Trends in Fellowship Training for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

Case log trends of urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery fellows: A comparison of urology- and gynecology-based fellowship programs

AIMS

Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) fellowship can be pursued after completion of either a urology (URO) or obstetrics and gynecology (GYN) residency. Our aim is to determine differences in graduating fellow cohort (GFC) case logs between URO- and GYN-based URPS programs.

METHODS

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs for URPS GFCs in both GYN- and URO-based programs were analyzed for the 2019-2023 academic years (AY). Unpaired t-tests with Welch's correction were used to compare annual mean logged cases between URO- versus GYN-based GFCs for select surgical categories and the top 11 most logged index cases.

RESULTS

GYN-based GFCs logged more cases for all pelvic organ prolapse (POP) categories including surgery on apical POP, anterior wall POP, and posterior wall POP (all p < 0.01), while URO-based GFCs logged more cases for surgery on the urinary system (p = 0.03). For the top 11 logged procedures, URO-based GFCs logged more sacral neuromodulation cases (p = 0.02), whereas GYN-based GFCs logged more slings, vaginal hysterectomies, minimally-invasive hysterectomies, vaginal apical POP, vaginal posterior POP, vaginal anterior POP, and minimally-invasive apical POP cases (all p < 0.01). There was no difference between URO- and GYN-based GFCs for complex urodynamics, cystoscopy with botox injection, or periurethral injection cases.

CONCLUSIONS

URO-based URPS fellows tend to graduate with more surgery on the urinary system and sacral neuromodulation cases, while GYN-based fellows perform more slings, hysterectomies, and POP surgery. These findings may help fellowships better understand potential differences in training among graduates from URO- and GYN-based programs and encourage collaboration to lessen these discrepancies.

Current exposure to Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery faculty during urology residency

INTRODUCTION

Contemporary US resident exposure to Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) faculty during urology residency is unknown.

METHODS

Accredited US urology residencies were identified through the American Urological Association (AUA). Accredited, urology-based FPMRS fellowships were identified through the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction. The number of faculty and residency positions were obtained from program AUA profiles if they were last modified within the current application cycle; this information was obtained from program websites if AUA profiles were outdated. Data on faculty fellowship training was manually extracted from program websites. A quality control cross-check of program and faculty training characteristics was performed through direct communication with 5% of programs.

RESULTS

Of 139 accredited residency programs assessed, 10.8% were affiliated with an accredited, urology-based FPMRS fellowship. In total, 29.5% of residency programs, representing 25% of US urology residents, had neither a FPMRS fellowship nor any FPMRS certified faculty. The national FPMRS faculty-to-resident ratio was 1:10.8, and 7.4% of faculty at all residency programs were FPMRS certified. In comparison, faculty-to-resident ratios for other subspecialties were: 1:4.7 for pediatrics, 1:3.6 for oncology, 1:5.9 for minimally invasive surgery/endourology, 1:14.2 for trauma/reconstruction, and 1:11.8 for andrology or male sexual/reproductive health. The FPMRS faculty-to-resident ratio was 1:5.1 in programs with a urology-based FPMRS fellowship compared with 1:13.4 in programs without a FPMRS fellowship.

CONCLUSIONS

30% of US urology residency programs lack FPMRS trained faculty. Even when FPMRS faculty are on staff, the field is often underrepresented relative to other urologic subspecialties. Further studies are required to ascertain if inadequate exposure to FPMRS cases and mentors during training contribute to the shortage of urology residents who choose to specialize in FPMRS. This link has important implications for the current shortage of FPMRS providers.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Genitourinary Tract Injury Within 1 Year After Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

IMPORTANCE

The rate of genitourinary tract injury (GUTI) following pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery is presently ill-defined and based on relatively small trials with short follow-up time. Given the potential for higher risk of injury with POP, a better understanding of this type of injury is important for patient counseling.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors of GUTI related to POP surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Women undergoing POP surgery between 2010 and 2019 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes in the Premier Healthcare Database. The primary outcome was GUTI, defined as bladder or ureteral injury, and vesicovaginal or ureterovaginal fistula within 1 year of surgery. Genitourinary tract injury was identified using International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were divided into those with and without GUTI. Differences between groups were evaluated using the Student t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Fisher exact test as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent predictors of GUTI.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine thousand one hundred fifty-eight surgical procedures for POP were captured between 2010 and 2019. The rate of GUTI was 1.10%: 0.48% bladder, 0.64% ureteral injuries, and 0.01% fistulas. The most significant variables associated with any GUTI were as follows: adhesiolysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-6.51), blood transfusion (aOR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.34-10.04), and low-volume surgeons (<12 cases per year) (aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.60-1.77), nonurologic or gynecologic surgeon specialty (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.49-2.00), and uterosacral suspension (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.13-1.49).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of GUTI following POP surgery is lower than has previously been reported. Surgeon experience and specialty and surgical approach may affect GUTI incidence.

Trends Among Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Fellowships and Graduates

IMPORTANCE

Understanding differences in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) urology and gynecology-based fellowships is important because both are accredited by the American Board of Medical Subspecialties.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to characterize urology-based and gynecology-based FPMRS fellowships.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An institutional review board-approved 21-item survey was emailed to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited FPMRS fellowship program directors from January 8 through March 9, 2021. The survey aimed to characterize fellowships through a series of common and specialty-specific questions. Responses were collected with Qualtrics and analyzed using STATA/MP Version 16.1.

RESULTS

The response rate was 75% (52/69). Many programs accept both gynecology- and urology-trained applicants (urology-based fellowships, 45.4%; gynecology-based fellowships, 68.3%) since the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education accreditation in 2012. Within the gynecology-based cohort, there have been 10 urology-trained graduates among 7 programs (n = 1-2). Barriers to accepting urology applicants were limited gynecologic knowledge/experience (n = 14) and length of training (n = 11). Thirty-seven (94.8%) reported their graduates log more than 30 hysterectomies and 8.3% (n = 3) log 3 or more urinary diversions.Within the urology-based cohort, there have been 16 gynecology-trained graduates among 4 programs (n = 2-7). Lack of urologic clinical knowledge (n = 4) and training length (n = 2) were cited as barriers to accepting gynecology-trained applicants. Three (27%) reported that their graduates log more than 30 hysterectomies, while 8 (72.7%) reported that graduates log 3 or more urinary diversions.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite many FPMRS programs stating that they accept gynecology or urology-trained applicants, few fellows graduate from outside specialty FPMRS training programs. Several barriers were identified that may prevent trainees acceptance outside of their residency specialty. Procedural training experience differs between urology- and gynecology-based fellowships.

Trends in Surgical Exposure and Experience in Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Fellowship Programs

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to characterize variations in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery (FPMRS) fellows' surgical experiences, concurrence with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) proposed procedural volume guidelines, and to explore how these factors affect self-assessed preparedness to practice independently upon graduation.

METHODS

An electronic survey was sent to 166 fellows enrolled in ACGME-approved FPMRS fellowship programs during the 2017-2018 academic year. The survey included questions on demographics, program specifics, desires for future practice, case volume, and self-assessed ability to independently perform selected procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 99 fellows responded, yielding a 59.6% (99/166) response rate. Procedures assessed as "core" urogynecologic surgeries were midurethral sling, sacral nerve stimulator placement, abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, extraperitoneal colpopexy, intraperitoneal colpopexy, anterior colporrhaphy, posterior colporrhaphy, colpocleisis, rectovaginal fistula repair, vesicovaginal fistula repair, and urethral diverticulectomy. The percentage of third-year respondents meeting proposed ACGME guidelines varied from 56.3% (18/32; sling procedures) to 96.9% (31/32; intraperitoneal colpopexy and rectovaginal fistula repair). Although 67.7% (67/99) of all respondents reported that they did not expect to feel qualified to perform at least one of these procedures independently upon graduation from fellowship, 99.0% (98/99) predicted that they would be adequately trained overall to practice independently upon graduation.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical experience varied among FMPRS surgical fellows. Case volume was somewhat but not completely associated with self-perceived ability to practice a procedure independently.