Thromboelastography on-the-go: Evaluation of the TEG 6s device during ground and high-altitude Aeromedical Evacuation with extracorporeal life support

A Deployable Viscoelastic Coagulation Monitor Enables Point-of-Care Assessment of Coagulopathy in Swine With Polytrauma

INTRODUCTION

Absence of pre-hospital coagulation tests challenges prompt management of hemostasis after trauma. The Viscoelastic Coagulation Monitor (VCM, Entegrion, Durham, NC) is a hand-held coagulation test for point-of-care. We evaluated VCM in a translational swine polytrauma model, hypothesizing that VCM correlates with a laboratory reference method, the TEG 5000 (Haemonetics, Boston, MA), and can identify coagulopathic phenotypes relevant to trauma. Our secondary hypothesis was that pre-warming of VCM disposable test cartridges using a heating plate versus pre-warming of cartridges by carrying the cartridge in the user's pocket does not significantly alter results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in tandem with a parent study involving anesthetized, mechanically ventilated swine (n = 20; 54 ± 5 kg) that encountered traumatic brain injury, pulmonary contusion and hemorrhage, or combination/polytrauma injury. Blood was collected at baseline, post-injury, post-shock, post-transfusion, and 6-, 24-, and 48 h post-injury to perform VCM at point-of-care. Within-group effect of time was assessed. Spearman correlation examined linear relations between VCM and standard laboratory-based coagulation tests; as well as lactate, ionized calcium, and body temperature. Logistic regression examined predictiveness of VCM to identify coagulopathic phenotypes, with receiver operator characteristic curves generated to assess diagnostic capability. At a subset of timepoints, necessity of pre-warming the VCM test cartridge using a heating plate versus pre-warming the cartridge by placement in the user's pocket was assessed by conducting simultaneous tests on two separate instruments, with results analyzed by paired t-test with crossover design.

RESULTS

VCM revealed time-dependent changes in clotting time, clot formation time (CFT), alpha, maximum clot firmness (MCF), and lysis index (LI30). All VCM metrics correlated with the respective TEG 5000 metrics, with strongest correlation for VCM MCF with TEG MA (rhos = 0.77, P < .0001) and VCM LI30 with TEG LY30 (rhos = -0.76, P < .0001). VCM demonstrated good (area under the curve >0.70) to excellent (area under the curve >0.90) diagnostic accuracy in detection of low platelet count (MCF), low hematocrit (clotting time, clot formation time, alpha, and MCF), low fibrinogen (MCF), and high fibrinogen (alpha, MCF). There was no statistically or clinically relevant effect of cartridge warming method on results.

CONCLUSIONS

In a trauma model, VCM detected significant changes in coagulation at point-of-care in a simplified portable form factor. VCM could enable informed hemostasis management in pre-hospital settings where coagulations tests are unavailable, pending further validation in clinical trials.

Investigation and validation of the TEG6s during rotary wing aeromedical flight

INTRODUCTION

To improve rural and austere trauma care, hospital-based testing performed at the point of injury may shorten the time lapsed from injury to intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the TEG6s device (Haemonetics(R), Clinton, PA) in a rotary wing aircraft. Prior attempts suffered from limitation related to lack of vibration mitigation.

METHODS

This was an investigator-initiated, industry-supported study. Haemonetics provided a TEG6s analyzer. The device underwent a standard validation. It was secured in place on the aircraft using shipping foam for vibration mitigation. Donors provided two tubes of sample blood in one sitting. Paired studies were performed on the aircraft during level flight and in the hospital, using the Global Hemostasis with Lysis Cartridge(Haemonetics (R), Clinton, PA). Both normal and presumed pathologic samples were tested in separate phases. Paired t tests were performed.

RESULTS

For normal donors, the mean R for laboratory compared with the aircraft was 6.2 minutes versus 7.2 minutes ( p = 0.025). The mean ± SD Citrated Rapid TEG Maximum Amplitude (CRT MA) was 59.3 ± 5.6 mm and 55.9 ± 7.3 mm ( p < 0.001) for laboratory and aircraft ( p < 0.001). Among normal donors, R was within normal range for 17 of 18 laboratory tests and 18 of 18 aircraft tests ( p > 0.99). During the testing of pathologic samples, the mean R time was 14.8 minutes for laboratory samples and 12.6 minutes for aircraft ( p = 0.02). Aircraft samples were classified as abnormal in 78% of samples; this was not significantly different than laboratory samples ( p = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

The use of the TEG6s for inflight viscoelastic testing appears promising. While statistically significant differences are seen in some results, these values are not considered clinically significant. Classifying samples as normal or abnormal demonstrated a higher correlation. Future studies should focus on longer flight times to evaluate for LY30, takeoff, and landing effects. Overall, this study suggests that TEG6s can be used in a prehospital environment, and further study is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level III.

Viscoelastic Testing Methods

Viscoelastic testing methods examine the real-time formation of a clot in a whole blood sample, and include thromboelastography (TEG), rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), and several other testing platforms. They allow for concurrent assessment of multiple aspects of clotting, including plasmatic coagulation factors, platelets, fibrinogen, and the fibrinolytic pathway. This testing is rapid and may be performed at the point-of-care, allowing for prompt identification of coagulopathies to guide focused and rational administration of blood products as well as the identification of anticoagulant effect. With recent industry progression towards user-friendly, cartridge-based, portable instruments, viscoelastic testing has emerged in the 21st century as a powerful tool to guide blood transfusions in the bleeding patient, and to identify and treat both bleeding and thrombotic conditions in many operative settings, including trauma surgery, liver transplant surgery, cardiac surgery, and obstetrics. In these settings, the use of transfusion algorithms guided by viscoelastic testing data has resulted in widespread improvements in patient blood management as well as modest improvements in select patient outcomes. To address the increasingly wide adoption of viscoelastic methods and the growing number of medical and laboratory personnel tasked with implementing, performing, and interpreting these methods, this chapter provides an overview of the history, physiology, and technology behind viscoelastic testing, as well as a practical review of its clinical utility and current evidence supporting its use. Also included is a review of testing limitations and the contextual role played by viscoelastic methods among all coagulation laboratory testing.

Advances in the Management of Coagulopathy in Trauma: The Role of Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays across All Phases of Trauma Care

Uncontrolled bleeding is the leading cause of preventable death following injury. Trauma-induced coagulopathy can manifest as diverse phenotypes ranging from hypocoagulability to hypercoagulability, which can change quickly during the acute phase of trauma care. The major advances in understanding coagulation over the past 25 years have resulted from the cell-based concept, emphasizing the key role of platelets and their interaction with the damaged endothelium. Consequently, conventional plasma-based coagulation testing is not accurate in predicting bleeding and does not provide an assessment of which blood products are indicated. Viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHA), conducted in whole blood, have emerged as a superior method to guide goal-directed transfusion. The major change in resuscitation has been the shift from unbridled crystalloid loading to judicious balanced blood product administration. Furthermore, the recognition of the rapid changes from hypocoagulability to hypercoagulability has underscored the importance of ongoing surveillance beyond emergent surgery. While the benefits of VHA testing are maximized when used as early as possible, current technology limits use in the pre-hospital setting and the time to results compromises its utility in the emergency department. Thus, most of the reported experience with VHA in trauma is in the operating room and intensive care unit, where there is compelling data to support its value. This overview will address the current and potential role of VHA in the seriously injured patient, throughout the continuum of trauma management.

Evaluation of the altitude impact on a point-of-care thromboelastography analyzer measurement: prerequisites for use in airborne medical evacuation courses

PURPOSE

Hemorrhagic shock is the first cause of preventable death in combat. Evacuations of wounded by aircraft are increasingly used and severely injured patients can spend consequent time in the air, mostly during strategic evacuation. In these situations, monitoring of blood coagulation may be pivotal in the management of blood product transfusion. Viscoelastic-guided transfusion is relevant in these situations. However, evaluation of these devices used in aircraft is lacking, especially the impact of decreased atmospheric pressure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of an easy-to-carry viscoelastic system (TEG^® 6s, Haemonetics).

METHODS

First, TEG^® 6s repeatability, reproducibility, and correlation with chronometric methods and TEG-5000 were assessed on quality controls, healthy volunteers, and patients. Secondly, we tested the influence of vibrations and altitude on TEG^® 6s parameters (0ft vs. 8000 ft = 2428 m) and on quality control samples (normal and hypocoagulable).

RESULTS

TEG^® 6s exhibited good correlation with the reference method and TEG^® 5000. Repeatability and reproducibility CVs were satisfactory. The tests performed in the hypobaric chamber revealed that performance at 0 ft and 8000 ft (2428 m) for 9 out of 13 parameters was not significantly different. However, we showed a significant increasing of CRT.Alpha (p = 0.049), CK.Alpha, CK.MA (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively) and CFF.MA increased (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our study provides proof of concept to validate testing in an actual aeromedical situation. Indeed, TEG^® 6s appears to ease of use, resistance to high altitude conditions, and reliability on healthy humans. It is necessary to carry out a study on hemorrhagic injured patients in an aircraft.

Hemorrhagic Resuscitation Guided by Viscoelastography in Far-Forward Combat and Austere Civilian Environments: Goal-Directed Whole-Blood and Blood-Component Therapy Far from the Trauma Center

Modern approaches to resuscitation seek to bring patient interventions as close as possible to the initial trauma. In recent decades, fresh or cold-stored whole blood has gained widespread support in multiple settings as the best first agent in resuscitation after massive blood loss. However, whole blood is not a panacea, and while current guidelines promote continued resuscitation with fixed ratios of blood products, the debate about the optimal resuscitation strategy-especially in austere or challenging environments-is by no means settled. In this narrative review, we give a brief history of military resuscitation and how whole blood became the mainstay of initial resuscitation. We then outline the principles of viscoelastic hemostatic assays as well as their adoption for providing goal-directed blood-component therapy in trauma centers. After summarizing the nascent research on the strengths and limitations of viscoelastic platforms in challenging environmental conditions, we conclude with our vision of how these platforms can be deployed in far-forward combat and austere civilian environments to maximize survival.

Agreement Between the TEG 6s and TEG 5000 Analyzers in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Thromboelastography (TEG) evaluates viscoelastic properties of blood clot formation. The TEG 5000 analyzer is commonly used but prone to errors related to vibration or operator error. The TEG 6s was developed to overcome these limitations. Performance of TEG 6s compared with TEG 5000 has not been reported in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We compared the agreement between devices via a single-center prospective observational study in hospitalized adult patients on ECMO. Data for both devices were collected daily for 3 days after ECMO initiation. Standard tests for method comparison were used. Thirty-four matching samples were available for analysis. Minimal bias was noted; however, the limit of agreement was wide for TEG parameters. Visually, agreement was better for values within the reference ranges of the tests. Lin's coefficients demonstrated moderate correlation for reaction time and alpha angle (0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.76 and 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.78, respectively). Excellent correlation was demonstrated for kinetic time and maximum amplitude (0.88; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94 and 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94). The TEG 6s device may represent an acceptable surrogate for the TEG 5000 in patients on ECMO. However, limitations in reliability were noted, and the devices may not be interchangeable when results fall outside of the reference values.

Viscoelastic hemostatic assays: Update on technology and clinical applications

Viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHA) are point of care tests that allow for a global assessment of coagulation using whole blood. The technology to allow this assessment has evolved from the original thromboelastography (TEG, Haemonetic, Boston, MA) to now include thromboelastometry (ROTEM, Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA), and, most recently, the Quantra Hemostasis Analyzer (Hemosonics, Charlottesville, VA). Diagnosis and treatment algorithms incorporating viscoelastic hemostatic tests for bleeding patients in a variety of clinical situations have now been developed. The original ROTEM and TEG technologies have been updated with emphasis placed on a cartridge-based technologies. Results from the new devices show good correlation with those from the previous versions of the devices, while cartridge-based technology has increased device stability and enhanced portability to the bedside. In this article, we will review recent advances in TEG and ROTEM technology and introduce the Quantra Hemostasis Analyzer device.

Viscoelastic monitoring in trauma resuscitation

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injury results in both physical and physiologic insult. Successful care of the trauma patient depends upon timely correction of both physical and biochemical injury. Trauma-induced coagulopathy is a derangement of hemostasis and thrombosis that develops rapidly and can be fatal if not corrected. Viscoelastic monitoring (VEM) assays have been developed to provide rapid, accurate, and relatively comprehensive depictions of an individual's coagulation profile. VEM are increasingly being integrated into trauma resuscitation guidelines to provide dynamic and individualized guidance to correct coagulopathy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We performed a narrative review of the search terms viscoelastic, thromboelastography, thromboelastometry, TEG, ROTEM, trauma, injury, resuscitation, and coagulopathy using PubMed. Particular focus was directed to articles describing algorithms for management of traumatic coagulopathy based on VEM assay parameters.

RESULTS

Our search identified 16 papers with VEM-guided resuscitation strategies in adult patients based on TEG, 12 such protocols in adults based on ROTEM, 1 protocol for children based on TEG, and 2 protocols for children based on ROTEM.

CONCLUSIONS

This review presents evidence to support VEM use to detect traumatic coagulopathy, discusses the role of VEM in trauma resuscitation, provides a summary of proposed treatment algorithms, and discusses pending questions in the field.

Investigating the Multi-Faceted Nature of Radiation-Induced Coagulopathies in a Göttingen Minipig Model of Hematopoietic Acute Radiation Syndrome

Coagulopathies are well documented after acute radiation exposure at hematopoietic doses, and radiation-induced bleeding is notably one of the two main causes of mortality in the hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome. Despite this, understanding of the mechanisms by which radiation alters hemostasis and induces bleeding is still lacking. Here, male Göttingen minipigs received hematopoietic doses of 60Co gamma irradiation (total body) and coagulopathies were characterized by assessing bleeding, blood cytopenia, fibrin deposition, changes in hemostatic properties, coagulant/anticoagulant enzyme levels, and markers of inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and barrier integrity to understand if a relationship exists between bleeding, hemostatic defects, bone marrow aplasia, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction and loss of barrier integrity. Acute radiation exposure induced coagulopathies in the Göttingen minipig model of hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome; instances of bleeding were not dependent upon thrombocytopenia. Neutropenia, alterations in hemostatic parameters and damage to the glycocalyx occurred in all animals irrespective of occurrence of bleeding. Radiation-induced bleeding was concurrent with simultaneous thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, inflammation, increased heart rate, decreased nitric oxide bioavailability and endothelial dysfunction; bleeding was not observed with the sole occurrence of a single aforementioned parameter in the absence of the others. Alteration of barrier function or clotting proteins was not observed in all cases of bleeding. Additionally, fibrin deposition was observed in the heart and lungs of decedent animals but no evidence of DIC was noted, suggesting a unique pathophysiology of radiation-induced coagulopathies. These findings suggest radiation-induced coagulopathies are the result of simultaneous damage to several key organs and biological functions, including the immune system, the inflammatory response, the bone marrow and the cardiovasculature.

Continuous renal replacement therapy in patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life‐saving therapy utilized for patients with severe life‐threatening cardiorespiratory failure. Patients treated with ECMO are among the most severely ill encountered in critical care and are at high‐risk of developing multiple organ dysfunction, including acute kidney injury (AKI) and fluid overload. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is increasingly utilized inpatients on ECMO to manage AKI and treat fluid overload. The indications for renal replacement therapy for patients on ECMO are similar to those of other critically ill populations; however, there is wide practice variation in how renal supportive therapies are utilized during ECMO. For patients requiring both CRRT and ECMO, CRRT may be connected directly to the ECMO circuit, or CRRT and ECMO may be performed independently. This review will summarize current knowledge of the epidemiology of AKI, indications and timing of CRRT, delivery of CRRT, and the outcomes of patients requiring CRRT with ECMO.

Can Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta Fly? Assessing Aortic Balloon Performance for Aeromedical Evacuation

BACKGROUND

Noncompressible torso hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) placement may occur before transport; however, its efficacy has not been demonstrated at altitude. We hypothesized that changes in altitude would not result in blood pressure changes proximal to a deployed REBOA.

METHODS

A simulation model for 7Fr guidewireless REBOA was used at altitudes up to 22,000 feet. Female pigs then underwent hemorrhagic shock to a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 40 mm Hg. After hemorrhage, a REBOA catheter was deployed in the REBOA group and positioned but not inflated in the no-REBOA group. Animals underwent simulated aeromedical evacuation at 8000 ft or were left at ground level. After altitude exposure, the balloon was deflated, and the animals were observed.

RESULTS

Taking the REBOA catheter to 22,000 ft in the simulation model resulted in a lower systolic blood pressure but a preserved MAP. In the porcine model, REBOA increased both systolic blood pressure and MAP compared with no-REBOA (P < 0.05) and was unaffected by altitude. No differences in postflight blood pressure, acidosis, or systemic inflammatory response were observed between ground and altitude REBOA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

REBOA maintained MAP up to 22,000 feet in an inanimate model. In the porcine model, REBOA deployment improved MAP, and the balloon remained effective at altitude.

Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in aeromedical transport

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®)-sigma and thromboelastography (TEG®)-6s viscoelastic point-of-care assays during rotary wing aeromedical transport, and to determine the reliability of the results obtained.

METHODS

A single centre, prospective, observational, non-interventional feasibility study performed at Gold Coast University Hospital intensive care unit, and in a LifeFlight Retrieval Medicine operated Leonardo AW139 helicopter. Blood was collected from eight healthy volunteers on 18 April 2019 and all testing was performed on that day. Functions measured were ROTEM-sigma extrinsically activated thromboelastometry (EXTEM) clotting time (CT), EXTEM amplitude at 5 min after CT (A5) and fibrin-based extrinsically activated thromboelastometry (FIBTEM) A5, and TEG-6s Kaolin (CK) reaction time (R), functional fibrinogen (CFF) maximal amplitude (MA) and CFF amplitude at 10 min after R (A10). Differences between the results obtained in the helicopter and control results at Gold Coast University Hospital during flight and after flight, and also differences in control results over time up to 3 h were analysed.

RESULTS

During flight both the ROTEM-sigma and TEG-6s devices failed to give reliable results. Post flight, the helicopter and control samples correlated well. Repeat testing of control samples at 1 and 3 h also revealed good correlation over time.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to reliably run tests on both the ROTEM-sigma and TEG-6s after the devices have been flown in a rotary wing aircraft. However, testing cannot be performed while in flight conditions. It is also possible to run blood samples collected up to 3 h prior and acquire results which correlate well with initial testing.

A comparison between the TEG 6s and TEG 5000 analyzers to assess coagulation in trauma patients

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

BACKGROUND

Trauma-induced coagulopathy is a major driver of mortality following severe injury. Viscoelastic goal-directed resuscitation can reduce mortality after injury. The TEG 5000 system is widely used for viscoelastic testing. However, the TEG 6s system incorporates newer technology, with encouraging results in cardiovascular interventions. The purpose of this study was to validate the TEG 6s system for use in trauma patients.

METHODS

Multicenter noninvasive observational study for method comparison conducted at 12 US Levels I and II trauma centers. Agreement between the TEG 6s and TEG 5000 systems was examined using citrated kaolin reaction time (CK.R), citrated functional fibrinogen maximum amplitude (CFF.MA), citrated kaolin percent clot lysis at 30 minutes (CK.LY30), citrated RapidTEG maximum amplitude (CRT.MA), and citrated kaolin maximum amplitude (CK.MA) parameters in adults meeting full or limited trauma team criteria. Blood was drawn ≤1 hour after admission. Assays were repeated in duplicate. Reliability (TEG 5000 vs. TEG 6s analyzers) and repeatability (interdevice comparison) was quantified. Linear regression was used to define the relationship between TEG 6s and TEG 5000 devices.

RESULTS

A total of 475 patients were enrolled. The cohort was predominantly male (68.6%) with a median age of 49 years. Regression line slope estimates (ß) and linear correlation estimates (p) were as follows: CK.R (ß = 1.05, ρ = 0.9), CFF.MA (ß = 0.99, ρ = 0.95), CK.LY30 (ß = 1.01, ρ = 0.91), CRT.MA (TEG 6s) versus CK.MA (TEG 5000) (ß = 1.06, ρ = 0.86) as well as versus CRT.MA (TEG 5000) (ß = 0.93, ρ = 0.93), indicating strong reliability between the devices. Overall, within-device repeatability was better for TEG 6s versus TEG 5000, particularly for CFF.MA and CK.LY30.

CONCLUSION

The TEG 6s device appears to be highly reliable for use in trauma patients, with close correlation to the TEG 5000 device and equivalent/improved within-device reliability. Given the potential advantages of using the TEG 6s device at the site of care, confirmation of agreement between the devices represents an important advance in diagnostic testing.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic test, level II.