Predicting Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation: Trying to Catch It Early

Early outcomes of lung transplantation with lung allografts from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-positive donors

OBJECTIVE

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can be detected for extended periods of time with nucleic acid amplification test even after transmissibility becomes negligible. Lung allografts from COVID-19-positive donors have been used for transplantation in highly selected cases. This study aimed to clarify the early outcomes of lung transplantation with COVID-19-positive donors.

METHODS

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database between April 2020 and June 2022 was retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

In the study period, 1297 COVID-19-positive donors were identified and the lungs were transplanted from 47 donors (3.6%). Of 47 donors, 44 donors were positive for COVID-19 NAT with nasopharyngeal swabs and the other 3 were positive with bronchoalveolar lavage. The COVID-19-positive lung donors were younger than the COVID-19-negative donors (28.4 ± 11.6 years vs 35.4 ± 13.6 years, P < .001). Recipients of the COVID-19-positive lungs (n = 47) were more likely have a greater lung allocation score (57.1 ± 22.9 vs 50.5 ± 19.7, P = .057) than recipients of COVID-19-negative lungs (n = 5501). The posttransplant length of hospital stay (39.8 ± 43.6 days vs 30.6 ± 34.5 days, P = .181), need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support at 72 hours after transplantation (2.6% [1/38] vs 10.4% [541/5184], P = .18), and 1-year overall survival rate (85.6% vs 87.1%, P = .63) were comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected lung allografts from COVID-19-positive donors had comparable early posttransplant outcomes to lung allografts from COVID-19-negative donors.

Outcomes of listing for lung and heart-lung transplantation in pulmonary hypertension: comparative experience in France and the UK

Background

Lung or heart-lung transplantation (LT/HLT) for severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) as the primary disease indication carries a high risk of waiting list mortality and post-transplant complications. France and the UK both have coordinated PH patient services but with different referral pathways for accessing LT services.

Methods

We conducted a comparative analysis of adult PH patients listed for LT/HLT in the UK and France.

Results

We included 211 PH patients in France (2006-2018) and 170 in the UK (2010-2019). Cumulative incidence of transplant, delisting and waiting list death within 3 years were 81%, 4% and 11% in France versus 58%, 10% and 15% in the UK (p<0.001 for transplant and delisting; p=0.1 for death). Median non-priority waiting time was 45 days in France versus 165 days in the UK (p<0.001). High-priority listing occurred in 54% and 51% of transplanted patients respectively in France and the UK (p=0.8). Factors associated with achieving transplantation related to recipients' height, male sex, clinical severity and priority listing status. 1-year post-transplant survival was 78% in France and 72% in the UK (p= 0.04).

Conclusion

Access to transplantation for PH patients is better in France than in the UK where more patients were delisted due to clinical deterioration because of longer waiting time. High rates of priority listing occurred in both countries. Survival for those achieving transplantation was slightly better in France. Ensuring optimal outcomes after transplant listing for PH patients is challenging and may involve early listing of higher risk patients, increasing donor lung utilisation and improving allocation rules for these specific patients.

Regadenoson Reduces Soluble Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-Products in Lung Recipients

BACKGROUND

The selective adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) agonist regadenoson reduces inflammation due to lung ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). The objective of this study was to investigate molecular and cellular mechanisms by which regadenoson reduces IRI in lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

Fourteen human lung transplant recipients were infused for 12 hours with regadenoson and 7 more served as untreated controls. Plasma levels of high mobility group box 1 and its soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE) were measured by Luminex. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 and 9 were measured by gelatin zymography. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 was measured by mass spectroscopy. A2AR expression on leukocytes was analyzed by flow cytometry. MMP-9-mediated cleavage of RAGE was evaluated using cultured macrophages in vitro.

RESULTS

Regadenoson treatment during lung transplantation significantly reduced levels of MMP-9 (P < .05), but not MMP-2, and elevated levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (P < .05), an endogenous selective inhibitor of MMP-9. Regadenoson infusion significantly reduced plasma levels of sRAGE (P < .05) during lung reperfusion compared with control subjects. A2AR expression was highest on invariant natural killer T cells and higher on monocytes than other circulating immune cells (P < .05). The shedding of RAGE from cultured monocytes/macrophages was increased by MMP-9 stimulation and reduced by an MMP inhibitor or by A2AR agonists, regadenoson or ATL146e.

CONCLUSIONS

In vivo and in vitro studies suggest that A2AR activation reduces sRAGE in part by inhibiting MMP-9 production by monocytes/macrophages. These results suggest a novel molecular mechanism by which A2AR agonists reduce primary graft dysfunction.

A single-center experience of 1500 lung transplant patients

OBJECTIVE

Over the past 30 years, lung transplantation has emerged as the definitive treatment for end-stage lung disease. In 2005, the lung allocation score (LAS) was introduced to allocate organs according to disease severity. The number of transplants performed annually in the United States continues to increase as centers have become more comfortable expanding donor and recipient criteria and have become more facile with the perioperative and long-term management of these patients. We report a single-center experience with lung transplants, looking at patients before and after the introduction of LAS.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1500 adult lung transplants at a single center performed between 1988 and 2016. Patients were separated into 2 groups, before and after the introduction of LAS: group 1 (April 1988 to April 2005; 792 patients) and group 2 (May 2005 to September 2016; 708 patients).

RESULTS

Differences in demographic data were noted over these periods, reflecting changes in allocation of organs. Group 1 patient average age was 48 ± 13 years, and 404 subjects (51%) were male. Disease processes included emphysema (52%; 412), cystic fibrosis (18.2%; 144), pulmonary fibrosis (16.1%; 128) and pulmonary vascular disease (7.2%; 57). Double lung transplant (77.7%; 615) was performed more frequently than single lung transplant (22.3%; 177). Group 2 average age was 50 ± 14 years, and 430 subjects (59%) were male. Disease processes included pulmonary fibrosis (46%; 335), emphysema (25.8%; 188), cystic fibrosis (17.7%; 127) and pulmonary vascular disease (1.6%; 11). Double lung transplant (96.2%; 681) was performed more frequently than single lung transplant (3.8%; 27). Overall incidence of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction (PGD) in group 1 was significantly lower at 22.1% (175) than in group 2 at 31.6% (230) (P < .001). Nonetheless, overall hospital mortality was not statistically different between the 2 groups (4.4% vs 3.5%; P < .4). Most notably, survival at 1 year was statistically different at 646 (81.6%) for group 1 and 665 (91.4%) for group 2 (P < .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient demographics over the study period have changed with an increased number of fibrotic patients transplanted. In addition, more aggressive strategies with donor/recipient selection appear to have resulted in a higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction. This does not, however, appear to affect patient survival on index hospitalization or at 1 year. In fact, we have observed a significant improvement in survival at 1 year in the more recent era. This observation suggests that continued expansion of possible donors and recipients, coupled with a more sophisticated understanding of primary graft dysfunction and long-term chronic rejection, can lead to increased transplant volume and prolonged survival.