The experience of head and neck cancer survivorship (including laryngectomy): an integrated biopsychosocial model

Head and neck cancer patient journey's health literacy: a multidisciplinary team perspective. VOICE study

PURPOSE

Health literacy is a current Public Health priority in Portugal. The participation of well-informed patients in their care and shared decision making are essential, especially in chronic aggressive and debilitating pathologies such as recurrent or metastatic (R/M) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC).

AIMS

This study aimed to characterize R/M HNSCC patients' and caregivers' information needs identified by healthcare professionals (HCPs).

METHODS

Two online Focus Groups, one with only medical doctors and the other with other HCPs involved in the treatment of R/M HNSCC patients, were conducted, using a modified Metaplan, Lean or adapted PDCA methodology. The discussions were audio recorded in full and content analysis was performed using ATLAS.ti qualitative data analysis software.

RESULTS

Topics addressed were diagnosis, treatment, quality of life, and global evaluation. In general, all experts agreed that only essential information should be cautiously given, according to patients' and caregivers' wishes. It was consensual that patients are given the necessary information to adhere to treatment. Two main barriers were identified: one barrier was associated with verbal communication due to the lack of health literacy of these patients, and the other barrier regarded healthcare access. It was also considered important to remind patients of the daily and social activities that they could and should maintain, as well as providing sufficient social resources and problem-solving training to caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

This qualitative study highlights the complexity of R/M HNSCC patients' care. Immediate availability of psychologists and psychiatrists should be implemented in all centers that treat HNSCC patients. The differences found between the physicians' Focus Group and other HCPs' Focus Group in some of the addressed topics emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary and holistic approach, in a biomedical model integrated with a biopsychosocial model.

The health care experiences of people with head and neck cancer: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Understanding health care experience in head and neck cancer (HNC) is becoming increasingly important due to changes in the disease profile, survivorship, and a greater appreciation of patient health care experience as an important outcome measure. People with HNC encounter many different types of health care professionals and health care touchpoints.

METHOD

Through systematic database searching, this scoping review of qualitative English-language studies describes the self-reported care experiences of those with HNC across the health care continuum, and describes the current state of the literature.

RESULTS

Overall, the 95 studies identified were heterogeneous and investigated a broad range of topics. Trends across studies showed research centered on hospital-based care, conducted in developed countries, with more studies on feeding than other aspects of care. Generic qualitative research frameworks, with individual interviews, were the preferred method of data collection.

CONCLUSION

Despite identifying many studies, there are significant gaps in our understanding of the HNC patient experience.

[Advanced nursing practice model for head and neck cancer: A practice development project]

Advanced nursing practice model for head and neck cancer: A practice development project Abstract. Background: Head and neck cancer confronts patients and their families with big challenges due to complex treatments as well as changes in vital functions and appearance. They require multifaceted support and benefit from coordinated, interprofessional collaboration and advanced nursing practice. Problem/aim: In a tertiary head and neck cancer center, a coordinating contact person was missing for patients, families and the care team. Therefore, a project was launched to develop an advanced nursing practice program. Methods: Methods included an advanced nursing practice concept, approaches for practice development, and action research. The project consisted of four phases: Stakeholder analysis and literature review were followed by the definition of the advanced nursing practice program, which was then tested during a pilot phase, and evaluated using structural/process data and stakeholder interviews. Results: Evidence-based, continuous, person-centered care was improved across the care continuum for patients/families. The nurses' expertise was supported and the collaboration with internal/external clinicians was facilitated. Patients/families valued the continuity offered by the advanced practice nurse. Discussion: The methodological approaches supported a goal-oriented approach; especially participatory practice development helped to address employees' concerns. Limitations/transfer: To date, a sustainable program cannot yet be warranted. For similar projects, an approach with stakeholder analysis, multidisciplinary focus, and early evaluation planning is recommended.

A qualitative exploration of physical and psychosocial well-being in the short and long term after treatments for cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

Cervical cancer is predominantly a cancer of younger women, and improvements in oncological outcomes have led to an increase in cervical cancer survivors living with the long-term effects of treatment. Understanding the recovery process after treatment is essential to increase awareness of the short- and long-term needs of survivors. The aim of this study was to qualitatively explore the recovery process and return to daily activity of cervical cancers survivors from a biopsychosocial perspective.

METHODS

Participants were 21 women treated for cervical cancer between the ages of 18 and 60 years, living in the United Kingdom. Interviews were undertaken face to face and via the telephone using a semi-structured interview schedule.

RESULTS

Data analysis revealed themes which represented participants' experience and perceptions of treatment as a paradox; emotional needs after treatment; and a journey of adversarial growth. A key finding from this analysis was the nuanced experiences between treatment modalities, with physical changes perceived to be more disruptive following radical treatments, whilst psychological repercussions were significant regardless of treatment type.

CONCLUSION

This study provides novel insight into the varied recovery experiences of those treated with surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer, which can be used to improve the survivorship experience.

Rehabilitation Needs of Head and Neck Cancer Patients and Stakeholders: Case Study

Background

The incidents of Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) are rising worldwide, suggesting that this type of cancer is becoming more common. The foreseen growth of incidents signifies that future rehabilitation services will have to meet the needs of a wider population.

Objective

The aim of this paper is to explore the needs of patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals during HNC rehabilitation.

Methods

This paper reports the empirical findings from a case study that was conducted in a cancer rehabilitation center in Copenhagen to elicit the needs of HNC cancer patients, informal caregivers and healthcare professionals.

Results

Four areas of needs during the rehabilitation process were identified: service delivery, emotional, social and physical needs. Service delivery needs and emotional needs have been identified as the most prevalent.

Conclusions

Stakeholders' needs during the rehabilitation process were found to be interrelated. All stakeholders faced service delivery challenges in the form of provision and distribution of information, including responsibilities allocation between municipalities, hospitals and rehabilitation services. Emotional and social needs have been reported by HNC patients and informal caregivers, underlining the importance of inclusion of all actors in the design of future healthcare interventions. Connected Health (CH) solutions could be valuable in provision and distribution of information.

Resilience: an essential element in head and neck cancer survivorship and quality of life

PURPOSE

Individuals with head and neck cancer (HNCa) face myriad biopsychosocial challenges. Even after treatment completion, these challenges may cause continued disablement and diminished quality of life (QoL). Resilience may serve to minimize the disabling impact of HNCa and, in turn, maximize QoL. The purpose of this study was to formally assess resilience in HNCa survivors and explore its relationship with QoL.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted. Forty HNCa survivors completed three validated, self-report questionnaires pertaining to the collection of resilience and QoL data. Descriptive and correlational analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Resilience was identified in HNCa survivors and a positive correlation was found between resilience and QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Data suggest that resilience may buffer the influence of HNCa on QoL. Thus, screening for reduced levels of resilience may proactively facilitate identification of those who are most vulnerable to the psychosocial impact of HNCa. Interventions that foster resilience may ameliorate the challenges of HNCa and maximize QoL.

Multikinase inhibitors in thyroid cancer: timing of targeted therapy

In the 9 years since the publication of our 2011 review of targeted treatment of thyroid cancer with multikinase inhibitors, much has changed in the landscape of this heterogeneous disease. New multikinase and selective inhibitor treatments for medullary thyroid cancer, radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer have completed trials and improved progression-free survival. Many physicians are concerned by dose-limiting adverse effects of these drugs and are wary to begin treatment in patients who are systemically well but have marked disease burden, which makes the timing of treatment initiation challenging. Published mechanistic data on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have helped guide our understanding of how to dose effectively with these drugs. A major goal in TKI therapy is to optimize inhibition of oncogenic kinase drivers while maintaining patient quality of life. Real-world data have now been published on how TKIs have fared outside the clinical trial environment. In this Review, we provide a summary of published data on the efficacy of TKIs in clinical practice, to provide clinicians with a more realistic view of how their patients will manage and respond to TKI therapy. Furthermore, we review the data on mechanisms of inhibition, outcomes and adverse effects of TKIs and provide an update on targeted treatment of thyroid cancer, focusing on optimizing the timing of treatment initiation.

[Subjective significance of olfactory dysfunction after laryngectomy : Let's ask our patients]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Laryngectomy is usually associated with olfactory dysfunction. How do laryngectomees personally experience and feel about this change?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In cooperation with the Bundesverband der Kehlkopfoperierten (German Association of Throat Cancer Patients) and together with laryngectomized patients, a new questionnaire was created and distributed via the regional offices according to the population sizes of the federal states (n = 293) for the first time in spring 2018. The questionnaire covers patient characteristics and daily life without a larynx, as well as the specific areas of smell and taste, albeit without differentiation between ortho- and retronasal olfaction. The items were designed to be answered using patient-friendly visual rating scales, multiple-choice answers, and free text.

RESULTS

Return rate was 198/293 (67.6%). Median age of all participants was 69 years (48-88). Overall life situation was rated by 99/198 (50%) participants as "good" or "very good." The primary subjective impairment for the patients was loss of voice (137/198, 69.1%) and loss of olfaction (113/198, 59.1%). Adaption to life without a larynx has been completed within a maximum of 3 years for 161/198 (81.3%) patients. Principally, 127/198 (64.1%) affirmed being able to smell and 176 of 198 (88.9%) being able to taste; however, only 29/198 (14.6%) rated their sense of smell and 109/198 (55.1%) their sense of taste as "good" or "very good." Most frequently detected smell sensations were perfume (141), smoke (126), and feces (99). Univariate analysis showed a significant (p < 0.05) correlation between adaptation time <1 year and current subjective smell and taste.

CONCLUSION

Subjective loss of smell and taste after laryngectomy is a daily problem for patients in Germany, which should be focused on promptly and included in early rehabilitation strategies.

Patients' Perspectives on What Makes a Better Care Experience While Undergoing Treatment for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia Secondary to Head and Neck Cancer

Patients' perceptions on what makes a better care experience for head and neck cancer (HNca) have not been widely sought. Patients' perceptions can play a crucial role in shaping quality care and client involvement. To investigate patients' perspectives on what makes a better care experience while undergoing rehabilitation for oropharyngeal dysphagia secondary to HNca. Qualitative data were collected in the form of semi-structured interviews from eight patients after they had undergone rehabilitation for HNca. The data were thematically analysed by two researchers independently. Six themes, plus subthemes, were identified. These themes were Supportive network is essential; Reassurance from staff professionalism; Access to service; Using own motivation and resilience; Receiving the right information and Ongoing shock and adjustment. Results are discussed in context of the literature and clinical implications and future research are recommended. Collation of patients' perspectives is valuable to increase insight into what makes a better rehabilitative journey for patients with HNca. Rehabilitation that is holistic, specialised and patient-specific is highly valued by patients with HNca.

Immune-relevant aspects of murine models of head and neck cancer

Head and neck cancers (HNCs) cause significant mortality and morbidity. There have been few advances in therapeutic management of HNC in the past 4 to 5 decades, which support the need for studies focusing on HNC biology. In recent years, increased recognition of the relevance of the host response in cancer progression has led to novel therapeutic strategies and putative biomarkers of tumor aggressiveness. However, tumor-immune interactions are highly complex and vary with cancer type. Pre-clinical, in vivo models represent an important and necessary step in understanding biological processes involved in development, progression and treatment of HNC. Rodents (mice, rats, hamsters) are the most frequently used animal models in HNC research. The relevance and utility of information generated by studies in murine models is unquestionable, but it is also limited in application to tumor-immune interactions. In this review, we present information regarding the immune-specific characteristics of the murine models most commonly used in HNC research, including immunocompromised and immunocompetent animals. The particular characteristics of xenograft, chemically induced, syngeneic, transgenic, and humanized models are discussed in order to provide context and insight for researchers interested in the in vivo study of tumor-immune interactions in HNC.