United Kingdom military surgical preparedness for contingency operations

Lessons from the use of telemedicine in the austere military environment and the implications for deployed surgical teams

Over the last 20 years, there have been significant changes in UK surgical training. Civilian surgical training may no longer prepare military surgeons for the range of skills they require on operations. One method to address gaps in knowledge or experience is to use telemedicine to facilitate specialist consultations from UK-based specialists to deployed medical teams. In the UK Defence Medical Services (DMS), this capability is called real-time clinical support (RTCS). RTCS provides a direct audio-visual link from a deployed location anywhere in the world to a supporting medical specialist in the UK. RTCS is currently delivered via a combination of off-the-shelf hardware and commercially available software. This article will outline the current use of RTCS, with emphasis on deployed surgical teams in austere environments, and discuss the advantages and limitations of this capability. However, it must be emphasised that no technology can be a substitute for clinical training and experience. Although several limitations remain, the authors believe that RTCS offers potential benefits for the DMS and could be an important tool aiding deployed clinicians. It can also be argued that by engaging with the concept now, the DMS can shape future developments in this sphere.

How do deployed general surgeons acquire relevant skill sets and competencies and mitigate skill fade?

There are recognised difficulties internationally with acquisition and retention of skills among deployed military general surgeons. These are compounded by reduced trauma workload in non-deployed roles or during low tempo or limited activity deployments, and the winding-down of combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. We summarise the relevant military-run courses, military-civilian collaborations and potential future strategies that have been used to address skill sets and competencies of deployed surgeons. We use examples from the American, British, Danish, French, German and Swedish Armed Forces. There is variation between nations in training, with a combination of didactic lectures, simulation training and trauma placements in civilian settings at home and overseas. Data regarding effectiveness of these techniques are sparse. It is likely that combat surgical skill-set acquisition and maintenance requires a combination of employment at a high-volume trauma centre during a surgeon's non-deployed role, together with military-specific courses and high-fidelity simulation to fill skill gaps. There are multiple newer modalities of training that require further evaluation if they are to prove effective in the future. We aimed to summarise the current methods used internationally to ensure acquisition and retention of vital skill sets for these surgeons.

General surgical training for Operation Trenton

The UK military commitment to United Nations operations has led to a new challenge in identifying and developing skill sets required for humanitarian operations. The last two decades have concentrated on kinetic operations, with haemorrhage control being the main driver. The austere location and prolonged evacuation timelines have led to identifying management strategies of conditions that would previously have been evacuated to higher echelons of care. The Defence Medical Services have a multifaceted approach to training military personnel for operations, varying from regular exposure to high-acuity trauma and general surgery within their host NHS Trust, to validated training platforms that evolve continually to address the training needs demanded by differing fields of conflict.

Skill sets required for the management of military head, face and neck trauma: a multidisciplinary consensus statement

Introduction

The evolution of medical practice is resulting in increasing subspecialisation, with head, face and neck (HFN) trauma in a civilian environment usually managed by a combination of surgical specialties working as a team. However, the full combination of HFN specialties commonly available in the NHS may not be available in future UK military-led operations, necessitating the identification of a group of skill sets that could be delivered by one or more deployed surgeons.

Method

A systematic review was undertaken to identify those surgical procedures performed to treat acute military head, face, neck and eye trauma. A multidisciplinary consensus group was convened following this with military HFN trauma expertise to define those procedures commonly required to conduct deployed, in-theatre HFN surgical combat trauma management.

Results

Head, face, neck and eye damage control surgical procedures were identified as comprising surgical cricothyroidotomy, cervico-facial haemorrhage control and decompression of orbital haemorrhage through lateral canthotomy. Acute in-theatre surgical skills required within 24 hours consist of wound debridement, surgical tracheostomy, decompressive craniectomy, intracranial pressure monitor placement, temporary facial fracture stabilisation for airway management or haemorrhage control and primary globe repair. Delayed in-theatre procedures required within 5 days prior to predicted evacuation encompass facial fracture fixation, delayed lateral canthotomy, evisceration, enucleation and eyelid repair.

Conclusions

The identification of those skill sets required for deployment is in keeping with the General Medical Council’s current drive towards credentialing consultants, by which a consultant surgeon’s capabilities in particular practice areas would be defined. Limited opportunities currently exist for trainees and consultants to gain experience in the management of traumatic head, face, neck and eye injuries seen in a kinetic combat environment. Predeployment training requires that the surgical techniques described in this paper are covered and should form the curriculum of future military-specific surgical fellowships. Relevant continued professional development will be necessary to maintain required clinical competency.