Comparison of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Attendance Based on Referring Provider Specialty

Rehabilitation of pelvic floor dysfunction after radiation therapy for a rare gynecological cancer: A case report

Objective

Radiation therapy (RT) for gynecological cancers has significant effects on patients' quality of life regarding sexual dysfunction, urinary incontinence (UI), fecal incontinence (FI), and psychological distress. There is a scarcity in literature for the inclusive therapeutic approaches of pelvic health physical therapy (PHPT) for cancer survivors. Therefore, this case describes a comprehensive PHPT program to address the complexity of pelvic floor dysfunctions due to RT.

Case description

A 54-year-old female was diagnosed with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina. After a one-year treatment of chemotherapy and RT, the patient presented with overall fatigue, psychological distress, dyspareunia, mixed UI, fecal urgency and FI, and bilateral vulvar lymphedema. The PHPT exam revealed vaginal dryness, vulvovaginal fibrosis, and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) weakness.A comprehensive treatment approach included referrals to multidisciplinary specialists. PHPT incorporated motor learning, strengthening and stretching of PFM, internal and external fascia mobilization for PFM and vulvar tissues, lymphatic drainage, vaginal dilators, pain neuroscience education and nutrition recommendations. After seven sessions, the patient demonstrated improved PFM strength, improved psychosocial measures, no UI or FI, as well as reduced discomfort during intercourse.

Conclusions

Symptoms were clinically improved with a multidisciplinary approach and comprehensive PHPT. However, considering the consistency and time required for physiological and psychological recovery for gynecological cancer survivors, it was recommended to continue the plan of care and home program developed to address the patient's goals.

Impact statement

Treatment utilized a holistic and interdisciplinary approach to address the multifactorial nature of vaginal cancer and side effects of RT. PHPT, which promptly maximized improvement, included manual therapy, exercises, education, and motivational interviewing strategies that prioritized the patient's goals and built a nurturing clinician-patient relationship. Health care providers are strongly encouraged to refer to PHPT as interventions may significantly improve the patient's quality of life.This case report follows the CARE Guidelines (Riley et al., 2017).

Addressing Health Care Access Disparities Through a Public Health Approach to Physical Therapist Practice

As the field evolves as a doctoring profession, the role and scope of physical therapist practice must also grow to meet important and urgent public health needs. Scalable, population-level interventions must be prioritized to the same degree as tailored, individual-level care. Drawing from public health frameworks, this perspective proposes an approach to population-level physical therapist care delivery that aims to mitigate disease and disability and improve health outcomes by expanding access, decreasing cost, and improving quality of care for those facing the greatest health disparities. Application of these frameworks prompts the development of novel approaches to rehabilitation service delivery to advance twin goals of promoting access to care and reducing health disparities. This paper describes how a population health framework and public health approach can be used to support necessary evolution and innovation within the field of physical therapy and to improve rehabilitation service delivery. Rapid developments in the digital and virtual health space have created a unique opportunity for physical therapists to lean into a new vision of their role as clinicians within the broader health ecosystem. This paper will provide clinicians with a broader perspective of physical therapist expertise and describe opportunities for the development and application of a physical therapist skill set toward driving population health outcomes. Real-world examples will guide clinicians to consider opportunities in their own practice for implementing this public health approach and potentially addressing various contributors to persistent health disparities.

Health Care Utilization by Patients With Chronic Pelvic Pain

OBJECTIVE

To describe the patterns of health care utilization among patients with chronic pelvic pain.

METHODS

Deidentified administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse were used. Adult female patients who had their first medical claim for chronic pelvic pain between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, were included. Utilization was examined for 12 months after the index diagnosis. The greedy nearest neighbor matching method was used to identify a control group of individuals without chronic pelvic pain. Comparisons were made between those with and those without chronic pelvic pain using χ 2 tests for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests for continuous data.

RESULTS

In total, 18,400 patients were analyzed in the chronic pelvic pain cohort. Patients with chronic pelvic pain had a higher rate of chronic overlapping pain conditions. Patients with chronic pelvic pain had higher rates of health care utilization across all queried indices. They had more outpatient office visits; 55.5% had 10 or more office visits. Patients with chronic pelvic pain showed higher utilization of the emergency department (ED) (6.3 visits vs 1.9 visits; P <.001). Urine culture and pelvic ultrasonography were the most utilized tests. One-third of patients with chronic pelvic pain utilized physical therapy (PT), and 13% utilized psychological or behavioral therapy. Patients with chronic pelvic pain had higher rates of hysterectomy (8.9% vs 0.6%). The average total health care costs per patient with chronic pelvic pain per year was $12,254.

CONCLUSION

Patients with chronic pelvic pain have higher rates of chronic overlapping pain conditions and undergo more ED visits, imaging tests, and hysterectomies than patients without chronic pelvic pain. Improving access to multidisciplinary care, increasing utilization of interventions such as PT and psychological or behavioral therapy, and reducing ED utilization may be possible targets to help reduce overall health care costs and improve patient care.

Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Attendance Among High-Risk Postpartum Patients

IMPORTANCE

Limited data describe attendance to pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) in a postpartum patient population.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was describe attendance to PFPT in a cohort of postpartum women at high-risk of pelvic floor concerns. We secondarily compared attendance between patients with and without evaluation in a postpartum pelvic floor healing clinic (PPFHC).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of 2 convenience samples from an academic hospital. The PPFHC cohort comprised all postpartum vaginal delivery patients evaluated in the PPFHC from July 2021 to July 2022. The historical pre-PPFHC cohort comprised patients with third/fourth-degree obstetrical lacerations from December 2019 to January 2021. We abstracted attendance to PFPT, number of visits, Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) scores, Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) scores, and discharge status.

RESULTS

Our cohort contained 464 patients, 195 (42.0%) from pre-PPFHC and 269 (58.0%) from PPFHC. Among all patients 302 (65.1%) were referred to PFPT and 170 (56.3%) attended at least 1 visit, 82 (48.2%) were discharged from PFPT with goals met, and the median number of visits was 6 (3-10). The majority of patients (97.0%, n = 261) seen in the PPFHC were referred to PFPT, compared with 22.0% (n = 41) of pre-PPFHC patients (P < 0.01). More patients in the pre-PPFHC cohort attended PFPT than in those the PPFHC cohort (75.6% vs 53.5%, P ≤ 0.01). Most patients exhibited improved PFDI and PFIQ scores after PFPT (n = 88, 80.0%, and n = 89, 81.7% respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients attending postpartum PFPT demonstrated high therapy completion rates. A dedicated PPFHC had more referrals, however, lower PFPT attendance rates, when compared with a historical cohort.

A pilot trial of movement-based pelvic floor physical therapy to address pelvic floor myofascial pain and lower urinary tract symptoms

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Pelvic floor myofascial pain (PFMP) is associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The objective of this study was to test movement-based pelvic floor physical therapy (PT) for patients with PFMP and LUTS. We hypothesized that movement-based PT designed to target PFMP would result in significant improvement in both PFMP and concomitant LUTS.

METHODS

This pilot trial enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe PFMP on palpation who were referred to movement-based PT to diagnose and treat pelvic floor dysfunction in the context of body alignment and movement patterns. The primary outcome was change in Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI) scores after PT. Factors associated with PT attendance were also measured. We aimed to enroll 55 participants to achieve 80% power to detect a difference in 11 points on the UDI scores with an alpha-level of 0.05, accounting for a 10% loss to follow-up. The sample size was increased to 65 owing to a higher-than-expected loss-to-follow-up rate.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were enrolled and 62 analyzed. Thirty-eight (61.3%) attended PT, and 30 (48.4%) completed a follow-up PT Attendance (PTA) survey. Overall, UDI score and irritative, obstructive, and stress subscales (p<0.0001) improved in participants who attended PT as well as mean myofascial examination scores at each site.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants who attended movement-based PT demonstrated an improvement in LUTS. Future studies should extend our findings by: first, confirming whether the myofascial pain-directed elements of PT improved LUTS; second, investigating whether movement-based PT improves prolapse symptoms; and third, including a non-PT control arm to rule out the possible influence of a placebo effect and behavioral modifications on LUTS and PFMP.

The Impact of Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy on Bladder and Bowel Function After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

IMPORTANCE

Women with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) are at increased risk of pelvic floor disorders. No standard of care exists for management of pelvic floor dysfunction after OASI.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of pelvic floor physical therapy (PFPT) on bladder and bowel function after OASI and to describe adherence to PFPT.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of women with OASI presenting at a postpartum care clinic from 2017 to 2021 was conducted. Women were grouped according to PFPT attendance. Urinary Distress Inventory 6 (UDI-6) and Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) were administered at baseline and 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 430 women with OASI presented to a postpartum care clinic, of which 137 (31.9%) attended PFPT, and 293 (68.1%) did not attend. Baseline and 6-month questionnaires were completed by 169 women: 52 (30.8%) in the PFPT group and 117 (69.2%) in the non-PFPT group. Baseline UDI-6 and FISI scores were higher in the PFPT group. Improvement in UDI-6 was not different between groups (-5.8 ± 14.9 vs -3.7 ± 10.8, P = 0.36). The non-PFPT group had greater worsening of FISI compared with PFPT group (9.8 ± 15.2 vs 1.1 ± 11.5, P < 0.001). Sixty-six percent (n = 136) of women referred to PFFT attended at least 1 session, of which 32.4% (n = 44) completed all sessions. Completely adherent women were referred to PFPT earlier (18.5 vs 28.5 days postpartum, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Women in both the PFPT and non-PFPT groups reported improvement in bladder leakage 6 months after OASI. Women who did not attend PFPT had significant worsening of bowel leakage. Early referral to PFPT in women with pelvic floor dysfunction following OASI should be considered.