A Case of Nonfatal Strangulation Associated With Intimate Partner Violence

Medical evidence assisting non-fatal strangulation prosecution: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

Non-fatal strangulation (NFS) is a serious form of gendered violence that is fast becoming an offence in many jurisdictions worldwide. However, it often leaves little or no externally visible injuries making prosecution challenging. This review aimed to provide an overview of how health professionals can support the prosecution of criminal charges of NFS as part of regular practice, particularly when externally visible injuries are absent.

METHOD

Eleven databases were searched with terms related to NFS and medical evidence in health sciences and legal databases. Eligible articles were English language and peer reviewed, published before 30 June 2021; sample over 18 years that had primarily survived a strangulation attempt and included medical investigations of NFS injuries, clinical documentation of NFS or medical evidence related to NFS prosecution.

RESULTS

Searches found 25 articles that were included for review. Alternate light sources appeared to be the most effective tool for finding evidence of intradermal injury among NFS survivors that were not otherwise visible. However, there was only one article that examined the utility of this tool. Other common diagnostic imaging was less effective at detection, but were sought after by prosecutors, particularly MRIs of the head and neck. Recording injuries and other aspects of the assault using standardised tools specific for NFS were suggested for documenting evidence. Other documentation included writing verbatim quotes of the experience of the assault and taking good quality photographs that could assist with corroborating a survivor's story and proving intent, if relevant for the jurisdiction.

CONCLUSION

Clinical responses to NFS should include investigation and standardised documentation of internal and external injuries, subjective complaints and the experience of the assault. These records can assist in providing corroborating evidence of the assault, reducing the need for survivor testimony in court proceedings and increasing the likelihood of a guilty plea.

Lessons Learned: A Case of Intimate Partner Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Intimate partner violence (IPV) has been a major public health threat long before COVID-19. However, the pandemic has removed protective measures from victims, while heightening risk factors associated with IPV. Emergency department providers are often the initial point of contact in the health care system for IPV victims; therefore, knowledge of current screening guidelines and best practices in assessment and management of IPV is essential. The purpose of this case report is to present a missed opportunity involving IPV in an emergency department during the COVID-19 pandemic and to discuss the lessons learned with the aim of educating health care providers on the subtle signs of IPV and current screening guidelines.

Nonfatal Strangulation: More Than Meets the Eye

Nonfatal strangulation is a relatively newly recognized mechanism of injury that may not be taken seriously because of lack of physical injuries that many times accompany it. This comparison case series supports the importance of considering not only visually detected injuries but also symptoms the patient may be experiencing when determining diagnostics necessary to guide a treatment plan. A visually detectable injury is dependent on multiple factors. Bruises may occur with minimal pressure but may not be visible immediately after assault. Contrary to this, extensive bruising of the neck is not an accurate indicator of damage to underlying structures. The authors' experiences in these two cases signify the necessity of a comprehensive assessment utilizing both physical symptoms and assessments as the basis for determining nonfatal strangulation treatment plans.

"Don't Just Randomly Grab Someone's Neck during Intercourse!" An Analysis of Internet Articles about Choking/Strangulation during Sex

Sexual choking/strangulation has become prevalent among young U.S. adults, yet little is known about media articles that teach readers about choking. We conducted a content analysis of 27 Internet articles, examining how choking is described, information related to health risks and healthcare, and article accuracy. Most articles described choking in positive terms and indicated choking can be done safely or properly, even while acknowledging potential dangers. Only two articles indicated having undergone expert/medical review. Few gave information about signs that would warrant seeking healthcare. Sexuality professionals need to be aware of choking-related information and misinformation in online media articles.

United States ED Visits by Adult Women for Nonfatal Intimate Partner Strangulation, 2006 to 2014: Prevalence and Associated Characteristics

INTRODUCTION

Nonfatal intimate partner strangulation poses significant acute and long-term morbidity risks and also heightens women's risk for future femicide. The lifetime prevalence of nonfatal intimate partner strangulation has been estimated to be approximately 10%, or 11 million women, in the general United States population. Given the potential for significant health risks and serious consequences of strangulation, this study adds to the limited literature by estimating prevalence and describing the associated characteristics of strangulation-related visits among United States ED visits by adult women after intimate partner violence.

METHODS

Prevalence estimation as well as simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses were completed using data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample spanning the years 2006 to 2014.

RESULTS

The prevalence of strangulation codes was estimated at 1.2% of all intimate partner violence visits. Adjusting for visits, hospital characteristics, and visit year, higher odds of strangulation were noted in younger women, metropolitan hospitals, level I/II trauma centers, and non-Northeast regions. Increases in strangulation events among intimate partner violence-related visits in recent years were also observed.

DISCUSSION

A relatively low prevalence may reflect an underestimate of true nonfatal intimate partner strangulation visits owing to coding or a very low rate of ED visits for this issue. Higher odds of strangulation among intimate partner violence visits by women in more recent years may be due to increased recognition and documentation by frontline clinicians and coding teams. Continued research is needed to further inform clinical, postcare, and social policy efforts.

The neuropsychological outcomes of non-fatal strangulation in domestic and sexual violence: A systematic review

This systematic review draws together evidence from the literature for the pathological, neurological, cognitive, psychological, and behavioural outcomes of non-fatal strangulation in domestic and sexual violence. A systematic search of PubMed, PsycINFO, CINHAL, Proquest, ASSIA, Web of Science, WestLaw, Open Grey, and Ethos was conducted, with no date limits set, to identify eligible studies. Thirty empirical, peer-reviewed studies were found which met the inclusion criteria. Pathological changes included arterial dissection and stroke. Neurological consequences included loss of consciousness, indicating at least mild acquired brain injury, seizures, motor and speech disorders, and paralysis. Psychological outcomes included PTSD, depression, suicidality, and dissociation. Cognitive and behavioural sequelae were described less frequently, but included memory loss, increased aggression, compliance, and lack of help-seeking. However, no studies used formal neuropsychological assessment: the majority were medical case studies or based on self-report. Furthermore, few authors were able to control for possible confounds, including other physical violence and existing psychosocial difficulties. There is therefore a need for further neuropsychological research, focusing on cognitive and behavioural outcomes, using standardized tools, and control groups where possible. This is urgent, given societal normalization of strangulation, and legal systems which often do not reflect the act's severity and its consequences.