1
|
Does it matter how we evaluate HRQOL? Longitudinal comparison of the EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-OG25 and FACT-E. J Cancer Surviv 2020; 15:641-650. [PMID: 33106994 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00957-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-OG25 and FACT-E compared longitudinally provide similar reflections of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS Eighty-six esophageal cancer patients treated with curative intent, scheduled to complete both questionnaires at baseline and post-treatment time points until 36 months. A generalized estimating equation model utilizing a Gaussian family compared instruments longitudinally. The two-one-sided-test (TOST) method assessed equivalence between the instruments. RESULTS Trajectories for social domain and overall quality of life differed significantly between instruments. Also, FACT-G's functional well-being post-treatment returns to baseline 3-6 months earlier than the EORTC QLQ-C30's role functioning subscale, suggesting measurement of different components. Trajectories for physical and esophageal symptom subscales are similar and are deemed equivalent. Emotional domains are comparable and bear little resemblance to the physical domain trajectories indicating reflection of emotional experience rather than a physical proxy. EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales have a trajectory similar to its physical functioning scale except for the emotional and esophageal symptoms scales. Overall HRQOL in both instruments showed a consistent return to baseline/pre-treatment levels by 6 months post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS Overall HRQOL recovers earlier after curative-intent treatment than previously reported despite persistence of physical symptoms, with a consistent return to pre-treatment levels by 6 months after treatment. This supports the concept that HRQOL is not primarily defined by physical function. Based on this longitudinal comparison, FACT-E provides a more multidimensional assessment of HRQOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Curative intent treatment for esophageal cancer has adverse effects on HRQOL but despite intense treatment, overall HRQOL recovers within 6 months.
Collapse
|
2
|
Schandl A, Johar A, Anandavadivelan P, Vikström K, Mälberg K, Lagergren P. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after oesophageal cancer surgery. Acta Oncol 2020; 59:613-619. [PMID: 32193960 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2020.1741677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To improve survivorship in patients who have undergone curatively intended treatment for oesophageal cancer, we aimed to identify key targets for future patient-reported outcomes research.Methods: This nationwide Swedish prospective cohort study enrolled patients between 2014 and 2019 who had undergone surgical resection for oesophageal cancer 1 year earlier. Eight well-validated patient-reported outcome measures, including health-related quality of life, psychological status and sleep, were presented as proportions and mean scores (MS) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results: Among 281 participants, approximately half of the patients reported problems associated with food intake such as eating restrictions (49%) and food aversion (47%). Other common problems were sleep (51%), fatigue (41%) and anxiety (36%). Fewer patients suffered from financial difficulties (9%), trouble swallowing saliva (4%) and hair loss (7%). However, these problems were perceived as highly burdensome on an individual level.Conclusions: This nationwide, population-based study indicates that symptom burden is high in oesophageal cancer survivors 1 year after surgery. The most common problems are associated with food intake, sleep, fatigue and anxiety. However, less frequent symptoms were sometimes more debilitating for the individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Schandl
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Division of Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Asif Johar
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Division of Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Poorna Anandavadivelan
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Division of Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karin Vikström
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Division of Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kalle Mälberg
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Division of Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Division of Surgical Care Science, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maharaj AD, Holland JF, Scarborough RO, Evans SM, Ioannou LJ, Brown W, Croagh DG, Pilgrim CHC, Kench JG, Lipton LR, Leong T, McNeil JJ, Nikfarjam M, Aly A, Burton PR, Cashin PA, Chu J, Duong CP, Evans P, Goldstein D, Haydon A, Hii MW, Knowles BPF, Merrett ND, Michael M, Neale RE, Philip J, Porter IWT, Smith M, Spillane J, Tagkalidis PP, Zalcberg JR. The Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry (UGICR): a clinical quality registry to monitor and improve care in upper gastrointestinal cancers. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031434. [PMID: 31575580 PMCID: PMC6773358 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry (UGICR) was developed to monitor and improve the quality of care provided to patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers in Australia. PARTICIPANTS It supports four cancer modules: pancreatic, oesophagogastric, biliary and primary liver cancer. The pancreatic cancer (PC) module was the first module to be implemented, with others being established in a staged approach. Individuals are recruited to the registry if they are aged 18 years or older, have received care for their cancer at a participating public/private hospital or private clinic in Australia and do not opt out of participation. FINDINGS TO DATE The UGICR is governed by a multidisciplinary steering committee that provides clinical governance and oversees clinical working parties. The role of the working parties is to develop quality indicators based on best practice for each registry module, develop the minimum datasets and provide guidance in analysing and reporting of results. Data are captured from existing data sources (population-based cancer incidence registries, pathology databases and hospital-coded data) and manually from clinical records. Data collectors directly enter information into a secure web-based Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) data collection platform. The PC module began with a pilot phase, and subsequently, we used a formal modified Delphi consensus process to establish a core set of quality indicators for PC. The second module developed was the oesophagogastric cancer (OGC) module. Results of the 1 year pilot phases for PC and OGC modules are included in this cohort profile. FUTURE PLANS The UGICR will provide regular reports of risk-adjusted, benchmarked performance on a range of quality indicators that will highlight variations in care and clinical outcomes at a health service level. The registry has also been developed with the view to collect patient-reported outcomes (PROs), which will further add to our understanding of the care of patients with these cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashika D Maharaj
- Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer F Holland
- Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ri O Scarborough
- Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sue M Evans
- Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Liane J Ioannou
- Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wendy Brown
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - James G Kench
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Trevor Leong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John J McNeil
- Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mehrdad Nikfarjam
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ahmad Aly
- Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paul R Burton
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Julie Chu
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cuong P Duong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Evans
- Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Goldstein
- Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Michael W Hii
- St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Neil D Merrett
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael Michael
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachel E Neale
- Population Health Division, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | | | | | - Marty Smith
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Spillane
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - John R Zalcberg
- Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sato-Dahlman M, Yamamoto M. The Development of Oncolytic Adenovirus Therapy in the Past and Future - For the Case of Pancreatic Cancer. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2019; 18:153-161. [PMID: 28228084 DOI: 10.2174/1568009617666170222123925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 12/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignant disease and the efficacy of current treatments for unresectable diseases is quite limited despite recent advances. Gene therapy /virotherapy strategies may provide new options for the treatment of various cancers including pancreatic cancer. Oncolytic adenovirus shows an antitumoral effect via its intratumoral amplification and strong cytocidal effect in a variety of cancers and it has been employed for the development of potent oncolytic virotherapy agents for pancreatic cancer. Our ultimate goal is to develop an oncolytic adenovirus enabling the treatment of patients with advanced or spread diseases by systemic injection. Systemic application of oncolytic therapy mandates more efficient and selective gene delivery and needs to embody sufficient antitumor effect even with limited initial delivery to the tumor location. In this review, the current status of oncolytic adenoviruses from the viewpoints of vector design and potential strategies to overcome current obstacles for its clinical application will be described. We will also discuss the efforts to improve the antitumor activity of oncolytic adenovirus, in in vivo animal models, and the combination therapy of oncolytic adenovirus with radiation and chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mizuho Sato-Dahlman
- Division of Basic and Translational Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, MN, United States
| | - Masato Yamamoto
- Division of Basic and Translational Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sato-Dahlman M, Wirth K, Yamamoto M. Role of Gene Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer-A Review. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:E103. [PMID: 29614005 PMCID: PMC5923358 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10040103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2018] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Mortality from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has remained essentially unchanged for decades and its relative contribution to overall cancer death is projected to only increase in the coming years. Current treatment for PDAC includes aggressive chemotherapy and surgical resection in a limited number of patients, with median survival of optimal treatment rather dismal. Recent advances in gene therapies offer novel opportunities for treatment, even in those with locally advanced disease. In this review, we summarize emerging techniques to the design and administration of virotherapy, synthetic vectors, and gene-editing technology. Despite these promising advances, shortcomings continue to exist and here will also be highlighted those approaches to overcoming obstacles in current laboratory and clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Keith Wirth
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
| | - Masato Yamamoto
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
- Stem Cell Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
- Surgery BTR, MMC 195, 8195F, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Janmaat VT, Steyerberg EW, van der Gaast A, Mathijssen RHJ, Bruno MJ, Peppelenbosch MP, Kuipers EJ, Spaander MCW. Palliative chemotherapy and targeted therapies for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 11:CD004063. [PMID: 29182797 PMCID: PMC6486200 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004063.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Almost half of people with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer have metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Chemotherapy and targeted therapies are increasingly used with a palliative intent to control tumor growth, improve quality of life, and prolong survival. To date, and with the exception of ramucirumab, evidence for the efficacy of palliative treatments for esophageal and gastroesophageal cancer is lacking. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of cytostatic or targeted therapy for treating esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer with palliative intent. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, the Web of Science, PubMed Publisher, Google Scholar, and trial registries up to 13 May 2015, and we handsearched the reference lists of studies. We did not restrict the search to publications in English. Additional searches were run in September 2017 prior to publication, and they are listed in the 'Studies awaiting assessment' section. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy versus best supportive care or control in people with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently extracted data. We assessed the quality and risk of bias of eligible studies according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We calculated pooled estimates of effect using an inverse variance random-effects model for meta-analysis. MAIN RESULTS We identified 41 RCTs with 11,853 participants for inclusion in the review as well as 49 ongoing studies. For the main comparison of adding a cytostatic and/or targeted agent to a control arm, we included 11 studies with 1347 participants. This analysis demonstrated an increase in overall survival in favor of the arm with an additional cytostatic or targeted therapeutic agent with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 0.84, high-quality evidence). The median increased survival time was one month. Five studies in 750 participants contributed data to the comparison of palliative therapy versus best supportive care. We found a benefit in overall survival in favor of the group receiving palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy compared to best supportive care (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.92, high-quality evidence). Subcomparisons including only people receiving second-line therapies, chemotherapies, targeted therapies, adenocarcinomas, and squamous cell carcinomas all showed a similar benefit. The only individual agent that more than one study found to improve both overall survival and progression-free survival was ramucirumab. Palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy increased the frequency of grade 3 or higher treatment-related toxicity. However, treatment-related deaths did not occur more frequently. Quality of life often improved in the arm with an additional agent. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS People who receive more chemotherapeutic or targeted therapeutic agents have an increased overall survival compared to people who receive less. These agents, administered as both first-line or second-line treatments, also led to better overall survival than best supportive care. With the exception of ramucirumab, it remains unclear which other individual agents cause the survival benefit. Although treatment-associated toxicities of grade 3 or more occurred more frequently in arms with an additional chemotherapy or targeted therapy agent, there is no evidence that palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy decrease quality of life. Based on this meta-analysis, palliative chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy can be considered standard care for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent T Janmaat
- Erasmus University Medical CenterDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRotterdamNetherlands
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Erasmus University Medical CenterDepartment of Public HealthPO Box 2040RotterdamNetherlands3000 CA
| | - Ate van der Gaast
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical CenterDepartment of Medical OncologyDr. Molewaterplein 40RotterdamNetherlands3015 GD
| | - Ron HJ Mathijssen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical CenterDepartment of Medical OncologyDr. Molewaterplein 40RotterdamNetherlands3015 GD
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Erasmus University Medical CenterDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRotterdamNetherlands
| | - Maikel P Peppelenbosch
- Erasmus University Medical CenterDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRotterdamNetherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Erasmus University Medical CenterDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRotterdamNetherlands
| | - Manon CW Spaander
- Erasmus University Medical CenterDepartment of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRotterdamNetherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Haj Mohammad N, De Rooij S, Hulshof M, Ruurda J, Wijnhoven B, Erdkamp F, Sosef M, Gisbertz S, van Berge Henegouwen M, Sprangers M, van Laarhoven H. Activities of daily living and quality of life during treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and after surgery in patients with esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2016; 114:684-690. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.24378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Haj Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology; University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Sophia De Rooij
- Department of Internal Medicine; Section of Geriatric Medicine; Academic Medical Center Groningen; Groningen The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine; Section of Geriatric Medicine; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Hulshof
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Ruurda
- Department of Surgery; University Medical Center Utrecht; Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery; Erasmus MC; University Medical Center Rotterdam; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Frans Erdkamp
- Department of Internal Medicine; Zuyderland Medisch Centrum; Heerlen/Sittard/Geleen The Netherlands
| | - Meindert Sosef
- Department of Surgery; Zuyderland Medisch Centrum; Heerlen/Sittard/Geleen The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | | - Mirjam Sprangers
- Department of Medical Psychology; Academic Medical Center; Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
A decade of day-case endoscopically guided stent placement in malignant oesophagogastric strictures. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:2280-2286. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5230-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
9
|
Howell M, Wong G, Turner RM, Tan HT, Tong A, Craig JC, Howard K. The Consistency and Reporting of Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Trials of Immunosuppressive Agents in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2016; 67:762-74. [DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2015] [Accepted: 11/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
10
|
Advances in understanding and improving gastrointestinal symptoms during supportive and palliative care: a decade of progress. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2016; 10:149-51. [PMID: 27054289 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Jacobs M, Macefield RC, Elbers RG, Sitnikova K, Korfage IJ, Smets EMA, Henselmans I, van Berge Henegouwen MI, de Haes JCJM, Blazeby JM, Sprangers MAG. Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res 2014; 23:1155-76. [PMID: 24293086 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0576-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study is to (1) estimate the direction, clinical relevance, and duration of health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) change in the first year following esophageal cancer surgery and (2) to assess the robustness of the estimates by subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and an exploration of publication bias. METHODS A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and CENTRAL to identify randomized and non-randomized studies was performed. We compared the baseline HRQL data with 3-, 6-, 9-, or 12-month follow-ups to estimate the magnitude and duration of HRQL change. These estimates were then classified as trivial, small, medium, or large. Primary outcomes were role functioning, eating, and fatigue. Secondary outcomes were physical and social functioning, dysphagia, pain, and coughing problems. We conducted subgroup analysis for open surgery, open surgery preceded by neoadjuvant therapy, and minimally invasive surgery. Sensitivity analyses assessed the influence of study design, transformation/imputation of the data, and HRQL questionnaire used. RESULTS We included the data from 15 studies to estimate the change in 28 HRQL outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery. The main analysis showed that patients' social functioning deteriorated. Symptoms of fatigue, pain, and coughing problems increased. These changes lasted for 9-12 months, although some symptoms persisted beyond the first year after surgery. For many other HRQL outcomes, estimates were only robust after subgroup or sensitivity analyses (e.g., role and physical functioning), or remained too heterogeneous to interpret (e.g., eating and dysphagia). CONCLUSIONS Patients will experience a clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in HRQL after esophageal cancer surgery. However, for many HRQL outcomes, more and better quality evidence is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jacobs
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, Ragunath K, Ang Y, Kang JY, Watson P, Trudgill N, Patel P, Kaye PV, Sanders S, O'Donovan M, Bird-Lieberman E, Bhandari P, Jankowski JA, Attwood S, Parsons SL, Loft D, Lagergren J, Moayyedi P, Lyratzopoulos G, de Caestecker J. British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on the diagnosis and management of Barrett's oesophagus. Gut 2014; 63:7-42. [PMID: 24165758 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 821] [Impact Index Per Article: 82.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
These guidelines provide a practical and evidence-based resource for the management of patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related early neoplasia. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument was followed to provide a methodological strategy for the guideline development. A systematic review of the literature was performed for English language articles published up until December 2012 in order to address controversial issues in Barrett's oesophagus including definition, screening and diagnosis, surveillance, pathological grading for dysplasia, management of dysplasia, and early cancer including training requirements. The rigour and quality of the studies was evaluated using the SIGN checklist system. Recommendations on each topic were scored by each author using a five-tier system (A+, strong agreement, to D+, strongly disagree). Statements that failed to reach substantial agreement among authors, defined as >80% agreement (A or A+), were revisited and modified until substantial agreement (>80%) was reached. In formulating these guidelines, we took into consideration benefits and risks for the population and national health system, as well as patient perspectives. For the first time, we have suggested stratification of patients according to their estimated cancer risk based on clinical and histopathological criteria. In order to improve communication between clinicians, we recommend the use of minimum datasets for reporting endoscopic and pathological findings. We advocate endoscopic therapy for high-grade dysplasia and early cancer, which should be performed in high-volume centres. We hope that these guidelines will standardise and improve management for patients with Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia.
Collapse
|
13
|
Jacobs M, Macefield RC, Elbers RG, Sitnikova K, Korfage IJ, Smets EMA, Henselmans I, van Berge Henegouwen MI, de Haes JCJM, Blazeby JM, Sprangers MAG. Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res 2013; 23:1097-115. [PMID: 24129668 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0545-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2013] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study is to (1) estimate the direction, clinical relevance, and duration of health-related quality of life (HRQL) change in the first year following esophageal cancer surgery and (2) to assess the robustness of the estimates by subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and an exploration of publication bias. METHODS A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and CENTRAL to identify randomized and non-randomized studies was performed. We compared the baseline HRQL data with 3-, 6-, 9-, or 12-month follow-ups to estimate the magnitude and duration of HRQL change. These estimates were then classified as trivial, small, medium, or large. Primary outcomes were role functioning, eating, and fatigue. Secondary outcomes were physical and social functioning, dysphagia, pain, and coughing problems. We conducted subgroup analysis for open surgery, open surgery preceded by neo-adjuvant therapy, and minimally invasive surgery. Sensitivity analyses assessed the influence of study design, transformation/imputation of the data, and HRQL questionnaire used. RESULTS We included data from 15 studies to estimate the change in 28 HRQL outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery. The main analysis showed that patients' social functioning deteriorated. Symptoms of fatigue, pain, and coughing problems increased. These changes lasted for 9-12 months, although some symptoms persisted beyond the first year after surgery. For many other HRQL outcomes, estimates were only robust after subgroup or sensitivity analyses (e.g., role and physical functioning), or remained too heterogeneous to interpret (e.g., eating and dysphagia). CONCLUSIONS Patients will experience a clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in HRQL after esophageal cancer surgery. However, for many HRQL outcomes, more and better quality evidence is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jacobs
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, Meibergdreef 5, 1100DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is characterized by 6 striking features: increasing incidence, male predominance, lack of preventive measures, opportunities for early detection, demanding surgical therapy and care, and poor prognosis. Reasons for its rapidly increasing incidence include the rising prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux and obesity, combined with the decreasing prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. The strong male predominance remains unexplained, but hormonal influence might play an important role. Future prevention might include the treatment of reflux or obesity or chemoprevention with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or statins, but no evidence-based preventive measures are currently available. Likely future developments include endoscopic screening of better defined high-risk groups for EAC. Individuals with Barrett esophagus might benefit from surveillance, at least those with dysplasia, but screening and surveillance strategies need careful evaluation to be feasible and cost-effective. The surgery for EAC is more extensive than virtually any other standard procedure, and postoperative survival, health-related quality of life, and nutrition need to be improved (eg, by improved treatment, better decision-making, and more individually tailored follow-up). Promising clinical developments include increased survival after preoperative chemoradiotherapy, the potentially reduced impact on health-related quality of life after minimally invasive surgery, and the new endoscopic therapies for dysplastic Barrett esophagus or early EAC. The overall survival rates are improving slightly, but poor prognosis remains a challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesper Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bentley JP, Goldsbury DE, Eslick GD, Cox MR, O'Connell DL. Stent insertion for palliation of advanced oesophageal carcinoma symptoms by level of socioeconomic disadvantage in urban New South Wales. Med J Aust 2013; 198:531-2. [DOI: 10.5694/mja12.11445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2012] [Accepted: 04/09/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jason P Bentley
- NSW Biostatistical Officer Training Program, Ministry of Health, Sydney, NSW
| | | | - Guy D Eslick
- Whiteley‐Martin Research Centre, Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| | - Michael R Cox
- Whiteley‐Martin Research Centre, Nepean Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Macefield RC, Avery KNL, Blazeby JM. Integration of clinical and patient-reported outcomes in surgical oncology. Br J Surg 2012; 100:28-37. [PMID: 23165422 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2012] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide information about the patient perspective and experience of undergoing surgery for cancer, but evidence suggests that they are not used widely to influence practice. This review considers key challenges and opportunities for using PROs effectively in gastrointestinal surgical oncology, drawing on principles learnt from surgical oncology in general. METHODS Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in surgical oncology reporting PROs as primary or secondary outcomes, and studies examining methods to communicate PRO information, were identified. Common themes are summarized and the future of PRO studies considered. RESULTS Reviews highlighted the need for improved design, conduct and reporting of PROs in RCTs in surgical oncology. Main issues related to the multiplicity of PRO measures hindering data synthesis and clinical understanding, problems with missing data risking bias, and limited integration of clinical and PRO data undermining the role of PRO data in practice. Reviews indicated that patients want PRO data to meet information needs and early work shows that graphically displayed PROs are understood by patients. CONCLUSION PROs have a role in the evaluation of surgical oncology, but increased consensus and collaboration between surgeons and methodologists is needed to improve the design, conduct and reporting of PROs with clinical outcomes in trials. Possible solutions include investing more effort and systematic thought into the PRO rationale in RCTs, the development and use of 'core outcome sets' with PROs, and implementation of the extension to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines for reporting PROs in RCTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R C Macefield
- Academic Unit of Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Systematic review reveals limitations of studies evaluating health-related quality of life after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer. Qual Life Res 2012; 22:1787-803. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0290-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
18
|
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is an aggressive and physically and emotionally devastating disease. It has one of the poorest survival rates among all malignant tumors, mainly due to late symptom presentation and early metastatic dissemination. Cure is possible through extensive surgery, typically followed by a long recovery period, affecting general well-being, as well as basic aspects of life, such as eating, drinking and socializing. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a multidimensional concept assessing symptoms and functions related to a disease or its treatment from the patient's perspective. HRQL is a fundamental part of treatment in surgical oncology, particularly in esophageal cancer. This review assesses the scientific data regarding some HRQL aspects after esophageal cancer surgery, for example, postoperative recovery time, determinants of postoperative HRQL and long-term HRQL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Therese Djärv
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dorcaratto D, Grande L, Ramón JM, Pera M. [Quality of life of patients with cancer of the oesophagus and stomach]. Cir Esp 2011; 89:635-44. [PMID: 21907976 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2011.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2011] [Accepted: 06/27/2011] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The study of the health related quality of life in patients with digestive tract cancer, and particularly in those with tumours of the oesophagus and stomach, provides useful information for selecting the most suitable therapeutic option. It may also be used to predict the impact of the disease and its possible treatments on the physical, emotional and social condition of the patient. Various sensitive and reliable tools have been developed over the past decades that are capable of measuring the quality of life of patients; the use of questionnaires has made it easier to exchange information between the patient and the doctor. The pre- and post-operative variations in the quality of life in patients with oesophageal-gastric cancer are of prognostic value on the outcome of the disease. For all these reasons, the health related quality of life is currently considered, along with disease free survival and absence of recurrences, one of the most important parameters in order to assess the impact on the patients of a particular oncological treatment. The aim of this article is to review the role of the health related quality of life assessment, as well as the various tools which are available to measure it in patients with oesophageal-gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitri Dorcaratto
- Sección de Cirugía Gastrointestinal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Institut de Recerca IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|