1
|
Ruch B, Kumm K, Arias S, Katariya NN, Mathur AK. Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation: Early Challenges, Clinical Improvement, and Future Directions. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:27-44. [PMID: 37953039 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts remain a widely underutilized source of donor organs for transplantation. Although initially linked with inferior outcomes, DCD liver transplant can achieve excellent patient and graft survival with suitable matching of donor and recipient characteristics, rapid donor recovery and precise donor assessment, and appropriate perioperative management. The advent of clinical liver perfusion modalities promises to redefine the viability parameters for DCD liver allografts and hopefully will encourage more widespread usage of this growing source of donor livers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna Ruch
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. https://twitter.com/BriannaCRuch
| | - Kayla Kumm
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. https://twitter.com/Kayla_Kumm
| | - Sandra Arias
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Nitin N Katariya
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA. https://twitter.com/nnk_tx_hpb
| | - Amit K Mathur
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shen T, Zheng SH, Chen J, Zhou ZS, Yang MF, Liu XY, Chen JL, Zheng SS, Xu X. Older liver grafts from donation after circulatory death are associated with impaired survival and higher incidence of biliary non-anastomotic stricture. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2023; 22:577-583. [PMID: 36775686 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Grafts from older donors after circulatory death were associated with inferior outcome in liver transplants in the past. But it has seemed to remain controversial in the last decade, as a result of modified clinical protocols, selected recipients, and advanced technology of organ perfusion and preservation. The present study aimed to examine the impact of older donor age on complications and survival of liver transplant using grafts from donation after circulatory death (DCD). METHODS A total of 944 patients who received DCD liver transplantation from 2015 to 2020 were included and divided into two groups: using graft from older donor (aged ≥ 65 years, n = 87) and younger donor (age < 65 years, n = 857). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to eliminate selection bias. RESULTS A progressively increased proportion of liver transplants with grafts from older donors was observed from 1.68% to 15.44% during the study period. The well-balanced older donor (n = 79) and younger donor (n = 79) were 1:1 matched. There were significantly more episodes of biliary non-anastomotic stricture (NAS) in the older donor group than the younger donor group [15/79 (19.0%) vs. 6/79 (7.6%); P = 0.017]. The difference did not reach statistical significance regarding early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and primary non-function (PNF). Older livers had a trend toward inferior 1-, 2-, 3-year graft and overall survival compared with younger livers, but these differences were not statistically significant (63.1%, 57.6%, 57.6% vs. 76.9%, 70.2%, 67.7%, P = 0.112; 64.4%, 58.6%, 58.6% vs. 76.9%, 72.2%, 72.2%, P = 0.064). The only risk factor for poor survival was ABO incompatible transplant (P = 0.008) in the older donor group. In the subgroup of ABO incompatible cases, it demonstrated a significant difference in the rate of NAS between the older donor group and the younger donor group [6/8 (75.0%) vs. 3/14 (21.4%); P = 0.014]. CONCLUSIONS Transplants with grafts from older donors (aged ≥ 65 years) after circulatory death are more frequently associated with inferior outcome compared to those from younger donors. Older grafts from DCD are more likely to develop NAS, especially in ABO incompatible cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Shen
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
| | - Shan-Hua Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Jun Chen
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Oncology and Intelligent Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China
| | | | - Meng-Fan Yang
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Oncology and Intelligent Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China
| | - Xiang-Yan Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China
| | - Jun-Li Chen
- China Liver Transplant Registry, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Shu-Sen Zheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shulan (Hangzhou) Hospital, Hangzhou 310022, China; Division of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China
| | - Xiao Xu
- Key Laboratory of Integrated Oncology and Intelligent Medicine of Zhejiang Province, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-organ Transplantation, Hangzhou 310003, China; Institute of Organ Transplantation, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ibeabuchi T, Li E, Bittermann T, Mahmud N, Abt PL. Can ex-situ normothermic perfusion improve graft survival compared to static cold storage among donation after circulatory death liver allografts? Liver Transpl 2023; 29:952-960. [PMID: 37016764 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
Limited data suggest that ex-situ normothermic liver perfusion (ENLP) may improve the outcomes of donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplants compared to static cold storage (SCS). All adult DCD liver transplants performed between 2016 and 2021 were identified in the United Network of Organ Sharing database. ENLP liver transplants were compared to SCS using inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance clinical and demographic confounders. The primary analysis simulated intention-to-treat with inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox models. Compared to SCS DCDs (N = 3,079), recipients of ENLP DCDs (N = 65) had lower Model of End Stage Liver Disease scores at transplant (16.5 v. 18.8, p = 0.033), longer wait times (468 ± 720 vs. 246 ± 467 d; p < 0.001), and received livers from donors with a greater BMI (29.2 vs. 27.5; p = 0.008). ENLP preservation was associated with a lower risk of graft failure (HR 0.31 vs. SCS, 95% CI:0.12-0.86, p = 0.023) and a lower incidence of retransplantation. A sub-analysis restricted to the 20 centers performing ENLP, encompassing 946 SCS DCDs, demonstrated similar results: (HR 0.33 vs. SCS, 95% CI: 0.13-0.94, p = 0.021). Among 111 patients who required retransplantation and where the etiology of graft failure was identified, graft failure due to ischemic cholangiopathy was noted in 1 ENLP and 46 SCS. In this retrospective analysis of the early US DCD ENLP experience, there may exist a graft survival benefit to transplants performed with ENLP compared to SCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobenna Ibeabuchi
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eric Li
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Therese Bittermann
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nadim Mahmud
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter L Abt
- Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lennon C, Harvey D, Goldstein PA. Ethical considerations for theatre teams in organ donation after circulatory determination of death. Br J Anaesth 2023; 130:502-507. [PMID: 36801100 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Transplant surgery is an area that gives rise to a number of ethical considerations. As medicine continues to expand the boundaries of what is technically possible, we must consider the ethical implications of our interventions, not solely on patients and society, but also on those asked to provide that care. Here, we consider physician participation in procedures required to provide patient care in the context of the ethical convictions held by the physician, with an emphasis on organ donation after circulatory determination of death. Strategies that can be used to mitigate any potential negative impact on the psychological well-being of members of the patient care team are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dan Harvey
- National Health Service Blood & Transplant, UK; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Peter A Goldstein
- Department of Anesthesiology, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Siddiqui F, Al-Adwan Y, Subramanian J, Henry ML. Contemporary Considerations in Solid Organ Transplantation Utilizing DCD Donors. TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tpr.2022.100118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
6
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To define benchmark cutoffs for redo liver transplantation (redo-LT). BACKGROUND In the era of organ shortage, redo-LT is frequently discussed in terms of expected poor outcome and wasteful resources. However, there is a lack of benchmark data to reliably evaluate outcomes after redo-LT. METHODS We collected data on redo-LT between January 2010 and December 2018 from 22 high-volume transplant centers. Benchmark cases were defined as recipients with model of end stage liver disease (MELD) score ≤25, absence of portal vein thrombosis, no mechanical ventilation at the time of surgery, receiving a graft from a donor after brain death. Also, high-urgent priority and early redo-LT including those for primary nonfunction (PNF) or hepatic artery thrombosis were excluded. Benchmark cutoffs were derived from the 75th percentile of the medians of all benchmark centers. RESULTS Of 1110 redo-LT, 373 (34%) cases qualified as benchmark cases. Among these cases, the rate of postoperative complications until discharge was 76%, and increased up to 87% at 1-year, respectively. One-year overall survival rate was excellent with 90%. Benchmark cutoffs included Comprehensive Complication Index CCI ® at 1-year of ≤72, and in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates of ≤13% and ≤15%, respectively. In contrast, patients who received a redo-LT for PNF showed worse outcomes with some values dramatically outside the redo-LT benchmarks. CONCLUSION This study shows that redo-LT achieves good outcome when looking at benchmark scenarios. However, this figure changes in high-risk redo-LT, as for example in PNF. This analysis objectifies for the first-time results and efforts for redo-LT and can serve as a basis for discussion about the use of scarce resources.
Collapse
|
7
|
Cannon RM, Nassel AF, Walker JT, Sheikh SS, Orandi BJ, Lynch RJ, Shah MB, Goldberg DS, Locke JE. Lost potential and missed opportunities for DCD liver transplantation in the United States. Am J Surg 2022; 224:990-998. [PMID: 35589438 PMCID: PMC9940905 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donation after cardiac death(DCD) has been proposed as an avenue to expand the liver donor pool. METHODS We examined factors associated with nonrecovery of DCD livers using UNOS data from 2015 to 2019. RESULTS There 265 non-recovered potential(NRP) DCD livers. Blood type AB (7.8% vs. 1.1%) and B (16.9% vs. 9.8%) were more frequent in the NRP versus actual donors (p < 0.001). The median driving time between donor hospital and transplant center was similar for NRP and actual donors (30.1 min vs. 30.0 min; p = 0.689), as was the percentage located within a transplant hospital (20.8% vs. 20.9%; p = 0.984).The donation service area(DSA) of a donor hospital explained 27.9% (p = 0.001) of the variability in whether a DCD liver was recovered. CONCLUSION A number of potentially high quality DCD donor livers go unrecovered each year, which may be partially explained by donor blood type and variation in regional and DSA level practice patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Cannon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | - Ariann F Nassel
- Lister Hill Center for Health Policy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jeffery T Walker
- Center for the Study of Community Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Saulat S Sheikh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Babak J Orandi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Raymond J Lynch
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Malay B Shah
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - David S Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Jayme E Locke
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Justo I, Marcacuzco A, García-Conde M, Caso O, Cobo C, Nutu A, Manrique A, Calvo J, García-Sesma A, Rivas C, Loinaz C, Jiménez-Romero C. Liver Transplantation in Sexagenarian Patients Using Grafts From Uncontrolled Circulatory Death Versus Grafts From Brain Death Donation. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:1839-1846. [PMID: 35909015 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.05.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increased number of older recipients underwent liver transplantation in recent years, and consequently needing to obtain more liver grafts. In order to increase this pool, in 2006, we initiated the use of livers from uncontrolled circulatory death (uDCD). We analyzed the use of uDCD livers in sexagenarian recipients and their effect on overall survival. METHODS A retrospective and comparative study was performed among 4 groups according to recipient age (less or greater than 60 years) and donor type (donor brain death [DBD] or uDCD): Group A: DBD livers in recipients aged <60 years (n = 169); Group B: uDCD livers in recipients aged <60 years (n = 36); Group C: DBD livers in recipients aged >60 years (n = 96); and Group D: uDCD livers in recipients aged >60 years(n = 39). RESULTS Intraoperative transfusion, biliary complications, primary non-function, acute rejection, chronic renal dysfunction, retransplantation, and mortality during follow-up (cardiovascular diseases in 3 patients, hepatitis C virus recurrence in 4 patients, and de novo malignancies in 3 patients) were significantly higher, and 5-year patient and graft survival was significantly lower in sexagenarian recipients. Bilirubin and packed red blood cells transfusion were risk factors for patient survival, whereas hepatocelular carcinoma, creatinine, and packed red blood cells transfusion were risk factors for patient survival. Recipient age (<60 years) was confirmed as protective factor for patient and graft survival, whereas the use of uDCD was not a risk factor for patient or graft survival. CONCLUSIONS Use of a uDCD liver did not demonstrate as a risk factor for patient and graft survival, and recipient age (<60 years) was a protective factor for patient and graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iago Justo
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Alberto Marcacuzco
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - María García-Conde
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Oscar Caso
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Cobo
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anisa Nutu
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Manrique
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Calvo
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alvaro García-Sesma
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Rivas
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmelo Loinaz
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Jiménez-Romero
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Croome KP, Mathur AK, Aqel B, Yang L, Taner T, Heimbach JK, Rosen CB, Paz-Fumagalli R, Taner CB. Classification of Distinct Patterns of Ischemic Cholangiopathy Following DCD Liver Transplantation: Distinct Clinical Courses and Long-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Cohort. Transplantation 2022; 106:1206-1214. [PMID: 34468429 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the number of donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver transplants (LTs) performed in the United States continues to increase annually, there has been interest by policy makers to develop a more robust exception point safety net for patients who develop ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) following DCD LT. As such, there is a need for better understanding of the clinical course and long-term outcomes in patients who develop IC, as well as determining if IC can be classified into distinct categories with distinctly different clinical outcomes. METHODS All DCD LT performed at Mayo Clinic Florida, Mayo Clinic Arizona, and Mayo Clinic Rochester from January 1999 to March 2020 were included (N = 770). Outcomes were compared between 4 distinct radiologic patterns of IC: diffuse necrosis, multifocal progressive, confluence dominant, and minor form. RESULTS In total, 88 (11.4%) patients developed IC, of which 42 (5.5%) were listed for retransplantation of liver (ReLT). Patients with diffuse necrosis and multifocal progressive patterns suffered from frequent hospital admissions for cholangitis in the first year following DCD LT (median 3 and 2), were largely stent dependent (100% and 85.7%), and almost universally required ReLT. Patients with confluence dominant disease were managed with multiple stents and frequently recovered, ultimately becoming stent free without need for ReLT. Patients with the minor form IC did well with limited need for stent placement or repeat procedures and did not require ReLT. Graft survival was different between the 4 distinct IC patterns (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The present analysis provides a detailed analysis on the natural history and clinical course of IC. Patients developing IC can be classified into 4 distinct patterns with distinct clinical courses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amit K Mathur
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Bashar Aqel
- Division of Gastroenterology and hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Liu Yang
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Timucin Taner
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | - C Burcin Taner
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schlegel A, Foley DP, Savier E, Flores Carvalho M, De Carlis L, Heaton N, Taner CB. Recommendations for Donor and Recipient Selection and Risk Prediction: Working Group Report From the ILTS Consensus Conference in DCD Liver Transplantation. Transplantation 2021; 105:1892-1903. [PMID: 34416750 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Although the utilization of donation after circulatory death donors (DCDs) for liver transplantation (LT) has increased steadily, much controversy remains, and no common acceptance criteria exist with regard to donor and recipient risk factors and prediction models. A consensus conference was organized by International Liver Transplantation Society on January 31, 2020, in Venice, Italy, to review the current clinical practice worldwide regarding DCD-LT and to develop internationally accepted guidelines. The format of the conference was based on the grade system. International experts in this field were allocated to 6 working groups and prepared evidence-based recommendations to answer-specific questions considering the currently available literature. Working group members and conference attendees served as jury to edit and confirm the final recommendations presented at the end of the conference by each working group separately. This report presents the final statements and recommendations provided by working group 2, covering the entire spectrum of donor and recipient risk factors and prediction models in DCD-LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Schlegel
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - David P Foley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, William S. Middleton VA Medical Center, Madison, WI
| | - Eric Savier
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Sorbonne Université Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Mauricio Flores Carvalho
- Hepatobiliary Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, AOU Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Luciano De Carlis
- Department of General Surgery and Transplantation, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Nigel Heaton
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Burcin Taner
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Early Allograft Dysfunction and Complications in DCD Liver Transplantation: Expert Consensus Statements From the International Liver Transplantation Society. Transplantation 2021; 105:1643-1652. [PMID: 34291765 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Livers for transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors are relatively more prone to early and ongoing alterations in graft function that might ultimately lead to graft loss and even patient death. In consideration of this fact, this working group of the International Liver Transplantation Society has performed a critical evaluation of the medical literature to create a set of statements regarding the assessment of early allograft function/dysfunction and complications arising in the setting of donation after circulatory death liver transplantation.
Collapse
|
12
|
Wickramaratne N, Li R, Tian T, Khoraki J, Kang HS, Chmielewski C, Maitland J, Liebrecht LK, Fyffe-Freil R, Lindell SL, Mangino MJ. Cholangiocyte Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) is a potential molecular mechanism driving ischemic cholangiopathy in liver transplantation. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0246978. [PMID: 34234356 PMCID: PMC8263302 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has expanded the donor pool for liver transplantation. However, ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) after DCD liver transplantation causes inferior outcomes. The molecular mechanisms of IC are currently unknown but may depend on ischemia-induced genetic reprograming of the biliary epithelium to mesenchymal-like cells. The main objective of this study was to determine if cholangiocytes undergo epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) after exposure to DCD conditions and if this causally contributes to the phenotype of IC. Human cholangiocyte cultures were exposed to periods of warm and cold ischemia to mimic DCD liver donation. EMT was tested by assays of cell migration, cell morphology, and differential gene expression. Transplantation of syngeneic rat livers recovered under DCD conditions were evaluated for EMT changes by immunohistochemistry. Human cholangiocytes exposed to DCD conditions displayed migratory behavior and gene expression patterns consistent with EMT. E-cadherin and CK-7 expressions fell while N-cadherin, vimentin, TGFβ, and SNAIL rose, starting 24 hours and peaking 1-3 weeks after exposure. Cholangiocyte morphology changed from cuboidal (epithelial) before to spindle shaped (mesenchymal) a week after ischemia. These changes were blocked by pretreating cells with the Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGFβ) receptor antagonist Galunisertib (1 μM). Finally, rats with liver isografts cold stored for 20 hours in UW solution and exposed to warm ischemia (30 minutes) at recovery had elevated plasma bilirubin 1 week after transplantation and the liver tissue showed immunohistochemical evidence of early cholangiocyte EMT. Our findings show EMT occurs after exposure of human cholangiocytes to DCD conditions, which may be initiated by upstream signaling from autocrine derived TGFβ to cause mesenchymal specific morphological and migratory changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niluka Wickramaratne
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Ru Li
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Tao Tian
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Jad Khoraki
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Hae Sung Kang
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Courtney Chmielewski
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Jerry Maitland
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Loren K. Liebrecht
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Ria Fyffe-Freil
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Susanne Lyra Lindell
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Martin J. Mangino
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma using grafts from uncontrolled circulatory death donation. Sci Rep 2021; 11:13520. [PMID: 34188156 PMCID: PMC8241826 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92976-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Controversy exists regarding whether the rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) differs when using livers from donation after controlled circulatory death (DCD) versus livers from donation after brain death (DBD). The aim of this cohort study was to analyze rates of HCC recurrence, patient survival, and graft survival after OLT for HCC, comparing recipients of DBD livers (n = 103) with recipients of uncontrolled DCD livers (uDCD; n = 41). No significant differences in tumor size, tumor number, serum alpha-fetoprotein, proportion of patients within Milan criteria, or pre-OLT bridging therapies were identified between groups, although the waitlist period was significantly shorter in the uDCD group (p = 0.040). HCC recurrence was similar between groups. Patient survival was similar between groups, but graft survival was lower in the uDCD group. Multivariate analysis identified recipient age (p = 0.031), pre-OLT bridging therapy (p = 0.024), and HCC recurrence (p = 0.048) as independent risk factors for patient survival and pre-OLT transarterial chemoembolization (p = 0.045) as the single risk factor for HCC recurrence. In conclusion, similar patient survival and lower graft survival were observed in the uDCD group. However, the use of uDCD livers appears to be justified due to a shorter waitlist time, and lower waitlist dropout and HCC recurrence rates.
Collapse
|
14
|
Justo I, Nutu A, García-Conde M, Marcacuzco A, Manrique A, Calvo J, García-Sesma Á, Caso Ó, Martín-Arriscado C, Andrés A, Paz E, Jiménez-Romero C. Incidence and risk factors of primary non-function after liver transplantation using grafts from uncontrolled donors after circulatory death. Clin Transplant 2020; 35:e14134. [PMID: 33128296 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Graft primary non-function (PNF) is the most severe complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and is frequently associated with livers from uncontrolled circulatory death (uDCD). METHODS We reviewed retrospectively the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of patients showing PNF after receiving uDCD liver grafts. The series comprises 75 OLT performed during 11 years. RESULTS The incidence of PNF using uDCD livers was 8%. We compared patients who developed PNF (n = 6) vs. patients without PNF (n = 69). Mean pump flow of donors during normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) was significantly lower in PNF (p = .032). Day 1 post-OLT levels of transaminases and the incidence of renal complications and postoperative mortality were also significantly higher in the PNF group, but 5-year patient survival was similar in both groups (66.7% in PNF and 68.5% in non-PNF). All PNF patients underwent re-OLT, and 2 died. PNF incidence has decreased in the last 5-years. Binary logistic regression analysis confirmed final ALT value >4 times the normal value as risk factor for PNF, and median donor pump flow >3700 ml/min as protective effect. CONCLUSIONS Adequate donor pump flow during NRP was a protective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iago Justo
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anisa Nutu
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - María García-Conde
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Marcacuzco
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Manrique
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Calvo
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Álvaro García-Sesma
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Óscar Caso
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Martín-Arriscado
- Unit of Statistical Analysis, "Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Amado Andrés
- Service of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, "Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Estela Paz
- Service of Immunology, "Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Jiménez-Romero
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Doce de Octubre" Hospital, Instituto de Investigación (imas12), Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Silverstein J, Roll G, Dodge JL, Grab JD, Yao FY, Mehta N. Donation After Circulatory Death Is Associated With Similar Posttransplant Survival in All but the Highest-Risk Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients. Liver Transpl 2020; 26:1100-1111. [PMID: 32531867 PMCID: PMC8722407 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receive a higher proportion of livers from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors compared with non-HCC etiologies. Nevertheless, data on outcomes in patients with HCC receiving DCD grafts are limited. We evaluated the influence of DCD livers on post-LT outcome among HCC patients. We identified 7563 patients in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database who underwent LT with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score exceptions from 2012 to 2016, including 567 (7.5%) who received a DCD donor organ and 6996 (92.5%) who received a donation after brain death (DBD) donor organ. Kaplan-Meier probabilities of post-LT HCC recurrence at 3 years were 7.6% for DCD and 6.4% for DBD recipients (P = 0.67) and post-LT survival at 3 years was 81.1% versus 85.5%, respectively (P = 0.008). On multivariate analysis, DCD donor (hazard ratio, 1.38; P = 0.005) was an independent predictor of post-LT mortality. However, a survival difference after LT was only observed in subgroups at higher risk for HCC recurrence including Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score ≥4 (DCD 57.0% versus DBD 72.6%; P = 0.02), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥100 (60.1% versus 76.9%; P = 0.049), and multiple viable tumors on last imaging before LT (69.9% versus 83.1%; P = 0.002). In this analysis of HCC patients receiving DCD versus DBD livers in the UNOS database, we found that patients with a low-to-moderate risk of HCC recurrence (80%-90% of the DCD cohort) had equivalent survival regardless of donor type. It appears that DCD donation can best be used to increase the donor pool for HCC patients with decompensated cirrhosis or partial response/stable disease after locoregional therapy with AFP at LT <100 ng/mL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordyn Silverstein
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Garrett Roll
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jennifer L. Dodge
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Joshua D. Grab
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Francis Y. Yao
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA,Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Neil Mehta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Croome KP. Donation after Circulatory Death: Potential Mechanisms of Injury and Preventative Strategies. Semin Liver Dis 2020; 40:256-263. [PMID: 32557479 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors represent a potential means to help address the disparity between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT) and the availability of donor livers. While initial enthusiasm for DCD LT was high in the early 2000s, early reports of high rates of biliary complications and inferior graft survival resulted in reluctance among many transplant centers to use DCD liver grafts. As with all innovations in transplant practice, there is undoubtedly a learning curve associated with the optimal utilization of liver grafts from DCD donors. More contemporary data has demonstrated that results with DCD LT are improving and the number of DCD LT performed annually has been steadily increasing. In this concise review, potential mechanisms of injury for DCD livers are discussed along with strategies that have been employed in clinical practice to improve DCD LT outcomes.
Collapse
|
17
|
Liver Transplantation Using Uncontrolled Donors After Circulatory Death: A 10-year Single-center Experience. Transplantation 2020; 103:2497-2505. [PMID: 31765364 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One method for increasing the donor pool for orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTs) is to use uncontrolled donation after circulation death (uDCDs). METHODS From January 2006 to December 2016, we performed 75 OLTs using uDCD livers. The control group comprised a sample of 265 OLTs using livers of donations after brain death (DBDs). A comparative study was performed. RESULTS Of 256 potential uDCD donors cannulated, 75 (29.3%) livers were accepted for OLT. The amount of hemoderivatives transfused was significantly higher in the uDCD group. The rate of primary nonfunction was also significantly higher (P = 0.031) in uDCD recipients (8%) than DBD recipients (1.5%). The overall rate of biliary complications was significantly higher (P = 0.001) in uDCD recipients (23 cases, 30.6%) than DBD recipients (28 cases, 10.6%). In the uDCD group, 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 82.7%, 73%, and 71.5%, respectively; in the DBD group, they were 89%, 83.7%, and 78.8%, respectively (P = 0.180). In the uDCD group, 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 73.3%, 65.1%, and 63.6%, respectively; in the DBD group, they were 87.1%, 81.9%, and 76.5%, respectively (P = 0.013). Multivariate analysis showed that independent risk factors for patient and graft survival were intraoperative transfusion of >6 units of packed red blood cell concentrates and recipients who were older than 60 years. CONCLUSIONS Although graft survival is significantly lower using uDCD livers, 5-year patient survival in recipients of DBD and uDCD livers is similar. After careful selection, the livers of uDCD can be selectively used for OLT.
Collapse
|
18
|
Jiménez-Romero C, Manrique A, García-Conde M, Nutu A, Calvo J, Caso Ó, Marcacuzco A, García-Sesma Á, Álvaro E, Villar R, Aguado JM, Conde M, Justo I. Biliary Complications After Liver Transplantation From Uncontrolled Donors After Circulatory Death: Incidence, Management, and Outcome. Liver Transpl 2020; 26:80-91. [PMID: 31562677 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The utilization of livers from donation after uncontrolled circulatory death (uDCD) increases the availability of liver grafts, but it is associated with a higher incidence of biliary complications (BCs) and lower graft survival than those organs donated after brain death. From January 2006 to December 2016, we performed 75 orthotopic liver transplantations (OLTs) using uDCD livers. To investigate the relationship of BCs with the use of uDCD OLT, we compared patients who developed BCs (23 patients) with those who did not (non-BC group, 43 patients) after excluding cases of hepatic artery thrombosis (a known cause of BC) and primary nonfunction. The groups had similar uDCD donor maintenance, donor and recipient characteristics, and perioperative morbidity/mortality rates, but we observed a higher rate of hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C virus in the non-BC group. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary dilation, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography dilation, Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ), a T-tube, and retransplantation were used for BC management. In the BC group, 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survival rates were 91.3%, 69.6%, and 65.2%, respectively, versus 77.8%, 72.9%, and 72.9%, respectively, in the non-BC group (P = 0.89). However, 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates were 78.3%, 60.9%, and 56.5%, respectively, in the BC group versus 77.8%, 72.9%, and 72.9%, respectively, in the non-BC group (P = 0.38). Multivariate analysis did not indicate independent risk factors for BC development. In conclusion, patient and graft survival rates were generally lower in patients who developed BCs but not significantly so. These complications were managed in the majority of patients through radiological dilation, endoscopic dilation, or Roux-en-Y HJ. Retransplantation is necessary in rare cases after the failure of biliary dilation or surgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Jiménez-Romero
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Investigación, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Manrique
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Investigación, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - María García-Conde
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Investigación, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anisa Nutu
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Investigación, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jorge Calvo
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Investigación, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Óscar Caso
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Investigación, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Marcacuzco
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Investigación, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Álvaro García-Sesma
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Investigación, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Edurne Álvaro
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Investigación, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Roberto Villar
- Department of Radiology, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - José María Aguado
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Conde
- Service of General and Digestive Surgery, Lucus Augusti Hospital, Lugo, Spain
| | - Iago Justo
- Unit of HPB Surgery and Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Instituto de Investigación, Doce de Octubre University Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Machine perfusion is a hot topic in liver transplantation and several new perfusion concepts are currently developed. Prior to introduction into routine clinical practice, however, such perfusion approaches need to demonstrate their impact on liver function, post-transplant complications, utilization rates of high-risk organs, and cost benefits. Therefore, based on results of experimental and clinical studies, the community has to recognize the limitations of this technology. In this review, we summarize current perfusion concepts and differences between protective mechanisms of ex- and in-situ perfusion techniques. Next, we discuss which graft types may benefit most from perfusion techniques, and highlight the current understanding of liver viability testing. Finally, we present results from recent clinical trials involving machine liver perfusion, and analyze the value of different outcome parameters, currently used as endpoints for randomized controlled trials in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Schlegel
- Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Xavier Muller
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp Dutkowski
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Can hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) rescue futile DCD liver grafts? HPB (Oxford) 2019; 21:1156-1165. [PMID: 30777695 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The new UK-DCD-Risk-Score has been recently developed to predict graft loss in DCD liver transplantation. Donor-recipient combinations with a cumulative risk of >10 points were classified as futile and achieved an impaired one-year graft survival of <40%. The aim of this study was to show, if hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) can rescue such extended DCD livers and improve outcomes. METHODS "Futile"-classified donor-recipient combinations were selected from our HOPE-treated human DCD liver cohort (01/2012-5/2017), with a minimum follow-up of one year. Main risk factors, which contribute to the classification "futile" include: elderly donors>60years, prolonged functional donor warm ischemia time (fDWIT > 30min), long cold ischemia time>6hrs, donor BMI>25 kg/m2, advanced recipient age (>60years), MELD-score>25points and retransplantation status. Endpoints included all outcome measures during and after DCD LT. RESULTS Twenty-one donor-recipient combinations were classified futile (median UK-DCD-Risk-Score:11 points). The median donor age and fDWIT were 62 years and 36 min, respectively. After cold storage, livers underwent routine HOPE-treatment for 120 min. All grafts showed immediate function. One-year and 5-year tumor death censored graft survival was 86%. CONCLUSION HOPE-treatment achieved excellent outcomes, despite high-risk donor and recipient combinations. Such easy, endischemic perfusion approach may open the door for an increased utilization of futile DCD livers in other countries.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ruffolo LI, Levstik MA, Hernandez-Alejandro R. Watching the Clock in Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation. Liver Transpl 2019; 25:1305-1307. [PMID: 31365774 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Luis I Ruffolo
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Mark A Levstik
- Division of Transplant Hepatology and Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Abdominal Transplantation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Paterno F, Guarrera JV, Wima K, Diwan T, Cuffy MC, Anwar N, Woodle ES, Shah S. Clinical Implications of Donor Warm and Cold Ischemia Time in Donor After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation. Liver Transpl 2019; 25:1342-1352. [PMID: 30912253 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The use of donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver allografts has been constrained by limitations in the duration of donor warm ischemia time (DWIT), donor agonal time (DAT), and cold ischemia time (CIT). The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of longer DWIT, DAT, and CIT on graft survival and other outcomes in DCD liver transplants. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients was queried for adult liver transplants from DCD donors between 2009 and 2015. Donor, recipient, and center variables were included in the analysis. During the study period, 2107 patients underwent liver transplant with DCD allografts. In most patients, DWIT and DAT were <30 minutes. DWIT was <30 minutes in 1804 donors, between 30 and 40 minutes in 248, and >40 minutes in 37. There was no difference in graft survival, duration of posttransplant hospital length of stay, and readmission rate between DCD liver transplants from donors with DWIT <30 minutes and DWIT between 30 and 40 minutes. Similar outcomes were noted for DAT. In the multivariate analysis, DAT and DWIT were not associated with graft loss. The predictors associated with graft loss were donor age, donor sharing, CIT, recipient admission to the intensive care unit, recipient ventilator dependence, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and low-volume transplant centers. Any CIT cutoff >4 hours was associated with increased risk for graft loss. Longer CIT was also associated with a longer posttransplant hospital stay, higher rate of primary nonfunction, and hyperbilirubinemia. In conclusion, slightly longer DAT and DWIT (up to 40 minutes) were not associated with graft loss, longer posttransplant hospitalization, or hospital readmissions, whereas longer CIT was associated with worse outcomes after DCD liver transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavio Paterno
- Division of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and University Hospital, Newark, NJ
| | - James V Guarrera
- Division of Liver Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School and University Hospital, Newark, NJ
| | - Koffi Wima
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Tayyab Diwan
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Madison C Cuffy
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Nadeem Anwar
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - E Steve Woodle
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Shimul Shah
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kalisvaart M, Muiesan P, Schlegel A. The UK-DCD-Risk-Score - practical and new guidance for allocation of a specific organ to a recipient? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 13:771-783. [PMID: 31173513 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1629286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Multiple factors contribute to the overall outcome in donation after circulatory death liver transplantation. The majority is however inconsistently reported with various acceptance criteria and thresholds, when to decline a specific graft. Recent improvement in outcome was based on an increased awareness of the cumulative risk, combining donor and recipient parameters, which encouraged the community to accept livers with an overall higher risk. Areas covered: This review pictures the large number of risk factors in this field with a special focus on parameters, which contribute to available prediction models. Next, features of the recently developed UK-DCD-Risk-Score, which led to a significantly impaired graft survival, above a suggested threshold of >10 score points, are discussed. The clinical impact of this new model on the background of other prediction tools with their subsequent limitations is highlighted in a next chapter. Finally, we provide suggestions, how to further improve outcomes in this challenging field of transplantation. Expert opinion: Despite the recent development of new prediction models, including the UK-DCD-Risk-Score, which provides a sufficient prediction of graft loss after DCD liver transplantation, the consideration of other confounders is essential to better understand the overall risk and metabolic liver status to improve the comparability of clinical studies. More uniform definitions and thresholds of individual risk factors are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marit Kalisvaart
- a Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust , Birmingham , UK.,b Department of Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital of Zurich , Zurich , Switzerland
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- a Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust , Birmingham , UK
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- a Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust , Birmingham , UK.,c National Institute for Health Research Birmingham, Liver Biomedical Research Centre, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Karp S. An Opportunity to Significantly Decrease Liver Wait-List Death. Liver Transpl 2019; 25:1138-1139. [PMID: 31206224 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Seth Karp
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Wanis KN, Madenci AL, Dokus MK, Tomiyama K, Al-Judaibi BM, Hernán MA, Hernandez-Alejandro R. The Effect of the Opioid Epidemic on Donation After Circulatory Death Transplantation Outcomes. Transplantation 2019; 103:973-979. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
26
|
Boteon APCS, Schlegel A, Kalisvaart M, Boteon YL, Abradelo M, Mergental H, Roberts JK, Mirza DF, Perera MTPR, Isaac JR, Muiesan P. Retrieval Practice or Overall Donor and Recipient Risk: What Impacts on Outcomes After Donation After Circulatory Death Liver Transplantation in the United Kingdom? Liver Transpl 2019; 25:545-558. [PMID: 30919560 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Parameters of retrieval surgery are meticulously documented in the United Kingdom, where up to 40% of livers are donation after circulatory death (DCD) donations. This retrospective analysis focuses on outcomes after transplantation of DCD livers, retrieved by different UK centers between 2011 and 2016. Donor and recipient risk factors and the donor retrieval technique were assessed. A total of 236 DCD livers from 9 retrieval centers with a median UK DCD risk score of 5 (low risk) to 7 points (high risk) were compared. The majority used University of Wisconsin solution for aortic flush with a median hepatectomy time of 27-44 minutes. The overall liver injury rate appeared relatively high (27.1%) with an observed tendency toward more retrieval injuries from centers performing a quicker hepatectomy. Among all included risk factors, the UK DCD risk score remained the best predictor for overall graft loss in the multivariate analysis (P < 0.001). In high-risk and futile donor-recipient combinations, the occurrence of liver retrieval injuries had negative impact on graft survival (P = 0.023). Expectedly, more ischemic cholangiopathies (P = 0.003) were found in livers transplanted with a higher cumulative donor-recipient risk. Although more biliary complications with subsequent graft loss were found in high-risk donor-recipient combinations, the impact of the standardized national retrieval practice on outcomes after DCD liver transplantation was minimal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda P C S Boteon
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Schlegel
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Marit Kalisvaart
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Yuri L Boteon
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Manuel Abradelo
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Hynek Mergental
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - J Keith Roberts
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darius F Mirza
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Liver Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - M Thamara P R Perera
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Liver Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John R Isaac
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Liver Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- The Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham National Health Service Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Liver Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is still performed in a limited number of countries. This article summarizes the development of DCD in Spain and presents recent Spanish contributions to gain knowledge on the potential benefits and the practical use of normothermic regional perfusion (nRP). RECENT FINDINGS DCD now contributes to 24% of deceased donors in Spain. The development of DCD has been based on an assessment of practices in the treatment of cardiac arrest and end-of-life care to accommodate the option of DCD; the creation of an adequate regulatory framework; and institutional support, professional training and public education. Appropriate posttransplant outcomes have been obtained with organs from both uncontrolled and controlled DCD donors. nRP is increasingly used, with preliminary data supporting improved results compared with other in-situ preservation/recovery approaches. Mobile teams with portable extracorporeal membrane oxygenation devices are making nRP possible in hospitals without these resources. To avoid the possibility of reestablishing brain circulation after the determination of death, a specific methodology has been validated. SUMMARY DCD has been successfully developed in Spain following a streamlined process. nRP may become a standard in DCD, although further evidence on the benefits of this technology is eagerly awaited.
Collapse
|
28
|
Vivalda S, Zhengbin H, Xiong Y, Liu Z, Wang Z, Ye Q. Vascular and Biliary Complications Following Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Meta-analysis. Transplant Proc 2019; 51:823-832. [PMID: 30979471 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess biliary and vascular complications after liver transplantations (LTs) sourced from deceased donors. METHODS This study reviewed potentially relevant English-language articles gathered from PubMed and Medline published from 2012 to 2017. One additional study was carried out using our institution's database for articles published from 2013 to 2017. Biliary and vascular complications from adult patients receiving their first deceased-donor LT were included. This meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) and the study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Ten studies met our inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity in donation after cardiac death (DCD) and donation after brain death (DBD) recipients was observed and minimized after pooling a subgroup analysis. This latter analysis focused on biliary stricture, biliary leaks and stones, and vascular thrombosis and stenosis. Meta-analyses showed that patients receiving DCD organs have a greatly increased risk of biliary complications compared to those receiving DBD organs, particularly the following: biliary leaks and stones (odds ratio [OR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-2.34); and biliary stricture (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.21-2.06). DCD grafts tended to be but were not significantly associated with DBD regarding vascular thrombosis (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.05-2.50), and the risk of vascular stenosis in DCD grafts was not statistically significant (OR = 1.25, 95% CI, .70-2.25). CONCLUSION DCD was associated with an increased risk of biliary complications after LT, tended to indicate an increased risk of vascular thrombosis versus, and was not associated with an increased risk of vascular stenosis compared to DBD. There was no significant difference between the grafts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Vivalda
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Transplant Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - H Zhengbin
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Transplant Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Y Xiong
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Transplant Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Z Liu
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Transplant Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Z Wang
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Transplant Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Q Ye
- Institute of Hepatobiliary Diseases, Transplant Center, Hubei Key Laboratory of Medical Technology on Transplantation, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China; Transplantation Medicine Engineering and Technology Research Center, National Health Commission, the 3rd Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Schlegel A, Dutkowski P. Impact of Machine Perfusion on Biliary Complications after Liver Transplantation. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19113567. [PMID: 30424553 PMCID: PMC6274934 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19113567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 11/01/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe in this review the different types of injuries caused to the biliary tree after liver transplantation. Furthermore, we explain underlying mechanisms and why oxygenated perfusion concepts could not only protect livers, but also repair high-risk grafts to prevent severe biliary complications and graft loss. Accordingly, we summarize experimental studies and clinical applications of machine liver perfusion with a focus on biliary complications after liver transplantation. Key points: (1) Acute inflammation with subsequent chronic ongoing liver inflammation and injury are the main triggers for cholangiocyte injury and biliary tree transformation, including non-anastomotic strictures; (2) Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) protects livers from initial oxidative injury at normothermic reperfusion after liver transplantation. This is a unique feature of a cold oxygenation approach, which is effective also end-ischemically, e.g., after cold storage, due to mitochondrial repair mechanisms. In contrast, normothermic oxygenated perfusion concepts protect by reducing cold ischemia, and are therefore most beneficial when applied instead of cold storage; (3) Due to less downstream activation of cholangiocytes, hypothermic oxygenated perfusion also significantly reduces the development of biliary strictures after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Schlegel
- Department of Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
- NIHR Liver Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
| | - Philipp Dutkowski
- Department of Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Angelico R, Perera MTPR, Manzia TM, Parente A, Grimaldi C, Spada M. Donation after Circulatory Death in Paediatric Liver Transplantation: Current Status and Future Perspectives in the Machine Perfusion Era. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:1756069. [PMID: 29744353 PMCID: PMC5878911 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1756069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Efforts have been made by the transplant community to expand the deceased donor pool in paediatric liver transplantation (LT). The growing experience on donation after circulatory death (DCD) for adult LT has encouraged its use also in children, albeit in selective cases, opening new perspectives for paediatric patients. Even though there has recently been a slight increase in the number of DCD livers transplanted in children, with satisfactory graft and patient outcomes, the use of DCD grafts in paediatric recipients is still controversial due to morbid outcomes associated with DCD grafts. In this context, recent advances in the optimization of donor support by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and in the graft preservation by liver machine perfusion could find application in order to expand the donor pool in paediatric LT. In the present study we review the current literature on DCD liver grafts transplanted in children and on the use of extracorporeal donor support and liver perfusion machines in paediatrics, with the aim of defining the current status and future perspectives of paediatric LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Angelico
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Bambino Gesù Children's Research Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Tommaso Maria Manzia
- Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Liver Unit, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Parente
- Department of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, Liver Unit, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Grimaldi
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Bambino Gesù Children's Research Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Spada
- Division of Abdominal Transplantation and Hepatobiliopancreatic Surgery, Bambino Gesù Children's Research Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Schlegel A, Scalera I, Perera MTPR, Kalisvaart M, Mergental H, Mirza DF, Isaac J, Muiesan P. Impact of donor age in donation after circulatory death liver transplantation: Is the cutoff "60" still of relevance? Liver Transpl 2018; 24:352-362. [PMID: 28885771 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Advanced donor age has been identified as a risk factor when combined with donor warm ischemia time (WIT), eg, in donation after circulatory death (DCD). In several countries, DCD livers older than 60 years are not considered suitable due to concerns related to poor graft function and development of ischemic cholangiopathy. In this study, we evaluate outcomes after DCD liver transplantation using grafts from donors older than 60 years. We analyzed outcomes after DCD liver transplantation (n = 315), comparing donors > 60 years (n = 93) and donors ≤ 60 years (n = 222) from our center between 2005 and 2015. End points included graft function and complications and patient and graft survival. Multivariate risk analysis was performed to define further key factors that predicted inferior outcome. Donor age at the cutoff 60 years failed to stratify patient and graft survival. The rate of vascular, biliary, and overall complications was comparably low in both cohorts, and the median comprehensive complication index was 42.7 points, independent from the donor age. Second, donor body mass index (BMI) above a threshold of 25 kg/m2 significantly impacted on graft and patient survival at any donor age, whereas donor WIT and cold ischemia times were not predictive for graft loss. In conclusion, older DCD donors can be successfully used for liver transplantation with good longterm outcomes when further risk factors are limited. Additional risk is transmitted by an increased donor BMI regardless of donor age. Liver Transplantation 24 352-362 2018 AASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Schlegel
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Liver Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Irene Scalera
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Thamara P R Perera
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Liver Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Liver Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marit Kalisvaart
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Hynek Mergental
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Liver Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Darius F Mirza
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Liver Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Liver Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Isaac
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Liver Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- The Liver Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Liver Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Foley DP. Avoid rejecting livers from donation after circulatory death donors based on donor age alone. Liver Transpl 2018; 24:325-326. [PMID: 29351370 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David P Foley
- Department of Surgery School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Vining CC, Ecker BL, Abt PL, Olthoff KM. Donation after cardiac death in the hepatocellular carcinoma patient: Same indication? Liver Transpl 2017; 23:S27-S33. [PMID: 28846212 DOI: 10.1002/lt.24862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Revised: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Charles C Vining
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Brett L Ecker
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Peter L Abt
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kim M Olthoff
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abt PL, Goldberg DS. Retransplantation After a Failed Donation After Circulatory Determination of Death Liver Transplant: MELD Exception Priority and Second Chances. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:2240-2242. [PMID: 28621875 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2017] [Revised: 06/02/2017] [Accepted: 06/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- P L Abt
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - D S Goldberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.,Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|