1
|
Anton A, Wong S, Shapiro J, Weickhardt A, Azad A, Kwan EM, Spain L, Gunjur A, Torres J, Parente P, Parnis F, Goh J, Semira MC, Gibbs P, Tran B, Pezaro C. Real-world incidence of symptomatic skeletal events and bone-modifying agent use in castration-resistant prostate cancer - an Australian multi-centre observational study. Eur J Cancer 2021; 157:485-492. [PMID: 34344533 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Bone metastases occur frequently in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and may lead to skeletal-related events (SREs), including symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs). Bone-modifying agents (BMAs) delay SREs and SSEs. However, the real-world use of BMAs is debated given the absence of demonstrated survival advantage and potential adverse events (AEs). Our retrospective study examined BMA use and SSE rates in Australian patients with CRPC. METHODS Patients with CRPC and bone metastases were identified from the electronic CRPC Australian Database. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns and AEs were analysed. Descriptive statistics reported baseline characteristics, SSE rates and BMA use. Comparisons between groups used t-tests and Chi-square analyses. Overall survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 532 eligible patients were identified with a median age of 73 years (range: 44-97 years). BMAs were prescribed in 232 men (46%), 183 of whom received denosumab. Patients receiving first-line docetaxel for CRPC were more likely to commence BMAs than those receiving abiraterone or enzalutamide (51% vs 31% vs 38%; p = 0.004). SSEs occurred in 148 men (28%), most commonly symptomatic lesions requiring intervention (75%). At the time of initial SSEs, only 28% were receiving BMAs. Patients treated at sites with lower BMA use (<median) had higher SSE rates (32% vs 22%, p = 0.019). CONCLUSION In our real-world cohort, SSEs occurred in almost one-third of patients with CRPC and bone metastases, whereas less than half of patients received BMAs. The lower rate of SSEs in treatment sites with increased BMA use supports their benefit in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelyn Anton
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Andrew Weickhardt
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Arun Azad
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Edmond M Kwan
- Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lavinia Spain
- Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ashray Gunjur
- Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Phillip Parente
- Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Francis Parnis
- Adelaide Cancer Centre, Adelaide, Australia; University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Goh
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Peter Gibbs
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ben Tran
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Carmel Pezaro
- Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Weston Park Cancer Centre, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cheng Y, Zhuo L, Pan Y, Wang S, Zong J, Sun W, Gao S, Lu J, Zhan S. Treatment patterns of prostate cancer with bone metastasis in Beijing: A real-world study using data from an administrative claims database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2019; 28:1501-1509. [PMID: 31397051 PMCID: PMC6900185 DOI: 10.1002/pds.4874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Revised: 07/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore treatment patterns among patients with prostate cancer and bone metastasis and to compare clinical outcomes following use of different hormone therapies including combined androgen blockade (CAB), nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) monotherapy, and castration monotherapy. METHODS We conducted a population-based cohort study using data from the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance database (2011-2014) in Beijing. We identified 475 patients with newly diagnosed bone metastatic prostate cancer with at least one prescription for hormone therapy and described their treatment patterns over a median follow-up of 20.7 months. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare time to chemotherapy initiation between patients starting on different hormone therapies. RESULTS Hormone therapy and/or bisphosphonate therapy with zoledronic acid were the initial treatments in the majority of patients (87.8%); chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery were usually given later in the treatment pathway. CAB was the most common hormone treatment (73.7%). For time to chemotherapy initiation, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 2.43 (1.08-5.44) for NSAA alone vs CAB and 1.29 (0.78-2.13) for castration alone vs CAB. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that while a wide range of therapies are used to treat patients with prostate cancer and bone metastasis in Beijing, hormone therapy and bisphosphonate therapy are the most commonly prescribed, and use of CAB was seen to be advantageous in delaying time to chemotherapy initiation over NSAA monotherapy. Future studies should explore longer-term treatment patterns, including use of newly approved treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinchu Cheng
- Department of PharmacyPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public HealthPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingChina
| | - Lin Zhuo
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public HealthPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingChina
- Research Center of Clinical EpidemiologyPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Yuting Pan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public HealthPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingChina
| | - Shengfeng Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public HealthPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingChina
| | - Jihong Zong
- Department of EpidemiologyBayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals IncWhippanyNew Jersey
| | - Wentao Sun
- HEOR and Medical AffairsBayer Healthcare Co, LtdBeijingChina
| | - Shuangqing Gao
- Department of Data ManagementBeijing Brainpower Pharmacy Consulting Co LtdBeijingChina
| | - Jian Lu
- Department of UrologyPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
| | - Siyan Zhan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public HealthPeking University Health Science CenterBeijingChina
- Research Center of Clinical EpidemiologyPeking University Third HospitalBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gómez Rivas J, Carrion DM, Alvarez-Maestro M, Cathelineau X, Sanchez-Salas R, Di Lorenzo G, Di Maio M, Paul A, Martinez-Piñeiro L, Sartor O, Saad F, Debruyne F. Bone-targeted therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer: where do we stand? MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 71:445-456. [PMID: 31353876 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03420-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the last years, there have been significant developments in the therapeutic armamentarium of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). New evidence shows that the addition of bone-targeted agents (BTA) to "life-prolonging agents" result in improved clinical benefit. This review aims to give an overview of data for the use of BTAs in a new era of mCRPC where new agents are used in daily practice. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A non-systematic review of the literature was performed combining the keywords: "castration-resistant prostate cancer" and "bone-targeted therapy". The primary objective was to provide a critical assessment of data for the use of BTAs in mCRPC, and the secondary objective was to assess novel targeted therapy. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Zoledronic acid and denosumab have shown to be effective in reducing the risk of SREs in patients with mCRPC. The point at which treatment with bisphosphonates or denosumab should be initiated during PCa evolution has yet to be determined. The EMA has restricted the usage of Ra-223 to patients who have had two previous treatments for mCRPC to the bone or who cannot receive other treatments. Ra-223 should only be used as monotherapy or in combination with ADT for the treatment of mCRPC, symptomatic bone metastases and without visceral metastases. With recent developments in PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals, PSMA RLT agents are now under investigation for the treatment of mCRPC. CONCLUSIONS Reducing skeletal-related morbidity remains a crucial goal of palliative life-extending therapy in mCRPC. New data about dosing schedules and combinations of different treatments will continue to refine the optimal strategy for incorporating BTAs into the new treatment paradigms for PCa. Novel molecules such as PSMA-targeted small molecules promise theranostic agents in the management of PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain - .,Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain -
| | - Diego M Carrion
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mario Alvarez-Maestro
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Massimo Di Maio
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Asit Paul
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Luis Martinez-Piñeiro
- Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Oliver Sartor
- Tulane Cancer Center, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Fred Saad
- Unit of Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Francis Debruyne
- Department of Urology, Andros Men's and Gynos Women's Health Institutes, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|