Does Rectocele on Defecography Equate to Rectocele on Physical Examination in Patients With Defecatory Symptoms?

Assessment of manometric results following posterior pericervical repair or level I to III surgical procedures

Constipation and obstructive bowel disorders are the most common symptoms of prolapse and posterior defects. Prolapse and obstructive defecation disorders are treated using various surgical techniques to repair posterior defects. This study aimed to evaluate the manometry results of patients before and after reconstructive surgery of the posterior compartment. This retrospective cohort study included 40 women with defecation disorders referred to the Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, an academic center affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, from 2020 to 2021. Data were collected through medical records and a checklist developed by the researcher before and after surgery. All analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 26), with significance at p<0.05. Forty women with a mean age of 49.47±9.66 years participated in this study. The manometry results showed significant differences in patients before and after surgery in parameters such as maximum resting pressure, push test, constipation, straining during defecation, finger support necessity, sensation of incomplete defecation, dyspareunia, and husband's sexual satisfaction (p<0.001). In addition, all patients had a grade 2 or higher posterior compartment prolapse, which improved in all cases after surgery (p<0.0001). Patients' symptoms significantly improved during the 12-month follow-up after DeLancey level 3 to 1 surgery. This type of surgery proved to be an effective surgical intervention without significant complications in the short-term follow-up.

[Imaging of the pelvic floor (MR defecography) : The surgeon's perspective]

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance defecography (MRD) plays a central role in diagnosing pelvic floor functional disorders by visualizing the entire pelvic floor along with pelvic organs and providing functional assessment of the defecation process. A shared understanding between radiology and surgery regarding indications and interpretation of findings is crucial for optimal utilization of MRD.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to explain the indications for MRD from a surgical perspective and elucidate the significance of radiological findings for treatment. It intends to clarify for which symptoms MRD is appropriate and which criteria should be followed for standardized results. This is prerequisite to develop interdisciplinary therapeutic approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted, including current consensus guidelines.

RESULTS

MRD can provide relevant findings in the diagnosis of fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation syndrome, particularly in cases of pelvic floor descent, enterocele, intussusception, and pelvic floor dyssynergia. However, rectocele findings in MRD should be interpreted with caution in order to avoid overdiagnosis.

CONCLUSION

MRD findings should never be considered in isolation but rather in conjunction with patient history, clinical examination, and symptomatology since morphology and functional complaints may not always correlate, and there is wide variance of normal values. Interdisciplinary interpretation of MRD results involving radiology, surgery, gynecology, and urology, preferably in the context of pelvic floor conferences, is recommended.

Rectocele: Correlation Between Defecography and Physical Examination

IMPORTANCE

There is a lack of consensus regarding the clinical applicability of fluoroscopic defecography in evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to evaluate the association between rectocele on defecography and posterior vaginal wall prolapse (PVWP) on physical examination. The secondary objective was to describe radiologic and clinical predictors of surgical intervention and outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective review of patients enrolled in a large health maintenance organization who underwent defecography and were examined by a urogynecologist within 12 months. The electronic medical record was reviewed for demographic and clinical variables, including pelvic organ prolapse and defecatory symptoms, physical examination, and surgical intervention through 12 months after initial urogynecologic examination or 12 months after surgery if applicable.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Of those, 168 (90.3%) had a rectocele on defecography and 31 (16.6%) had PVWP at or beyond the hymen. Rectocele size on defecography was poorly correlated with PVWP stage (spearman ρ = 0.18). Forty patients underwent surgical intervention. Symptoms of splinting, digitation, and stool trapping were associated with surgical intervention (odds ratio, 4.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-11.34; P < 0.01) as was advanced PVWP stage ( P < 0.01), while rectocele presence and size on defecography were not. Large rectocele size on defecography was correlated with persistent postoperative defecatory symptoms ( P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated a poor correlation between rectocele size on defecography and PVWP stage. Defecatory symptoms (splinting, digitation, stool trapping) and higher PVWP stage were associated with surgical intervention, while rectocele on defecography was not.

Rectocele: Incidental or important? Observe or operate? Contemporary diagnosis and management in the multidisciplinary era

BACKGROUND

More common in older women than younger women, rectoceles may be secondary to pelvic floor weakness and/or pelvic floor dysfunction with impaired rectal evacuation. Rectoceles may be small (<2 cm), medium (2-4 cm), or large (>4 cm). Arguably, large rectoceles are more likely to be associated with symptoms (e.g., difficult defecation). It can be challenging to ascertain the extent to which a rectocele is secondary to pelvic floor dysfunction and/or whether a rectocele, rather than associated pelvic floor dysfunction, is responsible for symptoms. Surgical repair should be considered when initial treatment measures (e.g., bowel modifying agents and pelvic floor biofeedback therapy) are unsuccessful.

PURPOSE

We summarize the clinical features, diagnosis, and management of rectoceles, with an emphasis on outcomes after surgical repair. This review accompanies a retrospective analysis of outcomes after multidisciplinary, transvaginal rectocele repair procedures undertaken by three colorectal surgeons in 215 patients at a large teaching hospital in the UK. A majority of patients had a large rectocele. Some patients also underwent an anterior levatorplasty and/or an enterocele repair. All patients were jointly assessed, and some patients underwent surgery by colorectal and urogynecologic surgeons. In this cohort, the perioperative data, efficacy, and harms outcomes are comparable with historical data predominantly derived from retrospective series in which patients had a good outcome (67%-78%), symptoms of difficult defecation improved (30%-50%), and patients had a recurrent rectocele 2 years after surgery (17%). Building on these data, prospective studies that rigorously evaluate outcomes after surgical repair are necessary.

Rectoceles: Is There a Correlation Between Presence of Vaginal Prolapse and Radiographic Findings in Symptomatic Women?

BACKGROUND

Constipation is highly prevalent. Women with constipation are evaluated for the presence of vaginal prolapse that may contribute to obstructed defecation syndrome. Defecography can identify anatomic causes of obstructed defecation syndrome (rectocele, intussusception, and enterocele).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the characteristics of women with obstructed defecation syndrome and radiographic rectoceles with and without posterior vaginal wall prolapse and to characterize the relationship between anatomical abnormalities and dysfunction.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective case-control study of women with obstructed defecation syndrome who had radiographic rectoceles on defecography.

SETTINGS

Women who presented to a Pelvic Floor Disorders Center were included.

PATIENTS

Cases were defined as constipated women with radiographic rectoceles and at least stage II posterior vaginal wall prolapse on examination. Controls were patients with radiographic rectoceles but without posterior vaginal wall prolapse on examination.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient characteristics, anorectal testing results, and validated questionnaires were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 106 women met inclusion criteria. Women with posterior vaginal wall prolapse (48 (45.3%)) had larger rectoceles on defecography than women without it on examination (3.4 cm vs 3.0 cm, p < 0.01). Women with posterior vaginal wall prolapse on examination were more likely to splint during defecation than women without vaginal wall prolapse (63.8% vs 27.3%, p < 0.01). All other defecatory symptoms, anorectal manometry parameters, and questionnaire responses were similar between groups.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective study design. Our data were taken from a single institution within a center specializing in the treatment of pelvic floor disorders, potentially limiting generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with constipation, radiographic rectoceles, and vaginal prolapse may differ from those without evidence of prolapse. Patients with vaginal prolapse were more likely to splint to aide evacuation and demonstrated larger rectoceles on defecography. Further studies are needed to determine whether constipation causes progression along this continuum or whether progression of prolapse is a cause of worsening defecatory dysfunction. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B626.

RECTOCELES EXISTE UNA CORRELACIN ENTRE LA PRESENCIA DE PROLAPSO VAGINAL Y LOS HALLAZGOS RADIOLGICOS EN MUJERES SINTOMTICAS

ANTECEDENTES:El estreñimiento es una enfermedad muy prevalente. Las mujeres con estreñimiento se evalúan para detectar la presencia de prolapso vaginal que pueda contribuir al síndrome de defecación obstructiva. La defecografía puede identificar las causas anatómicas del síndrome de defecación obstructiva (rectocele, invaginación intestinal (intususcepción) y enterocele).OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar las características de las mujeres con síndrome de defecación obstructiva y la presencia de rectocele como hallazgo radiológico, con y sin prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior, y caracterizar la relación entre las anomalías anatómicas y la presencia de disfunción.DISEÑO:Este es un estudio retrospectivo de casos y controles, de mujeres con síndrome de defecación obstructiva, que tenían rectocele como hallazgo radiológico en una defecografía.MARCO:Mujeres que acudieron a un Centro de Trastornos del Piso Pélvico.PACIENTES:Los casos fueron definidos como mujeres con estreñimiento con hallazgos radiológicos de rectocele, con al menos un prolapso estadio II de la pared vaginal posterio, en el examen físico. Los controles fueron pacientes con solo rectocele por hallazgos radiológicos, sin prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior en el examen físico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se compararon entre los grupos: las características de las pacientes, los resultados de las pruebas diagnósticas anorrectales y los cuestionarios validados.RESULTADOS:Un total de 106 mujeres cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Las mujeres con prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior 48 (45,3%) tenían rectoceles de mayor tamaño en la defecografía en comparación con las mujeres sin rectocele en el examen físico (3,4 cm versus 3,0 cm, p <0,01). Las mujeres con prolapso de la pared vaginal posterior en el examen, tenían una mayor probabilidad de que les fuera necesario ejercer una maniobra de presión manual o digital del periné durante la defecación, comparado con las mujeres sin rectocele clínico (63,8% versus 27,3%, p <0,01). Todos los demás síntomas defecatorios, los parámetros de la manometría anorrectal, y las respuestas al cuestionario fueron similares entre los grupos.LIMITACIONES:Estudio retrospectivo. Los datos fueron obtenidos de la base de datos de un centro especializado en el tratamiento de los trastornos del piso pélvico lo que potencialmente limita generalizar.CONCLUSIONES:Las pacientes con estreñimiento, rectocele como hallazgo radiológico, y prolapso vaginal pueden ser diferentes de aquellas sin evidencia de prolapso. Las pacientes con prolapso vaginal, tenían una mayor probabilidad de que les fuera necesario ejercer maniobras manuales o digitales de presión a nivel del periné para ayudar a la evacuación, y tenían rectoceles de mayor tamaño en la defecografía. Se necesitan más estudios para determinar si el estreñimiento causa que el rectocele aumente progresivamente de tamaño, empeorando la disfunción defecatoria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B626.

Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders: Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons

The Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium (PFDC) is a multidisciplinary organization of colorectal surgeons, urogynecologists, urologists, gynecologists, gastroenterologists, radiologists, physiotherapists, and other advanced care practitioners. Specialists from these fields are all dedicated to the diagnosis and management of patients with pelvic floor conditions, but they approach, evaluate, and treat such patients with their own unique perspectives given the differences in their respective training. The PFDC was formed to bridge gaps and enable collaboration between these specialties. The goal of the PFDC is to develop and evaluate educational programs, create clinical guidelines and algorithms, and promote high quality of care in this unique patient population. The recommendations included in this article represent the work of the PFDC Working Group on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pelvic Floor Disorders (members listed alphabetically in Table 1). The objective was to generate inclusive, rather than prescriptive, guidance for all practitioners, irrespective of discipline, involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients with pelvic floor disorders.