Meeting Report of the 13th Congress of the International Society of Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Sensitization and Desensitization in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is a field under research and has emerged as an alternative option for the repair of severe disfiguring defects that result from severe tissue loss in a selected group of patients. Lifelong immunosuppressive therapy, immunosuppression associated complications, and the effects of the host immune response in the graft are major concerns in this type of quality-of-life transplant. The initial management of extensive soft tissue injury can lead to the development of anti-HLA antibodies through injury-related factors, transfusion and cadaveric grafting. The role of antibody-mediated rejection, donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation and graft rejection in the context of VCA still remain poorly understood. The most common antigenic target of preexisting alloantibodies are MHC mismatches, though recognition of ABO incompatible antigens, minor histocompatibility complexes and endothelial cells has also been shown to contribute to rejection. Mechanistically, alloantibody-mediated tissue damage occurs primarily through complement fixation as well as through antibody-dependent cellular toxicity. If DSA exist, activation of complement and coagulation cascades can result in vascular thrombosis and infarction and thus rejection and graft loss. Both preexisting DSA but especially de-novo DSA are currently considered as main contributors to late allograft injury and graft failure. Desensitization protocols are currently being developed for VCA, mainly including removal of alloantibodies whereas treatment of established antibody-mediated rejection is achieved through high dose intravenous immunoglobulins. The long-term efficacy of such therapies in sensitized VCA recipients is currently unknown. The current evidence base for sensitizing events and outcomes in reconstructive transplantation is limited. However, current data show that VCA transplantation has been performed in the setting of HLA-sensitization.

First human facial retransplantation: 30-month follow-up

BACKGROUND

Since the first successful facial transplantation in 2005, the benefits of this procedure in terms of aesthetics, functionality, and quality of life have been firmly established. However, despite immunosuppressive treatment, long-term survival of the allograft might be compromised by chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR), leading to irreversible necrosis of the tissue. In the absence of therapeutic options, this complication is inevitably life-threatening.

METHODS

We report facial retransplantation in a man, 8 years after his first facial transplantation because of extensive disfigurement from type 1 neurofibromatosis and 6 weeks after complete loss of his allograft due to severe CAMR. We describe the chronology of immune-related problems that culminated in allograft necrosis and the eventual loss of the facial transplant, the desensitisation protocol used for this highly immunosensitised recipient, the surgical technicalities of the procedure, the specific psychological management of this patient, and the results from follow-up at 30 months.

FINDINGS

Although the patient had a complicated postoperative course with numerous immunological, infectious, cardiorespiratory, and psychological events, he was discharged after a hospital stay of almost 1 year. He has since been able to re-integrate into his community with acceptable restoration of his quality of life.

INTERPRETATION

This clinical report of the first documented human facial retransplantation is proof-of-concept that the loss of a facial transplant after CAMR can be mitigated successfully by retransplantation combined with an aggressive desensitisation process.

FUNDING

Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris.

Pharmacokinetics and Biodistribution of Tacrolimus after Topical Administration: Implications for Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation

AIM

The high doses of oral tacrolimus (TAC) (1,2) necessary to prevent acute rejection (AR) after vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) are associated with systemic adverse effects. The skin is the most antigenic tissue in VCA and the primary target of AR. However, the short-term use of topical TAC (Protopic®), as an off-label adjunct to oral TAC, to treat AR episodes pro re nata (PRN), has yielded inconsistent results. There is lack of data on the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of topical TAC in VCA, that hampers our understanding of the reasons for unreliable efficacy. Toward this goal, we evaluated the ability of topical TAC to achieve high local tissue concentrations at the site of application with low systemic concentrations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We assessed the pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of topical TAC (Protopic®, 0.03%) after single or repeated topical application in comparison to those after systemic delivery in rats. Animals received a single topical application of TAC ointment (Group 1) or an intravenous (IV) injection of TAC (Group 2) at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg. In another experiment, animals received daily topical application of TAC ointment (Group 3), or daily intraperitoneal (IP) injection of TAC (Group 4) at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg for 7 days. TAC concentrations in blood and tissues were analyzed by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS-MS).

RESULTS

Following single topical administration, TAC was absorbed slowly with a Tmax of 4 h and an absolute bioavailability of 11%. The concentrations of TAC in skin and muscle were several folds higher than whole blood concentrations. Systemic levels remained subtherapeutic (< 3 ng/ml) with repeated once daily applications.

CONCLUSION

Topical application of TAC ointment (Protopic®, 0.03%) at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day provided high concentrations in the local tissues with low systemic exposure. Repeated topical administration of TAC is well tolerated with no local or systemic adverse effects. This study confirms the feasibility of topical application of TAC for site specific graft immunosuppression and enables future applications in VCA.

Long-term Effects of Hypothermic Ex Situ Perfusion on Skeletal Muscle Metabolism, Structure, and Force Generation After Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hypothermic ex situ perfusion (HESP) systems are used to prolong allograft survival in solid organ transplantations and have been shown to be superior to static cold storage (SCS) methods. However, the effect of this preservation method on limb allograft survival and long-term function has not yet been tested. In this study, we investigated the long-term effects of the HESP on skeletal muscle metabolism, structure, and force generation and compared it with the current standard of preservation.

METHODS

Forty male Lewis rats (250 ± 25 g) were divided into 5 groups, including naive control, sciatic nerve transection or repair, immediate transplantation, SCS, and HESP. For the SCS group, limbs were preserved at 4°C for 6 hours. In the HESP group, limbs were continuously perfused with oxygenated histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate (HTK) solution at 10-15°C for 6 hours. Hemodynamic and biochemical parameters of perfusion were recorded throughout the experiment. At 12 weeks, electromyography and muscle force measurements (maximum twitch and tetanic forces) were obtained along with muscle samples for histology and metabolomics analysis.

RESULTS

Histology demonstrated 48% myocyte injury in the HESP group compared with 49% in immediate transplantation (P = 0.96) and 74% in the SCS groups (P < 0.05). The maximum twitch force measurement revealed a significantly higher force in the HESP group compared with the SCS group (P = 0.029). Essential amino acid levels of the gastrocnemius muscle did not reach significance, with the exception of higher proline levels in the HESP group.

CONCLUSIONS

HESP using HTK protects viability of the limb but fails to restore muscle force in the long term.