Analysis of radiation exposure among pediatric trauma patients at national trauma centers

Evaluating Adherence to Guideline-based Injury Grading in Pediatric Renal Trauma: How Are Patients Being Worked Up Prior to Transfer to a Level 1 Trauma Center?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether children with renal trauma who are transferred to a level I trauma center (TC) receive appropriate imaging studies before transfer and whether this impacts care. The American Urologic Association (AUA) Urotrauma guidelines state clinicians should perform IV contrast-enhanced CT with immediate and delayed images when renal trauma is suspected. Adherence to these guidelines in pediatric patients is unknown.

METHODS

Children treated for renal trauma at our TC between 2005 and 2019 were identified. Comparisons between patients with initial imaging at a transferring hospital (TH) and patients with initial imaging at our TC were performed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the included 293 children, 67% (197/293) were transferred into our TC and 61% (180/293) received initial imaging at the TH. Patients with initial imaging at the TH were more likely to have higher-grade renal injuries (P = .001) and were less likely to have guideline-recommended imaging (31% vs 82%, P < .001). Of patients who were imaged at the TH, 28% (50/180) underwent an additional CT imaging shortly after transfer. When imaging was incomplete at the TH, having an additional scan upon transfer was associated with emergent urologic surgery (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

Adherence to the AUA Urotrauma guidelines is low, with most pediatric renal trauma patients not receiving complete staging with delayed-phase imaging before transfer to a TC. Furthermore, patients initially imaged at THs were more likely to receive more CT scans per admission and were exposed to higher amounts of radiation. There is a need to improve imaging protocols for complete staging of renal trauma in children before transfer.

The Tertiary Survey as a Quality Improvement Initiative in Pediatric Trauma Care

BACKGROUND

Patients are at risk of missed or delayed injuries in the setting of multisystem trauma, which may be identified with a tertiary trauma survey (TTS). There is limited literature to support the utilization of a TTS in pediatric trauma population. We aim to assess the impact of the TTS as a quality and performance improvement tool in identifying missed or delayed injuries and improving the quality of care among pediatric trauma population.

METHODS

A retrospective study assessing a quality improvement/performance improvement (QI/PI) project focusing on the administration of tertiary surveys to pediatric trauma patients was conducted at our level 1 trauma center between 08-2020 and 08-2021. Patients with injury severity scores (ISS) greater than 12 and/or an anticipated hospital stay greater than 72 hours met inclusion criteria and were included.

RESULTS

Of the 535 trauma patients admitted to the pediatric trauma service during the study period, 85 (16%) patients met the criteria and received a TTS. Thirteen unaddressed or undertreated injuries were found in 11 patients: 5 cervical spine injuries, 1 subdural hemorrhage, 1 bowel injury, 1 adrenal hemorrhage, 1 kidney contusion, 2 hematomas, and 2 full thickness abrasions. Following TTS, 13 patients (15%) had additional imaging, which identified 6 of the 13 injuries.

CONCLUSION

The TTS is a valuable quality and performance improvement tool in the comprehensive care of trauma patients. Standardization and implementation of a tertiary survey have the potential to facilitate the prompt detection of injuries and improve the quality of care for pediatric trauma patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Pediatric Mandible Fractures

The management of pediatric facial fractures requires several considerations by the treating surgeon. Pediatric facial fractures occur less commonly than in adults. Among fracture patterns in children, studies have repeatedly demonstrated that mandible fractures are the most common facial fracture particularly the condyle. Most fractures in children are amenable to nonsurgical or closed treatment; however, certain indications exist for open treatment. The literature describing epidemiology, treatment trends, and long-term outcomes are limited in comparison with adult populations. The purpose of the article is to review the etiology, workup, and management of mandible fractures in children.

Impact of a statewide computed tomography scan educational campaign on radiation dose and repeat CT scan rates for transferred injured children

Purpose

Research demonstrates that children receive twice as much medical radiation from Computed Tomography (CT) scans performed at non-pediatric facilities as equivalent CTs performed at pediatric trauma centers (PTCs). In 2014, AFMC outreach staff educated Emergency Department (ED) staff on appropriate CT imaging utilization to reduce unnecessary medical radiation exposure. We set out to determine the educational campaign's impact on injured children received radiation dose.

Methods

All injured children who underwent CT imaging and were transferred to a Level I PTC during 2010 to 2013 (pre-campaign) and 2015 (post-campaign) were reviewed. Patient demographics, mode of transportation, ED length of stay, scanned body region, injury severity score, and trauma center level were analyzed. Median effective radiation dose (ERD) controlled for each variable, pre-campaign and post-campaign, was compared using Wilcoxon rank sum test.

Results

Three hundred eighty-five children under 17 years were transferred from 45 and 48 hospitals, pre- and post-campaign. Most (43%) transferring hospitals were urban or critical access hospitals (30%). Pre- and post-campaign patient demographics were similar. We analyzed 482 and 398 CT scans pre- and post-campaign. Overall, median ERD significantly decreased from 3.80 to 2.80. Abdominal CT scan ERD declined significantly from 7.2 to 4.13 (P-value 0.03). Head CT scan ERD declined from 3.27 to 2.45 (P-value < 0.0001).

Conclusion

A statewide, CT scan educational campaign contributed to ERD decline (lower dose scans and fewer repeat scans) among transferred injured children seen at PTCs. State-level interventions are feasible and can be effective in changing radiology provider practices.

Computed tomography rates and estimated radiation-associated cancer risk among injured children treated at different trauma center types

BACKGROUND

Trauma is a common indication for computed tomography (CT) in children. However, children are particularly vulnerable to CT radiation and its associated cancer risk. Identifying differences in CT usage across trauma centers and among specific populations of injured children is needed to identify where quality improvement initiatives could be implemented in order to reduce excess radiation exposure to children. We evaluated computed tomography (CT) rates among injured children treated at pediatric (PTC), mixed (MTC), or adult trauma centers (ATC) and estimated the resulting differential in potential cancer risk.

METHODS

We identified children age ≤18 years with blunt injury AIS ≥2 treated from 2010 to 2013 at 130 U.S trauma centers participating in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program. CT rates were compared across center types using Chi-square analysis. Stratified analyses in children with varying injury severity, mechanism, and age were performed. We estimated the impact of differential rates of CT scans on cancer risk using published attributable risks.

RESULTS

Among 59,010 children identified, CT rates were higher among injured children treated at ATC and MTC versus PTC. Findings were consistent after stratified analyses and were most striking in children with chest and abdomen/pelvis CT, adolescent age, low injury severity and fall injury mechanism. We estimated that for every 100,000 injured children, imaging practices in ATC and MTC would lead to an additional 17 and 16 lifetime cancers, respectively, when compared to PTC.

CONCLUSION

CT use among injured children is higher at ATC and MTC compared to PTC. Children with low injury severity, fall injury mechanism, and adolescent age are most vulnerable to differential imaging practices across centers. Quality improvement initiatives aimed at reducing heterogeneity in CT usage across trauma centers are required to mitigate pediatric radiation exposure and cancer risk.

The radiation footprint on the pediatric trauma patient

BACKGROUND

The actual baseline of radiation exposure used in evaluating pediatric trauma is not known and has relied on estimates in the literature that may not reflect clinical reality. Our objectives were to determine the baseline amount of radiation delivered in a pediatric trauma evaluation and correlate radiation exposure with trauma activation status to identify the cohort most at risk.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated trauma patients (N = 1050) at an independent Level I children's hospital for each level of trauma activation (consults, alerts, stats) from June 2010 to January 2011. Those patients with full dosimetry (N = 215) were analyzed for demographics, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, imaging modalities, and total effective radiation dosages during the full trauma assessment from the time of injury to discharge.

RESULTS

Demographics included gender (143 males, 72 females) and average age (5.5 years [range < 1-16]). The most radiation was conferred from CTs and greatest in trauma stats, followed by alerts, then consults (p < 0.001 for stat and alert doses compared to consults). Repeated imaging was common: 35% of stats had 2-3 CTs and 40% had 4-10 CTs (range 0-10 CTs). The average non-accidental trauma consult utilized four times as many CTs as the average consult (p = 0.002). Most outside hospital CTs (66%) delivered more radiation: 50.0% were at least double the standard pediatric dosage.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first to identify the actual baseline of radiation exposure for one trauma evaluation and correlate radiation exposure with trauma activation status. Factors associated with highest radiation include stat activations, suspected non-accidental traumas (NAT), and outside hospital system imaging.

Injured Children Receive Twice the Radiation Dose at Nonpediatric Trauma Centers Compared With Pediatric Trauma Centers

BACKGROUND

Use of cranial CT scans in children has been increasing, in part due to increased awareness of sports-related concussions. CT is the largest contributor to medical radiation exposure, a risk factor for cancer. Long-term cancer risks of CT scans can be two to three times higher for children than for adults because children are more radiosensitive and have a longer lifetime in which to accumulate exposure from multiple scans.

STUDY AIM

To compare the radiation exposure injured children receive when imaged at nonpediatric hospitals (NPHs) versus pediatric hospitals.

METHODS

Injured children younger than 18 years who received a CT scan at a referring hospital during calendar years (CYs) 2010 and 2013 were included. Patient-level factors included demographics, mode of transportation, and Injury Severity Score, and hospital-level factors included region of state, radiology services, and hospital type and size. Our primary outcome of interest was the effective radiation dose.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty-seven children were transferred to the pediatric trauma center during CYs 2010 and 2013, with a median age of 7.2 years (interquartile range 5-13). The median effective radiation dose received at NPHs was twice that received at the pediatric trauma center (3.8 versus 1.6 mSv, P < .001). Results were confirmed in independent and paired analyses, after controlling for mode of transportation, emergency department disposition, level of injury severity, and at the NPH trauma center level, hospital type, size, region, and radiology services location.

CONCLUSION

NPHs have the potential to substantially reduce the medical radiation received by injured children. Pediatric CT protocols should be considered.

Pediatric and adult trauma centers differ in evaluation, treatment, and outcomes for severely injured adolescents

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate differences in imaging, procedure utilization, and clinical outcomes of severely injured adolescents treated at adult versus pediatric trauma centers.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank was queried retrospectively for adolescents, 15-19years old, with a length of stay (LOS) >1day and Injury Severity Score (ISS) >25 treated at adult (ATC) or pediatric (PTC) Level 1 trauma centers from 2007 to 2011. Patient demographics and utilization of imaging and procedures were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was used to compare outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 12,861 adolescents, 51% were treated at ATC. Older age and more nonwhites were seen at ATC (p<0.01). Imaging and invasive procedures were more common at ATC (p<0.01). Shorter LOS (p=0.03) and higher home discharge rates (p<0.01) were seen at PTC. ISS and mortality did not differ. Age, race, ATC care (all p<0.01), and admission systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p=0.03) were predictors of CT utilization. ISS, SBP, and race (p<0.01) were risk factors for overall mortality; SBP (p=0.03) and ISS (p<0.01) predicted death from penetrating injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Severely injured adolescents experience improved outcomes and decreased imaging and invasive procedures without additional mortality risk when treated at PTC. PTC is an appropriate destination for severely injured adolescents.

Emergency Department Use of Computed Tomography for Children with Ventricular Shunts

OBJECTIVES

To quantify rates and variation in emergency department (ED) cranial computed tomography (CT) utilization in children with ventricular shunts, estimate radiation exposure, and evaluate the association between CT utilization and shunt revision.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective longitudinal cohort study of ED visits from 2003-2013 in children 0-18 years old with initial shunt placement in 2003. Data were examined from 31 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System. Main outcomes were cranial CT performed during an ED visit, estimated cumulative effective radiation dose, and shunt revision within 7 days. Multivariable regression modeled the relationship between patient- and hospital-level covariates and CT utilization.

RESULTS

The 1319 children with initial shunt placed in 2003 experienced 6636 ED visits during the subsequent decade. A cranial CT was obtained in 49.4% of all ED visits; 19.9% of ED visits with CT were associated with a shunt revision. Approximately 6% of patients received ≥10 CTs, accounting for 37.2% of all ED visits with a CT. The mean number of CTs per patient varied nearly 20-fold across hospitals; the individual hospital accounted for the most variation in CT utilization. The median (IQR) cumulative effective radiation dose was 7.2 millisieverts (3.6-14.0) overall, and 33.4 millisieverts (27.2-43.8) among patients receiving ≥10 CTs.

CONCLUSIONS

A CT scan was obtained in half of ED visits for children with a ventricular shunt, with wide variability in utilization by hospitals. Strategies are needed to identify children at risk of shunt malfunction to reduce variability in CT utilization and radiation exposure in the ED.

Computed tomography-related radiation exposure in children transferred to a Level I pediatric trauma center

PURPOSE

Pediatric trauma patients presenting to referring facilities (RF) often undergo computed tomography (CT) scans to identify injuries before transfer to a Level I pediatric trauma center (PTC). The purpose of our study was to evaluate RF compliance with the American College of Radiology (ACR) guidelines to minimize ionizing radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients and to determine the frequency of additional or repeat CT imaging after transfer to a PTC.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all pediatric trauma admissions from January 2010 to December 2011 at our American College of Surgeons Level I PTC was performed. Patient demographics, means of arrival, Injury Severity Score, and disposition were analyzed. Patients who underwent CT were grouped by means of arrival: those who were transferred from an RF versus those who presented primarily to the PTC. Compliance with ACR guidelines and need for additional or repeat CT scans were assessed for both groups.

RESULTS

Six hundred ninety-seven children (aged <18 years) were identified, with a mean age of 10.6 years. Three hundred twenty-one (46%) patients presented primarily to the PTC. Three hundred seventy-six (54%) were transferred from an RF, of which 90 (24%) patients underwent CT imaging before transfer. CT radiation dosing information was available for 79 (88%) of 90 patients. After transfer, 8 (9%) of 90 of children imaged at an RF required additional CT scans. In comparison, 314 (98%) of 321 patients who presented primarily to the PTC and underwent CT received appropriate pediatric radiation dosing. Mean radiation dose at PTC was approximately half of that at RF for CT scans of the head, chest, and abdomen/pelvis (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric trauma patients transferred from RF often undergo CT scanning with higher than recommended radiation doses, potentially placing them at an increased carcinogenic risk. Fortunately, few RF patients required additional CT scans after PTC transfer. Finally, compliance with ACR radiation dose limit guidelines is better achieved at a PTC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Care management study, level IV.

Analysis of radiation dose to pediatric patients during computed tomography examinations

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) utilization has increased rapidly over the past 15 years. CT is the most common source for radiation exposure.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to measure the effective dose of radiation delivered during routine head and abdominal CT examinations at a children's hospital.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of emergency department (ED) patients < 20 years of age who underwent head or abdominal CT scans in 2012 at a single children's hospital. The authors abstracted the dose-length product from the CT scanners and calculated the effective radiation dose delivered. Patient demographics were abstracted from the medical record. The relationship between effective dose and age, patient weight, and reason for examination were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 478 subjects were included: 255 underwent head CT, and 223 underwent abdominal CT. The median age was 8.1 years (interquartile range = 2.71 to 14.40 years) and 56.9% were male. The median effective dose for head CT was 2.68 mSv (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.54 to 2.84 mSv) and decreased as age increased. For abdominal CT, the median effective dose was 5.06 mSv (95% CI = 4.58 to 6.03 mSv) and increased as age increased (3.67 to 11.12 mSv, p < 0.001). For abdominal CT, 8% of 5- to 10-year-olds, 28% of those 10 to 15 years, and 60% of patients over age 15 years received effective doses over 10 mSv.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of radiation delivered to pediatric patients during routine CT examinations of the head and abdomen was low. Regardless, a large proportion of older patients were exposed to elevated effective doses of radiation during abdominal CT.

Radiation from CT scans in paediatric trauma patients: Indications, effective dose, and impact on surgical decisions

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the effective dose of radiation due to computed tomography (CT) scans in paediatric trauma patients at a level 1 Canadian paediatric trauma centre. We also explored the indications and actions taken as a result of these scans.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of paediatric trauma patients presenting to our centre from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2008. All CT scans performed during the initial trauma resuscitation, hospital stay, and 6 months afterwards were included. Effective dose was calculated using the reported dose length product for each scan and conversion factors specific for body region and age of the patient.

RESULTS

157 paediatric trauma patients were identified during the 2-year study period. Mean Injury Severity Score was 22.5 (range 12-75). 133 patients received at least one CT scan. The mean number of scans per patient was 2.6 (range 0-16). Most scans resulted in no further action (56%) or additional imaging (32%). A decision to perform a procedure (2%), surgery (8%), or withdrawal of life support (2%) was less common. The average dose per patient was 13.5mSv, which is 4.5 times the background radiation compared to the general population. CT head was the most commonly performed type of scan and was most likely to be repeated. CT body, defined as a scan of the chest, abdomen, and/or pelvis, was associated with the highest effective dose.

CONCLUSIONS

CT is a significant source of radiation in paediatric trauma patients. Clinicians should carefully consider the indications for each scan, especially when performing non-resuscitation scans. There is a need for evidence-based treatment algorithms to assist clinicians in selecting appropriate imaging for patients with severe multisystem trauma.

Trauma surgeon becomes consultant: evaluation of a protocol for management of intermediate-level trauma patients

PURPOSE

At our level 1 pediatric trauma center, 9-54 intermediate-level ("level 2") trauma activations are received per month. Previously, the surgery team was required to respond to and assume responsibility for all patients who had "level 2" trauma activations. In 8/2011, we implemented a protocol where the emergency room (ER) physician primarily manages these patients with trauma consultation for surgical evaluation or admission. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effects of the new protocol to ensure that patient safety and quality of care were maintained.

METHODS

We compared outcomes of patients treated PRE-implementation (10/2010-7/2011) and POST-implementation (9/2011-5/2012), including surgeon consultation rate, utilization of imaging and laboratory testing, ER length of stay, admission rate, and missed injuries or readmissions. Statistical analysis included chi-square and Student's t-test.

RESULTS

We identified 472 patients: 179 in the PRE and 293 in the POST period. The populations had similar baseline clinical characteristics. The surgical consultation rate in the POST period was only 42%, with no missed injuries or readmissions. The ER length of stay did not change. However, in the POST period there were significant decreases in the admission rate (73% to 44%) and the mean number of CT scans (1.4 to 1), radiographs (2.4 to 1.7), and laboratory tests (5.1 to 3.3) ordered in the emergency room (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intermediate-level pediatric trauma patients can be efficiently and safely managed by pediatric emergency room physicians, with surgical consultation only as needed. The protocol change improved resource utilization by decreasing testing and admissions and streamlining resident utilization in an era of reduced duty hours.