A Pilot Study on Vaginally Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Patients With Uterovaginal Prolapse

McCall culdoplasty vs. vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of advanced uterine prolapse: A randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to compare the anatomic outcomes of vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (VALS) with those of McCall culdoplasty (McCC) in patients undergoing concurrent vaginal hysterectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled study presents the outcomes of 68 patients who underwent hysterectomy and vaginal suspension for apical prolapse ≥ Stage III according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system between October 2017 and December 2020. Among these patients, 33 underwent VALS and 35 underwent McCC. Clinical features, surgical data, concomitant surgical procedures, postoperative complications, and recurrence rates were assessed. Before and after one year of surgery, the short form of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire and Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire were used to evaluate subjective symptoms. Patient Global Impression of Improvement Questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up durations were 25.5 ± 7.63 months and 25.6 ± 5.96 months in the VALS and McCC groups, respectively. Prolapse recurrence occurred in 3 (9.1%) women in the VALS group versus 12 (34.3%) women in the McCC group (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

The McCC operation was associated with a shorter operation time, whereas the VALS operation had a significantly higher objective success rate. Based on this study, it may be concluded that McCC is not an effective procedure for advanced uterine prolapse.

Assessing the Impact of Vaginal Hysterectomy with Vaginal Mesh Attachment on Outcomes and Complications during Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare mesh complications and failure rates after 1 year in laparoscopic minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISC) with ultralightweight mesh attached vaginally during total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH), laparoscopically if posthysterectomy (PH), or laparoscopically during supracervical hysterectomy.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse who elected for MISC.

INTERVENTIONS

Laparoscopic MISC with ultralightweight mesh attached vaginally during TVH, laparoscopically if PH, or laparoscopically during supracervical hysterectomy. Composite failure was defined as recurrent prolapse symptoms, prolapse past the hymen, or retreatment for prolapse.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2017, 650 patients met the inclusion criteria with 278 PH, 82 supracervical hysterectomy, and 290 vaginal hysterectomy patients. Median follow-up was similar for all groups (382 days vs 379 vs 345; p = .31). The majority in all groups were white (66.6%), nonsmokers (74.8%), postmenopausal (82.5%), and did not use estrogen (70.3%). Mesh complications did not differ among groups (1.6% PH, 2.5% supracervical hysterectomy, 2.2% vaginal hysterectomy; p >.99). There was no difference in anatomic failure (5% PH, 1.2% supracervical hysterectomy, 2.1% vaginal hysterectomy; p = .07), reoperation for prolapse (1.4% vs 1.2% vs 0.7%; p = .57), or composite failure (9.0% vs 3.7% vs 4.8%; p = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

TVH with vaginal mesh attachment of ultralightweight mesh had similar adverse events, mesh exposure rates, and failure rates to those of laparoscopic PH sacrocolpopexy or supracervical hysterectomy with laparoscopic mesh attachment.

Medium- to long-term outcomes of vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of stage III-IV pelvic organ prolapse

BACKGROUND

Vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (VALS) refers to the placement of synthetic meshes through the vagina in addition to traditional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. In this study, we aimed to investigate the medium- to long-term efficacy and safety of VALS for treating stage III-IV pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

The study was designed as a case series at a single center. Patients with stage III-IV POP in our hospital from January 2010 to December 2018 were included. Perioperative parameters, objective and subjective outcomes, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients completed the follow-up and were included in our study. Within a median follow-up duration of 35.4 months, the objective cure ratio of VALS reached 92.45% (98/106), and the subjective success rate was 99.06% (105/106). Patients reported significant improvements in subjective symptoms. In eight patients suffering anatomic prolapse recurrence, two posterior POP cases were treated by posterior pelvic reconstruction surgery, while six anterior POP cases did not need surgical therapies. The reoperation rate was 1.89% (2/106). No intraoperative complications occurred. Three patients (2.83%) had postoperative fever, and one (0.94%) had wound infection during hospitalization. Six patients (5.66%) had mesh exposure on the vaginal wall, and de novo urinary incontinence occurred in two patients (1.89%) during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

VALS is an effective and safe surgical method for treating severe POP. Therefore, VALS should be considered in the treatment of severe POP due to its favorable subjective and objective outcomes, relatively low rate of infection and acceptable rate of mesh exposure.

Rate of Mesh Erosion After Sacrocolpopexy With Concurrent Supracervical Compared With Total Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effect of concomitant supracervical hysterectomy compared with total hysterectomy during abdominal sacrocolpopexy on the rate of mesh erosion by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature.

DATA SOURCES

From database inception through January 2022, we explored MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies comparing the rate of mesh erosion in women undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy who had concomitant supracervical hysterectomy compared with total hysterectomy were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers separately ascertained studies, obtained data, and gauged study quality. The rate of mesh erosion was compared, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were estimated.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Nineteen studies with 10,572 women who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy were identified, including 4,285 women in the supracervical group and 6,287 women in the total hysterectomy group. The overall mean postprocedure follow-up time was 30.7±15.1 months (median 12.4, range 1.5-44.2). The median (95% CI) point prevalence of mesh erosion was 0.36% (0-1.9%) in women who had supracervical hysterectomy compared with 3.8% (1.8-8.7%) in women who had total hysterectomy. The overall rate of mesh erosion in women who had supracervical hysterectomy was lower compared with women who had total hysterectomy (pooled OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18-0.38, I 2 0%).

CONCLUSION

In women with symptomatic apical pelvic organ prolapse who undergo abdominal sacrocolpopexy with concomitant hysterectomy, supracervical hysterectomy is associated with a lower risk of mesh erosion compared with total hysterectomy.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42022301862.

Route of Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the incidence of mesh exposure based on route of hysterectomy at the time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes and prolapse recurrence.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy between 2007 and 2017 were stratified by hysterectomy approach: total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH), total laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy (TLH), and laparoscopic or robotic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH). Total vaginal hysterectomy was subdivided into vaginal and laparoscopic mesh attachment to the cuff. Statistical analyses were performed, with P < 0.05 denoting statistical significance.

RESULTS

Seven institutions participated, and 502 minimally invasive sacrocolpopexies with concomitant hysterectomy were performed by 23 surgeons: 263 TVH, 128 TLH, and 111 LSH. The median follow-up interval was 10 months, and this was significantly different between the groups (months): TVH, 11 (3-13); TLH, 2 (2-9); and LSH, 12 (5-24; P < 0.01). The overall incidence of vaginal mesh exposure was 4.0% (20/502). There were no significant differences in vaginal mesh exposure based on hysterectomy route: TVH, 5.7% (15/263); TLH, 1.6% (2/128); and LSH, 2.7% (3/111; P = 0.11). Within the TVH group, there was no significant difference in vaginal mesh exposure comparing vaginal and laparoscopic mesh attachment: 1.9% (1/52) versus 6.6% (14/211; P = 0.48). Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of recurrence compared with TVH and TLH: 10.8% (12/111) versus 3.4% (9/263) and 2.3% (3/128; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of sacrocolpopexy mesh exposure was not significantly different based on route of hysterectomy or mode of mesh attachment to the vagina. There was a significant increase in prolapse recurrence with supracervical hysterectomy.

Short and middle-term outcomes of vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacropolpopexy

OBJECTIVE

Vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (VALS), which is a combined surgical approach where a vaginal hysterectomy is initially performed, followed by transvaginal placement of synthetic mesh and laparoscopic suspension, can be an alternative to overcome the dissection, suturing limitations of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The aim of this study was to compare the operative times and middle-term anatomic outcomes of women with uterovaginal prolapse undergoing VALS with those of women undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy.

METHODS

This is a prospective cohort study that evaluates operation times, anesthesia times, estimated blood loss, middle-term outcomes, perioperative and postoperative complications. We compared the results of 47 women who had the VALS to that of 32 abdominal sacrocolpopexy (AS).

RESULTS

The mean follow up was 22.4 months for AS group and 20.5 months for VALS group. The VALS group (median 1 day) had shorter hospitalization duration than the AS group (median 3 days). The mean operation time was significantly shorter in the VALS group (125.9 minutes) than the AS group (151.9 minutes) (P = .03). There was no significant difference in perioperative and postoperative complication rates. Objective failure rate (8.5% in VALS, 15.6% in AS), subjective failure rates (6.4% in VALS, 9.4% in AS), recurrence (2.1% in VALS, 9.4% in AS) and mesh exposition rates (2.1% in VALS, 9.4% in AS) were similar in both procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

VALS with shorter operative time and hospitalization than conventional AS is a promising modification minimally invasive technique for sacrocolpopexy especially for those inexperienced in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.

Severe pelvic organ prolapse. Is there a long-term cure?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Vaginally assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (VALS) is a combined vaginal and laparoscopic surgical approach that has been described for the treatment of women with a uterus who suffer from severe multicompartmental pelvic organ prolapse (POP). The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term anatomical and functional outcomes and report the long-term mesh-related complications.

METHODS

This was a single-center prospective study of women with advanced POP who underwent VALS with at least 3 years of follow-up. The primary outcome was "composite surgical success" defined as: (1) no descent of the vaginal apex (point C) more than one-third into the vaginal canal and no anterior or posterior vaginal wall beyond the hymen (Ba and Bp < 0) (anatomical success), (2) no vaginal bulge symptoms and (3) no re-treatment for prolapse recurrence.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 7 years (range 3-10 years) with a composite surgical success rate of 95.7% (90/94). Failures (4.3%) included one (1.1%) case of anatomical recurrence (Bp: +1), one woman (1.1%) reporting vaginal bulge symptoms and two women (2.1%) who underwent a posterior colporrhaphy 6 and 12 months after primary surgery (reoperation rate: 2.1%). Two of 94 patients (2.1%) had been treated for mesh extrusion of the vaginal cuff prior to the follow-up visit.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined VALS technique can be considered a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of severe POP allowing a long-term anatomical restoration of all compartments with excellent functional outcomes.