Compliance With Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy in Patients Diagnosed With High-Tone Pelvic Floor Disorders

A Treatment Algorithm for High-Tone Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence- and consensus-based clinical practice guidelines for management of high-tone pelvic floor dysfunction (HTPFD). High-tone pelvic floor dysfunction is a neuromuscular disorder of the pelvic floor characterized by non-relaxing pelvic floor muscles, resulting in lower urinary tract and defecatory symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic pain. Despite affecting 80% of women with chronic pelvic pain, there are no uniformly accepted guidelines to direct the management of these patients.

METHODS

A Delphi method of consensus development was used, comprising three survey rounds administered anonymously via web-based platform (Qualtrics XM) to national experts in the field of HTPFD recruited through targeted invitation between September and December 2021. Eleven experts participated with backgrounds in urology, urogynecology, minimally invasive gynecology, and pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) participated. Panelists were asked to rate their agreement with rated evidence-based statements regarding HTPFD treatment. Statements reaching consensus were used to generate a consensus treatment algorithm.

RESULTS

A total of 31 statements were reviewed by group members at the first Delphi round with 10 statements reaching consensus. 28 statements were reposed in the second round with 17 reaching consensus. The putative algorithm met clinical consensus in the third round. There was universal agreement for PFPT as first-line treatment for HTPFD. If satisfactory symptom improvement is reached with PFPT, the patient can be discharged with a home exercise program. If no improvement after PFPT, second-line options include trigger or tender point injections, vaginal muscle relaxants, and cognitive behavioral therapy, all of which can also be used in conjunction with PFPT. Onabotulinumtoxin A injections should be used as third line with symptom assessment after 2-4 weeks. There was universal agreement that sacral neuromodulation is fourth-line intervention. The largest identified barrier to care for these patients is access to PFPT. For patients who cannot access PFPT, experts recommend at-home, guided pelvic floor relaxation, self-massage with vaginal wands, and virtual PFPT visits.

CONCLUSION

A stepwise approach to the treatment of HTPFD is recommended, with patients often necessitating multiple lines of treatment either sequentially or in conjunction. However, PFPT should be offered first line.

Triangulation of a Needs Assessment on High-Tone Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

IMPORTANCE

High-tone pelvic floor dysfunction is a complex condition that is challenging to manage effectively. Pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) is often used in the treatment and relies on a coordinated effort between the physician, patient, and physical therapist. Collaboration is crucial for therapy success, but there is limited research that includes personal perspectives from these individuals.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this qualitative study was to gain further insight from these groups to identify areas for improvement in patient counseling and understanding of the diagnosis of high-tone pelvic floor dysfunction and the role of physical therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

The following participants were recruited: urogynecologists, pelvic floor physical therapists, and patients. Semistructured interviews were conducted exploring participant experiences with therapy and management of the condition and surrounding phenomena.

RESULTS

Participants interviewed included 5 urogynecologists, 5 pelvic floor physical therapists, and 15 patients. Similarities in key themes were identified: (1) the usefulness of pelvic models and illustrations in counseling, (2) appropriate descriptions of therapy, (3) motivating factors for patients, and (4) patient barriers to completing therapy. Several emergent themes revealed a misalignment in perspectives, including (1) patients reporting an unclear understanding of PFPT, (2) patient unawareness of the intimacy of therapy, and (3) reports of unsupportive and unempathetic physician providers.

CONCLUSIONS

There are both similarities and discrepancies in the perspectives among physicians, pelvic floor physical therapists, and patients regarding high-tone pelvic floor dysfunction and PFPT. Acknowledging these comparisons and adapting practices could facilitate patient-centered care and improve patient understanding of their diagnosis.

A pilot trial of movement-based pelvic floor physical therapy to address pelvic floor myofascial pain and lower urinary tract symptoms

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Pelvic floor myofascial pain (PFMP) is associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The objective of this study was to test movement-based pelvic floor physical therapy (PT) for patients with PFMP and LUTS. We hypothesized that movement-based PT designed to target PFMP would result in significant improvement in both PFMP and concomitant LUTS.

METHODS

This pilot trial enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe PFMP on palpation who were referred to movement-based PT to diagnose and treat pelvic floor dysfunction in the context of body alignment and movement patterns. The primary outcome was change in Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) scores after PT. Factors associated with PT attendance were also measured. We aimed to enroll 55 participants to achieve 80% power to detect a difference in 11 points on the UDI scores with an alpha-level of 0.05, accounting for a 10% loss to follow-up. The sample size was increased to 65 owing to a higher-than-expected loss-to-follow-up rate.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were enrolled and 62 analyzed. Thirty-eight (61.3%) attended PT, and 30 (48.4%) completed a follow-up PT Attendance (PTA) survey. Overall, UDI score and irritative, obstructive, and stress subscales (p<0.0001) improved in participants who attended PT as well as mean myofascial examination scores at each site.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants who attended movement-based PT demonstrated an improvement in LUTS. Future studies should extend our findings by: first, confirming whether the myofascial pain-directed elements of PT improved LUTS; second, investigating whether movement-based PT improves prolapse symptoms; and third, including a non-PT control arm to rule out the possible influence of a placebo effect and behavioral modifications on LUTS and PFMP.

The Impact of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy on Bladder and Bowel Function After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

IMPORTANCE

Women with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) are at increased risk of pelvic floor disorders. No standard of care exists for management of pelvic floor dysfunction after OASI.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) on bladder and bowel function after OASI and to describe adherence to PFPT.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of women with OASI presenting at a postpartum care clinic from 2017 to 2021 was conducted. Women were grouped according to PFPT attendance. Urinary Distress Inventory 6 (UDI-6) and Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) were administered at baseline and 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 430 women with OASI presented to a postpartum care clinic, of which 137 (31.9%) attended PFPT, and 293 (68.1%) did not attend. Baseline and 6-month questionnaires were completed by 169 women: 52 (30.8%) in the PFPT group and 117 (69.2%) in the non-PFPT group. Baseline UDI-6 and FISI scores were higher in the PFPT group. Improvement in UDI-6 was not different between groups (-5.8 ± 14.9 vs -3.7 ± 10.8, P = 0.36). The non-PFPT group had greater worsening of FISI compared with PFPT group (9.8 ± 15.2 vs 1.1 ± 11.5, P < 0.001). Sixty-six percent (n = 136) of women referred to PFFT attended at least 1 session, of which 32.4% (n = 44) completed all sessions. Completely adherent women were referred to PFPT earlier (18.5 vs 28.5 days postpartum, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Women in both the PFPT and non-PFPT groups reported improvement in bladder leakage 6 months after OASI. Women who did not attend PFPT had significant worsening of bowel leakage. Early referral to PFPT in women with pelvic floor dysfunction following OASI should be considered.

Adherence to Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Referrals in Women With Fecal Incontinence

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the incidence of patient adherence with prescribed pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) in women presenting with fecal incontinence (FI) and to describe patient characteristics associated with nonadherence.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of women presenting with FI who were prescribed PFPT between January 2010 and December 2019. Adherence with PFPT was defined as either completion of documented recommended physical therapy sessions or discharge from therapy by the therapist before completion of the prescribed sessions.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 248 patients. A total of 159 (64.1%) patients attended at least 1 session of PFPT. Patients who did not attend any sessions were more likely to have a concurrent diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse (69.7% vs 55.3%, P = 0.03). When controlled for confounding variables, concurrent prolapse remained associated with nonattendance (adjusted odds ratio of 1.9 [95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.3]). Of the patients who attended PFPT, the adherence rate was 32.7% (n = 50), whereas the rate was 20% for the total cohort. Nonadherent patients were more likely to have a higher body mass index (28.9 vs 26.9, P = 0.02), but this was no longer statistically significant once other patient characteristics were controlled for. Of the entire cohort, 136 (54.8%) followed up with their physicians after the initial referral to PFPT. Of the 59 patients, 43.7% were offered second-line therapy.

CONCLUSION

Of the women prescribed PFPT for a diagnosis of FI, approximately two thirds attended at least a single session, but only one third of those patients were adherent with the recommended therapy.

An observational cohort study of pelvic floor photobiomodulation for treatment of chronic pelvic pain

Aim: This research is the first to evaluate the effectiveness of trans-vaginal photobiomodulation therapy (TV-PBMT) for chronic pelvic pain. Materials & methods: Observational analysis of 128 women, undergoing TV-PBMT for chronic pelvic pain. Minimal clinically important difference, defined as ≥2-point drop on a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), and effect size Cohen d coefficient, was calculated over nine treatments for overall pain, and pain with activities. Results: Compared with baseline, 64.5% of women showed improvement in overall pain, pain with bowel movement, intercourse, exercise, urination, sitting and vulvar pain (minimal clinically important difference = -2.4, -2.0, -2.4, -2.1, -2.1, -2.0, -3.1; d = 0.9, 0.7, 0.9, 0.7, 0.7, 0.7, 0.9) by treatment 9. Conclusion: In this cohort, TV-PBMT resulted in improvement of pelvic pain without serious adverse events.

Evaluation of a novel deep tissue transvaginal near-infrared laser and applicator in an ovine model

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) is an effective means of treating muscle spasm and pain. A novel near-infrared laser system has been commercialized for the treatment of myofascial pelvic pain in women (SoLá Therapy, UroShape, LLC). This study was undertaken to determine if this device is capable of delivering therapeutic levels of irradiance to the pelvic muscles and to identify the surface irradiance required to achieve this goal. This novel class IV near-infrared laser and transvaginal applicator were used to deliver near-infrared light energy through the vaginal mucosa of an adult Suffolk/Dorset Ewe. Irradiance was measured on the surface of the levator ani muscle, inside the levator ani muscle, and inside the bladder. Measurements were taken at powers of 5 W and 0.5 W. 3.0% of vaginal surface irradiance was measured inside of the levator ani muscle. 4.4% of vaginal surface irradiance was measured inside the bladder. At 5 W, the novel laser system provided a surface irradiance of 738 mW/cm². At 0.5 W, the system provided a surface irradiance of 74 mW/cm². A novel class IV near-infrared laser and transvaginal applicator delivered therapeutic irradiance to the levator ani muscle and bladder of an anesthetized ewe at a power setting of 5 W. A power setting of 0.5 W failed to deliver therapeutic energy into either the levator ani muscle or bladder. Clinical applications targeting deeper tissues such as the pelvic muscles and or bladder should consider power settings that exceed 0.5 W and or irradiance of ≥ 75 mW/cm².

Better together: multidisciplinary approach improves adherence to pelvic floor physical therapy

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To determine whether consultation with pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) at the time of initial urogynecologic evaluation increases adherence to PFPT and to identify factors associated with PFPT attendance and completion.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients evaluated for new urogynecology consultation at our institution in a 1-year period, abstracting data about demographics, diagnoses, and PFPT referral, attendance, and completion. Descriptive analyses compared patients who were referred to, attended, and completed PFPT, stratified by whether they saw PFPT the same day as their initial urogynecologic consultation. Logistic regression identified factors associated with PFPT attendance, completion, and referral.

RESULTS

PFPT referral was made for 35% (335/958), of whom 67% attended and 42% completed PFPT. Patients who saw PFPT the same day as their first urogynecology visit were significantly more likely to attend PFPT than those who did not (91% vs. 61%, p < 0.001), but completion rates did not differ (49% vs. 41%, p = 0.15). PFPT attendance was higher among women who saw a PFPT the same day as their initial urogynecology appointment (p < 0.001) and among those aged ≥ 65 years (p = 0.015). Age ≥ 65 years and white, non-Hispanic race/ethnicity were associated with PFPT completion. Patients with a diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence and those seen in multidisciplinary clinic were more likely to be referred to PFPT.

CONCLUSIONS

PFPT consultation at the time of initial urogynecologic evaluation improves attendance of initial PFPT appointment, but does not improve completion rates.