Unanticipated Uterine and Cervical Malignancy in Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Uterovaginal Prolapse

The incidence and risk factors of occult malignancy in patients receiving vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and risk factors for premalignant and malignant pathology in patients receiving vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and pelvic floor repair (PFR) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of pathological results after VH and PFR of 569 women at our institution from January 2011 through December 2020. Age, body mass index (BMI), POP-Q stage, and preoperative ultrasound results were evaluated as risk factors for occult malignancy.

RESULTS

Six of the 569 patients (1.1%) had unanticipated premalignant uterine pathology and 2 (0.4%) had unanticipated malignant uterine pathology (endometrial cancer). There was no significant difference in the incidence of premalignant or malignant uterine pathology according to age, BMI, and POP-Q stage. However, if endometrial pathology is confirmed on preoperative ultrasonography, the probability of confirming malignant pathology increases (OR 4.63; 95% CI 1.84-51.4; p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of occult malignancy during VH for POP was significantly lower than that found in hysterectomy owing to benign disease. In the case of POP patients, for whom uterine-conserving surgery is not absolutely contraindicated, it can be performed. However, if endometrial pathology is confirmed by preoperative ultrasonography, uterine-conserving surgery is not recommended.

Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when?

Purpose

The rates of hysterectomy are falling worldwide, and the surgical approach is undergoing a major change. To avoid abdominal hysterectomy, a minimally invasive approach has been implemented. Due to the increasing rates of subtotal hysterectomy, we are faced with the following questions: how often does the cervical stump have to be removed secondarily, and what are the indications?

Methods

This was a retrospective, single-centre analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump conducted from 2004 to 2018.

Results

Secondary resection of the cervical stump was performed in 137 women. Seventy-four percent of the previous subtotal hysterectomy procedures were performed in our hospital, and 26% were performed in an external hospital. During the study period, 5209 subtotal hysterectomy procedures were performed at our hospital. The three main indications for secondary resection of the cervical stump were prolapse (31.4%), spotting (19.0%) and cervical dysplasia (18.2%). Unexpected histological findings (premalignant and malignant) after subtotal hysterectomy resulted in immediate (median time, 1 month) secondary resection of the cervical stump in 11 cases. In four patients, the indication was a secondary malignant gynaecological disease that occurred more than 5 years after subtotal hysterectomy. The median time between subtotal hysterectomy and secondary resection of the cervical stump was 40 months. Secondary resection of the cervical stump was performed vaginally in 75.2% of cases, laparoscopically in 20.4% of cases and abdominally in 4.4% of cases. The overall complication rate was 5%.

Conclusion

Secondary resection of the cervical stump is a rare surgery with a low complication rate and can be performed via the vaginal or laparoscopic approach in most cases. The most common indications are prolapse, spotting and cervical dysplasia. If a secondary resection of the cervical stump is necessary due to symptoms, 66.6% will be performed within the first 6 years after subtotal hysterectomy.