The current and future economic state of acute care surgery

Implementation of a Vascular Acute Care Surgery Model is Associated with Improved Surgeon Efficiency and Two-Year Mortality After Lower Extremity Intervention

OBJECTIVE

Vascular surgeons work long, unpredictable hours with repeated exposure to high-stress situations. Inspired by general surgery acute care surgery models, we sought to organize the care of vascular emergencies with the implementation of a vascular acute care surgery (VACS) model. Within this model, a surgeon is in-house without elective cases and assigned for consultations and urgent operative cases on a weekly basis. This study examined the impact of a VACS model on postoperative mortality and surgeon efficiency.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of institutional Vascular Quality Initiative data from July 2014 - July 2023. Patients undergoing lower extremity bypass, peripheral vascular intervention, or amputation were included. There was a washout period from January 2020 - January 2022 to account for COVID-19 pandemic practice abnormalities. Patients were separated into pre- or post-VACS groups. The primary clinical outcomes were 30-day and 2-year mortality. Secondary clinical outcomes included 30-day complications and 30-day and 1-year major adverse limb events (MALE). Separate analyses of operating room data from July 2017 - February 2024 and fiscal data from fiscal year 2019 - fiscal year 2024 were conducted. A washout period from January 2020 - January 2022 was applied. Efficiency outcomes included monthly relative value units (RVUs) per clinical fraction full-time equivalent (cFTE) and daytime (0730-1700, Monday-Friday) operating room minutes. Patient factors and operative efficiency were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Regression modeling was performed for the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 972 and 257 patients in the pre- and post-VACS groups, respectively. Pre-VACS patients were younger (66.8±12.0 vs 68.7±12.7 years, p=0.03) with higher rates of coronary artery disease (34.6% vs 14.8%, p<0.01), hypertension (88.4% vs 82.2%, p=0.01), and tobacco history (84.4% vs 78.2%, p=0.02). 30-day mortality (2.4% pre- vs 0.8% post-VACS, p=0.18) and Kaplan-Meier estimation of 2-year mortality remained stable after VACS (p=0.07). VACS implementation was not associated with 30-day mortality but was associated with lower 2-year mortality hazard on multivariable Cox regression (hazard ratio: 0.5, 95% confidence interval: 0.3-0.9, p=0.01). Operative efficiency improved post-VACS (850.0 [765.7, 916.3] vs 918.0 [881.0, 951.1] RVU/cFTE-month, median [inter-quartile range], p=0.03). Daytime operating minutes increased (469.1±287.5 vs 908.2±386.2 minutes, p<0.01), while non-daytime minutes (420.0 [266.0, 654.0] vs 469.5 [242.0, 738.3] minutes, p=0.40) and weekend minutes (129.0 [0.0, 298.0] vs 113.5 [0.0, 279.5] minutes, p=0.59) remained stable.

CONCLUSIONS

A VACS model leads to improvement in surgeon operative efficiency while maintaining patient safety. The adoption of a vascular acute care model has a positive impact on the delivery of comprehensive vascular care.

Value in acute care surgery, Part 1: Methods of quantifying cost

BACKGROUND

With health care expenditures continuing to increase rapidly, the need to understand and provide value has become more important than ever. In order to determine the value of care, the ability to accurately measure cost is essential. The acute care surgeon leader is an integral part of driving improvement by engaging in value increasing discussions. Different approaches to quantifying cost exist depending on the purpose of the analysis and available resources. Cost analysis methods range from detailed microcosting and time-driven activity-based costing to less complex gross and expenditure-based approaches. An overview of these methods and a practical approach to costing based on the needs of the acute care surgeon leader is presented.

Benchmarking the value of care: Variability in hospital costs for common operations and its association with procedure volume

BACKGROUND

Efforts to improve health care value (quality/cost) have become a priority in the United States. Although many seek to increase quality by reducing variability in adverse outcomes, less is known about variability in costs. In conjunction with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Healthcare Economics Committee, the objective of this study was to examine the extent of variability in total hospital costs for two common procedures: laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

Nationally weighted data for adults 18 years and older was obtained for patients undergoing each operation in the 2014 and 2016 National Inpatient Sample. Data were aggregated at the hospital-level to attain hospital-specific median index hospital costs in 2019 US dollars and corresponding annual procedure volumes. Cost variation was assessed using caterpillar plots and risk-standardized observed/expected cost ratios. Correlation analysis, variance decomposition, and regression analysis explored costs' association with volume.

RESULTS

In 2016, 1,563 hospitals representing 86,170 LA and 2,276 hospitals representing 230,120 LC met the inclusion criteria. In 2014, the numbers were similar (1,602 and 2,259 hospitals). Compared with a mean of US $10,202, LA median costs ranged from US $2,850 to US $33,381. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy median costs ranged from US $4,406 to US $40,585 with a mean of US $12,567. Differences in cost strongly associated with procedure volume. Volume accounted for 9.9% (LA) and 12.4% (LC) of variation between hospitals, after controlling for the influence of other hospital (8.2% and 5.0%) and patient (6.3% and 3.7%) characteristics and in-hospital complications (0.8% and 0.4%). Counterfactual modeling suggests that were all hospitals to have performed at or below their expected median cost, one would see a national cost savings of greater than US $301.9 million per year (95% confidence interval, US $280.6-325.5 million).

CONCLUSION

Marked variability of median hospital costs for common operations exists. Differences remained consistent across changing coding structures and database years and were strongly associated with volume. Taken together, the findings suggest room for improvement in emergency general surgery and a need to address large discrepancies in an often-overlooked aspect of value.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiological, level III.