2016 was performed using the following search terms: fentanyl and administration, inhaled Excerpta Medica was searched from 1980 to May 2016 using the following search terms: exp fentanyl/inhalation drug administration Additionally, Web of Science was searched using the terms fentanyl and pain inclusive of 1945 to May 2016.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

We utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to select English language, human primary literature, review articles, and supporting data assessing the efficacy of nebulized fentanyl in acute pain.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Seven clinical trials have demonstrated no difference in efficacy between nebulized fentanyl and intravenous (IV) opioids. Few adverse effects were reported; however, the trials were of short duration. Nebulized fentanyl appeared to be a rapid-acting analgesic that does not require IV access.

CONCLUSION

Evidence suggests that nebulized fentanyl is as effective as IV opioids in the treatment of acute pain, with relatively few adverse effects. However, questions remain about the extemporaneous preparation of fentanyl nebulized solution, the variability in nebulization devices, and ensuring consistent drug delivery to distal airways in the clinical setting. The abuse potential of nebulized fentanyl should also be considered.

Pharmacological management of breathlessness in COPD: recent advances and hopes for the future

INTRODUCTION

Activity-related breathlessness is often the dominant symptom in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and usually persists despite optimal medical therapy. Currently, our inability to meaningfully alter the pathophysiology of the underlying disease means that we must focus our attention on relieving this distressing symptom so as to improve exercise tolerance and quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

The current review examines the neurobiology of breathlessness and constructs a solid physiological rationale for amelioration of this distressing symptom. We will examine the efficacy of interventions which: 1) reduce the increased central drive to breathe (opioids); 2) improve the respiratory system's ability to appropriately respond to this increased demand (bronchodilators); and 3) address the important affective dimension of breathlessness (anxiolytics). Expert commentary: Advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of activity-related breathlessness in COPD, and its measurement in the clinical domain, now set the stage for the development of effective management strategies on an individual patient basis.