Does the Degree of Cystocele Predict De Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence After Prolapse Repair? Further Analysis of the Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts Trial

Changes in Stress Urinary Incontinence Symptoms after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: a Nationwide Cohort Study (FINPOP)

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Various strategies are employed to manage stress urinary incontinence (SUI) during pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery. This study was aimed at facilitating shared decision-making by evaluating SUI symptom changes, staged SUI procedures, and their prognostic factors following POP surgery without concomitant SUI intervention.

METHODS

We analyzed 2,677 POP surgeries from a population-based observational cohort, excluding patients with prior SUI surgery. The outcome measures were subjective SUI utilizing the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 questionnaire and number of subsequent SUI procedures. Multivariable linear models were applied to identify predictors of persistent SUI, procedures for persistent SUI, and de novo SUI. The primary assessment occurred at the 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

At baseline, 50% (1,329 out of 2,677) experienced SUI; 35% (354 out of 1,005) resolved, an additional 14% (140 out 1,005) improved, and 5.1% (67 out of 1,308) underwent a procedure for persistent SUI. De novo SUI symptoms developed in 20% (218 out of 1,087), with 3.2% (35 out of 1,087) reporting bothersome symptoms; 0.8% (11 out of 1,347) underwent a procedure for de novo SUI. High baseline symptom severity increased the risk of persistent SUI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-2.53), whereas advanced preoperative apical prolapse decreased the risk (aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.93). De novo SUI was more common with advancing age (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05), baseline urgency urinary incontinence (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.06-1.38), and after transvaginal mesh surgery (aOR 1.93, 95% CI 1.24-3.00). It was not dependent on the compartment or preoperative degree of prolapse.

CONCLUSIONS

In a pragmatic setting, POP surgery results in a low rate of subsequent SUI procedures.

Incidence of de novo stress urinary incontinence following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of postoperative de novo stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in stress-continent women following minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy without an anti-incontinence procedure.

METHODS

We completed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of women undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without concurrent anti-incontinence procedures from October 2006 through January 2021.

RESULTS

Of the 169 women who underwent minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, 17.1% (n=30) developed de novo SUI, and 7.1% eventually underwent a midurethral sling placement. On logistic regression, BMI, preoperative urinary urgency, and history of transvaginal mesh repair were found to be significantly associated with and predictive of de novo SUI. When the concordance index (C-index) was calculated with the model published by Jelovsek et al. for women who developed de novo SUI within 12 months of the prolapse surgery, the current de novo SUI calculator was able to discriminate de novo SUI outcome (C-index = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of de novo SUI after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy without anti-incontinence procedure correlates directly with higher BMI, preoperative urinary urgency, and transvaginal mesh history for POP. Preoperative counseling for minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy should include discussing the risk of de novo SUI and preoperative factors that may increase this risk.

Severity of cystocele and risk factors of postoperative stress urinary incontinence after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse

Objectives:

Materials and Methods:

Results:

Conclusion:

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Paravaginal Repair and Sacrocolpopexy in Patients with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the surgical effects of robotic paravaginal repair and sacrocolpopexy in patients diagnosed with lateral cystocele due to paravaginal defect.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Robotic paravaginal repair and sacrocolpopexy were performed contemporaneously in 43 patients with high-grade pelvic organ prolapse combined with a lateral or mixed cystocele. To objectively evaluate prolapse correction, the POP-Q test was performed at the 12-month visit and the results compared to those of the preoperative period. Subjective satisfaction was scored using the PGI-I questionnaire.

RESULTS

POP-Q measurement results before and after surgery, an objective indicator of surgery, the Ba and C scores improved significantly from 2.1 ± 1.2 preoperatively to -2.0 ± 1.1 postoperatively (p<0.01), and from 0.3 ± 1.3 preoperatively to -4.3 ± 1.1 postoperatively (p<0.01), respectively. In PGI-I questionnaire, the numbers of patients who awarded scores of 1 and 2 (evidencing high-level symptom improvement) were 33 at 1 month (76.7%), 30 at 3 months (69.8%), and 28 (65.1%) at 12 months. When respondents awarding 3 points (a little improvement) were included, the numbers rose to 38 (88.4%) at 1 and 3 months and 35 (81.4%) at 12 months, indicating satisfaction with symptom improvement. There were no critical complications during and after surgery, but complications such as de novo SUI that lower patient satisfaction occurred in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted paravaginal repair and sacrocolpopexy can be safely performed in patients with cystocele-predominant pelvic organ prolapse and good surgical results can be expected with excellent effects.

Development and validation of a prediction model for bothersome stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a prediction model for bothersome stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery and to compare it with an existing clinical prediction model (CUPIDO model).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two tertiary hospitals in South Korea.

POPULATION

A total of 1142 patients who underwent prolapse surgery with or without a concomitant midurethral sling.

METHODS

To construct a prediction model, we performed logistic regression using both exhaustive and stepwise variable selection, validating the model both internally and externally.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Bothersome stress urinary incontinence defined as the presence of bothersome symptoms of stress urinary incontinence and/or subsequent continence procedure one year after surgery.

RESULTS

Postoperative bothersome stress urinary incontinence occurred in 10% of patients. A model containing six predictors (age, diabetes mellitus, subjective urinary incontinence, prolapse reduction stress test result, type of prolapse surgery, and a concomitant midurethral sling) showed excellent performance for predicting bothersome stress urinary incontinence (area under the curve 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.86) and outperformed the CUPIDO model (area under the curve 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.76; DeLong's test P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

This prediction model might be a useful tool to guide patient decision making regarding a concomitant continence procedure at the time of prolapse surgery. The predictive value of this model needs to be validated further in cohorts with different characteristics.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

The proposed prediction model for bothersome stress urinary incontinence after prolapse surgery outperforms an existing model.

Clinical Guidelines for Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (second edition)

The present article is an abridged English translation of the Japanese Clinical Guidelines for Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (second edition), published in September 2019. These guidelines consist of a total of 212 pages and are unique worldwide in that they cover female lower urinary tract symptoms other than urinary incontinence. They contain two algorithms for "primary treatment" and "specialized treatment," respectively. These guidelines, consisting of six chapters, address a total of 26 clinical questions including: (i) treatment algorithms; (ii) what are female lower urinary tract symptoms?; (iii) epidemiology and quality of life; (iv) pathology and illness; (v) diagnosis; and (vi) treatment. When the patient's symptoms mainly involve voiding and post-micturition symptoms, specialized treatment should be considered. In the event of voiding symptoms concurrent with storage symptoms, residual urine should be measured; if the residual urine volume is <100 mL, then diagnosis and treatment for storage symptoms is prioritized, and if the volume is ≥100 mL, then specialized treatment should be considered. When storage symptoms are the primary condition, then the patient is subject to the primary treatment algorithm. Specialized treatment for refractory overactive bladder includes botulinum toxin injection and sacral nerve stimulation. For stress urinary incontinence, surgical treatment is indicated, such as urethral slings. The two causes of voiding symptoms and post-micturition symptoms are lower urinary tract obstruction and detrusor underactivity (underactive bladder). Mechanical lower urinary tract obstruction, such as pelvic organ prolapse, is expected to improve with surgery.

Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse

The multifactorial pathophysiology of pelvic floor disorder accounts for the coexistence of several pelvic floor disorders in many women. Up to 54% of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) report concurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI). While POP is a risk factor for coexistent SUI, apical and anterior prolapse can also conceal SUI symptoms that are unmasked by POP repair, resulting in de novo SUI postoperatively. It is important for pelvic reconstructive surgeons to consider the relationship between POP and urinary incontinence in presurgical planning and to discuss with patients the risks and advantages of concurrent versus staged anti-incontinence procedures.

The effect of preoperative pelvic floor muscle training on urinary and colorectal-anal distress in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery-a randomized controlled trial

Introduction and hypothesis

Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) improves urinary incontinence and mild pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative PFMT on urinary and colorectal-anal distress and related quality of life (QoL) in women with severe POP scheduled for surgery.

Methods

Randomized controlled trial of 159 women scheduled for POP surgery (intervention = 81, controls = 78). Intervention consisted of daily PFMT from inclusion to the day of surgery. Symptoms and QoL were assessed at inclusion, day of surgery and 6 months postoperatively using the Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6), Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8), Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ) and Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ) (range 0–100). Mixed model statistical analyses were used.

Results

One hundred fifty-one (95%) women completed the study (intervention = 75, controls = 76). Mean waiting times until surgery and follow-up were 22 and 28 weeks. There was no difference in mean postoperative symptom and QoL scores (95% CI) between the intervention and control group: UDI-6 16 (12–21) vs. 17 (13–22), CRADI-8 15 (11–18) vs. 13 (10–16), UIQ 11 (7–15) vs. 10 (6–13) and CRAIQ 5 (2–7) vs. 6 (4–9), all p > 0.05. Overall mean scores were reduced from baseline to postoperative follow-up: UDI-6 37 (33–41) vs. 17 (14–20), CRADI-8 22 (19–25) vs. 14 (11–16); UIQ 28 (24–32) vs. 10 (7–13) and CRAIQ 16 (12–19) vs. 5 (3–7), all p < 0.01.

Conclusions

We found no added effect of preoperative PFMT on symptoms or QoL related to urinary and colorectal-anal distress in women scheduled for POP surgery. They achieved symptomatic improvement postoperatively regardless of PFMT.

Clinical trial registration

The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov: NCT 03,064,750.

Determining the risk factors and characteristics of de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common problem in women that affects their quality of life. According to the current evidence, 15%-50% of severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries lead to de novo urinary incontinence (UI). This study aimed at determining the risk factors and characteristics of de novo SUI after POP surgeries in a systematic review.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of articles in English related to the risk of UI after POP surgery published until December 2019 in the selected bibliographic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest.

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 2,363 studies, and after reviewing the titles and abstracts, 146 studies were identified. Moreover, 2 independent reviewers, using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists, evaluated the risk of biases in the selected studies. Finally, 40 studies met the inclusion criteria. The most important predictors of UI after POP surgery were positive pessary testing, age >50 years, and maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) <60 cmH₂O.

CONCLUSION

Positive pessary testing, older age, and low MUCP were the most important risk factors for de novo incontinence after POP surgeries.

Robotic-assisted repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a scoping review of the literature

The purpose of this article is to perform a scoping review of the medical literature regarding the efficacy, safety, and cost of robotic-assisted procedures for repair of pelvic organ prolapse in females. Sacrocolpopexy is the “gold standard” repair for apical prolapse for those who desire to maintain their sexual function, and minimally-invasive approaches offer similar efficacy with fewer risks than open techniques. The introduction of robotic technology has significantly impacted the field, converting what would have been a large number of open abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) procedures to a minimally-invasive approach in the United States. Newer techniques such as nerve-sparing dissection at the sacral promontory, use of the iliopectineal ligaments and natural orifice vaginal sacrocolpopexy may improve patient outcomes. Prolapse recurrence is consistently noted in at least 10% of patients regardless of route of mesh placement. Ancillary factors including pre-operative prolapse stage, retention of the cervix, type of mesh implant, and genital hiatus (GH) size all adversely affect surgical efficacy, while trainees do not. Minimally-invasive apical repair procedures are suited to early recovery after surgery protocols but may not be appropriate for all patients. Studies evaluating longer-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexies are needed to understand the relative risk/benefit ratio of this technique. With several emerging robotic platforms with improved features and a focus on decreasing costs, the future of robotics seems bright.

Anterior-Apical Transvaginal Mesh (Surelift) for Advanced Urogenital Prolapse: Surgical and Functional Outcomes at 1 Year

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the objective and subjective outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery using a modified Surelift system (Neomedic International, Barcelona, Spain) and to evaluate surgical complications and postoperative impact on quality of life (QOL) and lower urinary tract symptoms.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care university hospital.

PATIENTS

Patients with symptomatic anterior or apical POP stage III and above.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery with a modified Surelift transvaginal mesh kit.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-three women who underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery with a modified Surelift for symptomatic anterior or apical prolapse stage III and above from April 2018 to January 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. All completed a 72-hour voiding diary, urodynamic study, and multiple validated QOL questionnaires at baseline and at between 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Descriptive statistics were used for demographics and perioperative data. Paired-samples t test and the McNemar test were applied for comparison of pre- and postoperative continuous and categoric data, respectively. The primary outcomes were the objective cure of POP, defined as anterior and apical prolapse Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System ≤ stage I, and subjective cure on the basis of negative answers to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory 6. The objective and subjective cure rates at 1 year were 97.6% and 92.8%, respectively. There were significant improvements in QOL scores postoperatively. Although bladder outlet obstruction improved, de novo urodynamic stress incontinence and stress urinary incontinence were increased at 18.9% and 21.6%, respectively, at 1-year follow-up. The mesh extrusion rate was 4.8%.

CONCLUSION

A modified Surelift has good objective and subjective cure rates at 1 year postoperatively with 4.8% mesh extrusion rate. There was significant improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms and QOL. De novo urodynamic stress incontinence at 6 months to 12 months was increased, but it was not sufficiently bothersome to warrant surgery.

Balancing the possibility of needing a future incontinence procedure versus a future urethral sling revision surgery: a tradeoff analysis for continent women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Although urinary incontinence surgery has potential benefits such as preventing de novo stress urinary incontinence in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery, it comes with the potential cost of overtreatment and complications. We compared future surgery rates in a population cohort of women undergoing vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

METHODS

All women undergoing POP repair in California from 2005 to 2011 were identified from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development databases. Rates of repeat surgery in those with and without concomitant urethral sling procedures were compared. To control for confounding effects, multivariate mixed effects logistic regression models were constructed to compare each woman's individualized risk of undergoing either sling revision surgery or future incontinence surgery.

RESULTS

In the cohort, 38,456 underwent a sling procedure at the time of POP repair and 42,858 did not. The future surgery rate was higher for sling-related complications in the POP + sling cohort compared with future incontinence surgery in the POP alone cohort (3.5% versus 3.0% respectively, p < 0.001). The difference persisted in multivariate modeling, where most women (60%) are at a higher risk of requiring sling revision surgery compared with needing a future primary incontinence procedure (40%).

CONCLUSIONS

Women who undergo vaginal prolapse repair without an incontinence procedure are at a low risk of future incontinence surgery. Women without urinary incontinence who are considering vaginal POP surgery should be informed of the risks and benefits of including a sling procedure.