Blockade of HLA Antibody-Triggered Classical Complement Activation in Sera From Subjects Dosed With the Anti-C1s Monoclonal Antibody TNT009-Results from a Randomized First-in-Human Phase 1 Trial

rBMA: A robust Bayesian Model Averaging Method for phase II basket trials based on informative mixture priors

Oncology drug research in the last few decades has been driven by the development of targeted agents. In the era of targeted therapies, basket trials are often used to test the antitumor activity of a novel treatment in multiple indications sharing the same genomic alteration. As patient population are further fragmented into biomarker-defined subgroups in basket trials, novel statistical methods are needed to facilitate cross-indication learning to improve the statistical power in basket trial design. Here we propose a robust Bayesian model averaging (rBMA) technique for the design and analysis of phase II basket trials. We consider the posterior distribution of each indication (basket) as the weighted average of three different models which only differ in their priors (enthusiastic, pessimistic and non-informative). The posterior weights of these models are determined based on the effect of the experimental treatment in all the indications tested. In early phase oncology trials, different binary endpoints might be chosen for different indications (objective response, disease control or PFS at landmark times), which makes it even more challenging to borrow information across indications. Compared to previous approaches, the proposed method has the flexibility to support cross-indication learning in the presence of mixed endpoints. We evaluate and compare the performance of the proposed rBMA approach to competing approaches in simulation studies. R scripts to implement the proposed method are available at https://github.com/xwang317/rBMA.

The Promise of Complement Therapeutics in Solid Organ Transplantation

Transplantation is the ideal therapy for end-stage organ failure, but outcomes for all transplant organs are suboptimal, underscoring the need to develop novel approaches to improve graft survival and function. The complement system, traditionally considered a component of innate immunity, is now known to broadly control inflammation and crucially contribute to induction and function of adaptive T-cell and B-cell immune responses, including those induced by alloantigens. Interest of pharmaceutical industries in complement therapeutics for nontransplant indications and the understanding that the complement system contributes to solid organ transplantation injury through multiple mechanisms raise the possibility that targeting specific complement components could improve transplant outcomes and patient health. Here, we provide an overview of complement biology and review the roles and mechanisms through which the complement system is pathogenically linked to solid organ transplant injury. We then discuss how this knowledge has been translated into novel therapeutic strategies to improve organ transplant outcomes and identify areas for future investigation. Although the clinical application of complement-targeted therapies in transplantation remains in its infancy, the increasing availability of new agents in this arena provides a rich environment for potentially transformative translational transplant research.

Targeting the Complement Pathway in Kidney Transplantation

The complement system is paramount in the clearance of pathogens and cell debris, yet is increasingly recognized as a key component in several pathways leading to allograft injury. There is thus a growing interest in new biomarkers to assess complement activation and guide tailored therapies after kidney transplantation (KTx). C5 blockade has revolutionized post-transplant management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, a paradigm of complement-driven disease. Similarly, new drugs targeting the complement amplification loop hold much promise in the treatment and prevention of recurrence of C3 glomerulopathy. Although unduly activation of the complement pathway has been described after brain death and ischemia reperfusion, any clinical attempts to mitigate the ensuing renal insults have so far provided mixed results. However, the intervention timing, strategy, and type of complement blocker need to be optimized in these settings. Furthermore, the fast-moving field of ex vivo organ perfusion technology opens new avenues to deliver complement-targeted drugs to kidney allografts with limited iatrogenic risks. Complement plays also a key role in the pathogenesis of donor-specific ABO- and HLA-targeted alloantibodies. However, C5 blockade failed overall to improve outcomes in highly sensitized patients and prevent the progression to chronic antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Similarly, well-conducted studies with C1 inhibitors in sensitized recipients yielded disappointing results so far, in part, because of subtherapeutic dosage used in clinical studies. The emergence of new complement blockers raises hope to significantly reduce the negative effect of ischemia reperfusion, ABMR, and nephropathy recurrence on outcomes after KTx.

Sutimlimab for the Treatment of Cold Agglutinin Disease

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a rare autoimmune hemolytic anemia and a bone marrow clonal lymphoproliferative disorder. Hemolysis in CAD is complement-dependent and mediated by the classical activation pathway. Patients also frequently suffer from fatigue and cold-induced circulatory symptoms. Although not all patients need treatment, the symptom burden has previously been underestimated. Effective therapies target the clonal lymphoproliferation or the complement activation. Sutimlimab, a humanized monoclonal IgG4 antibody that binds and inactivates complement protein C1s, is the most extensively investigated complement inhibitor for the treatment of CAD. This review addresses the preclinical studies of sutimlimab and the studies of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. We then describe and discuss the prospective clinical trials that established sutimlimab as a rapidly acting, highly efficacious, and low-toxic therapeutic agent. This complement inhibitor does not improve the cold-induced circulatory symptoms, which are not complement-mediated. Sutimlimab is approved for the treatment of CAD in the US, Japan, and the European Union. A tentative therapeutic algorithm is presented. The choice of therapy for CAD should be based on an individual assessment, and patients requiring therapy should be considered for inclusion in clinical trials.

Complement C1s as a diagnostic marker and therapeutic target: Progress and propective

The molecules of the complement system connect the effectors of innate and adaptive immunity and play critical roles in maintaining homeostasis. Among them, the C1 complex, composed of C1q, C1r, and C1s (C1qr₂s₂), is the initiator of the classical complement activation pathway. While deficiency of C1s is associated with early-onset systemic lupus erythematosus and increased susceptibility to bacteria infections, the gain-of- function variants of C1r and C1s may lead to periodontal Ehlers Danlos syndrome. As C1s is activated under various pathological conditions and associated with inflammation, autoimmunity, and cancer development, it is becoming an informative biomarker for the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of diseases. Thus, more sensitive and convenient methods for assessing the level as well as activity of C1s in clinic samples are highly desirable. Meanwhile, a number of small molecules, peptides, and monoclonal antibodies targeting C1s have been developed. Some of them are being evaluated in clinical trials and one of the antibodies has been approved by US FDA for the treatment of cold agglutinin disease, an autoimmune hemolytic anemia. In this review, we will summarize the biological properties of C1s, its association with development and diagnosis of diseases, and recent progress in developing drugs targeting C1s. These progress illustrate that the C1s molecule is an effective biomarker and promising drug target.

Sutimlimab for treatment of cold agglutinin disease: why, how and for whom?

Therapies for cold agglutinin disease have been directed at the pathogenic B-cell clone. Sutimlimab, a monoclonal antibody that targets C1s, is the first complement inhibitor to be extensively studied in cold agglutinin disease. Sutimlimab selectively blocks the classical activation pathway and leaves the alternative and lectin pathways intact. Trials have documented high response rates with rapid improvement in hemolysis, hemoglobin levels and fatigue scores and low toxicity. Sutimlimab was recently approved in the USA. This drug appears to be particularly useful in severely anemic patients who require a rapid response, in acute exacerbations that do not resolve spontaneously and in patients in whom chemoimmunotherapy is contraindicated or has failed. The choice of therapy in cold agglutinin disease should be individualized.

Sutimlimab: First Approval

Sutimlimab (sutimlimab-jome; ENJAYMO™) is a humanized monoclonal antibody developed by Sanofi for the treatment of cold agglutinin disease (CAD). Sutimlimab is an immunoglobulin G, subclass 4 (IgG4) monoclonal antibody that inhibits the classical complement pathway by binding to complement protein component 1, s subcomponent (C1s), a serine protease which cleaves C4 and C2 to form the C3 convertase. Inhibition of the classical complement pathway at the level of C1s prevents deposition of complement opsonins on the surface of red blood cell (RBCs), leading to inhibition of haemolysis in patients with CAD. In February 2022, sutimlimab received its first approval in the USA to decrease the need for RBC transfusion due to haemolysis in adults with CAD. Sutimlimab is under regulatory review in Japan and the EU for CAD. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of sutimlimab leading to this first approval for CAD.

B Cell Immunity in Lung Transplant Rejection - Effector Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications

Allograft rejection remains the major hurdle in lung transplantation despite modern immunosuppressive treatment. As part of the alloreactive process, B cells are increasingly recognized as modulators of alloimmunity and initiators of a donor-specific humoral response. In chronically rejected lung allografts, B cells contribute to the formation of tertiary lymphoid structures and promote local alloimmune responses. However, B cells are functionally heterogeneous and some B cell subsets may promote alloimmune tolerance. In this review, we describe the current understanding of B-cell-dependent mechanisms in pulmonary allograft rejection and highlight promising future strategies that employ B cell-targeted therapies.

Pemphigus and Pemphigoid: From Disease Mechanisms to Druggable Pathways

Pemphigus and pemphigoid are paradigms for understanding the mechanisms of antibody-mediated autoimmune disease in humans. In pemphigus, IgG4-predominant autoantibodies cause intraepidermal blistering by direct interference with desmoglein interactions and subsequent disruption of desmosomes and signaling pathways. In pemphigoid, IgG1, IgG4, and IgE autoantibodies against basement membrane zone antigens directly interfere with hemidesmosomal adhesion, activating complement and Fc receptor‒mediated effector pathways. Unraveling disease mechanisms in pemphigus and pemphigoid has identified numerous opportunities for clinical trials, which hold promise to identify safer and more effective therapies for these potentially life-threatening diseases.

Developments in immunosuppression

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we discuss achievements in immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients published at last 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

Results of recent trials with everolimus in low-risk primary kidney transplant recipients suggest that lowTAC/EVR combination is noninferior and CMV and BKV viral infections are less frequent to standTAC/MPA. Iscalimab monoclonal antibody, which prevents CD40 to CD154 binding, has just recently entered phase II clinical studies in kidney transplantation. Eculizumab, anti-C5 monoclonal antobody was recently shown to improve outcomes in DSA+ living-donor kidney transplant recipients requiring pretransplant desensitization because of crossmatch positivity. Proximal complement C1 inhibition in patients with antibody-mediated rejection was studied in several phase I trials.

SUMMARY

Recent knowledge creates a path towards future immunosuppression success in sensitized recipients and in those in high risk of viral infections or CNI nephrotoxicity.

Aberrant activation of the complement system in renal grafts is mediated by cold storage

Aberrant complement activation leads to tissue damage during kidney transplantation, and it is recognized as an important target for therapeutic intervention. However, it is not clear whether cold storage (CS) triggers the complement pathway in transplanted kidneys. The goal of the present study was to determine the impact of CS on complement activation in renal transplants. Male Lewis and Fischer rats were used, and donor rat kidneys were exposed to 4 h or 18 h of CS followed by transplantation (CS + transplant). To study CS-induced effects, a group with no CS was included in which the kidney was removed and transplanted back to the same rat [autotransplantation (ATx)]. Complement proteins (C3 and C5b-9) were evaluated with Western blot analysis (reducing and nonreducing conditions) and immunostaining. Western blot analysis of renal extracts or serum indicated that the levels of C3 and C5b-9 increased after CS + transplant compared with ATx. Quite strikingly, intracellular C3 was profoundly elevated within renal tubules after CS + transplant but was absent in sham or ATx groups, which showed only extratubular C3. Similarly, C5b-9 immunofluorescence staining of renal sections showed an increase in C5b-9 deposits in kidneys after CS + transplant. Real-time PCR (SYBR green) showed increased expression of CD11b and CD11c, components of complement receptors 3 and 4, respectively, as well as inflammatory markers such as TNF-α. In addition, recombinant TNF-α significantly increased C3 levels in renal cells. Collectively, these results demonstrate that CS mediates aberrant activation of the complement system in renal grafts following transplantation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study highlights cold storage-mediated aberrant activation of complement components in renal allografts following transplantation. Specifically, the results demonstrate, for the first time, that cold storage functions in exacerbation of C5b-9, a terminal cytolytic membrane attack complex, in renal grafts following transplantation. In addition, the results indicated that cold storage induces local C3 biogenesis in renal proximal cells/tubules and that TNF-α promotes C3 biogenesis and activation in renal proximal tubular cells.

An overview of precision oncology basket and umbrella trials for clinicians

With advancements in biomarkers and momentum in precision medicine, biomarker-guided trials such as basket trials and umbrella trials have been developed under the master protocol framework. A master protocol refers to a single, overarching design developed to evaluate multiple hypotheses with the general goal of improving the efficiency of trial evaluation. One type of master protocol is the basket trial, in which a targeted therapy is evaluated for multiple diseases that share common molecular alterations or risk factors that may help predict whether the patients will respond to the given therapy. Another variant of a master protocol is the umbrella trial, in which multiple targeted therapies are evaluated for a single disease that is stratified into multiple subgroups based on different molecular or other predictive risk factors. Both designs follow the core principle of precision medicine-to tailor intervention strategies based on the patient's risk factor(s) that can help predict whether they will respond to a specific treatment. There have been increasing numbers of basket and umbrella trials, but they are still poorly understood. This article reviews common characteristics of basket and umbrella trials, key trials and recent US Food and Drug Administration approvals for precision oncology, and important considerations for clinical readers when critically evaluating future publications on basket trials and umbrella trials and for researchers when designing these clinical trials.

Updates on diagnosis and management of autoimmune blistering diseases

Over the last several decades, advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of autoimmune blistering diseases has resulted in significant improvements in diagnosis and management. These improvements include new diagnostic assays and therapies targeted at specific disease mediators. Furthermore, the abundance of new therapies in clinic trials for autoimmune blistering diseases will translate to an enhanced therapeutic armamentarium for clinicians. The aim of this article is to review new developments in the understanding of autoimmune blistering diseases and to summarize advancements in their diagnosis and management.

Specific Inhibition of the Classical Complement Pathway Prevents C3 Deposition along the Dermal-Epidermal Junction in Bullous Pemphigoid

Deposition of autoantibodies (α-BP180 and BP230) and complement along the dermal-epidermal-junction is a hallmark of bullous pemphigoid and was shown to be important for pathogenesis. Given the adverse effects of standard treatment (glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants), there is an unmet need for safe and effective therapies. In this phase 1 trial, we evaluated the safety and activity of BIVV009 (sutimlimab, previously TNT009), a targeted C1s inhibitor, in 10 subjects with active or past bullous pemphigoid (NCT02502903). Four weekly 60 mg/kg infusions of BIVV009 proved sufficient for inhibition of the classical complement pathway in all patients, as measured by CH50. C3c deposition along the dermal-epidermal junction was partially or completely abrogated in 4 of 5 patients, where it was present at baseline. BIVV009 was found to be safe and tolerable in this elderly population, with only mild to moderate adverse events reported (e.g., headache, fatigue). One serious adverse event (i.e., fatal cardiac decompensation) occurred at the end of the post-treatment observation period in an 84-year-old patient with a history of diabetes and heart failure, but was deemed unlikely to be related to the study drug. This trial provides the first results with a complement-targeting therapy in bullous pemphigoid, to our knowledge, and supports further studies on BIVV009's efficacy and safety in this population.

Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols

BACKGROUND

Master protocols, classified as basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials, are novel designs that investigate multiple hypotheses through concurrent sub-studies (e.g., multiple treatments or populations or that allow adding/removing arms during the trial), offering enhanced efficiency and a more ethical approach to trial evaluation. Despite the many advantages of these designs, they are infrequently used.

METHODS

We conducted a landscape analysis of master protocols using a systematic literature search to determine what trials have been conducted and proposed for an overall goal of improving the literacy in this emerging concept. On July 8, 2019, English-language studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases and hand searches of published reviews and registries.

RESULTS

We identified 83 master protocols (49 basket, 18 umbrella, and 16 platform trials). The number of master protocols has increased rapidly over the last five years. Most have been conducted in the US (n = 44/83) and investigated experimental drugs (n = 82/83) in the field of oncology (n = 76/83). The majority of basket trials were exploratory (i.e., phase I/II; n = 47/49) and not randomized (n = 44/49), and more than half (n = 28/48) investigated only a single intervention. The median sample size of basket trials was 205 participants (interquartile range, Q3-Q1 [IQR]: 500-90 = 410), and the median study duration was 22.3 (IQR: 74.1-42.9 = 31.1) months. Similar to basket trials, most umbrella trials were exploratory (n = 16/18), but the use of randomization was more common (n = 8/18). The median sample size of umbrella trials was 346 participants (IQR: 565-252 = 313), and the median study duration was 60.9 (IQR: 81.3-46.9 = 34.4) months. The median number of interventions investigated in umbrella trials was 5 (IQR: 6-4 = 2). The majority of platform trials were randomized (n = 15/16), and phase III investigation (n = 7/15; one did not report information on phase) was more common in platform trials with four of them using seamless II/III design. The median sample size was 892 (IQR: 1835-255 = 1580), and the median study duration was 58.9 (IQR: 101.3-36.9 = 64.4) months.

CONCLUSIONS

We anticipate that the number of master protocols will continue to increase at a rapid pace over the upcoming decades. More efforts to improve awareness and training are needed to apply these innovative trial design methods to fields outside of oncology.

Complement Activation in Autoimmune Bullous Dermatoses: A Comprehensive Review

Autoimmune bullous dermatoses (AIBD) are characterized by circulating autoantibodies that are either directed against epidermal antigens or deposited as immune complexes in the basement membrane zone (BMZ). The complement system (CS) can be activated by autoantibodies, thereby triggering activation of specific complement pathways. Local complement activation induces a pathogenic inflammatory response that eventually results in the formation of a sub- or intraepidermal blister. Deposition of complement components is routinely used as a diagnostic marker for AIBD. Knowledge from different animal models mimicking AIBD and deposition of complement components in human skin biopsies provides more insight into the role of complement in the pathogenesis of the different AIBD. This review outlines the role of the CS in several AIBD including bullous pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), pemphigus, linear IgA-disease, and dermatitis herpetiformis. We also discuss potential therapeutic approaches targeting key complement components, pathways and pathogenic complement-mediated events.

The therapeutic challenge of late antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection

Late antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) is a cardinal cause of kidney allograft failure, manifesting as a continuous and, in contrast with early rejection, often clinically silent alloimmune process. While significant progress has been made towards an improved understanding of its molecular mechanisms and the definition of diagnostic criteria, there is still no approved effective treatment. In recent small randomized controlled trials, therapeutic strategies with promising results in observational studies, such as proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, anti‐C5 antibody eculizumab, or high dose intravenous immunoglobulin plus rituximab, had no significant impact in late and/or chronic ABMR. Such disappointing results reinforce a need of new innovative treatment strategies. Potential candidates may be the interference with interleukin‐6 to modulate B cell alloimmunity, or innovative compounds that specifically target antibody‐producing plasma cells, such as antibodies against CD38. Given the phenotypic heterogeneity of ABMR, the design of adequate systematic trials to assess the safety and efficiency of such therapies, however, is challenging. Several trials are currently being conducted, and new developments will hopefully provide us with effective ways to counteract the deleterious impact of antibody‐mediated graft injury. Meanwhile, the weight of evidence would suggest that, when approaching using existing treatments for established antibody‐mediated rejection, “less may be more”.

Novel Approaches to Block Complement

The complement system may contribute in many ways to transplant injury, being a promising target for specific therapeutic interventions. There is evidence that the monoclonal anti-C5 antibody eculizumab is effective in the prevention and treatment of early antibody-mediated rejection, but terminal complement blockade might be of limited efficiency in chronic rejection. Given the diversity of immunological events triggered by activation steps upstream to C5, in particular, opsonin and anaphylatoxin formation through C3 cleavage, one may argue that, in the specific context of antibody-mediated rejection, inhibition of antibody-triggered classical pathway (CP) activation might be beneficial. Strategies to interfere with key CP component C1 are currently under clinical evaluation and include the therapeutic use of purified C1-inhibitor, which, besides targeting the integrity and function of the C1 complex, also affects components of the LP, the contact system, the coagulation cascade or surface molecules mediating leukocyte-endothelial interactions. In addition, a monoclonal anti-C1s antibody (BIVV009) has now entered clinical evaluation and was shown to effectively block antibody-triggered CP activation in rejecting kidney allografts. Moreover, modified apheresis techniques for preferential removal of macromolecules, including C1q, may allow for efficient complement depletion, in addition to antibody removal. The availability of effective strategies to interfere with the CP, as well as innovative approaches targeting other pathways, some of them already being tested in clinical trials, will help us figure out how complement contributes to acute and chronic graft injury, and hopefully provide us with new ways to more efficiently counteract rejection.

Increasing the Complement of Therapeutic Options in Bullous Pemphigoid

Bullous pemphigoid is a potentially life-threatening autoantibody-mediated dermatosis characterized by blister formation. Experimental mouse models of bullous pemphigoid feature complement-induced inflammation and tissue damage. Kasprick et al. now provide preclinical data that utilize ex vivo human skin assays and support testing of complement inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in human bullous pemphigoid.

Biological therapy of autoimmune blistering diseases

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune blistering skin diseases are a group of disorders subdivided according to the location of blister formation: intraepidermal blistering in the pemphigus group and subepidermal in the pemphigoid group. These conditions are clinically heterogeneous and are treated with systemic corticosteroids and/or other forms of immunosuppression on the basis of clinical subtype and disease severity. These approaches may not be effective for the induction and maintenance of clinical response or need to be stopped because of intolerable side effects.

AREAS COVERED

Biological therapies can represent a valid alternative strategy in various autoimmune blistering disorders and this review article will address this issue with a special focus on pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid. These biological approaches are designed to target B cells, autoantibodies, complement proteins, and several cytokines.

EXPERT OPINION

Innovative strategies for the treatment of autoimmune blistering conditions primarily depend on the use of drugs with a high degree of specificity targeting crucial steps in the immunopathology of these disorders. Novel biological agents offer treatment alternatives to patients with autoimmune blistering conditions by targeting B cells, pathogenic autoantibodies, complement and cytokines.

Anti-C1s monoclonal antibody BIVV009 in late antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection-results from a first-in-patient phase 1 trial

The classical pathway (CP) of complement may contribute to the pathogenesis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Selective CP blockade may be a promising strategy to counteract rejection. The objective of this first-in-patient phase 1b trial was to evaluate the safety/tolerability and CP-blocking potential of 4 weekly doses (60 mg/kg) of the anti-C1s antibody BIVV009 in complement-mediated disorders. Here we describe the results in a cohort of 10 stable kidney transplant recipients (median of 4.3 years posttransplantation) with late active ABMR and features of CP activation, such as capillary C4d or complement-fixing donor-specific antibodies (DSA). During 7 weeks follow-up, no severe adverse events were reported, and BIVV009 profoundly inhibited overall and DSA-triggered CP activation in serum. Five of 8 C4d-positive recipients turned C4d-negative in 5-week follow-up biopsies, while another 2 recipients showed a substantial decrease in C4d scores. There was, however, no change in microcirculation inflammation, gene expression patterns, DSA levels, or kidney function. In conclusion, we demonstrate that BIVV009 effectively blocks alloantibody-triggered CP activation, even though short-course treatment had no effect on indices of activity in late ABMR. This initial trial provides a valuable basis for future studies designed to clarify the therapeutic value of CP blockade in transplantation. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT#02502903.