FasterRib: A deep learning algorithm to automate identification and characterization of rib fractures on chest computed tomography scans

Diagnostic evaluation of blunt chest trauma by imaging-based application of artificial intelligence: A review

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly integral in clinical practice, such as during imaging tasks associated with the diagnosis and evaluation of blunt chest trauma (BCT). Due to significant advances in imaging-based deep learning, recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of AI in the diagnosis of BCT, with a focus on rib fractures, pulmonary contusion, hemopneumothorax and others, demonstrating significant clinical progress. However, the complicated nature of BCT presents challenges in providing a comprehensive diagnosis and prognostic evaluation, and current deep learning research concentrates on specific clinical contexts, limiting its utility in addressing BCT intricacies. Here, we provide a review of the available evidence surrounding the potential utility of AI in BCT, and additionally identify the challenges impeding its development. This review offers insights on how to optimize the role of AI in the diagnostic evaluation of BCT, which can ultimately enhance patient care and outcomes in this critical clinical domain.

Applications of Deep Learning in Trauma Radiology: A Narrative Review

Diagnostic imaging is essential in modern trauma care for initial evaluation and identifying injuries requiring intervention. Deep learning (DL) has become mainstream in medical image analysis and has shown promising efficacy for classification, segmentation, and lesion detection. This narrative review provides the fundamental concepts for developing DL algorithms in trauma imaging and presents an overview of current progress in each modality. DL has been applied to detect free fluid on Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST), traumatic findings on chest and pelvic X-rays, and computed tomography (CT) scans, identify intracranial hemorrhage on head CT, detect vertebral fractures, and identify injuries to organs like the spleen, liver, and lungs on abdominal and chest CT. Future directions involve expanding dataset size and diversity through federated learning, enhancing model explainability and transparency to build clinician trust, and integrating multimodal data to provide more meaningful insights into traumatic injuries. Though some commercial artificial intelligence products are Food and Drug Administration-approved for clinical use in the trauma field, adoption remains limited, highlighting the need for multi-disciplinary teams to engineer practical, real-world solutions. Overall, DL shows immense potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of trauma imaging, but thoughtful development and validation are critical to ensure these technologies positively impact patient care.

Deep learning for acute rib fracture detection in CT data: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To review studies on deep learning (DL) models for classification, detection, and segmentation of rib fractures in CT data, to determine their risk of bias (ROB), and to analyse the performance of acute rib fracture detection models.

METHODS

Research articles written in English were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science in April 2023. A study was only included if a DL model was used to classify, detect, or segment rib fractures, and only if the model was trained with CT data from humans. For the ROB assessment, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used. The performance of acute rib fracture detection models was meta-analysed with forest plots.

RESULTS

A total of 27 studies were selected. About 75% of the studies have ROB by not reporting the patient selection criteria, including control patients or using 5-mm slice thickness CT scans. The sensitivity, precision, and F1-score of the subgroup of low ROB studies were 89.60% (95%CI, 86.31%-92.90%), 84.89% (95%CI, 81.59%-88.18%), and 86.66% (95%CI, 84.62%-88.71%), respectively. The ROB subgroup differences test for the F1-score led to a p-value below 0.1.

CONCLUSION

ROB in studies mostly stems from an inappropriate patient and data selection. The studies with low ROB have better F1-score in acute rib fracture detection using DL models.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This systematic review will be a reference to the taxonomy of the current status of rib fracture detection with DL models, and upcoming studies will benefit from our data extraction, our ROB assessment, and our meta-analysis.