Novel Approaches to Block Complement

The Promise of Complement Therapeutics in Solid Organ Transplantation

Transplantation is the ideal therapy for end-stage organ failure, but outcomes for all transplant organs are suboptimal, underscoring the need to develop novel approaches to improve graft survival and function. The complement system, traditionally considered a component of innate immunity, is now known to broadly control inflammation and crucially contribute to induction and function of adaptive T-cell and B-cell immune responses, including those induced by alloantigens. Interest of pharmaceutical industries in complement therapeutics for nontransplant indications and the understanding that the complement system contributes to solid organ transplantation injury through multiple mechanisms raise the possibility that targeting specific complement components could improve transplant outcomes and patient health. Here, we provide an overview of complement biology and review the roles and mechanisms through which the complement system is pathogenically linked to solid organ transplant injury. We then discuss how this knowledge has been translated into novel therapeutic strategies to improve organ transplant outcomes and identify areas for future investigation. Although the clinical application of complement-targeted therapies in transplantation remains in its infancy, the increasing availability of new agents in this arena provides a rich environment for potentially transformative translational transplant research.

Antibody-mediated rejection in xenotransplantation: Can it be prevented or reversed?

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the commonest cause of failure of a pig graft after transplantation into an immunosuppressed nonhuman primate (NHP). The incidence of AMR compared to acute cellular rejection is much higher in xenotransplantation (46% vs. 7%) than in allotransplantation (3% vs. 63%) in NHPs. Although AMR in an allograft can often be reversed, to our knowledge there is no report of its successful reversal in a pig xenograft. As there is less experience in preventing or reversing AMR in models of xenotransplantation, the results of studies in patients with allografts provide more information. These include (i) depletion or neutralization of serum anti-donor antibodies, (ii) inhibition of complement activation, (iii) therapies targeting B or plasma cells, and (iv) anti-inflammatory therapy. Depletion or neutralization of anti-pig antibody, for example, by plasmapheresis, is effective in depleting antibodies, but they recover within days. IgG-degrading enzymes do not deplete IgM. Despite the expression of human complement-regulatory proteins on the pig graft, inhibition of systemic complement activation may be necessary, particularly if AMR is to be reversed. Potential therapies include (i) inhibition of complement activation (e.g., by IVIg, C1 INH, or an anti-C5 antibody), but some complement inhibitors are not effective in NHPs, for example, eculizumab. Possible B cell-targeted therapies include (i) B cell depletion, (ii) plasma cell depletion, (iii) modulation of B cell activation, and (iv) enhancing the generation of regulatory B and/or T cells. Among anti-inflammatory agents, anti-IL6R mAb and TNF blockers are increasingly being tested in xenotransplantation models, but with no definitive evidence that they reverse AMR. Increasing attention should be directed toward testing combinations of the above therapies. We suggest that treatment with a systemic complement inhibitor is likely to be most effective, possibly combined with anti-inflammatory agents (if these are not already being administered). Ultimately, it may require further genetic engineering of the organ-source pig to resolve the problem entirely, for example, knockout or knockdown of SLA, and/or expression of PD-L1, HLA E, and/or HLA-G.

Novel Complement C5 Small-interfering RNA Lipid Nanoparticle Prolongs Graft Survival in a Hypersensitized Rat Kidney Transplant Model

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) caused by donor-specific antibodies remains challenging. Given the critical roles of complement activity in antibody-mediated graft injury, we developed a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation of small-interfering RNA against complement C5 (C5 siRNA-LNP) and investigated whether C5 siRNA-LNP could downregulate the complement activity and act as an effective treatment for AMR.

METHODS

Lewis recipient rats were sensitized by skin grafting from Brown Norway donor rats. Kidney transplantation was performed at 4 wk post-skin grafting.C5 siRNA- or control siRNA-LNP was administered intravenously, and the weekly injections were continued until the study's conclusion. Cyclosporin (CsA) and/or deoxyspergualin (DSG) were used as adjunctive immunosuppressants. Complement activity was evaluated using hemolysis assays. The deposition of C5b9 in the grafts was evaluated using immunohistochemical analysis on day 7 posttransplantation.

RESULTS

C5 siRNA-LNP completely suppressed C5 expression and complement activity (hemolytic activity ≤ 20%) 7 d postadministration. C5 siRNA-LNP in combination with CsA and DSG (median survival time: 56.0 d) prolonged graft survival compared with control siRNA-LNP in combination with CsA and DSG (median survival time: 21.0 d; P = 0.0012; log-rank test). Immunohistochemical analysis of the grafts revealed that downregulation of C5 expression was associated with a reduction in C5b9-positive area ( P = 0.0141, Steel-Dwass test).

CONCLUSIONS

C5 siRNA-LNP combined with immunosuppressants CsA and DSG downregulated C5 activity and significantly prolonged graft survival compared with control siRNA-LNP with CsA and DSG. Downregulation of C5 expression using C5 siRNA-LNP may be an effective therapeutic approach for AMR.

Emerging drugs for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a focus on phase II & III trials

INTRODUCTION

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a leading cause of kidney allograft failure. Its therapy continues to be challenge, and no treatment has been approved for the market thus far.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we discuss the pathophysiology and phenotypic presentation of ABMR, the current level of evidence to support the use of available therapeutic strategies, and the emergence of tailored drugs now being evaluated in systematic clinical trials. We searched PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov and Citeline's Pharmaprojects for pertinent information on emerging anti-rejection strategies, laying a focus on phase II and III trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, we rely on the use of apheresis for alloantibody depletion and intravenous immunoglobulin (referred to as standard of care), preferentially in early active ABMR. Recent systematic trials have questioned the benefits of using the CD20 antibody rituximab or the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. However, there are now several promising treatment approaches in the pipeline, which are being trialed in phase II and III studies. These include interleukin-6 antagonism, CD38-targeting antibodies, and selective inhibitors of complement. On the basis of the information that has emerged so far, it seems that innovative treatment strategies for clinical use in ABMR may be available within the next 5-10 years.

Innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: A challenge for unmet needs

Due to the optimal results obtained in kidney transplantation and to the lack of interest of the industries, new innovative drugs in kidney transplantation are difficult to be encountered. The best strategy to find the new drugs recently developed or under development is to search in the sections of kidney transplantation still not completely covered by the drugs on the market. These unmet needs are the prevention of delayed graft function (DGF), the protection of the graft over the long time and the desensitization of preformed anti human leukocyte antigen antibodies and the treatment of the acute antibody-mediated rejection. These needs are particularly relevant due to the expansion of some kind of kidney transplantation as transplantation from non-heart beating donor and in the case of antibody-incompatible grafts. The first are particularly exposed to DGF, the latter need a safe desensitization and a safe treatments of the antibody mediated rejections that often occur. Particular caution is needed in treating these drugs. First, they are described in very recent studies and the follow-up of their effect is of course rather short. Second, some of these drugs are still in an early phase of study, even if in well-conducted randomized controlled trials. Particular caution and a careful check need to be used in trials launched 2 or 3 years ago. Indeed, is always necessary to verify whether the study is still going on or whether and why the study itself was abandoned.

Approaches for Controlling Antibody-Mediated Allograft Rejection Through Targeting B Cells

Both acute and chronic antibody-mediated allograft rejection (AMR), which are directly mediated by B cells, remain difficult to treat. Long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs) in bone marrow (BM) play a crucial role in the production of the antibodies that induce AMR. However, LLPCs survive through a T cell-independent mechanism and resist conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Desensitization therapy is therefore performed, although it is accompanied by severe side effects and the pathological condition may be at an irreversible stage when these antibodies, which induce AMR development, are detected in the serum. In other words, AMR control requires the development of a diagnostic method that predicts its onset before LLPC differentiation and enables therapeutic intervention and the establishment of humoral immune monitoring methods providing more detailed information, including individual differences in the susceptibility to immunosuppressive agents and the pathological conditions. In this study, we reviewed recent studies related to the direct or indirect involvement of immunocompetent cells in the differentiation of naïve-B cells into LLPCs, the limitations of conventional methods, and the possible development of novel control methods in the context of AMR. This information will significantly contribute to the development of clinical applications for AMR and improve the prognosis of patients who undergo organ transplantation.

Identification of Diagnostic Biomarkers and Their Correlation with Immune Infiltration in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease of the central retina, with no suitable biomarkers for early diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to find potential diagnostic biomarker candidates for AMD and investigate their immune-related roles in this pathology. Weight gene correlation analysis was first performed based on data from the Gene Expression Omnibus database and 20 hub genes were identified. The functional enrichment analyses showed that the innate immune response, inflammatory response, and complement activation were key pathways associated with AMD. Complement C1s (C1S), adrenomedullin (ADM), and immediate early response 5 like (IER5L) were identified as the crucial genes with favorable diagnostic values for AMD by using LASSO analysis and multiple logistic regression. Furthermore, a 3-gene model was constructed and proved to be of good diagnostic and predictive performance for AMD (AUC = 0.785, 0.840, and 0.810 in training, test, and validation set, respectively). Finally, CIBERSORT was used to evaluate the infiltration of immune cells in AMD tissues. The results showed that the NK cells, CD4 memory T cell activation, and macrophage polarization may be involved in the AMD process. C1S, ADM, and IER5L were correlated with the infiltration of the above immune cells. In conclusion, our study suggests that C1S, ADM, and IER5L are promising diagnostic biomarker candidates for AMD and may regulate the infiltration of immune cells in the occurrence and progression of AMD.

Aberrant activation of the complement system in renal grafts is mediated by cold storage

Aberrant complement activation leads to tissue damage during kidney transplantation, and it is recognized as an important target for therapeutic intervention. However, it is not clear whether cold storage (CS) triggers the complement pathway in transplanted kidneys. The goal of the present study was to determine the impact of CS on complement activation in renal transplants. Male Lewis and Fischer rats were used, and donor rat kidneys were exposed to 4 h or 18 h of CS followed by transplantation (CS + transplant). To study CS-induced effects, a group with no CS was included in which the kidney was removed and transplanted back to the same rat [autotransplantation (ATx)]. Complement proteins (C3 and C5b-9) were evaluated with Western blot analysis (reducing and nonreducing conditions) and immunostaining. Western blot analysis of renal extracts or serum indicated that the levels of C3 and C5b-9 increased after CS + transplant compared with ATx. Quite strikingly, intracellular C3 was profoundly elevated within renal tubules after CS + transplant but was absent in sham or ATx groups, which showed only extratubular C3. Similarly, C5b-9 immunofluorescence staining of renal sections showed an increase in C5b-9 deposits in kidneys after CS + transplant. Real-time PCR (SYBR green) showed increased expression of CD11b and CD11c, components of complement receptors 3 and 4, respectively, as well as inflammatory markers such as TNF-α. In addition, recombinant TNF-α significantly increased C3 levels in renal cells. Collectively, these results demonstrate that CS mediates aberrant activation of the complement system in renal grafts following transplantation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study highlights cold storage-mediated aberrant activation of complement components in renal allografts following transplantation. Specifically, the results demonstrate, for the first time, that cold storage functions in exacerbation of C5b-9, a terminal cytolytic membrane attack complex, in renal grafts following transplantation. In addition, the results indicated that cold storage induces local C3 biogenesis in renal proximal cells/tubules and that TNF-α promotes C3 biogenesis and activation in renal proximal tubular cells.

Complement 5 Inhibition Ameliorates Hepatic Ischemia/reperfusion Injury in Mice, Dominantly via the C5a-mediated Cascade

BACKGROUND

Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) is a serious complication in liver surgeries, including transplantation. Complement activation seems to be closely involved in hepatic IRI; however, no complement-targeted intervention has been clinically applied. We investigated the therapeutic potential of Complement 5 (C5)-targeted regulation in hepatic IRI.

METHODS

C5-knockout (B10D2/oSn) and their corresponding wild-type mice (WT, B10D2/nSn) were exposed to 90-minute partial (70%) hepatic ischemia/reperfusion with either anti-mouse-C5 monoclonal antibody (BB5.1) or corresponding control immunoglobulin administration 30 minutes before ischemia. C5a receptor 1 antagonist was also given to WT to identify which cascade, C5a or C5b-9, is dominant.

RESULTS

C5-knockout and anti-C5-Ab administration to WT both significantly reduced serum transaminase release and histopathological damages from 2 hours after reperfusion. This improvement was characterized by significantly reduced CD41+ platelet aggregation, maintained F4/80+ cells, and decreased high-mobility group box 1 release. After 6 hours of reperfusion, the infiltration of CD11+ and Ly6-G+ cells, cytokine/chemokine expression, single-stranded DNA+ cells, and cleaved caspase-3 expression were all significantly alleviated by anti-C5-Ab. C5a receptor 1 antagonist was as effective as anti-C5-Ab for reducing transaminases.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-C5 antibody significantly ameliorated hepatic IRI, predominantly via the C5a-mediated cascade, not only by inhibiting platelet aggregation during the early phase but also by attenuating the activation of infiltrating macrophages/neutrophils and hepatocyte apoptosis in the late phase of reperfusion. Given its efficacy, clinical availability, and controllability, C5-targeted intervention may provide a novel therapeutic strategy against hepatic IRI.

The role of novel therapeutic approaches for prevention of allosensitization and antibody-mediated rejection

Modification of pathogenic antibodies and their effector functions in autoimmune diseases or use of B cell/plasma cell-directed anticancer therapies have illuminated the biologic relevance of B cells, plasma cells (PCs), and pathogenic antibodies and complement in alloimmunity. They have also rejuvenated interest in how B cells mediate multiple effector functions that include antibody production, antigen presentation to T cells, costimulation, and the production of immune stimulating and immune modulatory cytokines that drive dysfunctional immune responses. Current methods to reduce alloantibodies are only modestly successful. Rituximab is used for desensitization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) treatment by targeting CD20 found on B-lymphocytes. However, PCs do not express CD20, likely explaining the limited success of this approach. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis (PLEX) have limited success due to antibody rebound. Despite attempts to develop tolerable therapeutics for management of AMR, none, to date, have been universally accepted or obtained Food and Drug Administration approval. Lack of approved therapeutics often results in patients having a much shorter graft survival due to AMR. Repurposing drugs from autoimmunity and cancer immunotherapy has rapidly yielded important advancements in the care of AMR patients. Here we discuss emerging therapeutics aimed at prevention and treatment of AMR.

The therapeutic challenge of late antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection

Late antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR) is a cardinal cause of kidney allograft failure, manifesting as a continuous and, in contrast with early rejection, often clinically silent alloimmune process. While significant progress has been made towards an improved understanding of its molecular mechanisms and the definition of diagnostic criteria, there is still no approved effective treatment. In recent small randomized controlled trials, therapeutic strategies with promising results in observational studies, such as proteasome inhibitor bortezomib, anti‐C5 antibody eculizumab, or high dose intravenous immunoglobulin plus rituximab, had no significant impact in late and/or chronic ABMR. Such disappointing results reinforce a need of new innovative treatment strategies. Potential candidates may be the interference with interleukin‐6 to modulate B cell alloimmunity, or innovative compounds that specifically target antibody‐producing plasma cells, such as antibodies against CD38. Given the phenotypic heterogeneity of ABMR, the design of adequate systematic trials to assess the safety and efficiency of such therapies, however, is challenging. Several trials are currently being conducted, and new developments will hopefully provide us with effective ways to counteract the deleterious impact of antibody‐mediated graft injury. Meanwhile, the weight of evidence would suggest that, when approaching using existing treatments for established antibody‐mediated rejection, “less may be more”.