Long-term sequelae of critical illness in sepsis, trauma and burns: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Sepsis Care Pathways-Qualitative Pilot Expert Interviews

Background/Objectives: Despite recent decades' rapid advances in the management of patients with sepsis and septic shock, global sepsis mortality and post-acute sepsis morbidity rates remain high. Our aim was, therefore, to provide a first overview of sepsis care pathways as well as barriers and supportive conditions for optimal pre-clinical, clinical, and post-acute sepsis care in Germany. Methods: Between May and September 2023, we conducted semi-structured, video-based, one-to-one pilot expert interviews with healthcare professionals representing pre-hospital, clinical, and post-acute care settings. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed according to the principles of Mayring's content analysis. Results: The eight interviewed professionals identified perceived critical success factors along the entire care pathway with regard to early detection (e.g., disease awareness), early acute treatment (e.g., unknown origin of infection), rehabilitation/aftercare (e.g., availability of primary care actors), and patient transitions within and between sectors (e.g., advance notice of patient arrival). These critical factors comprised: (1) the characteristics of the staff providing care (e.g., available experience), (2) the aids/utilities used (e.g., SOPs), (3) the presentation of the disease (e.g., clear symptoms), (4) the workplace (e.g., high workload), and (5) the cooperation between the staff caring for the patient (e.g., announced and standardized handovers). Conclusions: Apart from the specific recommendations that can be derived from the individual factors presented, it can be summarized that all levels of care seem only to be purposeful if providers collaborate and communicate efficiently (i.e., correct triage, multiple-eye principle, transfer management, provision of content-rich medical/discharge letters).

Endovascular Repair in Patients with Axillary-Subclavian Arterial Trauma

BACKGROUND

Arterial trauma of the axillary subclavian segment carries considerable morbidity and mortality risks. Surgical approaches are challenging given the hidden trajectory of these vessels, which has made the endovascular approach a valid and potentially better alternative for managing these injuries. We describe the incidence of relevant outcomes for patients with traumatic axillary and/or subclavian artery injury who underwent endovascular therapy at a tertiary care university hospital over a 15-year period in Cali, Colombia.

METHODS

We conducted an incidence study based on clinical records that included patients aged 15 years or older with traumatic axillary subclavian arterial injury treated with endovascular therapy between 2008 and 2022. Vascular injuries caused by intra-arterial dialysis catheter insertion (iatrogenic) were excluded. We described clinical and imaging characteristics upon admission, perioperative findings, and the incidence of complications and in-hospital mortality, with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

We included 32 patients, 93.8% of whom were male, with a median (interquartile range) age of 30 (21-42) years. The type of trauma was penetrating in 75% of patients (62.5% corresponding to gunshot wounds) and blunt in 25%. Upon admission, 12 patients (37.5%) exhibited hard signs of vascular injury, and 20 patients (62.5%) exhibited soft signs. Fourteen patients (47%) had an Injury Severity Score greater than 15, and 12 (37.5%) had hemodynamic instability. All but 3 patients (90.6%) suffered subclavian artery injury (right 48.3%, left 51.7%), while 12.9% had axillary artery injury (one patient with both vessels affected). Intraoperative complications happened in one patient (3.1%, 95% CI: 0.2-18%). Pseudoaneurysms were identified in 11 patients (34.4%), thrombosis in 6 (18.8%), and dissection in 6 (18.8%). Three (9.4%) patients required hybrid management (endovascular therapy following conventional surgery). No cases of ischemia or amputation occurred. The length of hospital stay was 6 (3, 11.5) days. No cases of in-hospital mortality were reported (0%, 95% CI: 0.0-13.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment in trauma is a minimally invasive technique with favorable clinical outcomes in patients with arterial trauma in the axillary-subclavian segment. This should be a viable therapeutic option for selected cases.

Outcome comparison of the most commonly employed wound coverage techniques in patients with massive burns ≥50% TBSA - A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Early wound coverage is one of the most essential factors influencing the survival of extensively burned patients, especially those with a total body surface area (TBSA) burned greater than 50 %. In patients with limited donor sites available for autografting, techniques such as the Meek micrograft procedure or cultured epidermal allografts (CEA) have proven to be viable alternatives. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we analyzed the outcomes of different wound coverage techniques in patients with massive burn injuries ≥ 50 % TBSA in the past 17 years.

METHODS

The EMBASE, PUBMED, Google Scholar and MEDLINE databases were searched from inception to December 2022 for studies investigating major burn reconstruction (>50 % TBSA) with the use of one of: a) autografts, b) allografts, c) cell-based therapies, and d) Meek micrografting. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The outcomes evaluated were mortality, length of hospital stay, graft take and number of operations performed.

RESULTS

Following a two-stage review process, 30 studies with 1369 patients were identified for analysis. Methods of coverage comprised the original autografting, and the newer Meek micrografting, CEA autografting, and allografting. Pooled mean age of the entire cohort was 32.5 years ( ± SE 3.6) with mean burn size of 66.1 % ( ± 2.5). After pooling the data, advantages in terms of mortality rate, length of stay, graft take and number of required surgeries were seen for the Meek and CEA groups. Mortality was highest in patients treated with autografts (50 %) and lowest with cell-based therapy (11 %). Length of stay was longest with cell-based therapy (91 ± 16 days) and shortest with Meek micrografting (50 ± 24 days). Graft take was highest with autografts (96 ± 2 %) and lowest with cell-based therapy (72 ± 9 %). Average number of operations was highest with cell-based therapy (9 ± 4) and lowest with Meek micrografting (4 ± 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of the four techniques highlighted differences in terms of all outcomes assessed, and each technique was associated with different advantages. Interestingly autografting, the option with the highest graft take rate, was also associated with the highest mortality. This study not only serves to provide the first comparison of the most commonly used techniques in major burn reconstruction, but also highlights the need for prospective studies that directly compare the efficacy of the different techniques to ultimately establish whether a true superior option exists.

Frailty as a sequela of burn injury: a post hoc analysis of the "RE-ENERGIZE" multicenter randomized-controlled trial and the National Health Interview Survey

BACKGROUND

With advancements in burn treatment and intensive care leading to decreased mortality rates, a growing cohort of burn survivors is emerging. These individuals may be susceptible to frailty, characterized by reduced physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to stressors commonly associated with aging, which significantly complicates their recovery process. To date, no study has investigated burns as a potential risk factor for frailty. This study aimed to determine the short-term prevalence of frailty among burn survivors' months after injury and compare it with that of the general population.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis was conducted on the Randomized Trial of Enteral Glutamine to Minimize the Effects of Burn Injury (RE-ENERGIZE) trial, an international randomized-controlled trial involving 1200 burn injury patients with partial- or full-thickness burns. Participants who did not complete the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire were excluded. Data for the general population were obtained from the 2022 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). Frailty was assessed using the FRAIL (Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness, Loss of weight) scale. Due to lack of data on loss of weight, for the purposes of this study, malnutrition was used as the fifth variable. Illness and malnutrition were based on admission data, while fatigue, resistance, and ambulation were determined from post-discharge responses to the SF-36. The burn cohort and general population groups were matched using propensity score matching and compared in terms of frailty status. Within the burn group, patients were divided into different subgroups based on their frailty status, and the differences in their (instrumental) activities of daily living (iADL and ADL) were compared. A multivariable analysis was performed within the burn cohort to identify factors predisposing to frailty as well as compromised iADL and ADL.

RESULTS

Out of the 1200 burn patients involved in the study, 600 completed the required questionnaires [follow-up time: (5.5 ± 2.3) months] and were matched to 1200 adults from the general population in the U.S. In comparison to the general population, burn patients exhibited a significantly higher likelihood of being pre-frail (42.3% vs. 19.8%, P < 0.0001), or frail (13.0% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.0001). When focusing on specific components, burn patients were more prone to experiencing fatigue (25.8% vs. 13.5%, P < 0.0001), limited resistance (34.0% vs. 2.7%, P < 0.0001), and restricted ambulation (41.8% vs. 3.8%, P < 0.0001). Conversely, the incidence rate of illness was observed to be higher in the general population (1.2% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.03), while no significant difference was detected regarding malnutrition (2.3% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.75). Furthermore, in comparison with robust burn patients, it was significantly more likely for pre-frail and frail patients to disclose compromise in ADL and iADL. The frail cohort reported the most pronounced limitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest a higher incidence of post-discharge frailty among burn survivors in the short-term following injury. Burn survivors experience compromised fatigue, resistance, and ambulation, while rates of illness and malnutrition were lower or unchanged, respectively. These results underscore the critical need for early identification of frailty after a burn injury, with timely and comprehensive involvement of a multidisciplinary team including burn and pain specialists, community physicians, physiotherapists, nutritionists, and social workers. This collaborative effort can ensure holistic care to address and mitigate frailty in this patient population.

Bridging frailty and burns: Defining acute burn injury as a cause of long-term frailty

Although our understanding of frailty has evolved and multiple indices have been developed, the impact of burn injuries on long-term health has been overlooked. With over 11 million annual cases globally, burns affect all demographics, although socioeconomic disparities are evident. With survival rates improved, morbidity among survivors is becoming more evident, and shows similarity to predictors of frailty. Some of the chronic effects of burns, including mental health issues and increased risks of disease, mirror frailty markers. Studies show burn survivors have lower life expectancy, independent of burn severity. Integrating burn history into frailty assessments and establishing specialized long-term care can mitigate this frailty risk. Improved interdisciplinary follow-up and research are vital for enhancing burn survivors' quality of life and longevity.

Negative pressure wound therapy in burns: a prospective, randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Negative-pressure-wound-therapy (NPWT) has become a widely used tool for the coverage and active treatment of complex wounds, including burns. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of NPWT in acute burns of upper and lower extremities and to compare results to the standard-of-care (SOC) at our institution.

METHODS

Patients that were admitted to our institution between May 2019 and November 2021 with burns on extremities between 0.5 % and 10 % of the total body surface area (%TBSA) were included and randomized to either NPWT or SOC (polyhexanide gel, fatty gauze, and cotton wool). Treatment was performed until complete wound healing. Patients that required skin grafts, received additional NPWT after grafting independent on the initial group allocation.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients suffering from burn injury between May 2019 and November 2021 were randomized into treatment with NPWT (n = 33) or SOC (n = 32); of these, 33 patients (NPWT) and 28 patients (SOC) had complete data sets and were included in the analysis. Both groups were similar regarding age (39.8 ± 13.7 vs. 44.8 ± 16.2 years,p = 0.192), total burn size (3.1 ± 2.3 vs. 3.4 ± 2.8 %TBSA,p = 0.721) and treated wound size (1.9 ± 1.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.8 %TBSA,p = 0.138). We found no differences regarding healing time (11.0 ± 4.9 vs. 8.6 ± 3.8,p = 0.074, and significant differences in a number of dressing changes throughout the study (2.4 ± 1.5 vs 4.2 ± 1.9,p < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis exhibited no statistically significant difference in the time to healing or skin grafting (p = 0.085) in NPWT group compared with SOC group. The median time to healing or skin grafting was 10(8-11) days for NPWT and 9(7-11) days for SOC. The hazard ratio for healing or skin graft was HR= 0.64(0.38-1.08). The results of the time-to-event analysis as well as the Kaplan-Meier curve on the PPS confirmed this result. We found no differences in secondary surgical operations 15.2 vs 21.4 % pain or functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found no significant difference between the two groups in terms of time to detect wound healing. We also found no difference regarding further operations for wound closure, pain and/or scarring. However, dressing changes were significantly less frequent for patients that were treated with NPWT, which may be a psychological and logistical advantage.

The long-term intercorrelation between post-burn pain, anxiety, and depression: a post hoc analysis of the "RE-ENERGIZE" double-blind, randomized, multicenter placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the growing prevalence of burn survivors, a gap persists in our understanding of the correlation between acute burn trauma and the long-term impact on psychosocial health. This study set out to investigate the prevalence of long-term pain and symptoms of anxiety and depression in survivors of extensive burns, comparing this to the general population, and identify injury and demographic-related factors predisposing individuals to psychosocial compromise.

METHODS

RE-ENERGIZE was an international, double-blinded, randomized-controlled trial that enrolled 1200 patients with partial- or full-thickness burns that required surgical treatment. For the post hoc analysis, we excluded participants who did not complete the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Normative data were taken from the 2021 National Health Interview Survey dataset. Propensity score matching was performed using the nearest-neighbor 1-to-1 method, and the two cohorts were compared in terms of chronic pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. A multivariable analysis was performed on the burns cohort to identify factors predicting post-discharge pain and symptoms of anxiety and depression.

RESULTS

A total of 600 burn patients and 26,666 general population adults were included in this study. Following propensity score matching, both groups comprised 478 participants each, who were predominately male, white, overweight and between 20 and 60 years old. Compared to the general population, burn patients were significantly more likely to report the presence of moderate and a lot of pain (p = 0.002). Symptoms of anxiety were significantly higher in the burn population in two of four levels (most of the time; some of the time; p < 0.0001 for both). Responders in the burn population were significantly less likely to report the absence of depressive symptoms (p < 0.0001). Burn patients were also significantly more likely to report that their mental health affects their social life. TBSA, history of depression, and female sex were identified as independently associated factors for pain, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. The presence of chronic pain and anxiety symptoms independently predicted for symptoms of depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyzing the largest multicenter cohort of patients with extensive burns, we find that burn injury is associated with chronic pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. In addition, TBSA-burned and history of depression directly correlate with the prevalence of chronic pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Finally, pain, and symptoms of anxiety and depression are interrelated and may have interactive effects on the process of recovery following burn injury. Burn patients would, therefore, benefit from a multidisciplinary team approach with early mobilization of pain and mental health experts, in order to promptly prevent the development of psychosocial challenges and their consequences.

Key Exercise Concepts in the Rehabilitation from Severe Burns

This article presents information on the benefits of exercise in counteracting the detrimental effects of bed rest, and/or severe burns. Exercise is key for maintaining physical function, lean body mass, metabolic recovery, and psychosocial health after major burn injuries. The details of an exercise training program conducted in severely burned persons are presented, as well as information on the importance of proper regulation of body temperature during exercise or physical activity. The sections on exercise and thermoregulation are followed by a section on the role of exercise in scarring and contractures. Finally, gaps in the current knowledge of exercise, thermoregulation, and contractures are presented.

Health-related quality of life among critically ill patients after discharge from the ICU-A systematic review protocol

The impact of critical illness on patients is profound, resulting in physical, mental, and social consequences and poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Several studies investigated HRQOL among patients discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU). However, few systematic reviews cover studies conducted in the last decade or using valid instruments for measuring HRQOL in general ICU survivor populations. Herein, we conduct a systematic review of these studies that followed PRISMA guidelines. We will search PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Cochrane Library, and Open Grey for papers. We will search for articles reporting the HRQOL of ICU survivors that were written in English and published from 01 January 2012 onward from the date of this protocol's publication. We will also extract HRQOL data and analyze associate factors. The risk of bias will be measured with a standard quality assessment tool. The strength of the results will depend on the number of studies and the consistency of their results. Trial registration number: PROSPERO CRD 42022304279.

Novel Design and Implementation of an Integrated Burn Rehabilitation Clinical Fellowship

ABSTRACT

Postgraduate medical burn rehabilitation training has been limited, with very few academic physiatrists specializing in burn rehabilitation. As a result, there are no existing models for postgraduate burn rehabilitation education. A 12-mo comprehensive clinical fellowship in burn rehabilitation was offered through a tertiary burn center with formal university accreditation. In this article, the clinical, educational, and skill-based goals developed and implemented for this novel fellowship was outlined to serve as a blueprint for future fellowships in burn rehabilitation, as well as reflections on the experience.

Short- and long term hyposmia, hypogeusia, dysphagia and dysphonia after facial burn injury - A prospective matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Facial burns frequently occur in occupational or household accidents. While dysphagia and dysphonia are known sequelae, little is known about impaired smell and taste after facial burns.

METHODS

In a prospective observational controlled study, we evaluated hyposmia via the Sniffin' Stick Test (SnS), hypogeusia via a taste strip test, and dysphonia and dysphagia via validated questionnaires acutely and one-year after burn, respectively. A matched control group consisting of a convenience sample of healthy volunteers underwent the same assessments.

RESULTS

Fifty-five facial burn patients (FB) and 55 healthy controls (CTR) were enrolled. Mean burn size was 11 (IQR: 29) % total body surface area (TBSA); CTR and FB were comparable regarding age, sex and smoking status. Acutely, hyposmia was present in 29% of the FB group (CTR: 9%, p = 0.014) and burn patients scored worse on the SnS than CTR (FB: 10; CTR: 11; IQR: 2; p = 0.013). Hyposmia per SnS correlated with subjective self-assessment. Hyposmia and SnS scores improved over time (FB acute: 10.5 IQR: 2; FB one year: 11; IQR: 2; p = 0.042) and returned to normal at one-year post burn in most patients who completed the study (lost to follow-up: 21 patients). Taste strip scores were comparable between FB and CTR, as was the acute prevalence of dysphagia and dysphonia.

CONCLUSION

Hyposmia acutely after facial thermal trauma appeared frequently in this study, especially when complicated by inhalation trauma or large TBSA involvement. Of all complete assessments, a fraction of burn patients retained hyposmia after one year while most improved over time to normal. Prevalence of dysphonia, dysphagia and hypogeusia was comparable to healthy controls in this study, perhaps due to overall minor burn severity.

Defining Posttraumatic Sepsis for Population-Level Research

IMPORTANCE

Multiple classification methods are used to identify sepsis from existing data. In the trauma population, it is unknown how administrative methods compare with clinical criteria for sepsis classification.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the agreement between 3 approaches to sepsis classification among critically ill patients with trauma and compare the sepsis-associated risk of adverse outcomes when each method was used to define sepsis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study used data collected between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020, from patients aged 16 years or older with traumatic injury, admitted to the intensive care unit of a single-institution level 1 trauma center and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 3 days. Statistical analysis was conducted from August 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022.

EXPOSURE

Hospital-acquired sepsis, as classified by 3 methods: a novel automated clinical method based on data from the electronic health record, the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), and explicit and implicit medical billing codes.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were chronic critical illness and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included number of days in an intensive care unit, number of days receiving mechanical ventilation, discharge to a skilled nursing or long-term care facility, and discharge to home without assistance.

RESULTS

Of 3194 patients meeting inclusion criteria, the median age was 49 years (IQR, 31-64 years), 2380 (74%) were male, and 2826 (88%) sustained severe blunt injury (median Injury Severity Score, 29 [IQR, 21-38]). Sepsis was identified in 747 patients (23%) meeting automated clinical criteria, 118 (4%) meeting NTDB criteria, and 529 (17%) using medical billing codes. The Light κ value for 3-way agreement was 0.16 (95% CI, 0.14-0.19). The adjusted relative risk of chronic critical illness was 9.9 (95% CI, 8.0-12.3) for sepsis identified by automated clinical criteria, 5.0 (95% CI, 3.4-7.3) for sepsis identified by the NTDB, and 4.5 (95% CI, 3.6-5.6) for sepsis identified using medical billing codes. The adjusted relative risk for in-hospital mortality was 1.3 (95% CI, 1.0-1.6) for sepsis identified by automated clinical criteria, 2.7 (95% CI, 1.7-4.3) for sepsis identified by the NTDB, and 1.0 (95% CI, 0.7-1.2) for sepsis identified using medical billing codes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of critically ill patients with trauma, administrative methods misclassified sepsis and underestimated the incidence and severity of sepsis compared with an automated clinical method using data from the electronic health record. This study suggests that an automated approach to sepsis classification consistent with Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) clinical criteria is feasible and may improve existing approaches to health services and population-based research in this population.

Proceedings of the 2021 American Burn Association State and Future of Burn Science Meeting

Periodically, the American Burn Association (ABA) has convened a State of the Science meeting on various topics representing multiple disciplines within burn care and research. In 2021 at the request of the ABA President, meeting development was guided by the ABA's Burn Science Advisory Panel (BSAP) and a subgroup of meeting chairs. The goal of the meeting was to produce both an evaluation of the current literature and ongoing studies, and to produce a research agenda and/or define subject matter-relevant next steps to advance the field(s). Members of the BSAP defined the topics to be addressed and subsequently solicited for nominations of expert speakers and topic leaders from the ABA's Research Committee. Current background literature for each topic was compiled by the meeting chairs and the library then enhanced by the invited topic and breakout discussion leaders. The meeting was held in New Orleans, LA on November 2nd and 3rd and was formatted to allow for 12 different topics, each with two subtopics, to be addressed. Topic leaders provided a brief overview of each topic to approximately 100 attendees, followed by expert-lead breakout sessions for each topic that allowed for focused discussion among subject matter experts and interested participants. The breakout and topic group leaders worked with the participants to determine research needs and associated next steps including white papers, reviews and in some cases collaborative grant proposals. Here, summaries from each topic area will be presented to highlight the main foci of discussion and associated conclusions.

The hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis in sepsis- and hyperinflammation-induced critical illness: Gaps in current knowledge and future translational research directions

The classical model of the vital increase in systemic glucocorticoid availability in response to sepsis- and hyperinflammation-induced critical illness is one of an activated hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. However, research performed in the last decade has challenged this rather simple model and has unveiled a more complex, time-dependent set of responses. ACTH-driven cortisol production is only briefly increased, rapidly followed by orchestrated peripheral adaptations that maintain increased cortisol availability for target tissues without continued need for increased cortisol production and by changes at the target tissues that guide and titrate cortisol action matched to tissue-specific needs. One can speculate that these acute changes are adaptive and that treatment with stress-doses of hydrocortisone may negatively interfere with these adaptive changes. These insights also suggest that prolonged critically ill patients, treated in the ICU for several weeks, may develop central adrenal insufficiency, although it remains unclear how to best diagnose and treat this condition.

Novel insights in endocrine and metabolic pathways in sepsis and gaps for future research

Sepsis is defined as any life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. It remains an important cause of critical illness and has considerable short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. In the last decades, preclinical and clinical research has revealed a biphasic pattern in the (neuro-)endocrine responses to sepsis as to other forms of critical illness, contributing to development of severe metabolic alterations. Immediately after the critical illness-inducing insult, fasting- and stress-induced neuroendocrine and cellular responses evoke a catabolic state in order to provide energy substrates for vital tissues, and to concomitantly activate cellular repair pathways while energy-consuming anabolism is postponed. Large randomized controlled trials have shown that providing early full feeding in this acute phase induced harm and reversed some of the neuro-endocrine alterations, which suggested that the acute fasting- and stress-induced responses to critical illness are likely interlinked and benefical. However, it remains unclear whether, in the context of accepting virtual fasting in the acute phase of illness, metabolic alterations such as hyperglycemia are harmful or beneficial. When patients enter a prolonged phase of critical illness, a central suppression of most neuroendocrine axes follows. Prolonged fasting and central neuroendocrine suppression may no longer be beneficial. Although pilot studies have suggested benefit of fasting-mimicking diets and interventions that reactivate the central neuroendocrine suppression selectively in the prolonged phase of illness, further study is needed to investigate patient-oriented outcomes in larger randomized trials.

Enteral nutrition alleviated lipopolysaccharides-induced hypercatabolism through ghrelin/GHS-R1α-POMC

Sustained hypercatabolism induced by sepsis contributed to serious complications and mortality in the intensive care unit. Enteral nutrition (EN) was required to maintain the energy balance during sepsis. Ghrelin, which was stimulated secretion by EN, had been shown to regulate energy homeostasis. Therefore, we tested whether EN alleviated hypercatabolism through ghrelin/GH secretagogue receptor 1α (GHS-R1α)-proopiomelanocortin (POMC) in endotoxemic rats. Rats in the Sham and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) groups were free access to rodent chow diet and water. Rats in the EN, EN + Lys and EN + 3-MA groups were intracerebroventricularly injected with saline, D-Lys3-GHRP-6 or 3-MA and then received EN for three days. Hypercatabolism was measured by the change of body weight, insulin resistance, leptin, corticosterone, muscle protein synthesis and atrophy. Serum and hypothalamic total ghrelin, acylated ghrelin, GHS-R1α and AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-autophagy-POMC pathway were also detected. The results showed that EN increased serum and hypothalamic total ghrelin, acylated ghrelin and GHS-R1α, effectively activated the hypothalamic AMPK-autophagy-POMC pathway and alleviated hypercatabolism in endotoxemic rats. The improving effects of EN on hypercatabolism and hypothalamic AMPK-autophagy-POMC pathway were abolished with the central administration of D-Lys3-GHRP-6 to inhibited hypothalamic GHS-R1α. And with the central administration of 3-MA to inhibited hypothalamic autophagy, the improving effect of EN on hypercatabolism was also abolished in endotoxemic rats. In conclusions, EN could significantly alleviate hypercatabolism through ghrelin/GHS-R1α-POMC in endotoxemic rats.