Biological aspects of aging that influence response to anticancer treatments

Pre-operative neoadjuvant vinblastine-prednisolone in canine mast cell tumours: A single-centre retrospective cohort study

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used in canine mast cell tumours (MCTs) to optimise surgical margins or to enable marginal excision in challenging locations. The objective of this study was to describe the outcome of dogs with cutaneous and subcutaneous MCTs treated with neoadjuvant vinblastine-prednisolone (NA-VP). Records of treatment-naïve dogs with cutaneous/subcutaneous MCT that received NA-VP were reviewed including signalment, indication for NA-VP, staging results, clinical response, surgical data and histopathology reports. For dogs with post-operative follow-up ≥365 days, predictive factors for local recurrence (LR) were evaluated. Forty-four dogs were included. NA-VP was indicated to optimise surgical margins (group MARG) in 19 dogs (43.2%) and to enable surgery (group MORB) in 25 dogs (56.8%). Complete and partial response were documented in 40.9% of dogs and 30 dogs (68.2%) underwent surgery. The indication for NA-VP was significantly associated with undergoing surgery (p < .001) on multivariable analysis. Twelve (48%) and 18 dogs (94.7%) underwent surgery in the group MORB and MARG, respectively. Five dogs (16.7%) experienced wound dehiscence. Complete excision was achieved in 14 dogs (46.7%). In dogs undergoing surgery with ≥365 days of follow-up, LR was documented in five cases (20.8%). None of the factors analysed including mitotic count, completeness of excision and response to NA-VP were associated with LR; notably, LR occurred in 3/11 (27.2%) completely excised MCTs. In a pre-operative setting, NA-VP appears safe and could be beneficial in selected cases. Prognostic factors such as clinical response, mitotic count and completeness of excision should be interpreted with caution following NA-VP.

Frailty and long-term survival of patients with ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Frailty has been related with poor prognosis of various diseases, including ovarian cancer. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between frailty and long-term survival of patients with ovarian cancer.

Methods

Relevant cohort studies were retrieved by search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane's Library, and Web of Science electronic databases. Two authors independently performed literature search, data collection, and statistical analyses. A random-effect model incorporating the possible influence of heterogeneity was used to pool the results.

Results

Nine cohort studies including 2497 women with confirmed diagnosis of ovarian cancer contributed to the meta-analysis, and 536 (21.5%) of them were with high frailty. The median follow-up durations varied between 24 and 69 months. Compared to patients with low or non-frailty, OC patients with high frailty were associated with poor overall survival (risk ratio [RR]: 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41 to 1.85, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%) and progression-free survival (RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.89, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). Subgroup analyses according to study design, cancer stage, age of patients, scales for frailty evaluation, follow-up duration, and quality score of the included study showed consistent association between high frailty and poor overall survival in women with ovarian cancer (p for subgroup effects all < 0.05). After considering GRADE criteria for strength of the evidence, it was rated low for both the two outcomes.

Conclusion

High frailty may be an independent risk factor of poor survival in women with ovarian cancer. Evaluating frailty may be important for predicting the prognosis and determining the optimal anticancer treatments in women with ovarian cancer.

Systematic Review Registration

https://inplasy.com/, identifier INPLASY202290028.