Representation of Minority Groups in Key Pelvic Floor Disorder Trials

Spanish-Speaking Latinas with Pelvic Floor Disorders: Understanding the Misunderstood

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Challenges to providing care to Spanish-speaking Latinas with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) are well studied. Limited data exist on patient and provider perspectives on the unique challenges in providing language-discordant care. Our study was aimed at highlighting these challenges and providing evidence-based recommendations on how to optimize the care of these women.

METHODS

Both Spanish-speaking patients with PFDs and non-Spanish speaking providers at the University of South Florida were recruited for this study. Interviews were conducted by a single bilingual interviewer. Topics included providers' experiences, specifically barriers, when caring for Spanish-speaking Latinas, and patients' experiences, focusing on differences between Spanish and non-Spanish speaking providers, while receiving care for PFDs. All interviews were analyzed using grounded theory qualitative methods.

RESULTS

Thirteen interviews were conducted, 7 Spanish-speaking Latinas with PFDs and 6 non-Spanish-speaking urogynecology providers. Qualitative analysis yielded three major themes noted by both patients and providers: cultural stigma, barriers influencing care, and behavioral adaptations to language discordance. Concepts identified from these themes included: generational shame and embarrassment, aversion to treatment, interpreter use barriers, lack of resources, accommodation between patient and provider, and time constraints. Culturally competent recommendations were made based on study findings and review of the literature to improve care of Spanish-speaking Latinas.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights common themes experienced by both patients and their non-Spanish-speaking providers caring for Spanish-speaking Latinas. The study provides recommendations and implementable strategies that can improve care and help providers to build a stronger therapeutic relationship with Spanish-speaking Latinas.

Experiences of Black Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders-A Qualitative Analysis Study

IMPORTANCE

Disparities research in Black women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) has primarily focused on epidemiology or surgical outcomes, but little is known about the patient perspective on seeking PFD care.

OBJECTIVE

To provide quality and equitable care to Black women with PFDs, we conducted a qualitative study to hear their perspectives and lived health care experiences.

STUDY DESIGN

Black women seeking care for PFDs at a tertiary care institution were invited to participate in qualitative interviews. Open-ended questions explored participants' knowledge, attitudes, and health care experiences. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded line-by-line. Inductive content analysis was performed to identify key themes, and consensus was achieved among the research team.

RESULTS

Eight Black women aged 21-83 years consented to participate. Patients noted a stigma surrounding PFDs, both among health care professionals and their community. They noted several barriers to care: financial, logistical, and racial bias. They cited difficulties in patient-health care professional communication, including not feeling heard or treated as an individual. They preferred gender and racial concordance with their physicians. These women expressed both a desire for more knowledge and to share this knowledge and advocate for other women.

CONCLUSIONS

Black women expressed distinct obstacles in their PFD health care. They reported not feeling heard or treated as a unique individual. The themes derived from this study identify complex patient-centered needs that can serve as the basis for future quality improvement work and/or hypothesis-driven research. By grounding health disparities research in patient perspectives, we can improve the health care experiences of Black women.

Pelvic Floor Disorders Among Minority Women: Differences in Prevalence, Severity and Health-Related Social Needs

OBJECTIVE

To characterize prevalence and severity of pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) in various health care settings and to examine unmet health-related social needs (HRSN) among minority women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Minority women with PFDs were recruited from our academic urogynecology clinic, a general urology clinic at our institution's safety net hospital, and a community outreach mobile clinic. Questions from the Urinary Distress Index-6, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory-6, and Female Genitourinary Pain Index were used to identify patients with stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder (OAB), and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS).

RESULTS

Sixty-one (46.6%) women identified as Hispanic, 53 (40.4%) as Black, and 17 (12.9%) as Other. Overall, self-reported PFDs included stress urinary incontinence in 45%, OAB in 74.8%, and CPPS in 24.4% of women. Hispanic women were more likely to report OAB symptoms, compared to Black women (odds ratio (OR) 3.4 [1.2-10.2], P = .03) or Other women (OR = 5.1 [1.3-20.4], P = .02). Participants held a median of 5 unmet HRSN. Minority women facing issues with family and community support, transportation, and utilities were more likely to report CPPS symptoms, compared to those without psychosocial issues (support OR: 4.8 [1.7-13.7], P = .002; transportation OR: 2.0 [1.0-8.2], P = .05; utility OR: 7.0 [1.9-28.1], P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Minority women with PFDs may have several unmet HRSNs which impact their ability to receive appropriate medical care. Our findings may assist in the development of effective strategies to improve health care outcomes for women dealing with PFDs.

Pelvic Floor Disorders in Black Women: Prevalence, Clinical Care, and a Strategic Agenda to Prioritize Care

Pelvic floor disorders are a group of common conditions affecting women of all racial and ethnic groups. These disorders are undertreated in all women, but this is especially magnified in Black people who have been historically marginalized in the United States. This article seeks to highlight the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in Black women, evaluate the clinical care they receive, examine barriers they face to equitable care, and present a strategic agenda to prioritize the care of Black women with pelvic floor disorders.

Association of Neighborhood-Level Socioeconomic Status With Prolapse Management Decision

IMPORTANCE

This study identifies how neighborhood-level socioeconomic status (SES) may affect patients' treatment decisions for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the association of neighborhood-level SES with the decision of surgical versus conservative POP management.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients newly diagnosed with POP at a tertiary medical center between 2015 and 2021. Patients lost to follow-up or poor surgical candidates were excluded. Patient characteristics, demographics, and treatment selection were abstracted from the electronic health record. Conservative management was defined as expectant, pessary, and/or pelvic floor physical therapy. Five-digit zip codes were linked to the Area Deprivation Index and used as a surrogate for neighborhood-level SES. Area Deprivation Indices were dichotomized at or below the sample median (less disadvantaged area) and above the sample median (more disadvantaged area). Logistic regression models estimated the odds of choosing surgical versus conservative management as a function of the Area Deprivation Index.

RESULTS

A total of 459 patients met the eligibility criteria (non-Hispanic White, 88.2%). The median age was 63 years (interquartile range, 52-70 years), and the majority had stage 2 POP (65.7%). Of all patients, 59.3% had Medicare/Medicaid, 39.9% were privately insured, and 0.9% were uninsured. Furthermore, 74.7% selected surgical management, and 25.3% chose conservative management. Increasing age and higher Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage were significantly associated with selecting surgery (P = 0.01). Women residing in a more disadvantaged area had a 67% increased odds of choosing surgical over conservative management (adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.64) after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Residing in a more disadvantaged zip code was associated with 67% increased odds of choosing surgical versus conservative POP management.

Prevalence of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Parous Women from the Tibet Autonomous Region: A Cross-Sectional Study

Purpose

Pelvic floor disorder (PFD) seriously affects the everyday life of women. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for postpartum PFD in women living in the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR).

Methods

Parous women who attended the outpatient gynaecology clinic at our hospital between June 2022 and August 2022 were screened in this study. The demographic and clinical data of these women were collected. Their pelvic floor functions were evaluated via a pelvic organ prolapse (POP) quantification examination, the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory Questionnaire-20 (PFDI-20) and the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS).

Results

A total of 201 women were included in this study, of whom 81.09% (163/201) were Tibetan. Twenty-seven women (13.43%) were diagnosed with POP stage ≥2 and 27 women (13.43%) with an OABSS score ≥3. The median PFDI-20 total score was 4.17 (range 0-43.75). Han women (n = 38) in the TAR had much lower PFDI-20 total scores, compared with Tibetan women (n = 163) (p < 0.05). The results of the multiple linear regression models showed that the PFDI-20 scores obtained from women living in the TAR were closely related to parity, history of heavy weight lifting, age, history of instrumental deliveries, ethnicity and number of caesarean sections.

Conclusion

Pelvic floor disorder is common among parous women living in the TAR. Ethnicity, parity, history of heavy weight lifting, age, history of instrumental deliveries and number of caesarean sections are the factors closely related to the PFDI-20 scores.

Knowledge of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction in African American and Afro-Caribbean Women Seeking Medical Care in a Primary Care Ambulatory Setting

IMPORTANCE

Approximately one fourth of U.S. community-dwelling women will develop a pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) within their lifetimes. Prior research has revealed that knowledge of PFD was low to moderate in the general population and lower among Black patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the proficiency of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in self-identified African American and Afro-Caribbean adult (age ≥ 18 years) female patients seeking medical care in our ambulatory setting.

STUDY DESIGN

In this cross-sectional study, we administered the Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire to patients in primary care and gynecology ambulatory settings at an academic medical center in Central Brooklyn. We used a multivariable Poisson regression model to find characteristics of the participants that are associated with proficiency in Prolapse and Incontinence Knowledge Questionnaire domains.

RESULTS

A total of 266 survey participants self-identified as African American or Afro-Caribbean. Overall, using a multivariable model, knowledge of POP was significantly higher among African Americans than Afro-Caribbeans, and 75.5% of our patients reported that they would seek information on urinary incontinence and POP from a medical provider (gynecologist or primary care doctor) compared with other alternatives (eg, internet, 19.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight subgroups that could benefit from provider-initiated education regarding PFD. Furthermore, although Black patients are often homogenized in research studies, differences may exist within subgroups likely because of varying interplays of structural racism and other social determinants of health, which may serve as an area of future research.

The Experience of Women From Underrepresented Groups With Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Urinary incontinence (UI) in women is a global public health issue. However, there is a limited understanding of the experience of women from underrepresented groups suffering from UI. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine current evidence regarding the experience of women with UI from these groups.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic search was undertaken to retrieve research studies that answered the research question. Four qualitative research studies were included. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guided this review.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged from this review: the perceived origin of UI, the physical, psychological, and social impact of UI, the impact of culture and religion on UI, and vice versa, and the interaction of women with health services.

DISCUSSION

Social determinants of health, such as religion and culture, need to be considered by professionals providing care if women from underrepresented groups experiencing UI are to receive optimal care.

Differences in Anorectal Manometry Values Among Women With Fecal Incontinence in a Racially, Ethnically, and Socioeconomically Diverse Population

IMPORTANCE

Anorectal manometry (ARM) is a valuable diagnostic and therapeutic tool that can both aid in identifying mechanisms contributing to fecal incontinence (FI) and inform management strategies. Consensus on standard reference range values has not been established, and women of varying racial and ethnic backgrounds are not well-represented in the current literature.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to compare ARM values between women of different racial and ethnic groups with FI.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of women with FI who underwent ARM at a tertiary health system in an urban underserved community between 2016 and 2021. Demographic information and ARM values were collected from the medical record. Socioeconomic status (SES) was represented by the percent of the population living below the poverty line according to zip code using U.S. census data. Anorectal manometry values were compared between racial and ethnic groups, and multivariable logistic regression was conducted to control for patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight women were included in the analysis: 33% Hispanic, 22% Black, and 45% White. Hispanic and Black women had higher body mass index and higher rates of diabetes and loose stools and were of significantly lower SES compared with White women. Black and Hispanic women had significantly lower thresholds for volume at first sensation and higher mean anal squeeze pressure. Differences were maintained after controlling for body mass index, diabetes, SES, and diarrhea (P = 0.03 and P = 0.01, respectively). Other ARM values were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Racial and ethnic differences in ARM values among women with FI exist. Further studies are needed to determine whether these differences have an impact on symptom severity, treatment selection and outcomes, and patient satisfaction.

Evidence-Informed, Interdisciplinary, Multidimensional Action Plan to Advance Overactive Bladder Research and Treatment Initiatives: Directives From State-of-the-Science Conference on Overactive Bladder and Cognitive Impairment

ABSTRACT

This article outlines an evidence-informed, interdisciplinary, multidimensional, comprehensive action plan for the American Urogynecologic Society to improve care of women with overactive bladder (OAB) while minimizing treatment-related adverse events, including cognitive impairment. It is a "call to action" to advance basic, translational, and clinical research and summarizes initiatives developed at the State-of-the-Science Conference on OAB and Cognitive Impairment to (1) develop framework for a new OAB treatment approach in women, (2) define research gaps and future research priorities, (3) champion health equity and diversity considerations in OAB treatment, (4) foster community and promote education to remove stigma surrounding OAB and urinary incontinence, and (5) elevate visibility and impact of OAB, by creating partnerships through education and engagement with health care professionals, industry, private and public payers, funding agencies, and policymakers.

Health disparities and access to advanced therapy for overactive bladder

AIMS

Refractory overactive bladder (OAB) is among the most common reasons for referral to specialists in voiding dysfunction. Significant racial and ethnic disparities exist in prevalence, severity, and management of OAB, presenting care barriers for marginalized patients. We aim to explicate these disparities and explore the factors that led to their existence and persistence. We will additionally offer suggestions to mitigate such disparities and approach equitable care for our patients.

METHODS

This is a narrative review of pertinent articles related to health disparities in OAB. Articles on OAB prevalence stratified by race and ethnicity, and variations in treatment patterns for patients of marginalized backgrounds were identified from the PubMed database. We also included a review of evidence from governmental and historical sources to provide sociocultural context.

RESULTS

Patients from marginalized backgrounds are underrepresented in OAB literature. There appear to be differences in symptom severity and prevalence based on race. OAB severity seems closely entwined with social determinants of health. Patients from marginalized populations experience numerous care barriers impeding the treatment of OAB. Finally, White patients are more likely to receive advanced management for OAB.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous health disparities exist in the diagnosis and management of OAB. This review is grounded in societal context: health injustice in the United States ultimately stems from systemic racism. Improving our understanding of care disparities and the systems that allow them to persist will bring us closer to equity and allow our patients from marginalized backgrounds to obtain the evidence-based care they deserve.