1
|
Uriarte I, Santamaria E, López-Pascual A, Monte MJ, Argemí J, Latasa MU, Adán-Villaescusa E, Irigaray A, Herranz JM, Arechederra M, Basualdo J, Lucena F, Corrales FJ, Rotellar F, Pardo F, Merlen G, Rainteau D, Sangro B, Tordjmann T, Berasain C, Marín JJG, Fernández-Barrena MG, Herrero I, Avila MA. New insights into the regulation of bile acids synthesis during the early stages of liver regeneration: A human and experimental study. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2024; 1870:167166. [PMID: 38642480 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Liver regeneration is essential for the preservation of homeostasis and survival. Bile acids (BAs)-mediated signaling is necessary for liver regeneration, but BAs levels need to be carefully controlled to avoid hepatotoxicity. We studied the early response of the BAs-fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19) axis in healthy individuals undergoing hepatectomy for living donor liver transplant. We also evaluated BAs synthesis in mice upon partial hepatectomy (PH) and acute inflammation, focusing on the regulation of cytochrome-7A1 (CYP7A1), a key enzyme in BAs synthesis from cholesterol. METHODS Serum was obtained from twelve human liver donors. Mice underwent 2/3-PH or sham-operation. Acute inflammation was induced with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in mice fed control or antoxidant-supplemented diets. BAs and 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) levels were measured by HPLC-MS/MS; serum FGF19 by ELISA. Gene expression and protein levels were analyzed by RT-qPCR and western-blot. RESULTS Serum BAs levels increased after PH. In patients with more pronounced hypercholanemia, FGF19 concentrations transiently rose, while C4 levels (a readout of CYP7A1 activity) dropped 2 h post-resection in all cases. Serum BAs and C4 followed the same pattern in mice 1 h after PH, but C4 levels also dropped in sham-operated and LPS-treated animals, without marked changes in CYP7A1 protein levels. LPS-induced serum C4 decline was attenuated in mice fed an antioxidant-supplemented diet. CONCLUSIONS In human liver regeneration FGF19 upregulation may constitute a protective response from BAs excess during liver regeneration. Our findings suggest the existence of post-translational mechanisms regulating CYP7A1 activity, and therefore BAs synthesis, independent from CYP7A1/Cyp7a1 gene transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iker Uriarte
- Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, CIMA, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eva Santamaria
- Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, CIMA, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Amaya López-Pascual
- Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, CIMA, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - María J Monte
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm U1193, Orsay, France
| | - Josepmaria Argemí
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain; Hepatology Unit, CCUN, Navarra University Clinic, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M Ujue Latasa
- Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, CIMA, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Elena Adán-Villaescusa
- Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, CIMA, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ainara Irigaray
- Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, CIMA, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jose M Herranz
- Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, CIMA, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Arechederra
- Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, CIMA, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jorge Basualdo
- Hepatology Unit, CCUN, Navarra University Clinic, Pamplona, Spain; Internal Medicine Department, ICOT Hospital Ciudad de Telde, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Felipe Lucena
- Internal Medicine Department, Navarra University Clinic, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando J Corrales
- Functional Proteomics Laboratory, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- General Surgery Department, Navarra University Clinic, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Pardo
- General Surgery Department, Navarra University Clinic, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Dominique Rainteau
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm U938, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
| | - Bruno Sangro
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain; Hepatology Unit, CCUN, Navarra University Clinic, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Carmen Berasain
- Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, CIMA, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose J G Marín
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Experimental Hepatology and Drug Targeting (HEVEPHARM), University of Salamanca, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Maite G Fernández-Barrena
- Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, CIMA, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ignacio Herrero
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain; Hepatology Unit, CCUN, Navarra University Clinic, Pamplona, Spain.
| | - Matias A Avila
- Hepatology Laboratory, Solid Tumors Program, CIMA, CCUN, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Troisi RI, Cho HD, Giglio MC, Rhu J, Cho JY, Sasaki K, Han DH, Kwon CHD, Han HS, Chen PD, Wu YM, Choi GH, Choi GS, Kim KH. Robotic and laparoscopic right lobe living donation compared to the open approach: A multicenter study on 1194 donor hepatectomies. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:484-492. [PMID: 38015444 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Due to the success of minimally invasive liver surgery, laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive donor hepatectomies (MIDH) are increasingly performed worldwide. We conducted a retrospective, multicentre, propensity score-matched analysis on right lobe MIDH by comparing the robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches to assess the feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of MIDHs. From January 2016 until December 2020, 1194 donors underwent a right donor hepatectomy performed with a robotic (n = 92), laparoscopic (n = 306), and open approach (n = 796) at 6 high-volume centers. Donor and recipients were matched for different variables using propensity score matching (1:1:2). Donor outcomes were recorded, and postoperative pain was measured through a visual analog scale. Recipients' outcomes were also analyzed. Ninety-two donors undergoing robotic surgery were matched and compared to 92 and 184 donors undergoing laparoscopic and open surgery, respectively. Conversions to open surgery occurred during 1 (1.1%) robotic and 2 (2.2%) laparoscopic procedures. Robotic procedures had a longer operative time (493 ± 96 min) compared to laparoscopic and open procedures (347 ± 120 and 358 ± 95 min; p < 0.001) but were associated with reduced donor blood losses ( p < 0.001). No differences were observed in overall and major complications (≥ IIIa). Robotic hepatectomy donors had significantly less pain compared to the 2 other groups ( p < 0.001). Fifty recipients of robotic-procured grafts were matched to 50 and 100 recipients of laparoscopic and open surgery procured grafts, respectively. No differences were observed in terms of postoperative complications, and recipients' survival was similar ( p =0.455). In very few high-volume centers, robotic right lobe procurement has shown to be a safe procedure. Despite an increased operative and the first warm ischemia times, this approach is associated with reduced intraoperative blood losses and pain compared to the laparoscopic and open approaches. Further data are needed to confirm it as a valuable option for the laparoscopic approach in MIDH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Hwui-Dong Cho
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mariano Cesare Giglio
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Jinsoo Rhu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kazuanri Sasaki
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease, and Surgery Institute, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Choon Hyuck David Kwon
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease, and Surgery Institute, Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Po-Da Chen
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei
| | - Yao-Ming Wu
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gyu Sung Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Hun Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Avramidou E, Terlemes K, Lymperopoulou A, Katsanos G, Antoniadis N, Kofinas A, Vasileiadou S, Karakasi KE, Tsoulfas G. Minimally Invasive Surgery in Liver Transplantation: From Living Liver Donation to Graft Implantation. LIVERS 2024; 4:119-137. [DOI: 10.3390/livers4010009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Since the end of the 20th century and the establishment of minimally invasive techniques, they have become the preferred operative method by many surgeons. These techniques were applied to liver surgery for the first time in 1991, while as far as transplantation is concerned their application was limited to the living donor procedure. We performed a review of the literature by searching in Pubmed and Scopus using the following keywords: Liver transplantation, Minimally invasive surgery(MIS) living liver donor surgery. Applications of MIS are recorded in surgeries involving the donor and the recipient. Regarding the recipient surgeries, the reports are limited to 25 patients, including combinations of laparoscopic, robotic and open techniques, while in the living donor surgery, the reports are much more numerous and with larger series of patients. Shorter hospitalization times and less blood loss are recorded, especially in centers with experience in a large number of cases. Regarding the living donor surgery, MIS follows the same principles as a conventional hepatectomy and is already the method of choice in many specialized centers. Regarding the recipient surgery, significant questions arise mainly concerning the safe handling of the liver graft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Avramidou
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Center for Research and Innovation in Solid Organ Transplantation Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Terlemes
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Center for Research and Innovation in Solid Organ Transplantation Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Afroditi Lymperopoulou
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Center for Research and Innovation in Solid Organ Transplantation Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Katsanos
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Center for Research and Innovation in Solid Organ Transplantation Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Antoniadis
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Center for Research and Innovation in Solid Organ Transplantation Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Athanasios Kofinas
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Center for Research and Innovation in Solid Organ Transplantation Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Stella Vasileiadou
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Center for Research and Innovation in Solid Organ Transplantation Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Konstantina-Eleni Karakasi
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Center for Research and Innovation in Solid Organ Transplantation Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Center for Research and Innovation in Solid Organ Transplantation Aristotle University of Thessaloniki School of Medicine, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hong SK, Kim JY, Lee J, Kim J, Choi HH, Lee S, Hong SY, Lee JM, Choi Y, Yi NJ, Lee KW, Suh KS. Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: Experience of 556 cases at Seoul National University Hospital. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:222-238. [PMID: 37321453 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) has become a routine procedure at Seoul National University Hospital, and the pure laparoscopic method is now being applied to liver recipients as well. This study aimed to review the procedure and outcomes of PLDH to identify any areas that required improvement. Data from 556 donors who underwent PLDH between November 2015 and December 2021 and their recipients were retrospectively reviewed. Among these, 541 patients underwent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH). The mean hospital stay of the donor was 7.2 days, and the rate of grade I, II, IIIa, and IIIb complications was 2.2%, 2.7%, 1.3%, and 0.9%, respectively, without any irreversible disabilities or mortalities. The most common early and late major complications in the recipient were intraabdominal bleeding (n = 47, 8.5%) and biliary problems (n = 198, 35.6%), respectively. Analysis of the PLDRH procedure showed that operative time, liver removal time, warm ischemic time, Δhemoglobin%, Δtotal bilirubin%, and postoperative hospital stay decreased significantly as the number of cases accumulated. In conclusion, the operative outcomes of PLDRH improved as the number of cases increased. However, continuous caution is needed because major complications still occur in donors and recipients even after hundreds of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Jae-Yoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jaewon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jiyoung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hyun Hwa Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sola Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Su Young Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - YoungRok Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ziogas IA, Kakos CD, Moris DP, Kaltenmeier C, Tsoulfas G, Montenovo MI, Alexopoulos SP, Geller DA, Pomfret EA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus laparoscopy-assisted versus pure laparoscopic versus robotic living donor hepatectomy. Liver Transpl 2023; 29:1063-1078. [PMID: 36866856 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
The value of minimally invasive approaches for living donor hepatectomy remains unclear. Our aim was to compare the donor outcomes after open versus laparoscopy-assisted versus pure laparoscopic versus robotic living donor hepatectomy (OLDH vs. LALDH vs. PLLDH vs. RLDH). A systematic literature review of the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Scopus databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement (up to December 8, 2021). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed separately for minor and major living donor hepatectomy. The risk of bias in nonrandomized studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 31 studies were included. There was no difference in donor outcomes after OLDH versus LALDH for major hepatectomy. However, PLLDH was associated with decreased estimated blood loss, length of stay (LOS), and overall complications versus OLDH for minor and major hepatectomy, but also with increased operative time for major hepatectomy. PLLDH was associated with decreased LOS versus LALDH for major hepatectomy. RLDH was associated with decreased LOS but with increased operative time versus OLDH for major hepatectomy. The scarcity of studies comparing RLDH versus LALDH/PLLDH did not allow us to meta-analyze donor outcomes for that comparison. There seems to be a marginal benefit in estimated blood loss and/or LOS in favor of PLLDH and RLDH. The complexity of these procedures limits them to transplant centers with high volume and experience. Future studies should investigate self-reported donor experience and the associated economic costs of these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis A Ziogas
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Christos D Kakos
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitrios P Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christof Kaltenmeier
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, Aristotle University School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Martin I Montenovo
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - David A Geller
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Pomfret
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kikuchi K, Nitta H, Umemura A, Katagiri H, Kanno S, Takeda D, Ando T, Amano S, Sasaki A. Risk-Adjusted Assessment of the Learning Curve for Pure Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy for Adult Recipients. World J Surg 2023; 47:2488-2498. [PMID: 37326677 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07089-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies on pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) have been reported. However, only few studies have reported on the learning curve of PLDH. In this report, we aimed to determine the learning curve of PLDH in adult patients using cumulative sum (CUSUM) and risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM) analyses. METHODS The data of donors who underwent PLDH at a single center between December 2012 and May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The learning curve was evaluated using the CUSUM and RA-CUSUM methods based on surgery duration. RESULTS Forty-eight patients were finally included in the present study. The mean operation time was 393.6 ± 80.3 min. PLDH was converted to laparotomy in three cases (6.3%). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, nine cases (18.8%) had higher-than-grade III postoperative complications and the most frequent complications were biliary complications. The CUSUM graph shows two peaks, at the 13th and 27th case. The multivariate analysis revealed that a body mass index ≥ 23 kg/m2 and intraoperative cholangiography were the only factors that were independently associated with longer operation time. Based on these results, an RA-CUSUM analysis was performed to assess the learning curve, which showed a decrease in the learning curve after 33 to 34 PLDH procedures. CONCLUSIONS A learning curve effect was demonstrated in this study after 33 to 34 PLDH procedures. There are relatively many biliary complications, and it is necessary to further examine the method of bile duct transection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Kikuchi
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan.
| | - Hiroyuki Nitta
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan
| | - Akira Umemura
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan
| | - Hirokatsu Katagiri
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan
| | - Shoji Kanno
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan
| | - Daiki Takeda
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan
| | - Taro Ando
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan
| | - Satoshi Amano
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan
| | - Akira Sasaki
- Department of Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba, Iwate, 028-3695, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Carmona-Rodríguez L, Gajadhar AS, Blázquez-García I, Guerrero L, Fernández-Rojo MA, Uriarte I, Mamani-Huanca M, López-Gonzálvez Á, Ciordia S, Ramos A, Herrero JI, Fernández-Barrena MG, Arechederra M, Berasain C, Quiroga J, Sangro B, Argemi J, Pardo F, Rotellar F, López D, Barbas C, Ávila MA, Corrales FJ. Mapping early serum proteome signatures of liver regeneration in living donor liver transplant cases. Biofactors 2023; 49:912-927. [PMID: 37171157 DOI: 10.1002/biof.1954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
The liver is the only solid organ capable of regenerating itself to regain 100% of its mass and function after liver injury and/or partial hepatectomy (PH). This exceptional property represents a therapeutic opportunity for severe liver disease patients. However, liver regeneration (LR) might fail due to poorly understood causes. Here, we have investigated the regulation of liver proteome and phosphoproteome at a short time after PH (9 h), to depict a detailed mechanistic background of the early LR phase. Furthermore, we analyzed the dynamic changes of the serum proteome and metabolome of healthy living donor liver transplant (LDLT) donors at different time points after surgery. The molecular profiles from both analyses were then correlated. Insulin and FXR-FGF15/19 signaling were stimulated in mouse liver after PH, leading to the activation of the main intermediary kinases (AKT and ERK). Besides, inhibition of the hippo pathway led to an increased expression of its target genes and of one of its intermediary proteins (14-3-3 protein), contributing to cell proliferation. In association with these processes, metabolic reprogramming coupled to enhanced mitochondrial activity cope for the energy and biosynthetic requirements of LR. In human serum of LDLT donors, we identified 56 proteins and 13 metabolites statistically differential which recapitulate some of the main cellular processes orchestrating LR in its early phase. These results provide mechanisms and protein mediators of LR that might prove useful for the follow-up of the regenerative process in the liver after PH as well as preventing the occurrence of complications associated with liver resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Irene Blázquez-García
- Functional Proteomics Laboratory, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Guerrero
- Functional Proteomics Laboratory, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel A Fernández-Rojo
- Hepatic Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, Madrid Institute for Advanced Studies in Food, Madrid, Spain
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Iker Uriarte
- Proteobotics SL, Madrid, Spain
- CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | - Sergio Ciordia
- Functional Proteomics Laboratory, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Ramos
- Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Navarra-IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain
| | - José Ignacio Herrero
- CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Centre for Metabolomics and Bioanalysis (CEMBIO), Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maite G Fernández-Barrena
- Proteobotics SL, Madrid, Spain
- CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - María Arechederra
- Proteobotics SL, Madrid, Spain
- CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Carmen Berasain
- Proteobotics SL, Madrid, Spain
- CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jorge Quiroga
- CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Centre for Metabolomics and Bioanalysis (CEMBIO), Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Bruno Sangro
- CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Centre for Metabolomics and Bioanalysis (CEMBIO), Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Josepmaría Argemi
- CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Centre for Metabolomics and Bioanalysis (CEMBIO), Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Pardo
- CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Centre for Metabolomics and Bioanalysis (CEMBIO), Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Centre for Metabolomics and Bioanalysis (CEMBIO), Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, Urbanización Montepríncipe, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel López
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, California, USA
| | - Coral Barbas
- CIBERehd, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Matías A Ávila
- Proteobotics SL, Madrid, Spain
- CIMA, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando J Corrales
- Functional Proteomics Laboratory, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kakos CD, Papanikolaou A, Ziogas IA, Tsoulfas G. Global dissemination of minimally invasive living donor hepatectomy: What are the barriers? World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:776-787. [PMID: 37342850 PMCID: PMC10277954 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i5.776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH) is a relatively novel procedure that can potentially increase donor safety and contribute to faster rehabilitation of donors. After an initial period in which donor safety was not effectively validated, MIDH currently seems to provide improved results, provided that it is conducted by experienced surgeons. Appropriate selection criteria are crucial to achieve better outcomes in terms of complications, blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay. Beyond a pure laparoscopic technique, various approaches have been recommended such as hand-assisted, laparoscopic-assisted, and robotic donation. The latter has shown equal outcomes compared to open and laparoscopic approaches. A steep learning curve seems to exist in MIDH, mainly due to the fragility of the liver parenchyma and the experience needed for adequate control of bleeding. This review investigated the challenges and the opportunities of MIDH and the barriers to its global dissemination. Surgeons need expertise in liver transplantation, hepatobiliary surgery, and minimally invasive techniques to perform MIDH. Barriers can be categorized into surgeon-related, institutional-related, and accessibility. More robust data and the creation of international registries are needed for further evaluation of the technique and the acceptance from more centers worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Dimitrios Kakos
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens 15123, Greece
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki 54622, Greece
| | - Angelos Papanikolaou
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens 15123, Greece
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States
| | - Ioannis A Ziogas
- Surgery Working Group, Society of Junior Doctors, Athens 15123, Greece
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki 54622, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
FINOTTI M, D’AMICO F, TESTA G. The current and future role of robotic surgery in liver surgery and transplantation. Minerva Surg 2022; 77:380-390. [DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.22.09629-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
10
|
Yeow M, Soh S, Starkey G, Perini MV, Koh YX, Tan EK, Chan CY, Raj P, Goh BKP, Kabir T. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of outcomes after open, mini-laparotomy, hybrid, totally laparoscopic, and robotic living donor right hepatectomy. Surgery 2022; 172:741-750. [PMID: 35644687 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes after living donor right hepatectomy via the following techniques: conventional open (Open), mini-laparotomy (Minilap), hybrid (Hybrid), totally laparoscopic (Lap), and robotic living donor right hepatectomy (Robotic). METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched from inception to August 2021 for comparative studies of patients who underwent living donor right hepatectomy. RESULTS Nineteen studies comprising 2,261 patients were included. Operation time was longer in Lap versus Minilap and Open (mean difference 65.09 min, 95% confidence interval 3.40-126.78 and mean difference 34.81 minutes, 95% confidence interval 1.84-67.78), and in Robotic versus Hybrid, Lap, Minilap, and Open (mean difference 144.72 minutes, 95% confidence interval 89.84-199.59, mean difference 113.24 minutes, 95% confidence interval 53.28-173.20, mean difference 178.33 minutes, 95% confidence interval 105.58-251.08 and mean difference 148.05 minutes, 95% confidence interval 97.35-198.74, respectively). Minilap and Open were associated with higher blood loss compared to Lap (mean difference 258.67 mL, 95% confidence interval 107.00-410.33 and mean difference 314.11 mL, 95% confidence interval 143.84-484.37) and Robotic (mean difference 205.60 mL, 95% confidence interval 45.92-365.28 and mean difference 261.04 mL, 95% confidence interval 84.26-437.82). Open was associated with more overall complications compared to Minilap (odds ratio 2.60, 95% confidence interval 1.11-6.08). Recipient biliary complication rate was higher in Minilap and Open versus Hybrid (odds ratio 3.91, 95% confidence interval 1.13-13.55 and odds ratio 11.42, 95% confidence interval 2.27-57.49), and lower in Open versus Minilap (OR 0.07, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.34). CONCLUSION Minimally invasive donor right hepatectomy via the various techniques is safe and feasible when performed in high-volume centers, with no major differences in donor complication rates and comparable recipient outcomes once surgeons have mounted the learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Yeow
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shauna Soh
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Graham Starkey
- Victorian Liver Transplant Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marcos V Perini
- Victorian Liver Transplant Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. https://twitter.com/yexin_koh
| | - Ek-Khoon Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. https://twitter.com/EkKhoonTan
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Prema Raj
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore. https://twitter.com/BrianKGoh
| | - Tousif Kabir
- Victorian Liver Transplant Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sakai T, Ko JS, Crouch CE, Kumar S, Choi GS, Hackl F, Han DH, Kaufman M, Kim SH, Luzzi C, McCluskey S, Shin WJ, Sirianni J, Song KW, Sullivan C, Hendrickse A. Perioperative management of living donor liver transplantation: Part 2 - Donors. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14690. [PMID: 35477939 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 02/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Living donor liver transplantation was first developed to mitigate the limited access to deceased donor organs in Asia in the 1990s. This alternative liver transplantation method has become a widely practiced and established transplantation option for adult patients suffering with end-stage liver disease, and it has successfully helped address the shortage of deceased donors. The Society for the Advancement of Transplant Anesthesia and the Korean Society of Transplantation Anesthesiologists jointly reviewed published studies on the perioperative management of adult live liver donors undergoing donor hemi-hepatectomy. The goal of the review is to offer transplant anesthesiologists and critical care physicians a comprehensive overview of the perioperative management of adult live donors. We featured the current status, donor selection process, outcomes and complications, surgical procedure, anesthetic management, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols, avoidance of blood transfusion, and considerations for emergency donation. Recent surgical advances, including laparoscopic donor hemi-hepatectomy and robotic laparoscopic donor surgery, are also addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuro Sakai
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justin Sangwook Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cara E Crouch
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Sathish Kumar
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Florian Hackl
- Department of Anesthesiology and Interventional Pain Management, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dai Hoon Han
- Department of HBP Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Michael Kaufman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Interventional Pain Management, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Seong Hoon Kim
- Organ Transplantation Center, National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Carla Luzzi
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stuart McCluskey
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Won Jung Shin
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joel Sirianni
- Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ki Won Song
- Department of Hepato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cinnamon Sullivan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Adrian Hendrickse
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Varghese CT, Chandran B, Gopalakrishnan U, Nair K, Mallick S, Mathew JS, Sivasankara Pillai Thankamony Amma B, Balakrishnan D, Sudheer OV, Sudhindran S. Extended criteria donors for Robotic Right Hepatectomy- A Propensity Score matched Analysis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 29:874-883. [PMID: 35411725 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic right donor hepatectomy (RDH) has been reported from experienced centers with reduced morbidity when compared to open RDH. However, outcomes in donors with large grafts/ complex biliovascular anatomy are unknown. METHODS Out of 170 robotic RDH, 100 had one or more of the following: graft weight ≥ 800gms, type 2/3 portal vein, >1 bile duct or hepatic artery and inferior hepatic veins >5mm requiring reconstruction (extended criteria donors- ExRDH), while the remaining 70 had standard anatomy (SRDH). After propensity score matching, 66 ExRDH were compared with 66 SRDH. Additionally, all robotic RDH performed were analysed in 3 temporal phases (60, 60 and 50). RESULTS Peak AST and ALT were higher among donors and recipients in the ExRDH arm compared to SRDH. Other intraoperative parameters and post-operative complications were similar between the two groups. During the last phase, donors demonstrated reduction in duration of surgery, postoperative complications and hospital stay while recipients showed decreased blood loss and hospital stay. CONCLUSION Robotic right hepatectomy performed in donors with extended criteria have similar perioperative outcomes as standard donors. However, a significant learning curve needs to be traversed. Further studies are required before safely recommending robotic RDH for all donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christi Titus Varghese
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, India
| | - Biju Chandran
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, India
| | - Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, India
| | - Krishnanunni Nair
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, India
| | - Shweta Mallick
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, India
| | - Johns Shaji Mathew
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, India
| | | | - Dinesh Balakrishnan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, India
| | - O V Sudheer
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, India
| | - S Sudhindran
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Kochi, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lapisatepun W, Junrungsee S, Chotirosniramit A, Udomsin K, Lapisatepun W, Chanthima P, Boonsri S, Lorsomradee S. Comparative outcomes of pure laparoscopic and open donor right hepatectomy: the first report from a Southeast Asian transplant center. BMC Surg 2022; 22:48. [PMID: 35148721 PMCID: PMC8832827 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01507-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) can provide better operative outcomes for the donor than conventional open donor right hepatectomy (CODRH). However, the complexity of the procedure typically makes transplant teams reluctant to perform it, especially in low-volume transplant centers. We compared the outcomes of PLDRH and CODRH to demonstrate the feasibility of PLDRH in a low-volume transplant program. Methods We carried out a retrospective study of adult living donor liver transplantation in Chiang Mai University Hospital from January 2015 to March 2021. The patients were divided into a PLDRH group and a CODRH group. Baseline characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative complications of donors and recipients were compared between the two groups. Results Thirty patients underwent donor hepatectomy between the dates selected (9 PLDRH patients and 21 CODRH patients). The baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were not significantly different. The median graft volume of the PLDRH group was 693.8 mL, which was not significantly different from that of the CODRH group (726.5 mL) The PLDRH group had a longer operative time than the CODRH group, but the difference was not statistically significant (487.5 min vs 425.0 min, p = 0.197). The overall complication rate was not significantly different between the two groups (33.3% vs 22.2%, p = 0.555). Additionally, for the recipients, the incidence of major complications was not significantly different between the groups (71.3 vs 55.6%, p = 0.792). Conclusion Even in the context of this low-volume transplant program, whose staff have a high level of experience in minimally invasive hepatobiliary surgery, PLDRH showed similar results to CODRH in terms of perioperative outcomes for donors and recipients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12893-022-01507-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Worakitti Lapisatepun
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Excellence Center of Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, 110 Intavarorod, Sripoom, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Sunhawit Junrungsee
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. .,Excellence Center of Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, 110 Intavarorod, Sripoom, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
| | - Anon Chotirosniramit
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Excellence Center of Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, 110 Intavarorod, Sripoom, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Kanya Udomsin
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Excellence Center of Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, 110 Intavarorod, Sripoom, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Warangkana Lapisatepun
- Excellence Center of Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, 110 Intavarorod, Sripoom, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Phuriphong Chanthima
- Excellence Center of Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, 110 Intavarorod, Sripoom, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Settapong Boonsri
- Excellence Center of Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, 110 Intavarorod, Sripoom, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Suraphong Lorsomradee
- Excellence Center of Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand, 110 Intavarorod, Sripoom, 50200, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Papoulas M, Hakeem AR, Heaton N, Menon KV. Pure laparoscopic versus open donor hepatectomy for adult living donor liver transplantation - A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Access Surg 2022; 18:1-11. [PMID: 35017391 PMCID: PMC8830577 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_103_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) for adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of donor outcomes following PLDH for adult LDLT. Materials and Methods Systematic review in line with the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines. Results Eight studies were included in the systematic review and six in the meta-analysis. A total of 575 donors underwent PLDH for adult LDLT. The mean donor age was 32.8 years with a BMI of 23.4 kg/m2 and graft weight of 675 g. The mean operative time was 353 min and the conversion rate was 2.8% (n = 16). Overall morbidity was 10.8% with 1.6% major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3b), zero mortality and 9.0 days length of stay (LOS). The meta-analysis demonstrated that the operative time was significantly shorter for the open donor hepatectomy group (mean difference 29.15 min; P = 0.006) and the LOS was shorter for the PLDH group (mean difference -0.73 days; P = 0.02), with a trend towards lesser estimated blood loss in PLDH group. However, no difference between the two groups was noted in terms of overall morbidity or major complications. Conclusions Perioperative outcomes of PLDH are similar to the standard open approach in highly specialised centers with trend towards lesser blood loss and overall shorter hospital stay. Careful donor selection and standardisation of the technique are imperative for the successful implementation and adoption of the procedure worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Papoulas
- Department of Institute of Liver Studies, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Abdul Rahman Hakeem
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation, St. James's University Hospital NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Department of Institute of Liver Studies, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Krishna V Menon
- Department of Institute of Liver Studies, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rotellar F, Ciria R, Wakabayashi G, Suh KS, Cherqui D. World Survey on Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy: A Global Snapshot of Current Practices in 2370 Cases. Transplantation 2022; 106:96-105. [PMID: 33586922 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Having little evidence on the real extent of the minimally invasive donor hepatectomy (MIDH), a world survey was conducted aiming to picture the spread of MIDH and to identify geographical, institutional, and individual differences. METHODS A web-based survey was created with 5 sections (general, institutional, surgeon's experience, technical, and spread and dissemination), comprising up to a total of 47 questions. A thorough search was carried out to identify all possible centers and surgeons performing MIDH. RESULTS A global MIDH experience of 2370 cases was collected: 1587 right hepatectomies (RHs; 48.9% pure laparoscopic), 471 left lateral sectionectomies (LLS; 81.1% pure laparoscopic), and 366 left hepatectomies (LHs; 77.6% laparoscopic-assisted). LLS and adult MIDH conversion rates were 5.4% and 3.9%, respectively. Median blood loss was 250 mL (100-600), 100 mL (50-250), and 150 mL (50-500) for RH, LLS, and LH, respectively. Intra- and postoperative transfusion rates were 0.5%, 0%, and 0.3%; and 1.3%, 1.6%, and 0% for RH, LLS, and LH, respectively. Geographically, Asia accounts up to 1730 cases (73% of the global experience, 49.6% pure lap), of which 1374 cases are RH; Europe and Middle East-395 cases-stands out for its experience in left lateral sectionectomy: 289 cases (93% pure lap). Finally, America accounts for 245 cases, using a laparoscopic-assisted technique in 72.6% of the cases (178). CONCLUSIONS This world survey provides evidence and data on the global spread of MIDH and anticipates how in a near future a large-scale adoption of these techniques may be observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ruben Ciria
- Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Hospital Reina Sofía, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- AP-HP, Hepatobiliary Center, Paul Brousse Hospital, Université Paris Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Peng Y, Li B, Xu H, Chen K, Wei Y, Liu F. Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2021; 32:832-841. [PMID: 34842460 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2021.0583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Pure laparoscopic liver donor right hepatectomy (LLDRH) remains challenging, and its value is still unclear compared with open liver donor right hepatectomy (OLDRH). Objective: To provide comprehensive evidence about the safety and efficacy of LLDRH. Methods: The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from the date of inception to July 2021. A fixed-effects or random-effects model was used to analyze the pooled data by using Review Manager Version 5.3. Results: A total of 1940 patients from 6 studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis. For perioperative outcomes of donors, LLDRH had a longer operative time than OLDRH (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 29.75 [4.23-55.26] minutes, P = .02), but it had lower overall morbidity (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67 [0.45-0.99], P = .04), fewer pulmonary complications (OR = 0.47 [0.29-0.76], P = .002), and shorter hospital stays (WMD = -1, P < .001) than OLDRH. However, major complications, biliary complications, portal vein problems, and intra-abdominal bleeding were comparable between the 2 groups. With regard to the postoperative data of recipients, the risks of biliary problems, hepatic artery problems, portal vein problems, hepatic vein problems, and postoperative liver failure were similar between the 2 groups. Conclusions: LLDRH for living donors is safe and effective, and it offers superior perioperative outcomes to OLDRH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufu Peng
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Bo Li
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hongwei Xu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Kang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, People's Hospital of Xichang City, Xichang City, China
| | - Yonggang Wei
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Center of Liver Transplantation, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lapisatepun W, Hong SK, Hong K, Han ES, Lee JM, Yi NJ, Lee KW, Suh KS. Influence of Large Grafts Weighing ≥ 1000 g on Outcome of Pure Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1980-1988. [PMID: 33104954 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04837-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depending on a transplant center's level of experience, utilization of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) may be limited due to graft size or anatomical variations. Here, we aimed to evaluate the influence of large hepatic grafts (≥ 1000 g) when performing PLDRH in both donors and recipients of such grafts. METHODS Medical records of living donors who underwent either PLDRH from November 2015 to August 2019 or open conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) from January 2010 to August 2019 and those of the graft recipients were retrospectively reviewed. Donors were separated into three groups: PLDRH graft ≥ 1000 g (n = 10; study group), PLDRH graft < 1000 g (n = 280; control-I group), and CDRH graft ≥ 1000 g (n = 24; control-II group). RESULTS Total operative duration (P = 0.017) and warm ischemia time (P < 0.001) were significantly longer in the study than in the control-I and control-II groups, respectively. ΔAlanine aminotransferase% was significantly lower in the study than in the control-I group (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in minor complication incidence between the study and control-I (P = 0.068) and control-II (P = 0.618) donors. There were no major complications in the study and control-II donors, whereas six control-I donors (2.1%) experienced a major complication (P = 1.000). Length of hospitalization was significantly shorter in the study than in the control-II group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in early and late major complication incidence for recipients between the study and control-I and control-II groups. CONCLUSIONS PLDRH for grafts weighing ≥ 1000 g appears to be safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons in a well-equipped center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Worakitti Lapisatepun
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.,Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
| | - Kwangpyo Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Eui Soo Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehakro, Jongrogu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Marubashi S, Nagano H. Laparoscopic living-donor hepatectomy: Review of its current status. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:484-493. [PMID: 34337297 PMCID: PMC8316741 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The laparoscopic living-donor hepatectomy procedure has been developing rapidly. Although its use has increased worldwide, it is still only performed by experienced surgeons at a limited number of institutions. However, technical innovations have improved the feasibility of more widespread use of laparoscopic living-donor hepatectomy. The advantages of laparoscopic living-donor hepatectomy should not be overemphasized, and the fundamental principle of "living-donor safety first" cannot be neglected. This review aims to summarize the current status of laparoscopic living-donor hepatectomy and to emphasize that, while this procedure may soon be used as a reliable, donor-friendly substitute for traditional open donor hepatectomy, its safety and efficacy require further substantiation first.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shigeru Marubashi
- Department of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic and Transplant SurgeryFukushima Medical UniversityFukushimaJapan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine SurgeryYamaguchi University Graduate School of MedicineUbeJapan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang W, Xu L, Zhang J, Che X. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy for adult liver transplantation: a meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:344-358. [PMID: 33281079 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.10.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (LDRH) was a controversial topic due to its unknown safety and feasibility. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies comparing LDRH with open living donor right hepatectomy (ODRH), which were published between the date of database establishment and June 2020. Revman5.3 was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included. For the donors, there was no significant difference in warm ischemic time, hospital stay, graft weight, hepatic arterial anomalies (HAA), hepatic vein anomalies (HVA), portal vein anomalies (PVA), biliary anomalies, bleeding, wound infection, severe complication rate and readmission rate. The estimated blood loss, incidence of complication, intra-abdominal fluid rate in the LDRH group were significantly lower than those in the ODRH group, while the operation time, time to remove liver in the LDRH group were significantly higher than those in the ODRH group. For the recipients, there was no significant difference in complication rate, bleeding, HAA, PVA, biliary anomalies, graft failure and mortality. The HVA rate in the LDRH group was significantly higher than that in the ODRH group. CONCLUSION LDRH is safe and feasible for adult living donor liver transplantation compared with ODRH and it can reduce intraoperative bleeding and postoperative complication in donors, which requires further verification by more multi-center comparative studies with large sample and high quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhang
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer /Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Lin Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China
| | - Jianwei Zhang
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer /Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xu Che
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer /Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, 518116, China.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Expert Consensus Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy for Living Donor Liver Transplantation From Innovation to Implementation: A Joint Initiative From the International Laparoscopic Liver Society (ILLS) and the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (A-PHPBA). Ann Surg 2021; 273:96-108. [PMID: 33332874 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Expert Consensus Guidelines initiative on MIDH for LDLT was organized with the goal of safe implementation and development of these complex techniques with donor safety as the main priority. BACKGROUND Following the development of minimally invasive liver surgery, techniques of MIDH were developed with the aim of reducing the short- and long-term consequences of the procedure on liver donors. These techniques, although increasingly performed, lack clinical guidelines. METHODS A group of 12 international MIDH experts, 1 research coordinator, and 8 junior faculty was assembled. Comprehensive literature search was made and studies classified using the SIGN method. Based on literature review and experts opinions, tentative recommendations were made by experts subgroups and submitted to the whole experts group using on-line Delphi Rounds with the goal of obtaining >90% Consensus. Pre-conference meeting formulated final recommendations that were presented during the plenary conference held in Seoul on September 7, 2019 in front of a Validation Committee composed of LDLT experts not practicing MIDH and an international audience. RESULTS Eighteen Clinical Questions were addressed resulting in 44 recommendations. All recommendations reached at least a 90% consensus among experts and were afterward endorsed by the validation committee. CONCLUSIONS The Expert Consensus on MIDH has produced a set of clinical guidelines based on available evidence and clinical expertise. These guidelines are presented for a safe implementation and development of MIDH in LDLT Centers with the goal of optimizing donor safety, donor care, and recipient outcomes.
Collapse
|
21
|
Broering DC, Elsheikh Y, Alnemary Y, Zidan A, Elsarawy A, Saleh Y, Alabbad S, Sturdevant M, Wu YM, Troisi RI. Robotic Versus Open Right Lobe Donor Hepatectomy for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Liver Transpl 2020; 26:1455-1464. [PMID: 32542956 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Revised: 03/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Robotic right lobe donor hepatectomy (RRLDH) is rarely performed, and data concerning its safety and efficacy are lacking. Here we compare our series of RRLDHs with a similar cohort undergoing open right lobe donor hepatectomy (ORLDH) with a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Among 263 consecutive adult patients undergoing right lobe living donor hepatectomy from January 2015 until July 2019, 35 RRLDHs were matched to 70 ORLDHs. A 1:2 PSM analysis was performed to make the groups comparable for donor sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) and for recipient sex, age, BMI, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and indication for transplant. Operative time was longer in RRLDHs compared with ORLDHs (504 ± 73.5 versus 331 ± 65.1 minutes; P < 0.001) but significantly decreased with the number of patients (P < 0.001). No conversions occurred. First warm ischemia time was longer and blood loss significantly less in RRLDHs (P = 0.001 and 0.003, respectively). Overall donor complications were similar: 2 (6%) in RRLDHs versus 12 (17%) in ORLDHs (P = 0.13). Biliary leak occurred in 1 (3%) patient receiving a robotic procedure and 2 (3%) patients receiving the conventional approach. Donors undergoing robotic surgery required less patient-controlled analgesia and had a shorter hospital stay compared with the open surgery group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). No significant differences in graft anatomical data and recipient outcomes were recorded. RRLDH is feasible, safe, and reproducible, with significantly decreased blood loss and a shorter hospital stay compared with the open procedure. The first 35 patients receiving the robotic procedure showed a substantial reduction in operative time, reflecting a rapid shortening of the learning curve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dieter C Broering
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Al Faisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yasser Elsheikh
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yasir Alnemary
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Zidan
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Elsarawy
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yahia Saleh
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Saleh Alabbad
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mark Sturdevant
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Yao-Ming Wu
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Al Faisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.,Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Carpenter D, Chaudhry S, Samstein B. The Current State of Minimally Invasive Living Donor Hepatectomy. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-020-00287-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
|
23
|
Hong SK, Suh KS, Cho JH, Lee JM, Yi NJ, Lee KW. Influence of Body Mass Index ≥30 on Pure Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy. Ann Transplant 2020; 25:e923094. [PMID: 32483107 PMCID: PMC7292238 DOI: 10.12659/aot.923094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) for donors with obesity has not been previously investigated. This study aimed to investigate the influence of donor obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) on and clinical outcomes after PLDRH. Material/Methods Records of all living donors who underwent PLDRH between November 2015 and May 2018 and open conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) between January 2011 and October 2015 at Seoul National University Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The donors were divided into 3 groups: PLDRH BMI ≥30, PLDRH BMI <30, and CDRH BMI ≥30. Results Donors in the PLDRH BMI ≥30 group (n=7) were compared with those in the PLDRH BMI <30 (n=65; control 1) and CDRH BMI ≥30 (n=8; control 2) groups. Graft weight was significantly heavier in PLDRH BMI ≥30 than in control 1 (P=0.012). The lowest hemoglobin (Hb) value was higher (P=0.014) and ΔHb% was lower (P=0.005) in PLDRH BMI ≥30 than in control 1. Similarly, the lowest Hb value was higher (P=0.021) and ΔHb% was lower (P<0.001) in PLDRH BMI ≥30 than in control 2. The peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (P=0.029) and ΔALT% were higher in PLDRH BMI ≥30 than in control 2. No significant differences in hospital stay and postoperative complications were found between PLDRH BMI ≥3 and control 1, as well as between PLDRH BMI ≥3 and control 2. Conclusions This study revealed that PLDRH is feasible in donors with obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae-Hyung Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lei HJ, Lin NC, Chen CY, Chou SC, Chung MH, Shyr BU, Tsai HL, Hsia CY, Liu CS, Loong CC. Safe Strategy to Initiate Total Laparoscopic Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Stepwise Approach From a Laparoscopy-Assisted Method. World J Surg 2020; 44:3108-3118. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05572-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
25
|
|
26
|
Minimally Invasive Donor Hepatectomy for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: An International, Multi-Institutional Evaluation of Safety, Efficacy and Early Outcomes. Ann Surg 2020; 275:166-174. [PMID: 32224747 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluating the perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive (MIV) donor hepatectomy for adult live donor liver transplants in a large multi-institutional series from both Eastern and Western centers. BACKGROUND Laparoscopic liver resection has become standard practice for minor resections in selected patients in whom it provides reduced postoperative morbidity and faster rehabilitation. Laparoscopic approaches in living donor hepatectomy for transplantation, however, remain controversial because of safety concerns. Following the recommendation of the Jury of the Morioka consensus conference to address this, a retrospective study was designed to assess the early postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic donor hepatectomy. The collective experience of 10 mature transplant teams from Eastern and Western countries was reviewed. METHODS All centers provided data from prospectively maintained databases. Only left and right hepatectomies performed using a MIV technique were included in this study. Primary outcome was the occurrence of complications using the Clavien-Dindo graded classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index during the first 3 months. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for complications. RESULTS In all, 412 MIV donor hepatectomies were recorded including 164 left and 248 right hepatectomies. Surgical technique was either pure laparoscopy in 175 cases or hybrid approach in 237. Conversion into standard laparotomy was necessary in 17 donors (4.1%). None of the donors died. Also, 108 experienced 121 complications including 9.4% of severe (Clavien-Dindo 3-4) complications. Median Comprehensive Complication Index was 5.2. CONCLUSIONS This study shows favorable early postoperative outcomes in more than 400 MIV donor hepatectomy from 10 experienced centers. These results are comparable to those of benchmarking series of open standard donor hepatectomy.
Collapse
|
27
|
Park J, Kwon CHD, Choi GS, Lee SK, Kim JM, Oh J, Chung YJ, Kim KS, Lee JS, Lee KW, Kim GS, Gwak MS, Ko JS, Kwon JH, Kim K, Lee SH, Joh JW. One-Year Recipient Morbidity of Liver Transplantation Using Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: Propensity Score Analysis. Liver Transpl 2019; 25:1642-1650. [PMID: 31271699 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Donor safety and graft results of pure laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy (LLDRH) have previously been compared with those of open living donor right hepatectomy (OLDRH). However, the clinical outcomes of recipients at 1-year follow-up have never been accurately compared. We aimed to compare 1-year outcomes of recipients of living donor right liver transplantation (LRLT) using pure LLDRH and OLDRH. From May 2013 to May 2017, 197 consecutive recipients underwent LRLT. Donor hepatectomies were performed either by OLDRH (n = 127) or pure LLDRH (n = 70). After propensity score matching, 53 recipients were included in each group for analysis. The clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared between the 2 groups. The primary outcome was recipient death or graft failure during the 1-year follow-up period. In the propensity-matched analysis, the incidence of death or graft failure during the 1-year follow-up period was not different between the 2 groups (3.8% versus 5.7%; odds ratio [OR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-8.95; P = 0.69). However, the composite of Clavien-Dindo 3b-5 complications was more frequent in the pure LLDRH group (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.15-5.96; P = 0.02). In conclusion, although pure LLDRH affords a comparable incidence of fatal complications in recipients, operative complications may increase at the beginning of the program. The safety of the recipients should be confirmed to accept pure LLDRH as a feasible option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jungchan Park
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Choon Hyuck David Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Suk-Koo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jongwook Oh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young Jae Chung
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyeong Sik Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji Soo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyo Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gaab Soo Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mi Sook Gwak
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Justin Sangwook Ko
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji-Hye Kwon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Keoungah Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seung Hwan Lee
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Won Joh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Park J, Kwon DCH, Choi GS, Kim SJ, Lee SK, Kim JM, Lee KW, Chung YJ, Kim KS, Lee JS, Rhu J, Kim GS, Gwak MS, Ko JS, Lee JE, Lee S, Joh JW. Safety and Risk Factors of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: Comparison to Open Technique in Propensity Score–matched Analysis. Transplantation 2019; 103:e308-e316. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
|
29
|
Abstract
RATIONALE Laparoscopic right donor hepatectomy has been reported sporadically in several experienced centers for selected donors. This report introduced a case of a donor with an independent right posterior segmental portal branching from the main portal vein. PATIENT CONCERNS A 47-year-old woman volunteered to donate her right liver to her 48-year-old husband. DIAGNOSES The recipient has been diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria and hepatitis B virus related cirrhosis. INTERVENTIONS The parenchymal transection was performed by ultrasonic aspirator and Hem-o-Lok clips. The right hepatic artery, right hepatic duct, and the anterior and posterior branches of right portal vein were meticulously dissected, clamped, and transected. The right hepatic vein was transected by vascular stapler. A Y-graft of the recipient's own portal confluence was reconstructed with the donor's separate right anterior and posterior portal veins. OUTCOMES The donor's operation time was 420 minutes and the warm ischemia time was about 9 minutes. Blood loss was less than 600 ml without transfusion. The donor was discharged at the 10th postoperative day without any complications. LESSONS Laparoscopic right hepatectomy for donors with anomalous portal vein branching and subsequent inflow reconstruction for adult living donor liver transplantation is safe and feasible in highly experienced center.
Collapse
|
30
|
Pure laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy using the Glissonean pedicle approach (with video). Surg Endosc 2019; 33:2704-2709. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06818-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
31
|
|
32
|
The learning curve in pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy: a cumulative sum analysis. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:3741-3748. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06668-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
33
|
Hong SK, Shin E, Lee KW, Yoon KC, Lee JM, Cho JH, Yi NJ, Suh KS. Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy: perspectives in manipulating a flexible scope. Surg Endosc 2018; 33:1667-1673. [PMID: 30465077 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6594-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interest in pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) is increasing worldwide with the donor's cosmetic demands and improvements in surgical techniques. Efficient manipulation of flexible scope is mandatory for successful PLDH, especially in right hepatectomy which requires more mobilization. This study provides guidelines on how to manipulate optimally a flexible scope. METHODS Data from 158 donors who underwent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) between November 2015 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS None of the donors required transfusion, conversion to open hepatectomy, or experienced any irreversible disabilities or mortalities. Three types of laparoscopic view provided by the flexible scope, which are bird's eye view, low angle view, and lateral view, were applied to each step of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS PLDRH can be successfully performed with maximizing visibility given by the tips and pitfalls in manipulating the flexible scope.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
| | - Eunhye Shin
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea.
| | - Kyung Chul Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University Medical College, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
| | - Jae-Hyung Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kwon CHD, Choi GS, Kim JM, Cho CW, Rhu J, Soo Kim G, Sinn DH, Joh JW. Laparoscopic Donor Hepatectomy for Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Recipients. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:1545-1553. [PMID: 30021060 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Even after 2 decades of experience in laparoscopic hepatectomy, data on purely laparoscopic approach for donor hepatectomy in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) are limited. We report our initial experience of a purely laparoscopic approach for donor hepatectomy for adult recipients to explore its potential application in the management of donors. We did a retrospective data analysis of 54 consecutive patients operated on between May 2013 and February 2015. There were 41 right, 10 extended right, and 3 left hepatectomies. The median operative time was 436 minutes (range 294-684 minutes), and warm ischemia time was 6 minutes (2-12 minutes). Estimated blood loss was 300 mL (10-850 mL), and none of the patients required intraoperative transfusion. Four cases were converted to open laparotomy. The major complication rate was 16.7%, and biliary complication was the most frequent cause. Patients with normal anatomy had a major complication rate of 9.3% as compared with 45.5% in patients with anatomic variations. All patients recovered, and there was no mortality. In conclusion, a purely laparoscopic donor hepatectomy for adult LDLT recipients seems to be a feasible option; with careful patient selection and when performed by experienced surgeons, it may afford results comparable to the open method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Choon Hyuck David Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chan Woo Cho
- Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University School of Medicine and College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jinsoo Rhu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gaab Soo Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Hyun Sinn
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Won Joh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
One Hundred Fifteen Cases of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy at a Single Center. Transplantation 2018; 102:1878-1884. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
36
|
Pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy of living donor is feasible and safe: a preliminary comparative study in China. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:4614-4623. [PMID: 30251141 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6214-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2017] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adoption of laparoscopic techniques for living donor major hepatectomy has been controversial issue. The aim of this study is to present the preliminary experience of laparoscopic right hepatectomy in China. METHODS All the donors receiving right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) were divided into three groups: pure laparoscopic right hepatectomy (PLRH) group, hand-assisted right hepatectomy (HARH) group and open right hepatectomy (ORH) group. We compared the perioperative data and surgical outcomes of donors and recipients among three groups. RESULTS From November 2001 to May 2017, 295 donors have received right hepatectomy for LDLT in our center. Among them, 7 donors received PLRH, 26 donors received HARH and 262 donors received ORH. The operation time of PLRH group (509.3 ± 98.9 min) was longer than that of the HARH group (451.6 ± 89.7 min) and the ORH group (418.4 ± 81.1 min, p = 0.003). The blood loss was the least in the PLRH group (378.6 ± 177.1 mL), compared with that in the HARH group (617.3 ± 240.4 mL) and that in the ORH group (798.6 ± 483.7 mL, p = 0.0013). The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the PLRH group (7, 7-10 days) than that in the HATH group (8.5, 7.5-12 days) and ORH group (11, 9-14 days; p = 0.001). Only one donor had pleural effusion (Grade I) and another one experienced pulmonary infection (Grade II). One recipient (14.3%) in the PLRH group occurred hepatic venous stenosis. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic approaches for right hepatectomy contribute to less blood loss, better cosmetic satisfaction, less severe complications, and faster rehabilitation. PLRH is a safe and feasible procedure, which must be performed in highly specialized centers with expertise of both LDLT and laparoscopic hepatectomy, and requires a hybrid-to-pure stepwise development.
Collapse
|
37
|
Broering DC, Elsheikh Y, Shagrani M, Abaalkhail F, Troisi RI. Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Left Lateral Sectionectomy in Pediatric Transplantation: A Propensity Score Analysis on 220 Consecutive Patients. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:1019-1030. [PMID: 29489071 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Left lateral sectionectomy for donor hepatectomy is a well-established alternative to deceased donor pediatric liver transplantation. However, very little is available on the laparoscopic approach (laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy [L-LLS]). With the aim to assess safety, reproducibility under proctorship, and outcomes following living donor liver transplantation in children, a comparative single-center series using propensity score matching (PSM) to evaluate open left lateral sectionectomy (O-LLS) versus L-LLS was carried out in a relatively short time period in a high-volume pediatric transplant center. A retrospective, observational, single-center, PSM study was conducted on 220 consecutive living donor hepatectomies from January 2011 to April 2017. The variables considered for PSM were as follows: year of operation, recipient age, indication for transplant, recipient weight, donor sex, donor age, and donor body mass index. After matching, 72 O-LLSs were fit to be compared with 72 L-LLSs. Operative time and warm ischemia time were significantly longer in L-LLSs, whereas blood loss and overall donor complication rates were significantly lower. Postoperative day 1 and 4 pain scores were significantly less in the L-LLS group (P = 0.015 and 0.003, respectively). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in L-LLS (4.6 versus 4.1 days; P = 0.014). Overall donor biliary complications were 9 (12.5%) and 1 (1.4%) for O-LLS and L-LLS (P = 0.022), respectively. Vascular complications occurred in 3 (4.2%) children without graft loss in the laparoscopic group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall patient survival rates were 98.5%, 90.9%, and 90.9% in the O-LLS group and in the L-LLS group 94.3%, 92.7%, and 86.8% (P = 0.28). In conclusion, L-LLS for donor hepatectomy is a safe and reproducible technique yielding better donor perioperative outcomes with respect to the conventional approach with similar recipient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dieter C Broering
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,Al Faisal University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Yasser Elsheikh
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,Al Faisal University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Shagrani
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,Al Faisal University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Faisal Abaalkhail
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,Al Faisal University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Organ Transplant Center, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,Department of General, Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Ghent University Hospital and Medical School, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chen KH, Siow TF, Chio UC, Wu JM, Jeng KS. Laparoscopic donor hepatectomy. Asian J Endosc Surg 2018; 11:112-117. [PMID: 29869841 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic liver resection has been applied to treat most indications for liver resection during the past two decades. According to the literature, patient numbers have increased exponentially as a result, and surgical difficulty has increased as well. In expert centers, laparoscopic anatomical hemihepatectomy and major liver resection more than 3 segments have become the acceptable treatment. Moreover, with surgical innovations and accumulated experience, living donor liver transplantation has become an established treatment choice for patients on the transplant waiting list. It is even considered an inevitable choice in regions with limited access to organs from deceased donors. However, significant morbidity and rare but catastrophic mortality are associated with donor hepatectomy and remain major concerns. Therefore, to decrease the incidence of complications, a minimally invasive approach in donor hepatectomy was adopted in the early 2000s. Initially, a minimally invasive approach was used for left lateral sectionectomy for pediatric liver transplant, then for laparoscopy-assisted hemihepatectomy and pure laparoscopic/robotic right donor hepatectomy, and more recently, for adult living donor liver transplantation. The extent of procedure complexity and potential complications depends on the approach and the size of the graft to be harvested. Early results from expert teams have seemed promising in terms of shortened donor recovery and improved perioperative outcomes. However, the combination of these two highly sophisticated surgical procedures raise more concerns about donor safety, especially with regard to unexpected events during the operation. A high level of evidence is very difficult to achieve in this highly specialized surgical practice with limited penetration. Therefore, an international registry has been suggested to determine the risks and benefits before the use of laparoscopic right donor hepatectomy spreads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuo-Hsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Division of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Tiing Foong Siow
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - U-Chon Chio
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Jiann-Ming Wu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Shyang Jeng
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Safwan M, Nagai S, Collins K, Rizzari M, Yoshida A, Abouljoud M. Impact of abdominal shape on living liver donor outcomes in mini-incision right hepatic lobectomy: Comparison among 3 techniques. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:516-527. [PMID: 29281863 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Although minimally invasive techniques for living donor hepatectomy have been developed, the surgical feasibility and limitations remain to be elucidated. The risks and outcomes involved need to be better understood prior to their widespread application. The aim of this study was to assess feasibility of minimally invasive donor hepatectomy by reviewing our experience. A total of 99 living donor liver transplantations performed between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All 99 living liver donors underwent right hepatectomy. The breakdown of the techniques is as follows: the standard technique in 33 patients; the laparoscopic-assisted minilaparotomy technique (hybrid technique group) in 19 patients; and the upper midline incision technique without laparoscopic assistance (minilaparotomy group) in 47 patients. An association between donor operative outcomes and body habitus, such as body mass index (BMI), abdominal truncal depth (approximated by celiac axis [CA] depth ratio), and umbilical circumference (UC) were assessed. Perioperative factors were compared between the standard technique and the minimally invasive technique. The minilaparotomy group had significantly shorter operative time (P = 0.046) and hospital stay (P = 0.005) than the standard technique group. Postoperative complication rates were similar between the 3 groups (P = 0.16). In the minilaparotomy group, greater BMI (P = 0.02), CA depth ratio (P = 0.04), and UC (P = 0.004) were found to be risk factors for postoperative complications. In the minilaparotomy group, CA depth ratio > 0.41, UC > 90 cm, and BMI > 30 kg/m2 were significantly associated with longer operative time and hospital stay. In the standard technique group, none of the body size factors were associated with postoperative outcomes. In conclusion, the minilaparotomy technique is safe and feasible, though technical difficulties may be encountered when performed on donors with larger body habitus. Ongoing efforts are required to ensure living donor safety. Liver Transplantation 24 516-527 2018 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Safwan
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Shunji Nagai
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Kelly Collins
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Michael Rizzari
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Atsushi Yoshida
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| | - Marwan Abouljoud
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hong SK, Lee KW, Choi Y, Kim HS, Ahn SW, Yoon KC, Kim H, Yi NJ, Suh KS. Initial experience with purely laparoscopic living-donor right hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2018; 105:751-759. [PMID: 29579333 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2017] [Revised: 10/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There may be concerns about purely laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH) compared with open donor right hepatectomy, especially when performed by surgeons accustomed to open surgery. This study aimed to describe technical tips and pitfalls in PLDRH. METHODS Data from donors who underwent PLDRH at Seoul National University Hospital between December 2015 and July 2017 were analysed retrospectively. Endpoints analysed included intraoperative events and postoperative complications. All operations were performed by a single surgeon with considerable experience in open living donor hepatectomy. RESULTS A total of 26 donors underwent purely laparoscopic right hepatectomy in the study interval. No donor required transfusion during surgery, whereas two underwent reoperation. In two donors, the dissection plane at the right upper deep portion of the midplane was not correct. One donor experienced portal vein injury during caudate lobe transection, and one developed remnant left hepatic duct stenosis. One donor experienced remnant portal vein angulation owing to a different approach angle, and one experienced arterial damage associated with the use of a laparoscopic energy device. One donor had postoperative bleeding due to masking of potential bleeding foci owing to intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopy. Two donors experienced right liver surface damage caused by a xiphoid trocar. CONCLUSION Purely laparoscopic donor hepatectomy differs from open donor hepatectomy in terms of angle and caudal view. Therefore, surgeons experienced in open donor hepatectomy must gain adequate experience in laparoscopic liver surgery and make adjustments when performing PLDRH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - K W Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Y Choi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - H S Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - S W Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Chonbuk National University College of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea
| | - K C Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - H Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - N J Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - K S Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Eguchi S, Soyama A, Hara T, Natsuda K, Okada S, Hamada T, Kosaka T, Ono S, Adachi T, Hidaka M, Takatsuki M. Standardized hybrid living donor hemihepatectomy in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:363-368. [PMID: 29194959 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2017] [Revised: 10/26/2017] [Accepted: 11/26/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of the most updated version and largest group of our standardized hybrid (laparoscopic mobilization and hepatectomy through midline incision) living donor (LD) hemihepatectomy compared with those from a conventional laparotomy in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Of 237 adult-to-adult LDLTs from August 1997 to March 2017, 110 LDs underwent the hybrid procedure. Preoperative and operative factors were analyzed and compared with conventional laparotomy (n = 126). The median duration of laparoscopic usage was 26 minutes in the hybrid group. Although there was improvement in applying this procedure over time from the beginning of the series of cases studied, blood loss and operative duration were still smaller and shorter in the hybrid group. There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of postoperative complications greater than or equal to Clavien-Dindo class III. There was no difference in recipient outcome between the groups. Our standardized procedure of hybrid LD hepatectomy is applicable and safe for all types of LD hepatectomies, and it enables the benefit of both the laparoscopic and the open approach in a transplant center without a laparoscopic expert. Liver Transplantation 24 363-368 2018 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susumu Eguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akihiko Soyama
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Takanobu Hara
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Koji Natsuda
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Satomi Okada
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Takashi Hamada
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Taiichiro Kosaka
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Ono
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Adachi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Masaaki Hidaka
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Mitsuhisa Takatsuki
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Suh KS, Hong SK, Lee KW, Yi NJ, Kim HS, Ahn SW, Yoon KC, Choi JY, Oh D, Kim H. Pure laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy: Focus on 55 donors undergoing right hepatectomy. Am J Transplant 2018; 18:434-443. [PMID: 28787763 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Although laparoscopic donor hepatectomy is increasingly common, few centers with substantial experience have reported the results of pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH). Here, we report the experiences of 60 consecutive liver donors undergoing pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH), with most undergoing right hepatectomy. None of the 60 donors who underwent PLDH had intraoperative complications and none required transfusions, reoperation, or conversion to open hepatectomy. Forty-five donors who underwent PLDRH between November 2015 and December 2016 were compared with 42 who underwent conventional donor right hepatectomy (CDRH) between May 2013 and February 2014. The total operation time was longer (330.7 vs 280.0 minutes; P < .001) and the percentage with multiple bile duct openings was higher (53.3% vs 26.2%; P = .010) in the PLDRH group. However, the length of postoperative hospital stay (8.4 vs 8.2 days; P = .495) and rate of complications (11.9% vs 8.9%; P = .733) and re-hospitalizations (4.8% vs 4.4%; P = 1.000) were similar in both groups. PLDH, including PLDRH, is feasible when performed by a highly experienced surgeon and transplant team. Further evaluation, including long-term results, may support these preliminary findings of comparative outcomes for donors undergoing PLDRH and CDRH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K S Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - S K Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - K W Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - N J Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - H S Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - S W Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Chonbuk National University College of Medicine, Jeonju, Korea
| | - K C Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - J Y Choi
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - D Oh
- Department of Surgery, Myongji Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - H Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
|
44
|
|