1
|
Haidar G, Bhamidipati D, Despines L, Sullivan C, Stuart S, Beckham JM, McMahon DK, Veldkamp P. An initiative to increase organ donor registration among persons with HIV. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:3186-3187. [PMID: 35869814 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ghady Haidar
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Divya Bhamidipati
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Linda Despines
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Colleen Sullivan
- Center for Organ Recovery & Education (CORE), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Susan Stuart
- Center for Organ Recovery & Education (CORE), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - J Michael Beckham
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Deborah K McMahon
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter Veldkamp
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kumar RN, Stosor V. Advances in Liver Transplantation for Persons with Human Immunodeficiency Infection. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2022; 24:39-50. [PMID: 35308580 PMCID: PMC8922075 DOI: 10.1007/s11908-022-00776-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca N. Kumar
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Travel Medicine, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC USA
| | - Valentina Stosor
- Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation and Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 645 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 900, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
METİN O, ŞİMŞEK C, GÜRAKAR A. Update on liver transplantation-newer aspects. Turk J Med Sci 2020; 50:1642-1650. [PMID: 32222125 PMCID: PMC7672347 DOI: 10.3906/sag-2002-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only therapeutic option offering gold standard treatment for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and acute liver failure (ALF), as well as for certain early-stage liver tumors. Currently, the greatest challenge facing LT is the simple fact that there are not enough adequate livers for all the potential patients that could benefit from LT. Despite efforts to expand the donor pool to include living and deceased donors, organ shortage is still a major problem in many countries. To solve this problem, the use of marginal liver grafts has become an inevitable choice. Although the definition of marginal grafts or criteria for expanded donor selection has not been clarified yet, they are usually defined as grafts that may potentially cause primary nonfunction, impaired function, or late loss of function. These include steatotic livers, older donors, donors with positive viral serology, split livers, and donation after cardiac death (DCD). Therefore, to get the best outcome from these liver grafts, donor-recipient selection should be vigilant. Alcohol- related liver disease (ALD) is one of the most common indications for LT in Europe and North America. Traditionally, LT for alcoholic liver disease was kept limited for patients who have achieved 6 months of abstinence, in part due to social and ethical concerns regarding the use of a limited resource. However, the majority of patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis who fail medical therapy will not live long enough to meet this requirement. Besides, the initial results of early liver transplantation (ELT) without waiting for 6 months of abstinence period are satisfactory in severe alcoholic hepatitis (SAH). It will be important to take care of these patients from a newer perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga METİN
- Department of Internal Medicine, Okmeydanı Training and Research Hospital, İstanbulTurkey
| | - Cem ŞİMŞEK
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, AnkaraTurkey
| | - Ahmet GÜRAKAR
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Liver Transplant Program Baltimore, MarylandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
: With current antiretroviral therapy, the lifespan of newly diagnosed persons with HIV (PWH) approaches that of uninfected persons. However, metabolic abnormalities related to both the disease and the virus itself, along with comorbidities of aging, have resulted in end-organ disease and organ failure as a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving therapy for PWH who have organ failure, and the approval of the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act has opened and expanded opportunities for PWH to donate and receive organs. The current environment of organ transplantation for PWH will be reviewed and future directions of research and treatment will be discussed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Waldman G, Rawlings SA, Kerr J, Vodkin I, Aslam S, Logan C, Dan J, Mehta S, Hill L, Karris MY. Successful optimization of antiretroviral regimens in treatment-experienced people living with HIV undergoing liver transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2019; 21:e13174. [PMID: 31520554 PMCID: PMC7510623 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) extends life expectancy for people living with HIV (PLWH). However, most older PLWH (≥50 years) "aged" with HIV and were exposed to historical HIV care practices and older, more toxic ART. In PLWH with exposure to older and multiple ART regimens, the drug interactions between ART frequently used in treatment-experienced persons and commonly used immunosuppressants remain a significant challenge. However, the advent of newer ART classes (eg, integrase non-strand transfer inhibitors) and more advanced HIV genetic resistance testing may allow optimization of ART regimens with minimal drug interactions. Here, we present a case series of three PLWH whose complicated ART interacted (or was at risk for interacting) with their post-liver transplant immunosuppression. After a review of their proviral DNA resistance testing, they successfully transitioned onto safer integrase non-strand transfer inhibitor-containing ART regimens without viral blips or evidence of organ rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina Waldman
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Stephen A Rawlings
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Janice Kerr
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Irine Vodkin
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Saima Aslam
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Cathy Logan
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Jennifer Dan
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Sanjay Mehta
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
- Department of Medicine, San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, CA
| | - Lucas Hill
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, CA
| | - Maile Y Karris
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wilk AR, Hunter RA, McBride MA, Klassen DK. National landscape of HIV+ to HIV+ kidney and liver transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:2594-2605. [PMID: 31207040 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Revised: 04/21/2019] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act, enacted on November 21, 2013, enables research on the transplantation of organs from donors infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (HIV+) into HIV+ individuals who, prior to transplantation, are infected with HIV. In 2015, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network revised organ allocation policies on November 21, and on November 23, the Secretary of Health and Human Services published research criteria and revised the Final Rule accordingly. The HOPE Act appears to be underutilized to date. As of December 31, 2018, there were 56 donors recovered (50 donors transplanted) resulting in 102 organs transplanted (31 liver, 71 kidney). As of December 31, 2018, 212 registrations were indicated on the waiting list as willing to accept an HIV+ kidney or liver, most of which were waiting in active status. Due to the limited number of transplants performed to date, definitive safety conclusions cannot be reached at this time, though current data suggest that 1-year patient and graft survival does not deviate in a major way from that observed in HIV+ recipients of non-HIV+ organs or non-HIV+ recipients. As safety data are reviewed and disseminated, it is anticipated that HOPE participation will increase should safety signals remain low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber R Wilk
- Research Department, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Robert A Hunter
- Policy and Community Relations Department, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Maureen A McBride
- Contract Operations, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia
| | - David K Klassen
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Expanding deceased donor kidney transplantation: medical risk, infectious risk, hepatitis C virus, and HIV. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2019; 27:445-453. [PMID: 30169460 DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Due to the organ shortage, which prevents over 90 000 individuals in the United States from receiving life-saving transplants, the transplant community has begun to critically reevaluate whether organ sources that were previously considered too risky provide a survival benefit to waitlist candidates. RECENT FINDINGS Organs that many providers were previously unwilling to use for transplantation, including kidneys with a high Kidney Donor Profile Index or from increased risk donors who have risk factors for window period hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV infection, have been shown to provide a survival benefit to transplant waitlist candidates compared with remaining on dialysis. The development of direct-acting antivirals to cure HCV infection has enabled prospective trials on the transplantation of organs from HCV-infected donors into HCV-negative recipients, with promising preliminary results. Changes in legislation through the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act have legalized transplantations from HIV-positive deceased donors to HIV-positive recipients for the first time in the United States. SUMMARY Critical reexamination of deceased donor organs that were previously discarded has resulted in greater utilization of these organs, an increased number of deceased donor transplants, and the provision of life-saving treatment to more transplant waitlist candidates.
Collapse
|
8
|
Van Pilsum Rasmussen SE, Bowring MG, Shaffer AA, Henderson ML, Massie A, Tobian AAR, Segev DL, Durand CM. Knowledge, attitudes, and planned practice of HIV-positive to HIV-positive transplantation in US transplant centers. Clin Transplant 2018; 32:e13365. [PMID: 30074638 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND HIV+ donor organs can now be transplanted into HIV+ recipients (HIV D+/R+) following the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act. Implementation of the HOPE Act requires transplant center awareness and support of HIV D+/R+ transplants. METHODS To assess center-level barriers to implementation, we surveyed 209 transplant centers on knowledge, attitudes, and planned HIV D+/R+ protocols. RESULTS Responding centers (n = 114; 56%) represented all UNOS regions. Fifty centers (93 organ programs) planned HIV D+/R+ protocols (kidney n = 48, liver n = 34, pancreas n = 8, heart n = 2, lung = 1), primarily in the eastern United States (28/50). Most (91.2%) were aware that HIV D+/R+ transplantation is legal; 21.4% were unaware of research restrictions. Respondents generally agreed with HOPE research criteria except the required experience with ≥5 HIV+ transplants by organ type. Centers planning HIV D+/R+ protocols had higher transplant volume, HIV+ recipient volume, increased infectious risk donor utilization, and local HIV prevalence (P < 0.01). Centers not planning HIV D+/R+ protocols were more likely to believe their HIV+ candidates would not accept HIV+ donor organs (P < 0.001). Most centers (83.2%) supported HIV+ living donation. CONCLUSIONS Although many programs plan HIV D+/R+ transplantation, center-level barriers remain including geographic clustering of kidney/liver programs and concerns about HIV+ candidate willingness to accept HIV+ donor organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary Grace Bowring
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ashton A Shaffer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Macey L Henderson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Allan Massie
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Aaron A R Tobian
- Transfusion Medicine Division, Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dorry L Segev
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christine M Durand
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Viral infections in solid organ transplant recipients: novel updates and a review of the classics. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2018; 30:579-588. [PMID: 28984642 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize new discoveries in viral pathogenesis and novel therapeutic and prophylactic strategies in organ transplant recipients. RECENT FINDINGS For decades, prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) has been the standard preventive strategy, but new clinical trials are expected to determine the advantages of preemptive therapy over prophylaxis. Novel anti-CMV agents, such as maribavir and letermovir, are being studied for the treatment of resistant/refractory CMV as alternatives to foscarnet and cidofovir. CMV immune monitoring may offer individualized management plans. Epstein-Barr virus infections in transplant recipients are difficult to prevent and treat, though recent data suggest possible merit to pretransplant rituximab among high-risk transplant recipients. We review the groundbreaking HIV-to-HIV organ transplant trials, which are expected to revolutionize the care of HIV-infected individuals. Finally, we review topical developments in human herpesvirus 8, Zika virus, RNA respiratory viruses, adenovirus, norovirus, and polyoma viruses in organ transplantation. SUMMARY Ongoing trials to optimize CMV prophylaxis and treatment, and outcomes of HIV-to-HIV organ transplantation in the United States, have significant implications to optimize management of these viruses in transplant recipients. Assessment of new antivirals and antiviral strategies, such as adoptive immunotherapy, is warranted for refractory viral infections.
Collapse
|