Specific Donor HLA-DR Types Correlate With Altered Susceptibility to Development of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

Immune processes in the pathogenesis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction: identifying the missing pieces of the puzzle

Lung transplantation is the optimal treatment for selected patients with end-stage chronic lung diseases. However, chronic lung allograft dysfunction remains the leading obstacle to improved long-term outcomes. Traditionally, lung allograft rejection has been considered primarily as a manifestation of cellular immune responses. However, in reality, an array of complex, interacting and multifactorial mechanisms contribute to its emergence. Alloimmune-dependent mechanisms, including T-cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection, as well as non-alloimmune injuries, have been implicated. Moreover, a role has emerged for autoimmune responses to lung self-antigens in the development of chronic graft injury. The aim of this review is to summarise the immune processes involved in the pathogenesis of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, with advanced insights into the role of innate immune pathways and crosstalk between innate and adaptive immunity, and to identify gaps in current knowledge.

Donor HLA-DR Drives the Development of De Novo Autoimmunity Following Lung and Heart Transplantation

Individuals harbor preexisting HLA−DR/DQ−restricted responses to collagen type V (ColV) mediated by Th17 cells under Treg control, both specific to peptides that bind to inherited HLA class II antigens. Yet after transplant, the donor−DR type somehow influences graft outcome. We hypothesized that, long after a lung or heart allograft, the particular HLA−DR type of the mismatched transplant donor transforms the specificity of the “anti−self” response. This could explain why, over long term, certain donor DRs could be more immunogenic than others.

Role of human and porcine MHC DRB1 alleles in determining the intensity of individual human anti-pig T-cell responses

BACKGROUND

Differences in quality and strength of immune responses between individuals are mainly due to polymorphisms in major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Focusing on MHC class-II, we asked whether the intensity of human anti-pig T-cell responses is influenced by genetic variability in the human HLA-DRB1 and/or the porcine SLA-DRB1 locus.

METHODS

ELISpot assays were performed using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 62 HLA-DRB1-typed blood donors as responder and the porcine B cell line L23 as stimulator cells. Based on the frequency of IFN-γ-secreting cells, groups of weak, medium, and strong responder individuals were defined. Mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assays were performed to study the stimulatory capacity of porcine PBMCs expressing different SLA-DRB1 alleles.

RESULTS

Concerning the MHC class-II configuration of human cells, we found a significant overrepresentation of HLA-DRB1*01 alleles in the medium/strong responder group as compared to individuals showing weak responses to stimulation with L23 cells. Evaluation of the role of MHC class-II variability in porcine stimulators revealed that cells expressing SLA-DRB1*06 alleles triggered strong proliferation in approximately 70% of humans. Comparison of amino acid sequences indicated that strong human anti-pig reactivity may be associated with a high rate of similarity between human and pig HLA/SLA-DRB1 alleles.

CONCLUSION

Variability in human and porcine MHC determines the intensity of individual human anti-pig T-cell responses. MHC typing and cross-matching of prospective recipients of xenografts and donor pigs could be relevant to select for donor-recipient combinations with minimal anti-porcine immunity.

Recent advances in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation can improve quality of life and prolong survival for individuals with end-stage lung disease, and many advances in the realms of both basic science and clinical research aspects of lung transplantation have emerged over the past few decades. However, many challenges must yet be overcome to increase post-transplant survival. These include successfully bridging patients to transplant, expanding the lung donor pool, inducing tolerance, and preventing a myriad of post-transplant complications that include primary graft dysfunction, forms of cellular and antibody-mediated rejection, chronic lung allograft dysfunction, and infections. The goal of this manuscript is to review salient recent and evolving advances in the field of lung transplantation.