Association of postoperative organ space infection after intraoperative irrigation in appendicitis

Postoperative organ space infection (OSI) following appendectomy: early term evaluation for pediatric population

No consensus has been reached on the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for postoperative organ space infection (OSI) following appendectomy. This study investigated the influence of antibiotic administration on postoperative OSIs in children with complex appendicitis. A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted in patients with OSI following complicated appendicitis between 2017 and 2019 at 3 hospitals in China. The qualified patients were dichotomized into a long-duration antibiotic group (> 5.5 days) and a short-duration antibiotic group (< 5.5 days) based on the median duration (5.5 days) of antibiotic administration. Potential biases in baseline characteristics were managed using propensity score matching for the two groups. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between the two groups. Propensity-matched analysis of the entire cohort revealed no significant effects in terms of the time to OSI resolution (p = 0.16) or recurrence (p = 0.22) for the short-duration and long-duration antibiotic groups. A slightly lower complication rate, including the incidence of abdominal distention (p = 0.093) and antibiotic-associated diarrhea (p = 0.024), was noted in patients with short-duration antibiotic administration. Furthermore, no significant difference in readmission requirements (p = 0.14) or hospitalization duration (p = 0.102) was found between the two groups. For OSI following complicated appendicitis, long-term antibiotic administration did not provide a significant benefit.

Effect and safety of peritoneal lavage for appendectomy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether peritoneal lavage is beneficial for the postoperative outcomes of appendectomy is debatable. This study is a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that aimed to determine whether peritoneal lavage leads to improved appendectomy outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published before September 2020. The meta-analysis calculated the pooled effect size by using a random effects model. The primary outcome was the incidence of intra-abdominal abscess. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of surgical-site infection, hospital stay duration, operation time, and readmission incidence.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 1487 patients were reviewed. The lavage group had a nonsignificantly lower incidence of intra-abdominal abscess (risk ratio [RR]: 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-1.18) and surgical-site infection (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.31-1.72) than did the nonirrigation group. Furthermore, the lavage group showed a nonsignificantly shorter hospital stay duration and lower readmission incidence than did the nonirrigation group. However, the lavage group required significantly more operation time than did the nonirrigation group (mean difference: 7.59 min; 95% CI: 4.67-10.50).

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that performing peritoneal lavage has no advantage over suction or drainage only in appendectomy. Moreover, peritoneal lavage significantly increased operation time. Consequently, for improving efficiency and reducing operation time, we suggest skipping peritoneal irrigation during appendectomy. However, the available evidence is of variable quality; therefore, high-quality prospective RCTs are required in the future.

Evaluating the association between American Association for the Surgery of Trauma emergency general surgery anatomic severity grades and clinical outcomes using national claims data

BACKGROUND

Emergency general surgery (EGS) encompasses a heterogeneous population of acutely ill patients, and standardized methods for determining disease severity are essential for comparative effectiveness research and quality improvement initiatives. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) has developed a grading system for the anatomic severity of 16 EGS conditions; however, little is known regarding how well these AAST EGS grades can be approximated by diagnosis codes in administrative databases.

METHODS

We identified adults admitted for 16 common EGS conditions in the 2012 to 2017q3 National Inpatient Sample. Disease severity strata were assigned using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes based on AAST EGS anatomic severity grades. We evaluated whether assigned EGS severity (multiple strata or dichotomized into less versus more complex) were associated with in-hospital mortality, complications, length of stay, discharge disposition, and costs. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities, hospital traits, geography, and year.

RESULTS

We identified 10,886,822 EGS admissions. The number of anatomic severity strata derived from ICD-9/10-CM codes varied by EGS condition and by year. Four conditions mapped to four strata across all years. Two conditions mapped to four strata with ICD-9-CM codes but only two or three strata with ICD-10-CM codes. Others mapped to three or fewer strata. When dichotomized into less versus more complex disease, patients with more complex disease had worse outcomes across all 16 conditions. The addition of multiple strata beyond a binary measure of complex disease, however, showed inconsistent results.

CONCLUSION

Classification of common EGS conditions according to anatomic severity is feasible with International Classification of Diseases codes. No condition mapped to five distinct severity grades, and the relationship between increasing grade and outcomes was not consistent across conditions. However, a standardized measure of severity, even if just dichotomized into less versus more complex, can inform ongoing efforts aimed at optimizing outcomes for EGS patients across the nation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic, level III.

Meta-analysis of unplanned readmission to hospital post-appendectomy: an opportunity for a new benchmark

BACKGROUND

Appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdominal pain requiring surgical intervention. While many studies report readmission, a meta-analysis of readmission post-appendectomy has not been published. This meta-analysis was undertaken to determine rates and predictors of hospital readmission following appendectomy and to potentially provide a metric benchmark.

METHODS

An ethically approved PROSPERO-registered (ID CRD42017069040) meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using databases PubMed and Scopus, was undertaken for studies published between January 2012 and June 2017. Articles relating to outcomes and readmissions after appendectomy were identified. Those scoring >15 for comparative studies and >10 for non-comparative studies, using Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria were included in the final analysis. The odds ratios (OR) using random-effects, Mantel-Haenszel method with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were computed for each risk factor with RevMan5.

RESULTS

A total of 1757 articles reviewed were reduced to 45 qualifying studies for a final analysis of 836 921 appendectomies. 4.3% (range 0.0-14.4%) of patients were readmitted within 30 days. Significant preoperative patient factors for increased readmission were diabetes mellitus (OR 1.93, CI 1.63-2.28, P < 0.00001), complicated appendicitis (OR 3.6, CI 2.43-5.34, P < 0.00001) and open surgical technique (OR 1.39, CI 1.08-1.79, P < 0.00001). Increased readmission was not associated with gender, obesity or paediatric versus general surgeons or centres.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis identified that readmission is not uncommon post-appendectomy, occurring in one in 25 cases. The mean readmission rate of 4.3% may act as a quality benchmark for improving emergency surgical care. Targeting high-risk groups with diabetes or complicated appendicitis and increasing use of laparoscopic technique may help reduce readmission rates.

GI Surgical Emergencies: Scope and Burden of Disease

Nearly 3 million patients are hospitalized every year for emergent gastrointestinal (GI) surgical problems and nearly one third of those will require surgery. This article reviews the scope of GI surgical emergencies within the context of emergency general surgery (EGS), costs of care, overview of several common GI surgical problems, and traditional and emerging treatment modalities. This article also argues for ongoing work in the area of risk assessment for EGS, and describes quality metrics as well as outcomes of care for these patients.