1
|
Millar MM, Herget KA, Ofori-Atta B, Codden RR, Edwards SL, Carter ME, Belnap B, Kirchhoff AC, Sweeney C. Cancer survivorship experiences in Utah: an evaluation assessing indicators of survivors' quality of life, health behaviors, and access to health services. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:337-347. [PMID: 36723708 PMCID: PMC10367944 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01671-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The 2016-2020 Utah Comprehensive Cancer Prevention and Control Plan prioritized strategies to address cancer survivorship experiences. In this paper we present estimates for nine indicators evaluating these priorities, trends over time, and assess disparities in survivorship experiences across demographic subgroups. METHODS We surveyed a representative sample of Utah cancer survivors diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 with any reportable cancer diagnosis. We calculated weighted percentages and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each indicator. We assessed change over time using a test for trend across survey years in a logistic regression model and used Rao-Scott F-adjusted chi-square tests to test the association between demographic characteristics and each survivorship indicator. RESULTS Most of the 1,793 respondents (93.5%) reported their pain was under control, 85.7% rated their overall health as good, very good, or excellent, but 46.5% experienced physical, mental, or emotional limitations. Only 1.7% of survivors aged 75 or older were current smokers, compared to 5.8% of 65-74-year-olds and 7.9% of survivors aged 55-74 (p < 0.006). No regular physical activity was reported by 20.6% and varied by survivor age and education level. The proportion who received a survivorship care plan increased from 34.6% in 2018 to 43.0% in 2021 (p = 0.025). However, survivors under age 55 were significantly less likely to receive a care plan than older survivors. CONCLUSION This representative survey of cancer survivors fills a gap in understanding of the cancer survivorship experience in Utah. Results can be used to evaluate and plan additional interventions to improve survivorship quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan M Millar
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
| | | | | | - Rachel R Codden
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Sandra L Edwards
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Brad Belnap
- Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Utah Cancer Control Program, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Anne C Kirchhoff
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Carol Sweeney
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Millar MM, Elena JW, Gallicchio L, Edwards SL, Carter ME, Herget KA, Sweeney C. The feasibility of web surveys for obtaining patient-reported outcomes from cancer survivors: a randomized experiment comparing survey modes and brochure enclosures. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019; 19:208. [PMID: 31730474 PMCID: PMC6858678 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0859-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Central cancer registries are often used to survey population-based samples of cancer survivors. These surveys are typically administered via paper or telephone. In most populations, web surveys obtain much lower response rates than paper surveys. This study assessed the feasibility of web surveys for collecting patient-reported outcomes via a central cancer registry. Methods Potential participants were sampled from Utah Cancer Registry records. Sample members were randomly assigned to receive a web or paper survey, and then randomized to either receive or not receive an informative brochure describing the cancer registry. We calculated adjusted risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals to compare response likelihood and the demographic profile of respondents across study arms. Results The web survey response rate (43.2%) was lower than the paper survey (50.4%), but this difference was not statistically significant (adjusted risk ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.72, 1.07). The brochure also did not significantly influence the proportion responding (adjusted risk ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval = 0.85, 1.25). There were few differences in the demographic profiles of respondents across the survey modes. Older age increased likelihood of response to a paper questionnaire but not a web questionnaire. Conclusions Web surveys of cancer survivors are feasible without significantly influencing response rates, but providing a paper response option may be advisable particularly when surveying older individuals. Further examination of the varying effects of brochure enclosures across different survey modes is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan M Millar
- Department of Internal Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. .,Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, 250 E 200 S, Suite 1375, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, USA.
| | - Joanne W Elena
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
| | - Lisa Gallicchio
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
| | - Sandra L Edwards
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, 250 E 200 S, Suite 1375, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, USA
| | - Marjorie E Carter
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, 250 E 200 S, Suite 1375, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, USA
| | - Kimberly A Herget
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, 250 E 200 S, Suite 1375, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, USA
| | - Carol Sweeney
- Department of Internal Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.,Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, 250 E 200 S, Suite 1375, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, USA.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Cir of Hope Dr. Salt, Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Millar MM, Elena JW, Gallicchio L, Edwards SL, Carter ME, Herget KA, Sweeney C. The feasibility of web surveys for obtaining patient-reported outcomes from cancer survivors: a randomized experiment comparing survey modes and brochure enclosures. BMC Med Res Methodol 2019. [PMID: 31730474 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0859-9:10.1186/s12874-019-0859-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central cancer registries are often used to survey population-based samples of cancer survivors. These surveys are typically administered via paper or telephone. In most populations, web surveys obtain much lower response rates than paper surveys. This study assessed the feasibility of web surveys for collecting patient-reported outcomes via a central cancer registry. METHODS Potential participants were sampled from Utah Cancer Registry records. Sample members were randomly assigned to receive a web or paper survey, and then randomized to either receive or not receive an informative brochure describing the cancer registry. We calculated adjusted risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals to compare response likelihood and the demographic profile of respondents across study arms. RESULTS The web survey response rate (43.2%) was lower than the paper survey (50.4%), but this difference was not statistically significant (adjusted risk ratio = 0.88, 95% confidence interval = 0.72, 1.07). The brochure also did not significantly influence the proportion responding (adjusted risk ratio = 1.03, 95% confidence interval = 0.85, 1.25). There were few differences in the demographic profiles of respondents across the survey modes. Older age increased likelihood of response to a paper questionnaire but not a web questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS Web surveys of cancer survivors are feasible without significantly influencing response rates, but providing a paper response option may be advisable particularly when surveying older individuals. Further examination of the varying effects of brochure enclosures across different survey modes is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan M Millar
- Department of Internal Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA. .,Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, 250 E 200 S, Suite 1375, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, USA.
| | - Joanne W Elena
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
| | - Lisa Gallicchio
- Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20852, USA
| | - Sandra L Edwards
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, 250 E 200 S, Suite 1375, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, USA
| | - Marjorie E Carter
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, 250 E 200 S, Suite 1375, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, USA
| | - Kimberly A Herget
- Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, 250 E 200 S, Suite 1375, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, USA
| | - Carol Sweeney
- Department of Internal Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.,Utah Cancer Registry, University of Utah, 250 E 200 S, Suite 1375, Salt Lake City, UT, 84111, USA.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, 2000 Cir of Hope Dr. Salt, Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Niedzwiedz CL, Knifton L, Robb KA, Katikireddi SV, Smith DJ. Depression and anxiety among people living with and beyond cancer: a growing clinical and research priority. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:943. [PMID: 31604468 PMCID: PMC6788022 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6181-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 318] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A cancer diagnosis can have a substantial impact on mental health and wellbeing. Depression and anxiety may hinder cancer treatment and recovery, as well as quality of life and survival. We argue that more research is needed to prevent and treat co-morbid depression and anxiety among people with cancer and that it requires greater clinical priority. For background and to support our argument, we synthesise existing systematic reviews relating to cancer and common mental disorders, focusing on depression and anxiety. We searched several electronic databases for relevant reviews on cancer, depression and anxiety from 2012 to 2019. Several areas are covered: factors that may contribute to the development of common mental disorders among people with cancer; the prevalence of depression and anxiety; and potential care and treatment options. We also make several recommendations for future research. Numerous individual, psychological, social and contextual factors potentially contribute to the development of depression and anxiety among people with cancer, as well as characteristics related to the cancer and treatment received. Compared to the general population, the prevalence of depression and anxiety is often found to be higher among people with cancer, but estimates vary due to several factors, such as the treatment setting, type of cancer and time since diagnosis. Overall, there are a lack of high-quality studies into the mental health of people with cancer following treatment and among long-term survivors, particularly for the less prevalent cancer types and younger people. Studies that focus on prevention are minimal and research covering low- and middle-income populations is limited. Conclusion Research is urgently needed into the possible impacts of long-term and late effects of cancer treatment on mental health and how these may be prevented, as increasing numbers of people live with and beyond cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire L Niedzwiedz
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
| | - Lee Knifton
- University of Strathclyde, Centre for Health Policy, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.,Mental Health Foundation, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Kathryn A Robb
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | | | - Daniel J Smith
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|