Combat thoracic surgery in Iraq and Afghanistan: 2002-2016

Exploring the competencies of operating room nurses in mobile surgical teams based on the Onion Model: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

With the frequent occurrence of public health emergencies, conflicts and natural disasters around the world, mobile surgical teams are becoming more crucial. The competency of the operating room (OR) nurse has a substantial impact on the effectiveness and quality of the surgical team's treatment, still there is limited knowledge about OR nurse competencies in mobile surgical teams. This study aimed to explore the competencies of OR nurses in mobile surgical teams based on the Onion Model.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative descriptive study of participants from 10 mobile surgical teams in 2022. Twenty-one surgical team members were interviewed, including 15 OR nurses, four surgeons, and two anesthesiologists. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The data were analyzed using Mayring's content analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight competencies were found in the data analysis, which were grouped into four major domains using the Onion Model. From the outer layer to the inner layer were knowledge and skills, professional abilities, professional quality, and personal traits. The qualitative data revealed several novel competencies, including triage knowledge, self and mutual medical aid, outdoor survival skills, and sense of discipline.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of the Onion Model promotes the understanding of competency and strengthens the theoretical foundations of this study. New competencies can enrich the content of the competencies of OR nurses. The results of this study can be used for clinical recruitment, evaluation and training of OR nurses in mobile surgical teams. This study encourages further research to develop competency assessment tools and training programs for OR nurses.

An Analysis of Head and Neck Surgical Workload During Recent Combat Operations From 2002 to 2016

INTRODUCTION

In battle-injured U.S. service members, head and neck (H&N) injuries have been documented in 29% who were treated for wounds in deployed locations and 21% who were evacuated to a Role 4 MTF. The purpose of this study is to examine the H&N surgical workload at deployed U.S. military facilities in Iraq and Afghanistan in order to inform training, needed proficiency, and MTF manning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the DoD Trauma Registry was performed for all Role 2 and Role 3 MTFs, from January 2002 to May 2016; 385 ICD-9 CM procedure codes were identified as H&N surgical procedures and were stratified into eight categories. For the purposes of this analysis, H&N procedures included dental, ophthalmologic, airway, ear, face, mandible maxilla, neck, and oral injuries. Traumatic brain injuries and vascular injuries to the neck were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 15,620 H&N surgical procedures were identified at Role 2 and Role 3 MTFs. The majority of H&N surgical procedures (14,703, 94.14%) were reported at Role 3 facilities. Facial bone procedures were the most common subgroup across both roles of care (1,181, 75.03%). Tracheostomy accounted for 16.67% of all H&N surgical procedures followed by linear repair of laceration of eyelid or eyebrow (8.23%) and neck exploration (7.41%). H&N caseload was variable.

CONCLUSIONS

H&N procedures accounted for 8.25% of all surgical procedures performed at Role 2 and Role 3 MTFs; the majority of procedures were eye (40.54%) and airway (18.50%). These data can be used as planning tools to help determine the medical footprint and also to help inform training and sustainment requirements for deployed military general surgeons especially if future contingency operations are more constrained in terms of resources and personnel.

The effectiveness of simulation-based training on the competency of military nurses: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Simulation is an integral component of healthcare education and military training. There is substantial evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of simulation-based training in nursing and the military; however, its effectiveness for military nurses has not been established in systematic reviews.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of simulation-based training on the competency of military nurses and provide guidance for future research on the training of military nurses.

DESIGN

A scoping literature review of PRISMA was used to guide the review.

METHODS

Six databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) were searched for English articles. The following search terms were used in different combinations: simulation, simulate, military, army, nurses, competency, training, and education. Our database search began in 2000 and ended in February 2022. Additionally, we conducted a manual search of the references of the identified studies.

RESULTS

In this review, ten studies published between 2008 and 2021 were included, nine were from the United States and one was from the United Kingdom. The results showed that simulation-based interventions were effective in military nurse competency training, including individual knowledge, skills, abilities and thinking, team communication and collaboration abilities, competency enhancement and maintenance. Simulations can effectively train the competencies of newly graduated military nurses, nurses during daily work, and in preparing nurses during deployment.

CONCLUSION

Existing studies on simulation-based training of military nurses are limited. Additional research is needed to assess other competency training for military nurses, pre-deployment training, and training using other simulation methods. It is important to find suitable simulation training methods for the different competencies required of military nurses.

Characterization of Humanitarian Trauma Care by US Military Facilities During Combat Operations in Afghanistan and Iraq

OBJECTIVE

To characterize humanitarian trauma care delivered by US military treatment facilities (MTFs) in Afghanistan and Iraq during combat operations.

BACKGROUND

International Humanitarian Law, which includes the Geneva Conventions, defines protections and standards of treatment to victims of armed conflicts. In 1949 these standards expanded to include injured civilians. In 2001, the Global War on Terror began in Afghanistan and expanded to Iraq in 2003. US MTFs provided care to all military forces, civilians, and enemy prisoners. A thorough understanding of the scope, epidemiology, resource requirements and outcomes of civilian trauma in combat zones has not been previously characterized.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of the Department of Defense Trauma Registry from 2005-2019. Inclusion criteria were civilians and non-NATO coalition personnel (NNCP) with traumatic injuries treated at MTFs in Afghanistan and Iraq. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, resource requirements, procedures, and outcomes were categorized.

RESULTS

A total of 29,963 casualties were eligible from the Registry. There were 16,749 (55.9%) civilians and 13,214 (44.1%) NNCP. The majority of patients were age >13 years [26,853 (89.6%)] and male [28,000 (93.4%)]. Most injuries were battle-related: 12,740 (76.1%) civilians and 11,099 (84.0%) NNCP. Penetrating trauma was the most common cause of both battle and nonbattle injuries: 12,293 (73.4%) civilian and 10,029 (75.9%) NNCP. Median injury severity score (ISS) was 9 in each cohort with ISS scores ≥ 25 in 2,236 (13.4%) civilians and 1,398 (10.6%) NNCP. Blood products were transfused to 35% of each cohort: 5,850 civilians received a transfusion with 2,118 (12.6%) of them receiving ≥10 units; 4,590 NNCPs received a transfusion with 1,669 (12.6%) receiving ≥ 10 units. MTF mortality rates were civilians 1,263 (7.5%) and NNCP 776 (5.9%). Interventions, both operative and non-operative, were similar between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In accordance with International Humanitarian Law, as well as the US military's medical rules of eligibility, civilians injured in combat zones were provided the same level of care as non-NATO Coalition Personnel. Injured civilians and NNCP had similar mechanisms of injury, injury patterns, transfusion needs, and ISS. This analysis demonstrates resource equipoise in trauma care delivered to civilians and NNCP. Hospitals in combat zones must be prepared to manage large numbers of civilian casualties with significant human and material resources allocated to optimize survival. The provision of humanitarian trauma care is resource-intensive, and these data can be used to inform planning factors for current or future humanitarian care in combat zones.