Outcomes of Rectovaginal Fistula Repair. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017;23:124-130. [PMID: 28106653 DOI: 10.1097/spv.0000000000000373]

Stapled transperineal rectovaginal fistula repair for low- and mid-level rectovaginal fistulas: A comparison study with rectal mucosal advancement flap repair

BACKGROUND

As an innovative treatment, stapled transperineal rectovaginal fistula repair (STR) for rectovaginal fistula (RVF) has demonstrated effectiveness in preliminary reports. This study aims to compare STR with rectal mucosal advancement flap repair (RAF), a widely utilized surgical procedure, for the surgical outcome of the low- and mid-level RVF.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with low- and mid-level RVF who underwent STR or RAF were included from both the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University and Xi'an Daxing Hospital. Among the 99 total patients, 77 underwent STR and 22 underwent RAF. Patient demographics, operative data, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Recurrence rate and associated risk factors were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences among patients in terms of clinical characteristics like age, BMI, aetiology, and fistula features. During the follow-up period of 20 months (interquartile range 3.0-41.8 months), a total of 28 patients relapsed, with a significantly lower recurrence rate in the STR group (20.8 %) than in the RAF group (54.6 %) (P = 0.005). In the multivariate Cox analysis, STR was an independent protective factor against recurrence (HR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.17-0.79, P = 0.01). Logistic regression indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between these two procedures in terms of surgical complications (OR: 0.53, 95%CI: 0.19-1.48, P = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

For low- and mid-level RVF, STR may be an alternative option for treatment modality that offers a lower recurrence rate, without observed disadvantage in terms of surgical complication rates.

Turnbull-Cutait Pull-Through Procedure Is an Alternative to Permanent Ostomy in Patients With Complex Pelvic Fistulas

BACKGROUND

A permanent stoma is frequently recommended in the setting of complex or recurrent rectovaginal fistulas because of the high failure rate of reconstructive procedures. The Turnbull-Cutait pull-through procedure is a salvage operation for motivated patients desiring to avoid permanent fecal diversion.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the cure rates of complex rectovaginal fistulas after the Turnbull-Cutait pull-through procedure based on cause.

DESIGN

After the institutional review approval board, a retrospective review of women who underwent the procedure (1993-2018) for a rectovaginal fistula was conducted. Patients' demographics, cause, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed.

SETTING

Colorectal surgery department at a tertiary center in the United States.

PATIENTS

Adult women with a rectovaginal fistula who underwent a colonic pull-through procedure were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Recurrence after the colonic pull-through procedure.

RESULTS

There were 81 patients who underwent colonic pull-through; of those, 26 patients had a rectovaginal fistula, had a median age of 51 (43-57) years, and had a mean BMI of 28 ± 3.2 kg/m 2 . A total of 4 patients (15%) had a recurrence and 85% of the patients healed. Ninety-three percent of the patients healed after the prior anastomotic leak. Patients with a Crohn's disease-related fistula had a 75% cure rate. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a cumulative incidence of recurrence of 8% (95% CI, 0%-8%) within 6 months after surgery and 12% at 12 months.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

The Turnbull-Cutait pull-through procedure may be the last option to preserve intestinal continuity and successfully treat rectovaginal fistulas in 85% of cases.

EL PROCEDIMIENTO PULLTHROUGH DE TURNBULLCUTAIT ES UNA ALTERNATIVA A LA OSTOMA PERMANENTE EN PACIENTES CON FSTULAS PLVICAS COMPLEJAS

ANTECEDENTES:Con frecuencia se recomienda un estoma permanente en el contexto de una fístula rectovaginal compleja o recurrente debido a la alta tasa de fracaso de los procedimientos reconstructivos. El procedimiento de extracción de Turnbull-Cutait es una operación de rescate para pacientes motivados que desean evitar la desviación fecal permanente.OBJETIVO:Analizar las tasas de curación de la fístula rectovaginal compleja después del procedimiento de extracción de Turnbull-Cutait según la etiología.DISEÑO:Después de la junta de aprobación de revisión institucional, se realizó una revisión retrospectiva de mujeres que se sometieron a un procedimiento (1993-2018) por fístula rectovaginal. Se analizaron los datos demográficos, la etiología y los resultados posoperatorios de los pacientes.AJUSTE:Departamento de cirugía colorrectal en un centro terciario en los Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Mujeres adultas con fístula rectovaginal que se sometieron a extracción del colon.RESULTADO PRINCIPAL:recurrencia después de la extracción del colon.RESULTADOS:Hubo 81 pacientes que tenían extracción colónica, de esas 26 fístulas rectovaginales con una mediana de edad de 51 (43 - 57) años, y un índice de masa corporal promedio de 28 ± 3,2 kg/m2. Un total de 4 (15%) pacientes tuvieron una recurrencia y el 85% de los pacientes se curaron. El noventa y tres por ciento de los pacientes se curaron después de la fuga anastomótica previa. Los pacientes con fístula relacionada con EC tuvieron una tasa de curación del 75%. El análisis de Kaplan Meier mostró una incidencia acumulada de recurrencia del 8% [95% intervalo de confianza 0%-18%] dentro de los 6 meses posteriores a la cirugía y del 12% a los 12 meses.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:El procedimiento de extracción de Turnbull-Cutait puede ser la última opción que se puede ofrecer para preservar la continuidad intestinal y tratar la fístula rectovaginal con éxito en el 85% de los casos. (Traducción-Yesenia.Rojas-Khalil).

Perioperative Factors Affecting the Healing of Rectovaginal Fistula

Rectovaginal fistula is rare, but a severe complication in gynecology, which despite the effort of clinicians is still not treated successfully in many cases. According to statistics, the healing rates of surgery in patients with RVF range from 20 to 100%. The treatment effectiveness depends on the etiology of fistula, the age of the patients, the presence of comorbidities, the type of surgery and many other factors. Considering the low efficiency of treatment and the high risk of recurrence, the question of possible methods to improve the results occurs. In our review, we analyzed both modifiable and non-modifiable factors which may influence the treatment, healing rate and future fate of the patients. Taking into account all analyzed risk factors, including age, comorbidities, smoking status, microbiology, medications, stoma and stool features, we are aware that rectovaginal fistula's treatment must be individualized and holistic. In cases of poorly healing RVF, the drainage of feces, the use of antibiotic prophylaxis or the implementation of estrogen therapy may be useful. Moreover, microbiome research in women with RVF and towards estrogen therapy should be performed in order to create treatment algorithms in women with fistulae. Those interventions, in our opinion, may significantly improve the outcome of the patients.

Ano-rectovaginal fistula after obstetrical anal sphincter injury: Diverting stoma does not improve the surgical results

AIM

Ano-rectovaginal fistulas (ARVF) are challenging for the surgeon. Most of the series mix aetiologies, leading to confusion with respect to the conclusion. The aim of this study was to assess the factors associated with the success of ARVF management following obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASIS).

METHODS

This retrospective multicentric study included all the patients undergoing surgery for ARVF identified by the hospital codes. Patients for whom the aetiology of ARVF was not OASIS were excluded. The major outcome measure was the success of the procedure.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with treated ARVF due to OASIS were identified. The success of overall management was 91.7%. Female patients underwent a mean of 2.5 (±1.7) procedures. A diverting stoma was formed in 29 patients (48.3%) of which 26 were closed at the end of the management period (89.7%). Of the 148 surgical procedures, only 55 were successful (37.2%). The order of the procedures (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 0.75-2.51) or the diverting stoma (OR = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.31-6.91) were not significantly associated with the success of the surgery. However, Martius flap (OR = 4.13; 95% CI: 1.1-15.54) and Musset procedures (OR = 5.79; 95% CI: 1.77-18.87) produced better results than the endorectal advancement flap (ERAF). The other procedures did not show a significant correlation with management success.

CONCLUSION

A diverting stoma is not mandatory in the management of ARVF due to OASIS to improve the success of the surgical procedure. While the Martius flap procedure offers better results, the ERAF procedure may be preferred as a primary intervention in the absence of sphincter injury as it is less invasive. In cases of residual sphincter injury, the Musset procedure is most likely to be the best option.

Minimally invasive endoscopic repair of rectovaginal fistula

BACKGROUND

Surgical techniques for repair of rectovaginal fistula (RVF) have been continually developed, but the ideal procedure remains unclear. Endoscopic repair is a novel and minimally invasive technique for RVF repair with increasing reporting.

AIM

To review the current applications and preliminary outcomes of this technique for RVF repair, aiming to give surgeons an alternative in clinical practice.

METHODS

Available articles were searched according to the search strategy. And the sample size, fistula etiology, fistula type, endoscopic repair approaches, operative time and hospital stay, follow-up period, complication and life quality assessment were selected for recording and further analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 11 articles were eventually identified, involving 71 patients with RVFs who had undergone endoscopic repair. The principal causes of RVFs were surgery (n = 51, 71.8%), followed by obstetrics (n = 7, 9.8%), inflammatory bowel disease (n = 5, 7.0%), congenital (n = 3, 4.2%), trauma (n = 2, 2.8%), radiation (n = 1, 1.4%), and in two patients, the cause was unclear. Most fistulas were in a mid or low position. Several endoscopic repair methods were included, namely transanal endoscopic microsurgery, endoscopic clipping, and endoscopic stenting. Most patients underwent > 1-year follow-up, and the success rate was 40%-93%, and all cases reported successful closure. Few complications were mentioned, while postoperative quality of life assessment was only mentioned in one study.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, endoscopic repair of RVF is novel, minimally invasive and promising with acceptable preliminary effectiveness. Given its unique advantages, endoscopic repair can be an alternative technique for surgeons.

Rectovaginal Fistula in Women With Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Case Series and Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we present a series of 2 cases of rectovaginal fistula (RVF) due to the use of a ring-type pessary in the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and a literature review on the management of RVF related to the use of pessaries.

METHODS

Two patients were selected from the medical records of the urogynecology service, and their demographic and clinical data were retrieved. An updated literature review was included presenting cases of RVF induced by or after use of a pessary.

RESULTS

Both patients evolved with removal of the pessary and correction of the fistula. The surgical procedures of choice were Le Fort Colpocleisis and posterior colporraphy without major complications. In the literature review, we selected 17 studies with a total of 23 cases reporting RVFs induced or followed by the use of pessaries.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the pessary is commonly indicated for the conservative treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, this device is not exempt from generating complications.

Bartholin's gland abscess a rare cause of rectovaginal fistula: A case report and literature review

Introduction

Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is an abnormal communication between the vagina and the rectum. RVFs caused by Bartholin's gland infection are very rare. We present the case of recurrent rectovaginal fistula complicating a bartholin's gland abcess successfully treated with a Martius flap. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the possibility of complication of bartholin's gland infection by a rectovaginal fistula and the efficacy of Martius flap procedure for recurrent RVF of the low third part of the vagina.

Observation

It is a 30-year-old woman admitted to our department for recurrent RVF due to an abscess of the Bartholin's glands. She was previously treated with a vaginal advancement flap which failed with persistence of the fistula and its symptoms. The patient underwent a RVF repair by Martius flap with complete healing of the fistula.

Discussion

Rectovaginal fistula is a complex pathology with psycho-social, individual, family, religious and ethno-environmental repercussions. Its main aetiologies are obstetric, rectal surgery. Several techniques including the vaginal or anal advancement flap and the Martius flap are used for the treatment of rectovaginal fistulas. For recurrent fistulas, the Martius flap seems to be the most indicated with better results.

Conclusion

Rectovaginal fistula remain a challenge for surgeons and have major psycho-socio-economic repercussions for the patient. The complication of Bartholin's gland infection by rectovaginal fistula is rare. The Martius flap technique is the method of choice for recurrent rectovaginal fistulas of the lower third of the vagina or in association with other pathologies.

•

Recovaginal fistula is a challenge for surgeons.

•

The rectovaginale fistula due to Bartholin’s gland abcess is very rare

•

Care must be taken during the management of this pathology which affetcs 2% of women during their life for avoiding that complication

•

The Martius flap is the method of choice for the treatment of rectovaginale fistula of the low third inferior part of the vagina

Female Pelvic Fistulae

Female pelvic fistulae are a pathologic connection between the urinary or gastrointestinal tract and the genital tract. Although this condition has been present for millennia, successful surgical treatments have only been described for the past few hundred years. In developed nations, the most common cause of genitourinary fistulae is benign gynecologic surgery, but worldwide it is obstetric trauma. Fistulae management is rooted in surgical intervention with the highest probability of success associated with the first repair.

Rectovaginal Fistula Repair 1 Year Later: Lessons Learned

INTRODUCTION

Rectovaginal (RV) fistulas are notoriously difficult to treat. Various methods for repair exist, and refinements in techniques can lead to "successful" outcomes. Review of the literature demonstrates that outcomes studies are scarce and mostly limited to comments on closure rate. We have experienced "success" in our own series with 100% closure rate, regardless of fistula etiology and comorbidities (radiation, inflammation, etc). However, long-term outcomes, including various complications and quality of life changes, have previously been underreported.

METHODS

Critical analysis of various outcomes after fistula repair in 14 patients was performed. Patients were surveyed and interviewed with regard to problems before and after fistula repair to obtain objective data focusing on their experience and outcomes. Conclusions are based on physician assessment and patient surveys 1 year after fistula repair and at least 6 months after ostomy reversal and are discussed within the context of data from the literature.

RESULTS

Overall satisfaction rate after repairs was high. All patients would undergo attempt at repair again regardless of complications or functional changes (not present before repair). After repair, sexual dyspareunia affected 5 patients (36%); however, most abstained from sexual activity when their RV fistula became apparent. No patient admitted to dyspareunia before the development of their RV fistula. Anal sphincter and defecation function, as well as stool continence, were judged by surgeons and patients uniformly as adequate. However, 3 patients (21%) complained of intermittent problems with urination. A new/different type of pain affected 2 of 4 patients with Crohn disease. One of these patients subsequently developed a new postsphincteric RV fistula. Another patient noted new intermittent vaginal discharge after ostomy reversal, and magnetic resonance imaging suggested a residual fistula, which was not seen on follow-up sigmoidoscopy and "Blue Dye Test."

CONCLUSIONS

We previously reported on algorithms for repair and refinements in techniques for "successful" repair of RV fistulas with zero recurrence rate. Long-term follow-up indicates, however, that although the overall satisfaction rate after surgery is high, true "success," defined as permanent fistula closure, is not necessarily problem free. Long-term morbidity and the management of other unique sequelae and problems are underreported.

Stapled transperineal repair for low- and mid-level rectovaginal fistulas: A 5-year experience and comparison with sutured repair

BACKGROUND

Currently, rectovaginal fistula (RVF) continues to be a surgical challenge worldwide, with a relatively low healing rate. Unclosed intermittent suture and poor suture materials may be the main reasons for this.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of stapled transperineal repair in treating RVF.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in the Coloproctology Department of The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China). Adult patients presenting with RVF who were surgically managed by perineal repair between May 2015 and May 2020 were included. Among the 82 total patients, 37 underwent repair with direct suturing and 45 underwent repair with stapling. Patient demographic data, Wexner faecal incontinence score, and operative data were analyzed. Recurrence rate and associated risk factors were assessed.

RESULTS

The direct suture and stapled repair groups showed similar clinical characteristics for aetiology, surgical history, fistula features, and perioperative Wexner score. The stapled repair group did not show superior results over the suture repair group in regard to operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay. However, the stapled repair group showed better postoperative Wexner score (1.04 ± 1.89 vs 2.73 ± 3.75, P = 0.021), less intercourse pain (1/45 vs 17/37, P = 0.045), and lower recurrence rate (6/45 vs 17/37, P = 0.001). There was no protective effect from previous repair history, smaller diameter of fistula (< 0.5 cm), better control of defecation (Wexner < 10), or stapled repair. Direct suture repair and preoperative high Wexner score (> 10) were risk factors for fistula recurrence. Furthermore, stapled repair gave better efficacy in treating complex RVFs (i.e., multiple transperineal repair history, mid-level fistula position, and poor control of defecation).

CONCLUSION

Stapled transperineal repair is advantageous for management of RVF, providing a high primary healing rate and low recurrence rate.

Perioperative Outcomes of Rectovaginal Fistula Repair Based on Surgical Approach: A National Contemporary Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the perioperative outcomes of transvaginal/perineal and abdominal approaches to rectovaginal fistula (RVF) repair using a national multicenter cohort.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was utilized to identify women undergoing RVF repair from 2005 to 2016. Emergent cases and those with concomitant bowel diversion were excluded. Baseline patient demographics, procedure characteristics, 30-day postoperative complications, return to the operating room, and readmission were evaluated. Baseline characteristics were compared across surgical approach. Multivariable logistic regression models identified preoperative characteristics independently associated with postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 2288 women underwent RVF repair: 1560 (68.2%) via transvaginal/perineal approach and 728 (31.8%) via abdominal approach. Patients undergoing transvaginal/perineal repair were significantly younger (median age, 46 years vs 63 years), with lower American Society for Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores, and less frequency of diabetes mellitus, dyspnea, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, disseminated cancer, and bleeding disorders (all P < 0.01). Those undergoing abdominal repair had higher rates of major complications (25.8% vs 8.7%), minor complications (13.5% vs 6.3%), and readmission (13.2% vs 7.8%). On multivariable analyses, ASA Class 3/4, disseminated cancer, and hematocrit <30% (P < 0.01) were associated with major complications in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing RVF repair via abdominal approach were older with more comorbidities and had higher postoperative complications rates, likely secondary to underlying differences in the treated populations. Irrespective of surgical approach, ASA class, disseminated cancer, and preoperative anemia were associated with higher postoperative morbidity. This may enhance preoperative counseling and allow for careful patient selection.

The Management of Complications of Feminizing Gender Affirming Genital Surgery

Penile inversion vaginoplasty is the most common technique used for gender affirming genital surgery in the treatment of gender dysphoria among transwomen. As vaginoplasty becomes more widely available, the management of associated complications has become its own field. There is a relative dearth of literature on surgery for complications following vaginoplasty. This review illustrates surgical technique and management options for patient reported complaints and complications following vaginoplasty. The goal of this manuscript is 2-fold (1) to introduce community surgeons to common postoperative issues they may encounter and (2) provide a systematic operative approach to complications for reconstructive surgeons who see transgender patients regularly.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications of Rectovaginal Fistula Repairs, Based on Different Surgical Routes

OBJECTIVE

To investigate incidence and risk factors for postoperative complications after rectovaginal fistula (RVF) repairs, based on different surgical routes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilized CPT codes to identify RVF repairs performed during 2005 to 2017 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Demographic/clinical characteristics were compared among different surgical routes. Logistic regression was performed to identify associations.

RESULTS

Among 1398 RVF cases, 1391 were included for final analysis: 159 (11.4%) were performed transabdominally (group 1), 253 (18.2%) transperineally (group 2), and 979 (70.4%) transvaginally/transanally (group 3). Group 1 was older compared with groups 2 and 3 (58.72 ± 15.23 years vs 44.11 ± 13.51 years vs 46.23 ± 14.31 years, P < 0.0001). Race/ethnicity was comparable in all groups with non-Hispanic-White most common. Comparably, group 1 had higher preoperative comorbidities: hypertension requiring medication (P < 0.0001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (P = 0.0347), preoperative infection (P = 0.002), functional dependence (P = 0.0001), and longer time between hospital admission to operation (P < 0.0001). Group 1 also had longer operating time (P < 0.0001); more American Society of Anesthesiologist ≥ 3 classification (P < 0.0001); and more likely inpatient status (P < 0.0001). The overall incidence of any postoperative complications was 13.2% (25.2%, group 1 vs 15.8%, group 2 vs 10.6%, group 3; P < 0.0001). The most common postoperative complications included unplanned readmission, postoperative superficial surgical site infection, and reoperation. The incidence of severe postoperative complications was 7.9% (17%, group 1 vs 7.1%, group 2 vs 6.6%, group 3, P < 0.0001): group 1 had highest rates of pulmonary embolism (P = 0.0004), deep venous thrombosis (P = 0.0453), bleeding requiring transfusion (P < 0.0001), stroke (P = 0.0207), unplanned reintubation (P = 0.0052), and death (P = 0.0004). Group 1 also had highest rates of minor postoperative complications like urinary tract infection (P = 0.0151), superficial surgical site infection (P = 0.0189), and pneumonia (P = 0.0103). In addition, group 1 had the greatest postoperative length of stay (P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, age (P = 0.0096), inpatient status at the time of surgery (P = 0.0004), and operating time >2 to 3 hours (P = 0.0023) were significant predictors of postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of complications after RVF repairs+/-concomitant procedures was 13.2%. The overall incidence of severe complications was 7.9%. The abdominal approach had more postoperative complications but it was not an independent predictor of postoperative complications after RVF repair.

Do the Surgical Outcomes of Rectovaginal Fistula Repairs Differ for Obstetric and Nonobstetric Fistulas? A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Rectovaginal fistulas can occur from both obstetric and nonobstetric (eg, inflammatory bowel disease, iatrogenic, or traumatic) etiologies. Current data on factors contributing to rectovaginal repair success or failure are limited, making adequate patient counseling difficult. Our objective was to compare outcomes of transperineal rectovaginal fistula repair performed in a single referral center on women with obstetric and nonobstetric causes.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of women who had a transperineal rectovaginal fistula repair performed by a urogynecologist at the University of Michigan from 2005 to 2015. Data were obtained by chart review and included demographics, medical comorbidities, fistula etiology, history of a prior fistula repair, failure of current repair, time to failure, and operative details. Repair failure was defined as fistula symptoms with presence of recurrent fistula on exam or imaging in the postoperative follow-up period. Comparisons between the obstetric and nonobstetric cohorts were performed using χ, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Relative risks were calculated to identify predictors of failure.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight women were included-53 obstetric and 35 nonobstetric fistulas. The overall fistula repair failure rate was 22.7% (n = 20). Median follow-up was 157.0 days (range, 47.5-402.0). Of all the factors, only nonobstetric etiology was significantly associated with an increased risk of repair failure (relative risk, 3.53 [range, 1.50-8.32]; P = 0.004.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonobstetric rectovaginal fistulas have a nearly 4-fold increased risk of repair failure compared with obstetric fistulas. Our results will help surgeons adequately counsel patients on potential outcomes of surgical repair of obstetric versus nonobstetric rectovaginal fistulas.

Efficacy of autologous fat graft injection in the treatment of anovaginal fistulas

BACKGROUND

Injection of autologous fat is an established method within plastic surgery for soft tissue augmentation. The aim of the present study was to determine whether transperineal fat graft injection could promote healing of anovaginal fistulas.

METHODS

The procedures were performed at the University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway, and at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, between May 2009 and September 2016. After abdominal liposuction, fat was injected around the fistula tract that was finally transected percutaneously with a sharp cannula and fat injected between the cut parts. The internal opening was closed with a suture. Patients had a minimum follow-up of 6 months after last fat graft injection.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven women underwent 48 procedures. The cause of fistula was obstetric (n = 9), abscess (n = 9), Crohn's disease (n = 7), radiation for anal cancer (n = 1) and endoscopic surgery after radiation for rectal cancer (n = 1). The mean amount of injected fat was 73 ml (SD ± 20 ml), and operating time was 63 min (SD ± 21 min). At median follow-up of 20 months (range 6-87 months) after the last injection, fistulas were healed in 21 women (77%), in 8 women after just one procedure. Healing was achieved in 6 of 7 women (86%) with Crohn's disease and in both women who had undergone radiation therapy. One woman developed an abscess and additional trans-sphincteric fistula 8 weeks after injection.

CONCLUSIONS

Fat graft injection for anovaginal fistulas is effective and safe.