Living Kidney Donation at a Crossroads: What Steps Do We Need to Take Now?

The Lived Experience of "Being Evaluated" for Organ Donation: Focus Groups with Living Kidney Donors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Comprehensive evaluations are required to safeguard voluntarism and minimize harm to living kidney donors. This process is lengthy, invasive, and emotionally challenging, with up to one fifth of potential donors opting out. We aimed to describe donors' experiences of the evaluation process.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We conducted 14 focus groups involving 123 kidney donors who completed donation from three transplant centers (Australia and Canada). Transcripts were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

We identified six themes reflecting donors' experiences of evaluation. The themes that related to perseverance included emotional investment (prioritizing the recipient's health, desperation for a normal life, protecting eligibility, shame of disappointing others, and overcoming opposition), undeterred by low risks (medical confidence and protection, worthwhile gamble, inherent invincibility, and normalizing risks), and mental preparation (avoiding regret, resolving decisional ambivalence, and managing expectations of recovery). The challenges included underlying fears for health (processing alarming information, unsettling uncertainty, and preoperative panic), system shortfalls (self-advocacy in driving the process, stressful urgency, inconsistent framing of safety, unnerving bodily scrutiny, questioning risk information, and draining finances); and lifestyle interference (living in limbo, onerous lifestyle disruption, and valuing flexibility).

CONCLUSIONS

Previous donors described an emotional investment in donating and determination to protect their eligibility, despite having concerns for their health, financial and lifestyle disruption, and opposition from their family or community. Our findings suggest the need to prepare donors for surgery and recovery, minimize anxiety and lifestyle burdens, ensure that donors feel comfortable expressing their fears and concerns, reduce unnecessary delays, and make explicit the responsibilities of donors in their assessment process.

Progress in Transplantation: Will It Be Achieved in Big Steps or by Marginal Gains?

A wish for progress in transplantation assumes that there are needs not met by the currently available therapy and that the barriers to resolving the problems can be surmounted. There are 5 major unmet needs: the potential to avoid transplantation either by prevention of disease or provision of an alternative to natural biological organ replacement; geographic heterogeneity of access to, and quality of, transplantation; availability of transplantation to those in need of it; survival of the patient and the transplant; and the avoidance of adverse effects of immunosuppression. During the past 50 years, there have been advances on at least 4 of these 5 fronts that illustrate the interplay of "big steps" and "marginal gains" in the following areas: surgical technique, testing the immunologic barriers, introduction of chemical and biological immunosuppression, and prophylaxis for microbial infections. The potential for further improvement comes in 5 major areas: blood biomarkers for monitoring of rejection, drug-free transplantation through the development of stable tolerance, eliminating the impact of ischemia-reperfusion injury, xenotransplantation of porcine kidneys, and finally, the possibility of autologous regeneration of functioning kidney tissue to treat advanced kidney disease.