Comparison of hemodynamic measurements from invasive and noninvasive monitoring during early resuscitation

The relationship of systemic and pulmonary arterial parameters with HFpEF scores (H2 FPEF, HFA-PEFF) and diastolic dysfunction parameters in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to show the relationship between pulmonary pulse wave transit time (pPTT), pulmonary artery stiffness (PAS), and aortic stiffness parameters measured by non-invasive methods, HFpEF patients, and HFpEF scores (H2 FPEF, HFA-PEFF).

METHOD

A total of 101 patients were included in our study, 52 of whom were HFpEF patients and 49 were control groups without heart failure. Echocardiographic parameters for PAS and pPTT were calculated, along with diastolic parameters that support the diagnosis of HFpEF. Aortic stiffness was assessed using a PWA monitor. Demographic features, laboratory findings, aortic stiffness parameters, and echocardiographic findings including pulmonary artery parameters were compared with the control group.

RESULTS

PAS, pPTT, PWV were significantly higher in the HFpEF group than in the control group (p < 0.001). PAS and pPTT correlated positively with HFpEF scores. In linear regression analysis for PAS, a directly positive correlation was found between E/e' and PAS, independent of aortic stiffness.

CONCLUSION

These parameters can be used as a predictive value in the diagnosis process of patients with suspected HFpEF. A significant relationship between PAS and ventricular stiffness (E/e') was shown independently of aortic stiffness.

Cardiac output measured by transthoracic echocardiography and Swan-Ganz catheter. A comparative study in mechanically ventilated patients with high positive end-expiratory pressure

Objective

To compare cardiac output measurements by transthoracic echocardiography and a pulmonary artery catheter in mechanically ventilated patients with high positive end-expiratory pressure. To evaluate the effect of tricuspid regurgitation.

Methods

Sixteen mechanically ventilated patients were studied. Cardiac output was measured by pulmonary artery catheterization and transthoracic echocardiography. Measurements were performed at different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (10cmH₂O, 15cmH₂O, and 20cmH₂O). The effect of tricuspid regurgitation on cardiac output measurement was evaluated. The intraclass correlation coefficient was studied; the mean error and limits of agreement were studied with the Bland-Altman plot. The error rate was calculated.

Results

Forty-four pairs of cardiac output measurements were obtained. An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.908 was found (p < 0.001). The mean error was 0.44L/min for cardiac output values between 5 and 13L/min. The limits of agreement were 3.25L/min and -2.37L/min. With tricuspid insufficiency, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.791, and without tricuspid insufficiency, 0.935. Tricuspid insufficiency increased the error rate from 32% to 52%.

Conclusions

In patients with high positive end-expiratory pressure, cardiac output measurement by transthoracic echocardiography is comparable to that with a pulmonary artery catheter. Tricuspid regurgitation influences the intraclass correlation coefficient. In patients with high positive end-expiratory pressure, the use of transthoracic echocardiography to measure cardiac output is comparable to invasive measures.

Cardiac output measurements via echocardiography versus thermodilution: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Echocardiography, as a noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation technique, is frequently used in critically ill patients. Different opinions exist regarding whether it can be interchanged with traditional invasive means, such as the pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (TD) technique. This systematic review aimed to analyze the consistency and interchangeability of cardiac output measurements by ultrasound (US) and TD. Five electronic databases were searched for studies including clinical trials conducted up to June 2019 in which patients’ cardiac output was measured by ultrasound techniques (echocardiography) and TD. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers who used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2), which was tailored according to our systematic review in Review Manager 5.3. A total of 68 studies with 1996 patients were identified as eligible. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were used to compare the cardiac output (CO) measured using the different types of echocardiography and different sites of Doppler use with TD. No significant differences were found between US and TD (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.14; 95% confidence interval, -0.30 to 0.02; P = 0.08). No significant differences were observed in the subgroup analyses using different types of echocardiography and different sites except for ascending aorta (AA) (random effects model: mean difference [MD], -0.37; 95% confidence interval, -0.74 to -0.01; P = 0.05) of Doppler use. The median of bias and limits of agreement were -0.12 and ±0.94 L/min, respectively; the median of correlation coefficient was 0.827 (range, 0.140–0.998). Although the difference in CO between echocardiography by different types or sites and TD was not entirely consistent, the overall effect of meta-analysis showed that no significant differences were observed between US and TD. The techniques may be interchangeable under certain conditions.

Right Heart Function in Critically Ill Patients at Risk for Acute Right Heart Failure: A Description of Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Arterial Coupling, Ejection Fraction and Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index

BACKGROUND

The gold standard for right heart function is the assessment of right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling defined as the ratio of arterial to end-systolic elastance (Ea/Emax). This study demonstrates the use of the volumetric pulmonary artery (PA) catheter for estimation of Ea/Emax and describes trends of Ea/Emax, right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) during initial 48hours of resuscitation in the trauma surgical intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

Review of prospectively collected data for 32 mechanically ventilated adult trauma and emergency general surgery patients enrolled within 6hours of admission to the ICU. Haemodynamics, recorded every 12hours for 48hours, were compared among survivors and non-survivors to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Mean age was 49±20 years, 69% were male, and 84% were trauma patients. Estimated Ea/Emax was associated with pulmonary vascular resistance and inversely related to pulmonary arterial capacitance and PA catheter derived RVEF. Seven (7) trauma patients did not survive to hospital discharge. Non-survivors had higher estimated Ea/Emax, suggesting right ventricular-pulmonary arterial uncoupling, with a statistically significant difference at 48hours (2.3±1.7 vs 1.0±0.58, p=0.018). RVEF was significantly lower in non-survivors at study initiation and at 48hours. PAPi did not show a consistent trend.

CONCLUSIONS

Estimation of Ea/Emax using volumetric PA catheter is feasible. Serial assessment of RVEF and Ea/Emax may help in early identification of right heart dysfunction in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients at risk for acute right heart failure.

Evaluation of the utility of cardiac ultrasonography of patients in a surgical intensive care unit

Background

Ultrasonography is being more commonly used by intensivists to assess the hemodynamic status of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) and for other purposes.

Objective

To review the indications for and evaluate the impact of cardiac ultrasonography (CUS) on the management of patients in a surgical ICU (SICU).

Method

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of patients in the SICU who underwent CUS performed by intensivists at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital from January 2011 to March 2013. CUS was used to determine (1) preload (using inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and collapsibility index), (2) cardiac contractility (using subjective assessment and fractional shortening), and (3) other miscellaneous findings.

Result

We included data from 157 patients (96 male and 61 female) whose age ranged from 15 to 99 years (mean 63.5 years) in the study. CUS was performed 190 times in these 157 patients. The most common indication for CUS was hemodynamic status assessment (78), followed by shock (69), oliguria (35), and other (8). CUS results led to 71 changes in management (37% of cases) ; namely, fluid challenge (38), inotropic drug management (7), drainage of pleural/abdominal fluid (12), and other changes (14). A weakly-positive correlation between the IVC diameter and CVP (Pearson’s r = 0.45) was demonstrated. The overall mortality rate was 14.6%.

Conclusion

CUS performed by intensivists can be used to assess the hemodynamic status of patients in the SICU, especially those with shock or oliguria, and lead to changes in the management of these patients.

Geriatric Trauma

Within the next 15 years, 1 in 5 Americans will be over age 65. $34 billion will be spent yearly on trauma care of this age group. This section covers situations in trauma unique to the geriatric population, who are often under-triaged and have significant injuries underestimated. Topics covered include age-related pathophysiological changes, underlying existing medical conditions and certain daily medications that increase the risk of serious injury in elderly trauma patients. Diagnostic evaluation of this group requires liberal testing, imaging, and a multidisciplinary team approach. Topics germane to geriatric trauma including hypothermia, elder abuse, and depression and suicide are also covered.

Ultrasonic evaluation of the heart

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the role of echocardiography for the hemodynamic evaluation of critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to its crucial role in evaluating heart abnormalities as in the classical cardiological approach, echocardiography is now frequently used by intensivists for noninvasive hemodynamic evaluation of the critically ill patient. Using echocardiography, it is possible to measure cardiac output, intravascular pressures and volumes, systolic and diastolic function of both ventricles, and preload responsiveness. This not only allows characterization of the precise nature of hemodynamic alterations in patients with circulatory and respiratory failure, but also provides guidance for hemodynamic optimization and optimization of ventilatory settings. There are now many data showing how echocardiography can be useful in detecting otherwise unrecognized myocardial depression in sepsis and right ventricular dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients. The main limitation of echocardiography for hemodynamic monitoring is its intermittent nature. Hence, echocardiography is often combined with other monitoring devices, allowing continuous measurement of flow and triggering new echocardiographic evaluations.

SUMMARY

Echocardiography has now become an important tool for hemodynamic evaluation of the critically ill patient. Echocardiography should be performed in most patients with circulatory and respiratory failure.

The role of invasive techniques in cardiopulmonary evaluation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the role of the invasive monitoring techniques pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and transpulmonary thermodilution (TPD) for cardiopulmonary monitoring in the critically ill patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

Characterization of the nature of hemodynamic alterations and hemodynamic optimization can be achieved both with PAC and TPD. Some recent trials suggest that volumetric measurements may be preferred in conditions with preserved left ventricular systolic function, whereas pressure measurements should be preferred in patients with altered left ventricular systolic function. Extravascular lung water is strongly associated with outcome and may be used to reflect the impact of fluid management strategies. The time response of this measurement needs still to be better defined.

SUMMARY

This review highlights that PAC and TPD have an important role in cardiopulmonary monitoring of critically ill patients. Both techniques can be used efficiently to diagnose the nature of circulatory or respiratory failure and to monitor the effects of therapies. The choice of the technique should be guided by the patient's condition and the need for additional measurements rather than based on physician's preferences.

Brain-type natriuretic peptide and right ventricular end-diastolic volume index measurements are imprecise estimates of circulating blood volume in critically ill subjects

BACKGROUND

Surrogate indicators have often been used to estimate intravascular volume to guide fluid management. Brain-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been used as a noninvasive adjunct in the diagnosis of fluid overload and as a marker of response to therapy, especially in individuals with congestive heart failure. Similarly, right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVI) measurements represent another parameter used to guide fluid resuscitation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether BNP and RVEDVI are clinically valuable parameters that can distinguish among hypovolemia, euvolemia, and hypervolemia, as measured by blood volume (BV) analysis in critically ill surgical subjects.

METHODS

This observational study was part of a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Subjects with pulmonary artery catheters for the treatment of traumatic injuries, severe sepsis/septic shock, cardiovascular collapse, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and postsurgical care were studied. Circulating BV was measured by a radioisotope dilution technique using the BVA-100 Analyzer (Daxor Corporation, New York, NY) within the first 24 hours of acute resuscitation. BV results were reported as percent deviation from the patient's ideal BV based on height and percent deviation from optimum weight. Hypovolemia was defined as less than 0%, euvolemia was defined as 0% to +16%, and hypervolemia was defined as greater than +16% deviation from ideal BV. RVEDVI was measured by continuous cardiac output pulmonary artery catheters (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). BNP and RVEDVI measurements obtained with BV analysis were evaluated with Fisher's exact test and regression analysis.

RESULTS

In 81 subjects, there was no difference in BV status between those with BNP of 500 pg/mL or greater and BNP of less than 500 pg/mL (p = 0.82) or in those with RVEDVI of 140 mL/m or greater and RVEDVI of less than 140 mL/m (p = 0.43). No linear relationship existed between BV and these parameters.

CONCLUSION

In critically ill surgical patients, BNP and RVEDVI were not associated with intravascular volume status, although they may be useful as indices that reflect increased cardiac preload.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, level III.