Prospective Outcomes of a Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Program Including Vaginal Electrogalvanic Stimulation for Urinary, Defecatory, and Pelvic Pain Symptoms

Advancing clinical understanding of surface electromyography biofeedback: bridging research, teaching, and commercial applications

INTRODUCTION

Expanding the use of surface electromyography-biofeedback (EMG-BF) devices in different therapeutic settings highlights the gradually evolving role of visualizing muscle activity in the rehabilitation process. This review evaluates their concepts, uses, and trends, combining evidence-based research.

AREAS COVERED

This review dissects the anatomy of EMG-BF systems, emphasizing their transformative integration with machine-learning (ML) and deep-learning (DL) paradigms. Advances such as the application of sophisticated DL architectures for high-density EMG data interpretation, optimization techniques for heightened DL model performance, and the fusion of EMG with electroencephalogram (EEG) signals have been spotlighted for enhancing biomechanical analyses in rehabilitation. The literature survey also categorizes EMG-BF devices based on functionality and clinical usage, supported by insights from commercial sectors.

EXPERT OPINION

The current landscape of EMG-BF is rapidly evolving, chiefly propelled by innovations in artificial intelligence (AI). The incorporation of ML and DL into EMG-BF systems augments their accuracy, reliability, and scope, marking a leap in patient care. Despite challenges in model interpretability and signal noise, ongoing research promises to address these complexities, refining biofeedback modalities. The integration of AI not only predicts patient-specific recovery timelines but also tailors therapeutic interventions, heralding a new era of personalized medicine in rehabilitation and emotional detection.

Levator Ani Syndrome Presenting with Vaginal Pain

Levator ani syndrome (LAS), also known as levator ani spasm, puborectalis syndrome, chronic proctalgia, pyriformis syndrome and pelvic tension myalgia, produces chronic anal pain. The levator ani muscle is susceptible to the development of myofascial pain syndrome, and trigger points may be elicited on physical examination. The pathophysiology remains to be fully delineated. The diagnosis of LAS is suggested primarily by the clinical history, physical examination and the exclusion of organic disease that can produce recurrent or chronic proctalgia. Digital massage, sitz bath, electrogalvanic stimulation and biofeedback are the treatment modalities most frequently described in the literature. Pharmacological management includes non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, diazepam, amitriptyline, gabapentin and botulinum toxin. The evaluation of these patients can be challenging due to a diversity of causative factors. The authors present the case of a nulliparous woman in her mid-30s presenting with acute onset of lower abdominal and rectal pain radiating to her vagina. There was no history of trauma, inflammatory bowel disease, anal fissure or altered bowel habit. Each pain episode lasted longer than 20 min and was exacerbated by sitting. Neurological examination showed no evidence of neurological dysfunction. Rectal examination was unremarkable. During vaginal examination, palpation of the levator ani muscles elicited pain indicating pelvic floor dysfunction. Laboratory investigations including a full blood count and C reactive protein were within normal range. Further investigation with a transabdominal ultrasound scan, CT of the abdomen and pelvis and MRI of the lumbar spine were unremarkable. She commenced treatment with amitriptyline 20 mg once daily. She was referred for pelvic floor physiotherapy. Functional pain syndromes, such as LAS, should be regarded as diagnoses of exclusion and considered only after a thorough evaluation has been performed to rule out structural causes of pain. Knowledge of the pelvic floor and pelvic wall muscles may enable the physician to identify LAS, a possible cause of chronic pelvic pain.

Efficacy of Kegel exercises combined with electrical stimulation on the restoration of postpartum pelvic floor muscle function

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of Kegel exercises combined with electrical stimulation on the restoration of postpartum pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function.

METHODS

Data of 120 parturients with full-term singleton pregnancy who delivered vaginally in the Guang'an People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed, and the study subjects were grouped into a Kegel exercise group (n=40, receiving Kegel exercise alone), an electrical stimulation group (n=40, receiving electrical stimulation alone) and a combined group (n=40, receiving Kegel exercises combined with electrical stimulation) according to the treatments received. All three groups received intervention for 3 months. The overall response rates (ORRs) at 3 months, changes in PFM strength and vaginal pressure during treatment, the scores of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF), the incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QOL), and the incidence rates of pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) were evaluated in the three groups.

RESULTS

ORR in the combined group (100.00%) was higher than that of the Kegel exercises group (87.50%) and the electrical stimulation group (85.00%) (P < 0.05). At 1, 3, and 6 months after intervention, the combined group was superior to the Kegel exercises and the electrical stimulation groups in systolic blood pressure (SBP) of pelvic floor, and the continuous SBP of type I and II muscle fibers (P < 0.05). After 6 months of follow-up, the scores of ICIQ-UI SF and I-QOL in the combined group were higher than those in the Kegel exercises and electrical stimulation groups (P < 0.05). The score of satisfaction in the combined group was higher than in Kegel exercises and electrical stimulation groups (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Kegel exercises combined with electrical stimulation have a good therapeutic effect on postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction, which can markedly improve PFM strength and vaginal pressure.

Using the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire to Improve Urinary Incontinence Assessments for Female Veterans

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate quality of life (QoL) in female veterans by comparing responses of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) before and after a chosen treatment for urinary incontinence (UI), determine whether a QoL assessment was being completed for each woman seeking care for UI, and review the PFIQ-7 questionnaire scores to ensure the veterans were offered the appropriate levels of treatment.

DESIGN

Quality improvement project using the plan-do-study-act cycle for evaluating change.

SETTING

/Local Problem: A Veterans Affairs Medical Center in the midwestern United States. No standardized education or QoL questionnaire was being used for female veterans diagnosed with UI before implementation of the project.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty female veterans diagnosed with stress or mixed UI who had completed Kegel exercises or pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) and a pre- and posttreatment PFIQ-7.

INTERVENTIONS/MEASUREMENTS

The Veterans Affairs Medical Center incorporated the PFIQ-7 into routine practice for pre- and posttreatment assessment of UI. Data were collected through a retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

The mean initial PFIQ-7 score for participants (n = 4) who chose PFR was 71.77 (SD = 82.79). The mean final PFIQ-7 score for participants in the PFR group was 43.99 (SD = 63.34). The mean initial PFIQ-7 score for participants who chose Kegel exercises was 71.72 (SD = 34.92), and the final score was 60.71 (SD = 44.98). When comparing pre- and posttreatment scores, a lower score means there was a positive effect from the treatment and reflects an improved QoL.

CONCLUSION

The addition of the QoL assessment tool assisted staff in developing an individualized plan of care for female veterans. Regardless of treatment option chosen, participants who did not show an overall improvement in the pre- and posttreatment QoL scores were referred to a more advanced level of care.

Clinical Review of Neuromusculoskeletal Complementary and Alternative Approaches for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome

Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is a functional pain disorder characterized by ongoing pain in the apparent absence of clinically identifiable causes. The prevalence of functional pain disorders demonstrates the importance of adequate management of ongoing symptomatology, but due to the uncertain etiology and myriad patient presentation phenotypes, reliable treatment options are difficult to implement. New interventions involving non-pharmacological approaches to pain management have been investigated across a spectrum of clinical and pre-clinical studies. Given that conservative care such as exercise, counseling, and musculoskeletal therapy is widely recommended as first-line treatment for CPPS, an updated review of these and related methodologies are needed. Familiarizing physicians and the public with the newest evidence for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and other conservative care treatments will assist with the promotion of evidence-based practices in a safe and reliable manner. This review aimed to summarize the current evidence and proposed mechanisms for non-pharmacological treatment specific to CAM and management of chronic pelvic pain centered on neuromusculoskeletal focused intervention such as acupuncture, auriculotherapy, manipulation, manual therapy, myofascial release, and phototherapy. The discussion suggests that reported improvements in pelvic pain or related symptomatology may be attributed to changes in the peripheral inflammasome and somatic origins of peripheral sensitization. Robustness of the included clinical studies is discussed throughout the review, and attention is paid to delineating inclusion criteria of formally diagnosed CPPS compared to general pelvic or abdominal pain. Overall, this review consolidates the current state of evidence regarding the utilization of non-traditional interventions using CAM techniques for the management of chronic pelvic pain and recommends a future direction for the field.

The effect of biofeedback interventions on pain, overall symptoms, quality of life and physiological parameters in patients with pelvic pain : A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Biofeedback is recognized as an effective additive method for treating certain phenotypes of chronic pelvic pain syndrome and is a therapeutic option in other pelvic pain conditions. This review aims to evaluate evidence from the literature with a focus on the effect of biofeedback on pain reduction, overall symptom relief, physiological parameters and quality of life.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using the databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and PEDro from inception to July 2020. Data were tabulated and a narrative synthesis was carried out, since data heterogeneity did not allow a meta-analysis. The PEDro scale and the McMaster Critical Review Form-Quantitative Studies were applied to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS

Out of 651 studies, 37 quantitative studies of primary research evaluating pelvic pain conditions in male and female adults and children were included. They covered biofeedback interventions on anorectal disorders, chronic prostatitis, female chronic pelvic pain conditions, urologic phenotypes in children and adults and a single study on low back pain. For anorectal disorders, several landmark studies demonstrate the efficacy of biofeedback. For other subtypes of chronic pelvic pain conditions there is tentative evidence that biofeedback-assisted training has a positive effect on pain reduction, overall symptoms relief and quality of life. Certain factors have been identified that might be relevant in improving treatment success.

CONCLUSIONS

For certain indications, biofeedback has been confirmed to be an effective treatment. For other phenotypes, promising findings should be further investigated in robust and well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for Pelvic Floor Hypertonicity: A Systematic Review of Treatment Efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Hypertonicity of the pelvic floor (PFH) is a disabling condition with urological, gynecological and gastrointestinal symptoms, sexual problems and chronic pelvic pain, impacting quality of life. Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is a first-line intervention, yet no systematic review on the efficacy of PFPT for the treatment of PFH has been conducted.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically appraise the current literature on efficacy of PFPT modalities related to PFH.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until February 2020. A manual search from reference lists of included articles was performed. Ongoing trials were reviewed using clinicaltrial.gov. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective - and retrospective cohorts and case-study analyses were included. Outcome measures were pelvic floor muscle tone and function, pain reports, sexual function, pelvic floor symptom scores, quality of life and patients' perceived effect.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in 10 eligible studies including 4 RCTs, 5 prospective studies, and 1 case study published between 2000 and 2019. Most studies had a high risk of bias associated with the lack of a comparison group, insufficient sample sizes and non-standardized interventions. Six studies were of low and 4 of medium quality. All studies were narratively reviewed. Three of 4 RCTs found positive effects of PFPT compared to controls on five out of 6 outcome measures. The prospective studies found significant improvements in all outcome measures that were assessed. PFPT seems to be efficacious in patients with chronic prostatitis, chronic pelvic pain syndrome, vulvodynia, and dyspareunia. Smallest effects were seen in patients with interstitial cystitis and painful bladder syndrome.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this systematic review suggest that PFPT can be beneficial in patients with PFH. Further high-quality RCTs should be performed to confirm the effectiveness of PFPT in the treatment of PFH. van Reijn-Baggen DA, Han-Geurts IJM, Voorham-van der Zalm PJ, et al. Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy for Pelvic Floor Hypertonicity: A Systematic Review of Treatment Efficacy. Sex Med Rev 2021;XX:1-22.

A Systematic Review of Intravaginal Diazepam for the Treatment of Pelvic Floor Hypertonic Disorder

This systematic review evaluates the efficacy of intravaginal diazepam in treating chronic pelvic pain and sexual dysfunction associated with high-tone pelvic floor dysfunction. A literature search was conducted in Medline and Web of Science, including articles from the database's inception to July 2019. The search identified 126 articles, and 5 articles met study inclusion criteria: 2 observational reviews and 3 small randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating intravaginal diazepam for high-tone pelvic floor dysfunction. The 2 observational studies identified subjective reports of improvement in sexual function for a majority of women, 96% and 71%, in each study. However, there were no statistical differences between Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain identified. One RCT found no significant changes between groups in median FSFI or VAS scores, and a second RCT found no significant changes between groups in 100-mm VAS scores. The third RCT demonstrated that compared with placebo, treatment with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and intravaginal diazepam for women with vestibulodynia and high-tone pelvic floor dysfunction yielded significant differences in reduction of dyspareunia (P ≤ .05), ability to relax pelvic floor muscles after contraction (P ≤.05), and current perception threshold values at a 5-Hz stimulation related to C fibers (P < .05), but no significant changes in 10-cm VAS scores. Intravaginal diazepam may be helpful in women with a specific diagnosis of high-tone pelvic floor dysfunction, but more and larger studies are needed to confirm these potential effects.

Biofeedback versus electrical stimulation for sexual dysfunction: a randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Sexual dysfunction is a common problem in the general population. We compared the effects of biofeedback and electrical stimulation on the symptoms of sexual pain dysfunction in women with urinary stress incontinence.

METHODS

We carried out a parallel randomized clinical trial in an outpatient department for physical medicine and rehabilitation at a university hospital. Based on DSM-5 criteria for sexual dysfunction, 22 patients with sexual dysfunction and stress incontinence were included and randomly allocated to each study arm. The primary outcome measure was the total score on the Female Sexual Function Index. Each group underwent pertinent treatment for 100 min, two times a week for 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Both groups showed favorable outcomes in increasing Female Sexual Function Index mean scores and their domains. However, for improving sexual function, women in the biofeedback group benefited more than those receiving electrical stimulation. Biofeedback raised desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, and satisfaction scores more than electrical stimulation (all p ≤ 0.025). Both interventions decreased pain during or following vaginal penetration similarly (p = 0.985).

CONCLUSIONS

Both biofeedback and electrical stimulation increased the Female Sexual Function Index score. However, to improve sexual function, women undergoing biofeedback seem to benefit more than those receiving electrical stimulation. We recommend considering the prescription of biofeedback for the treatment of sexual dysfunction because of its efficacy, lack of adverse effects, and easy application.