Outcomes in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery in Women Using Chronic Antithrombotic Therapy

Perioperative Safety of Bladder Hydrodistention in Patients on Antithrombotic Therapy

IMPORTANCE

Bladder hydrodistention (BH) is commonly used to diagnose and treat patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), but the overall assessment of bleeding complications for patients taking antithrombotics is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to investigate if perioperative complications were more common in patients with IC/BPS receiving antithrombotic therapy after BH.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed patients with IC/BPS who underwent hydrodistention during January 2010 and May 2021. Patients with and without antithrombotic drugs were identified and grouped, and their medical records were reviewed. Perioperative data and symptom scores were assessed. The rates of complications in the 2 groups were recorded at 3 months and at the last visit postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 387 patients were eventually included. Among them, 29 (7.5%) patients were receiving systemic antithrombotic therapy and 358 (92.5%) were not. Compared with the non-antithrombotic group, patients receiving antithrombotic therapy demonstrated a longer hospital stay (P = 0.033) and a longer catheterization time (P = 0.034). Moreover, the patients with antithrombotic drugs had increased odds of bladder tamponade (odds ratio, 6.76; P = 0.019) and urinary retention (odds ratio, 5.79; P = 0.033) both 3 months postoperatively and last follow-up, but this is not statistically different between patients with and without Hunner lesions. No thromboembolic events were identified during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Although a small number of patients with IC/BPS needed anticoagulants, longer hospital stays, longer catheterization time, and increased odds of bladder tamponade and urinary retention were observed in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. Still, a comprehensive management scheme to balance bleeding complications and antithrombotic agents is needed for individuals.

Risky business? Investigating outcomes of patients undergoing urgent laparoscopic appendectomy on antithrombotic therapy

INTRODUCTION

The literature regarding outcomes in patients on irreversible antithrombotic therapy (IAT) undergoing urgent laparoscopic appendectomy is limited. The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to examine the impact of prehospital IAT on outcomes in this population.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2014, seven institutions from the Southwest Surgical Multicenter Trials (SWSC MCT) group conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the clinical course of all patients on IAT who underwent urgent/emergent laparoscopic appendectomy. The IAT+ group was subdivided into IAT+ (Aspirin only) and IAT+ (Aspirin-Plavix). These groups were matched 1:1 to controls. The primary outcomes were estimated blood loss (EBL) and transfusion requirement. Secondary outcomes included infections (SSI - Surgical Site Infection, DSI - Deep Space Infection, and OSI - Organ Space Infection), hospital length of stay (HLOS), complications, 30-day readmissions, and mortality.

RESULTS

Out of the 2903 patients included in the study, 287 IAT+ patients were identified and matched in a 1:1 ratio to 287 IAT-patients. In the IAT+ vs IAT-analysis, no significant differences in EBL (p = 1.0), transfusion requirement during the preoperative (p = 0.5), intraoperative (p = 0.3) or postoperative periods (p = 0.5), infectious complications (SSI; p = 1.0, DSI; p = 1.0, and OSI; p = 0.1), overall complications (p = 0.3), HLOS (p = 0.7), 30-day readmission (p = 0.3), or mortality (p = 0.1) were noted. Similarly, outcomes in the IAT+ (Aspirin only) and IAT+ (Aspirin-Plavix) subgroups failed to demonstrate any significant differences when compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that IAT is not associated with worse outcomes in urgent/emergent laparoscopic appendectomy. Prehospital use of IAT should not be used to delay laparoscopic appendectomy.