Letters to the Editor

The impact of pregnancy on postoperative outcomes among obese women who underwent bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Women who had a history of bariatric surgery are increasingly becoming pregnant. There is growing evidence showing that increased risk of postoperative complications may be associated with the gestation after bariatric surgery.The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the potential impact of pregnancy on weight loss and postoperative complications in obese women after bariatric surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails were searched from inception through October 2018. Selection criteria included observational or randomized trial examining weight loss and medical complications in pregnant compared to non-pregnant women after bariatric surgery. Two reviewers extracted information and performed quality appraisal of eligible articles. Meta-analysis was performed to ascertain the certainty of the evidence when possible.

RESULTS

Seven observational cohort studies with a total of 27,369 obese women were included in the final analysis. The mean difference (95 % confidence interval) in percent excess weight loss between pregnant and non-pregnant subjects was -9.5 (-19.9, 0.9). The odds ratio (95 % confidence interval) for postoperative complications in pregnant relative to non-pregnant subjects was 0.85 (0.33, 2.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy may have little or no effect on weight loss or postoperative complications in women who have undergone bariatric surgery.

Development of a plain radiograph requesting algorithm for patients presenting with acute abdominal pain

Radiologists at a large teaching hospital felt that plain radiograph imaging was being performed inappropriately for patients admitted with acute abdominal pain. They felt requests were either not indicated or CT was a more appropriate first line radiological investigation in certain circumstances.An audit was performed looking at plain radiograph imaging requests for emergency admissions under general surgery, using Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) guidelines as the standard. The audit revealed that only 80% of plain radiograph requests met RCR guidelines. It also showed that 33% of acute admissions undergoing plain radiograph imaging proceeded to CT within forty-eight hours. These findings lead to the development of a plain radiograph algorithm. This aimed to improve plain radiograph imaging requests and to increase the use of CT as an earlier or first line radiological investigation where appropriate.Outcome of discussion at local and regional clinical governance meetings was that earlier CT would be useful in specific circumstances. The algorithm provides a framework for appropriately expediting CT in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain where bowel obstruction or perforation was suspected. However, consultant surgeons felt that in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain, the plain abdominal radiograph often demonstrates findings associated with specific diagnoses not specifically indicated by RCR guidelines. If RCR guidelines for plain radiograph imaging are broadened, radiological interpretation would examine for a broader range of findings and, when combined with other clinical information, diagnoses can be made, thus avoiding the need for further imaging or explorative surgery.