Recurrent or De Novo Allograft Steatosis and Long-term Outcomes After Liver Transplantation. Transplantation. 2019;103:e14-e21. [PMID: 29994981 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002317]

Post-Liver Transplant Metabolic Syndrome

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the second most frequent cause of liver transplantation following alcoholic liver disease. With longer follow-up and increased survival rates, the occurrence rate of the metabolic syndrome is increasing with time among liver transplant recipients. Reappearances of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after transplantation, both as recurring cases and new instances, are prevalent; nonetheless, the recurrence of fibrosis is minimal. Recognizing populations at elevated risk and enhancing the management of metabolic-related conditions are crucial for maintaining a healthy transplanted organ, particularly considering the prolonged utilization of immunosuppressive treatments. Furthermore, NASH-related cirrhosis patients who had transplant are at a greater risk of cardiovascular, renal events and increased incidence of cancer, necessitating a unique care strategy. This review discusses post-transplant metabolic syndrome, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention strategy, recurrent and de novo NAFLD and customized immunosuppression.

Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) after Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review of an Emerging Issue

The development of steatotic liver disease after liver transplant (LT) is widely described, and epidemiological data have revealed an increased incidence in recent times. Its evolution runs from simple steatosis to steatohepatitis and, in a small proportion of patients, to significant fibrosis and cirrhosis. Apparently, post-LT steatotic disease has no impact on the recipient's overall survival; however, a higher cardiovascular and malignancy burden has been reported. Many donors' and recipients' risk factors have been associated with this occurrence, although the recipient-related ones seem of greater impact. Particularly, pre- and post-LT metabolic alterations are strictly associated with steatotic graft disease, sharing common pathophysiologic mechanisms that converge on insulin resistance. Other relevant risk factors include genetic variants, sex, age, baseline liver diseases, and immunosuppressive drugs. Diagnostic evaluation relies on liver biopsy, although non-invasive methods are being increasingly used to detect and monitor both steatosis and fibrosis stages. Management requires a multifaceted approach focusing on lifestyle modifications, the optimization of immunosuppressive therapy, and the management of metabolic complications. This review aims to synthesize the current knowledge of post-LT steatotic liver disease, focusing on the recent definition of metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and its metabolic and multisystemic concerns.

Long-Term Outcomes of Recipients of Liver Transplants from Living Donors Treated with a Very Low-Calorie Diet

The increasing prevalence of steatotic liver disease (SLD) in potential living donors is concerning, as it limits donor's availability amid rising demand. OPTIFAST very low-calorie diet (VLCD), a meal replacement product, effectively reduces weight and hepatic steatosis before transplantation. However, data on the outcomes of recipients of VLCD-treated donors are lacking. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study on 199 living donor liver transplant recipients at Toronto General Hospital, Canada, between January 2015 and January 2020. We compared the 1-year posttransplant outcomes between recipients who received organs from donors treated with VLCD (N = 34) for either weight loss or steatosis reduction, with those who did not require treatment (N = 165). Our analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in the rates of postoperative complications (23% vs 32.4%, p=0.3) or intensive care unit stays (70.9% vs 70.6%, p=1) between recipients of non-VLCD and VLCD grafts. Following adjusted multivariate logistic regression, receipt of VLCD grafts was not associated with increased hospital length of stay. In addition, one-year mortality did not differ between the two groups (4.2% non-VLCD recipients vs 2.9% VLCD recipients, p=0.6). OPTIFAST VLCD treatment for liver donors demonstrates positive and safe outcomes in recipients, expanding the pool of potential living donors for increased organ availability.

Metabolic Disorders in Liver Transplant Recipients: The State of the Art

Liver transplantation represents a chief therapeutic approach for acute liver failure, end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite witnessing advancements in short- and medium-term survival over recent decades, attributed to refinements in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols, long-term mortality remains impervious to modification. Notably, cardiovascular disease emerges as a predominant cause of mortality among liver transplant recipients. This trend is accentuated by the increasing prominence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related cirrhosis as an indication for liver transplantation. Moreover, the administration of immunosuppressive agents is intricately linked to the degradation of the metabolic profile in liver transplant recipients, thereby contributing to the initiation or exacerbation of cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia. In addition, the post-liver transplantation period is marked by a decline in lifestyle quality and a failure to acknowledge the psychological distress experienced by patients throughout the transplant process. These factors can precipitate a deterioration in the patient's metabolic profile, exacerbated by suboptimal therapeutic compliance. This narrative review aims to comprehensively address the principal metabolic disorders intricately associated with liver transplantation.

Pancreatic steatosis is an independent risk factor for post-transplant diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is associated with an increased risk of post-transplant cardiovascular diseases, and several risk factors of PTDM have been shown in the literature. Yet, the relationship between hepatic and pancreatic steatosis with post-transplant diabetes mellitus remains vague. We aimed to evaluate pancreatic steatosis, a novel component of metabolic syndrome, and hepatic steatosis association with post-transplant diabetes mellitus in a single-center retrospective cohort study conducted on kidney transplant recipients.

METHOD

We have performed a single-center retrospective cohort study involving all kidney transplant recipients. We have utilized pretransplant Fibrosis-4, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score, and abdominal computed tomography for the assessment of visceral steatosis status.

RESULTS

We have included 373 kidney transplant recipients with a mean follow-up period of 32 months in our final analysis. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus risk is associated with older age (p < .001), higher body-mass index (p < .001), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-fibrosis score (p = .002), hepatic (p < .001) or pancreatic (p < .001) steatosis on imaging and higher pre-transplant serum triglyceride (p = .003) and glucose levels (p = .001) after multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our study illustrates that recipients' pancreatic steatosis is an independent predictive factor for post-transplant diabetes mellitus including in kidney transplant patients.

Modern glucose-lowering drugs in liver transplant recipients: improvement in weight, glycemic control, and potentially allograft steatosis

Introduction

Recurrent allograft steatosis occurs in one-third of transplanted livers. Antidiabetic agents like glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter type-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective in the management of obesity and hepatic steatosis in the general population; however, there is limited evidence supporting their use in allograft steatosis. We aimed to evaluate their effects on steatosis, body weight, and glycemic control in liver transplant recipients at our institution.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective cohort study of liver transplant recipients currently on a GLP1RA or SGLT2 inhibitor (transplanted 2015-2022), we compared clinical and radiological data before medication use and at follow-up. Differences were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

Thirty-seven liver transplant recipients were taking the agents. Diabetes was the most common indication (n = 33) followed by obesity (n = 4). Median follow up was 427 days (301,798). Among those with documented steatosis (n = 21), steatosis improved in 5, worsened in 4, remained unchanged in 1, and change could not be evaluated in 11 due to lack of comparable pre and post imaging. Average weight loss was 3.2 kg (p < 0.001) and BMI decreased by 1.2 kg/m2 (p < 0.001). Hemoglobin A1c decreased by 0.6 mmol/mol (p = 0.0014), insulin requirement reduced by 7 units/day (p = 0.02), and there was no change in additional antidiabetic medications.

Discussion

GLP1RA and SGLT-2 inhibitors are tolerated in transplant patients and result in weight loss and better glycemic control. They are promising agents to treat recurrent or de-novo liver allograft steatosis, but further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes in liver transplant recipients.

The Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in Severe Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Patients

The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus, obesity, and metabolic syndrome in the population can lead to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). In Western industrialized countries, this has become a major problem with significant socioeconomic impacts. MASH is now a leading cause of liver transplantation (LT), especially in developed countries. However, the post-transplant outcomes of such patients are a major concern, and published data are limited and extremely variable. In this article, we discuss graft and patient survival after LT, complications, the recurrence of MASH, and MASH appearing de novo after transplantation. Recent studies suggest that patients with MASH have slightly worse short-term survival, potentially due to increased cardiovascular mortality. However, most studies found that longer-term outcomes for patients undergoing LT for MASH are similar or even better than those for other indications. Hepatocellular carcinoma due to MASH cirrhosis also has similar or even better outcomes after LT than other etiologies. In conclusion, we suggest questions and topics that require further research to enhance healthcare for this growing patient population.

Multi-omics network analysis on samples from sequential biopsies reveals vital role of proliferation arrest for Macrosteatosis related graft failure in rats after liver transplantation

To investigate the molecular impact of graft MaS on post-transplant prognosis, based on multi-omics integrative analysis. Rats were fed by methionine-choline deficient diet (MCD) for MaS grafts. Samples were collected from grafts by sequential biopsies. Transcriptomic and metabolomic profilings were assayed. Post-transplant MaS status showed a close association with graft failure. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for in-vivo MaS were mainly enriched on pathways of cell cycle and DNA replication. Post-transplant MaS caused arrests of graft regeneration via inhibiting the E2F1 centered network, which was confirmed by an in vitro experiment. Data from metabolomics assays found insufficient serine/creatine which is located on one‑carbon metabolism was responsible for MaS-related GF. Pre-transplant MaS caused severe fibrosis in long-term survivors. DEGs for grafts from long-term survivors with pre-transplant MaS were mainly enriched in pathways of ECM-receptor interaction and focal adhesion. Transcriptional regulatory network analysis confirmed SOX9 as a key transcription factor (TF) for MaS-related fibrosis. Metabolomic assays found elevation of aromatic amino acid (AAA) was a major feature of fibrosis in long-term survivors. Graft MaS in vivo increased post-transplant GF via negative regulations on graft regeneration. Pre-transplant MaS induced severe fibrosis in long-term survivors via activations on ECM-receptor interaction and AAA metabolism.

A Comprehensive Review of Liver Allograft Fibrosis and Steatosis: From Cause to Diagnosis

Despite advances in posttransplant care, long-term outcomes for liver transplant recipients remain unchanged. Approximately 25% of recipients will advance to graft cirrhosis and require retransplantation. Graft fibrosis progresses in the context of de novo or recurrent disease. Recurrent hepatitis C virus infection was previously the most important cause of graft failure but is now curable in the majority of patients. However, with an increasing prevalence of obesity and diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease as the most rapidly increasing indication for liver transplantation, metabolic dysfunction-associated liver injury is anticipated to become an important cause of graft fibrosis alongside alloimmune hepatitis and alcoholic liver disease. To better understand the landscape of the graft fibrosis literature, we summarize the associated epidemiology, cause, potential mechanisms, diagnosis, and complications. We additionally highlight the need for better noninvasive methods to ameliorate the management of graft fibrosis. Some examples include leveraging the microbiome, genetic, and machine learning methods to address these limitations. Overall, graft fibrosis is routinely seen by transplant clinicians, but it requires a better understanding of its underlying biology and contributors that can help inform diagnostic and therapeutic practices.

Fibrosis and steatosis of the liver graft: Are non-invasive tests useful? A short review

As life expectancy of liver transplanted patients improves, new questions are arising to avoid progressive graft loss. The spectrum of chronic inflammation and fibrosis are known to be important triggers in the alteration of graft function. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard to better understand progressive, normal, and abnormal histological modifications of the graft. In parallel, the interest for metabolic steatosis development in post-transplantation is also growing. Long-term survival of these patients involves the management of comorbidities including metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases. Early detection of altered graft parenchyma, and monitoring of its evolution are undoubtedly essential. Non-invasive methods including transient elastography and fibrosis biomarkers are attractive tools to avoid drawbacks and complications of liver biopsy. Accuracy of these methods are well-known in a pre-transplantation setting, but evidence is lacking in post-transplantation setting. We review current knowledge of progressive liver fibrosis and steatosis development after transplantation and non-invasive methods of their assessment.

Evolving challenges with long-term care of liver transplant recipients

The number of liver transplants (LT) performed worldwide continues to rise, and LT recipients are living longer post-transplant. This has led to an increasing number of LT recipients requiring lifelong care. Optimal care post-LT requires careful attention to both the allograft and systemic issues that are more common after organ transplantation. Common causes of allograft dysfunction include rejection, biliary complications, and primary disease recurrence. While immunosuppression prevents rejection and reduces incidences of some primary disease recurrence, it has detrimental systemic effects. Most commonly, these include increased incidences of metabolic syndrome, various malignancies, and infections. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to optimize immunosuppression regimens to prevent allograft dysfunction while also decreasing the risk of systemic complications. Institutional protocols to screen for systemic disease and heightened clinical suspicion also play an important role in providing optimal long-term post-LT care. In this review, we discuss these common complications of LT as well as unique considerations when caring for LT recipients in the years after transplant.

NASH After Liver Transplantation: Impact of Immunosuppression

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has emerged as one of the common causes of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT). Patients with NAFLD-related cirrhosis and HCC are at high risk for the development of recurrent NAFLD after LT. NAFLD can also develop de novo post-transplantation in patients subjected to LT for other indications. Besides the pretransplant presence of various components of metabolic syndrome (MS) use of immunosuppressive agents in the post-LT setting forms one of the major drivers for the development of post-LT NAFLD. Individual components of conventional immunosuppressive regimens (corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and m-TOR inhibitors) are all implicated in the development of post-LT metabolic derangement and follow unique mechanisms of action and degree of disturbances. The development of cardiovascular risk is associated with post-LT NAFLD, although graft outcomes do not seem to be influenced only by the presence of post-LT NAFLD. Measures in consonance with the management of NAFLD, in general, including lifestyle modifications and control of metabolic risk factors, hold true for post-LT NAFLD. Tailoring immunosuppression strategies with early corticosteroid withdrawal and calcineurin inhibitor minimization balancing against the risk of graft rejection constitutes important nuances in the individualized management of post-LT NAFLD.

The plasma degradome reflects later development of NASH fibrosis after liver transplant

Although liver transplantation (LT) is an effective therapy for cirrhosis, the risk of post-LT NASH is alarmingly high and is associated with accelerated progression to fibrosis/cirrhosis, cardiovascular disease and decreased survival. Lack of risk stratification strategies hampers early intervention against development of post-LT NASH fibrosis. The liver undergoes significant remodeling during inflammatory injury. During such remodeling, degraded peptide fragments (i.e., 'degradome') of the ECM and other proteins increase in plasma, making it a useful diagnostic/prognostic tool in chronic liver disease. To investigate whether liver injury caused by post-LT NASH would yield a unique degradome profile that is predictive of severe post-LT NASH fibrosis, a retrospective analysis of 22 biobanked samples from the Starzl Transplantation Institute (12 with post-LT NASH after 5 years and 10 without) was performed. Total plasma peptides were isolated and analyzed by 1D-LC-MS/MS analysis using a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1000 UHPLC and nanoelectrospray ionization into an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer. Qualitative and quantitative peptide features data were developed from MSn datasets using PEAKS Studio X (v10). LC-MS/MS yielded ~ 2700 identifiable peptide features based on the results from Peaks Studio analysis. Several peptides were significantly altered in patients that later developed fibrosis and heatmap analysis of the top 25 most significantly changed peptides, most of which were ECM-derived, clustered the 2 patient groups well. Supervised modeling of the dataset indicated that a fraction of the total peptide signal (~ 15%) could explain the differences between the groups, indicating a strong potential for representative biomarker selection. A similar degradome profile was observed when the plasma degradome patterns were compared being obesity sensitive (C57Bl6/J) and insensitive (AJ) mouse strains. The plasma degradome profile of post-LT patients yielded stark difference based on later development of post-LT NASH fibrosis. This approach could yield new "fingerprints" that can serve as minimally-invasive biomarkers of negative outcomes post-LT.

Changings and Challenges in Liver Transplantation for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/Steatohepatitis

Liver transplantation for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/steatohepatitis (NAFLD/NASH) is increasing rapidly worldwide. Compared with alcohol and viral-related liver disease, NAFLD/NASH is more frequently associated with a systemic metabolic syndrome, which significantly affects other organs, requiring multidisciplinary management, in all phases of liver transplant.

Hepatic steatosis after liver transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

NAFLD can occur after liver transplantation (LT), as recurrence or de novo hepatic steatosis (HS). We aimed to evaluate the literature on prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of post-LT HS. Systematic review with meta-analysis through a search on: PUBMED, Scopus, and Web-of-Science, from inception until the September 30, 2021. Forty studies were included, representing 6979 patients. The post-LT HS prevalence was 39.76% (95% CI, 34.06-45.46), with a rising kinetics (11.06% increase per decade, p =0.04), and a geographical distribution (15.10% more prevalent in American continent compared with Europe and Asia). Recurrent HS was up to 5-fold more likely than de novo HS [OR: 5.38 (2.69-10.76)]. Metabolic disturbances were stronger risk factors in the post-LT recipient [obesity: OR: 4.62 (3.07-6.96); metabolic syndrome: OR: 3.26 (2.03-5.25)] as compared with pre-LT recipients, with the exception of diabetes mellitus, which doubled the risk at any set [pre-LT diabetes mellitus: OR: 2.06 (1.58-2.68); post-LT diabetes mellitus: OR: 2.12 (1.73-2.59)]. Donor factors were not the relevant risk factors for post-LT HS and the only immunosuppressive drug associated with increased risk was sirolimus [OR: 1.68 (1.07-2.64)]. The prevalence of post-LT steatohepatitis was 28.82% (19.62-38.03) and the strongest risk factor was pre-LT NAFLD. Limited outcomes data suggest that post-LT HS did not increase the risk for liver cirrhosis or mortality in these studies. Two out of 5 patients submitted to LT will develop post-LT HS, being recurrent HS more common than de novo HS. Diabetes mellitus and post-LT metabolic syndrome are the strongest risk factors for HS and baseline NAFLD for steatohepatitis. All transplanted patients should be enrolled in lifestyle interventions to prevent post-LT metabolic syndrome, and sirolimus should be avoided in high-risk patients.

Utility and prognostic value of diagnosing MAFLD in patients undergoing liver transplantation for alcohol-related liver disease

BACKGROUND

Recently, the term metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed to replace non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This concept enables diagnosing liver disease associated with metabolic dysfunction in patients with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), a main indication for liver transplantation (LTx). We assessed MAFLD prevalence in ALD patients undergoing LTx and its prognostic value on post-LTx outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all ALD patients transplanted at our center between 1990 and August 2020. MAFLD was diagnosed based on the presence or history of hepatic steatosis and a BMI > 25 or type II diabetes or ≥ 2 metabolic risk abnormalities at LTx. Overall survival and risk factors for recurrent liver and cardiovascular events were analyzed by Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of the 371 included patients transplanted for ALD, 255 (68.7%) had concomitant MAFLD at LTx. Median follow-up post-LTx was 72 months (IQR: 34.50-122). Patients with ALD-MAFLD were older at LTx (p = .001), more often male (p < .001) and more frequently had hepatocellular carcinoma (p < .001). No differences in perioperative mortality and overall survival were found. ALD-MAFLD patients had an increased risk of recurrent hepatic steatosis, irrespective of alcohol relapse, but no superimposed risk of cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-presence of MAFLD at LTx for ALD is associated with a distinct patient profile and is an independent risk factor for recurrent hepatic steatosis. The use of MAFLD criteria in ALD patients might increase awareness and treatment of specific hepatic and systemic metabolic abnormalities before and after LTx.

The plasma degradome reflects later development of NASH fibrosis after liver transplant

Although liver transplantation (LT) is an effective therapy for cirrhosis, the risk of post-LT NASH is alarmingly high and is associated with accelerated progression to fibrosis/cirrhosis, cardiovascular disease, and decreased survival. Lack of risk stratification strategies hamper liver undergoes significant remodeling during inflammatory injury. During such remodeling, degraded peptide fragments (i.e., 'degradome') of the ECM and other proteins increase in plasma, making it a useful diagnostic/prognostic tool in chronic liver disease. To investigate whether inflammatory liver injury caused by post-LT NASH would yield a unique degradome profile, predictive of severe post-LT NASH fibrosis, we performed a retrospective analysis of 22 biobanked samples from the Starzl Transplantation Institute (12 with post-LT NASH after 5 years and 10 without). Total plasma peptides were isolated and analyzed by 1D-LC-MS/MS analysis using a Proxeon EASY-nLC 1000 UHPLC and nanoelectrospray ionization into an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer. Qualitative and quantitative peptide features data were developed from MSn datasets using PEAKS Studio X (v10). LC-MS/MS yielded ∼2700 identifiable peptide features based on the results from Peaks Studio analysis. Several peptides were significantly altered in patients that later developed fibrosis and heatmap analysis of the top 25 most significantly-changed peptides, most of which were ECM-derived, clustered the 2 patient groups well. Supervised modeling of the dataset indicated that a fraction of the total peptide signal (∼15%) could explain the differences between the groups, indicating a strong potential for representative biomarker selection. A similar degradome profile was observed when the plasma degradome patterns were compared being obesity sensitive (C57Bl6/J) and insensitive (AJ) mouse strains. Both The plasma degradome profile of post-LT patients yields stark difference based on later development of post-LT NASH fibrosis. This approach could yield new "fingerprints" that can serve as minimally-invasive biomarkers of negative outcomes post-LT.

Liver transplantation for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: indications and post-transplant management

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the fastest growing indication to liver transplantation (LT) in Western Countries, both for end stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. NAFLD/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is often expression of a systemic metabolic syndrome; therefore, NAFLD/NASH patients require a multidisciplinary approach for a proper pre-surgical evaluation, which is important to achieve a post-transplant outcome comparable to that of other indications to LT. NAFLD/NASH patients are also at higher risk of post-transplant cardiovascular events, diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity, renal impairment and recurrent NASH. Lifestyle modifications, included diet and physical activity, are key to improve survival and quality of life after transplantation. A tailored immunosuppressive regimen may be proposed in selected patients. Development of new drugs for the treatment of recurrent NASH is awaited.

Outcomes of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis After Liver Transplantation: An Updated Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the fastest growing indication of liver transplantation (LT) and is projected to be the leading cause of LT in the near future. The systemic pathogenesis of NASH increases risks of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with NASH receiving LT. Thus, this study aimed to conduct a time-dependent survival analysis between LT recipients with and without NASH using hazard ratios.

METHODS

A search was conducted on Medline and Embase databases for articles relating to LT outcomes for NASH recipients. A survival analysis was conducted of hazard ratios using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model with meta-regression. To account for censoring, survival data were reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves and pooled to derive more accurate hazard estimates and all-cause mortality in NASH patients after LT. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted to analyze secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies involving 119,327 LT recipients were included in our analysis with a prevalence of NASH of 20.2% (95% CI, 12.9-30.2). The pooled 1-year, 5-year, and 10-year all-cause mortality in NASH patients after LT were 12.5%, 24.4%, and 37.9%, respectively. Overall survival was comparable between LT recipients for NASH vs non-NASH (hazard ratio, 0.910; 95% CI, 0.760 to 1.10; P = .34). Meta-regression showed that a higher model for end-stage liver disease score was associated with significantly worse overall survival in NASH compared with non-NASH after LT (95% CI, -0.0856 to -0.0181; P = .0026).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that patients undergoing LT for NASH cirrhosis have comparable complication rates, overall survival, and graft survival compared with non-NASH patients, although close monitoring may be indicated for those with higher model for end-stage liver disease scores.

Regression of Graft Steatosis After Liver Transplantation

Introduction: Liver grafts with limited steatosis are currently used for liver transplantation, but the natural history of graft steatosis is not well known. Project Aims or Questions: This program evaluation aimed at assessing changes of steatosis after liver transplantation. Design: A retrospective chart review was performed assessing presence and severity of steatosis in the liver explant and in time zero donor graft biopsies carried out at the time-point of liver transplantation on histopathology and on imaging one year thereafter in 30 well characterized patients. Results: Ten patients (33%) showed steatosis on explant. Time zero biopsy revealed steatosis in 18 grafts (60%) and no steatosis in 12 (40%). One year after transplantation, 8 patients (27%) had steatosis and 22 patients (63%) had none. Fourteen patients (47%) showed changes in steatosis: 12 showed resolution and 2 showed de novo steatosis. Explant macrovesicular steatosis was associated with presence of steatosis 1 year after transplantation (binary logistic regression model, p = 0.014), but not macrovesicular steatosis in the donor graft at time-point of transplantation. Conclusion: Resolution of graft steatosis was frequent. Presence of steatosis in the recipient's liver, but not graft steatosis, was a risk factor for steatosis 1 year after transplantation. Factors related to the recipient seem to prevail over donor-related factors in determining the persistence or de novo appearance of steatosis after liver transplantation.

Metabolic mechanisms for and treatment of NAFLD or NASH occurring after liver transplantation

The rising tide of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) associated with the obesity epidemic is a major health concern worldwide. NAFLD - specifically its more advanced form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related cirrhosis - is now the fastest growing indication for liver transplantation in the USA and Europe. Although the short-term and mid-term overall survival rates of patients who receive a liver transplant for NASH-related cirrhosis are essentially similar to those of patients who receive a transplant for other liver indications, recipients with NASH-related cirrhosis have an increased risk of waiting-list mortality and of developing recurrent liver disease and cardiometabolic complications in the longer term after liver transplantation. This Review provides a brief overview of the epidemiology of NAFLD and NASH and the occurrence of NAFLD or NASH in patients after liver transplantation for NASH and other liver indications. It also discusses the putative metabolic mechanisms underlying the emergence of NAFLD or NASH after liver transplantation as well as optimal therapeutic approaches for recipients of liver transplants, including the management of cardiometabolic comorbidities, tailored immunosuppression, lifestyle changes and pharmacotherapy for NAFLD.

Metabolic syndrome, hepatic fibrosis, and steatosis diagnosed by liver stiffness measurement and controlled attenuation parameter after liver transplantation: the impact on long-term survival

BACKGROUND

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) are used for diagnosis of liver fibrosis and steatosis. This study aimed to noninvasively evaluate hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in liver transplant recipients using CAP and LSM and the impact on survival of patients.

METHODS

In a prospective study, adult liver transplant recipients were included. CAP and LSM obtained during transient elastography (TE) were used for assessment of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Patients were followed during 4 years for mortality as the main outcome after liver transplantation.

RESULTS

From 296 patients, 24.7% and 25% of liver transplant recipients had liver steatosis and fibrosis in CAP and LSM, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, etiology of liver disease (NASH versus non-NASH) (HR: 3.125; 95% CI: 1.594-6.134; p = 0.001), and post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) (HR: 2.617; 95% CI: 1.396-4.926; p = 0.003) were associated with hepatic steatosis after liver transplantation.  In multivariable Cox regression analysis, liver fibrosis was an independent predictor of mortality after liver transplantation (HR: 4.926; 95%CI: 1.779-13.513; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

CAP and LS measurement during TE are useful methods for diagnosis of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in liver transplant recipients. LS measurement might predict long-term survival of patients.

Growing challenge of post-liver transplantation non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide, with an estimated prevalence of 25%. Post-liver transplantation (LT) recurrent or de novo hepatic steatosis is a common complication in recipients, irrespective of transplantation indication. Risk factors for graft steatosis mainly include obesity, immunosuppression, donor steatosis, and genetic factors. Liver transplant recipients are at high risk of developing insulin resistance, new-onset diabetes, and post-transplantation metabolic syndrome that is highly associated with immunosuppressive treatment. Post-LT NAFLD is often underdiagnosed due to the poor sensitivity of most routine imaging methods. The gold standard for the diagnosis of hepatic steatosis is liver biopsy, which is, however, limited to more complex cases due to its invasive nature. There is no approved pharmacotherapy in NAFLD. Lifestyle modification remains the cornerstone in NAFLD treatment. Other treatment strategies in post-LT NAFLD include lifestyle modifications, pharmacotherapy, bariatric surgery, and tailored immunosuppression. However, these approaches originate from recommendations in the general population, as there is scarce data regarding the safety and efficacy of current management strategies for NAFLD in liver transplant patients. Future prospective studies are required to achieve tailored treatment for these patients.

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients: A Histology-Based Study

Background

Recurrent or de novo nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are common after liver transplantation (LT) and may be associated with rapid progression to fibrosis; however, there is limited data in this regard after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Material and methods

This is a retrospective study at a high volume LDLT center of all liver biopsies performed in patients with post-transplant NAFLD diagnosed on ultrasound of the abdomen. Liver biopsy was indicated for raised transaminases and/or high liver stiffness on TE. The association between these prebiopsy parameters and inflammation and fibrosis on histology was analyzed. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation or median (25-75 interquartile range).

Results

The study cohort consisted of 31 males and 3 females, aged 43 ± 10 years. The LT to liver biopsy interval was 44 (28-68) months. The prebiopsy AST and ALT were 71 (38-119) and 66 (50-156), respectively. The histology suggested no nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in 7 (20%), borderline NASH in 15 (44%), and NASH in 12 (35%) patients. A total of 15 patients (44%) had stage 1 or stage 2 fibrosis. The proportion of patients having fibrosis was significantly higher in patients with NASH (83%) compared to patients with borderline NASH (33%) or no NASH (none had fibrosis, P = 0.001). Among 18 patients who underwent TE (on FibroScan), liver stiffness was significantly higher in patients with fibrosis [18.1 (9.7-22.5)] than in those without fibrosis [9.7 (4.0-12.7); P = 0.043].

Conclusion

Over a third of the LDLT recipients with post-transplant NAFLD developed NASH, and nearly half, borderline NASH 3-5 years after transplant. Most with established NASH also had fibrosis on histology. Prevention of risk factors and early diagnosis is warranted in these patients.

Predictors of patient survival following liver transplant in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the second-leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide and is projected to become the leading indication. Our study aimed to determine clinical variables that predict post-LT survival in NASH.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. On June 18, 2020 and April 28, 2022, Ovid MEDLINE ALL, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. No date limits were applied. Inclusion criteria specified the type of study and our study's population/comparison and outcome/timepoints. Pediatric, animal, retransplantation-only, and studies classifying cryptogenic cirrhosis patients with body mass index (BMI) <30 as NASH were excluded. Studies with duplicate cohorts and missing information were excluded from the meta-analysis. Studies were appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. This study was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42020196915).

FINDINGS

Out of 8583 studies identified, 25 studies were included in the systematic review, while 5 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Our quantitative review suggested that the following variables were predictive of post-LT NASH patient survival: recipient age, functional status, pre-LT hepatoma, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, diabetes mellitus (DM), pre-LT dialysis, hepatic encephalopathy, portal vein thrombosis, hospitalization/ICU at LT, and year of LT. Predictors of graft survival included recipient age, BMI, pre-LT dialysis, and DM. Our pooled meta-analyses included five predictors of patient survival. Increased patient mortality was associated with older recipient age (HR=2·07, 95%CI: 1·71-2·50, I²=0, τ²=0, p=0·40) and pretransplant DM (HR=1·18, 95%CI: 1·08-1·28, I²=0, τ²=0, p=0·76).

INTERPRETATION

Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise predictive variables of mortality in LT NASH patients. Clinically, this might help to identify modifiable risk factors that can be optimized in the post-transplant setting to improve patient outcomes and optimises decision making in the resource-limited LT setting.

FUNDING

Toronto General and Western Hospital Foundation.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Due to Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Current Concepts and Future Challenges

Obesity has been labeled as the global pandemic of the 21st century, resulting from a sedentary lifestyle and caloric excess. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), characterized by excessive hepatic steatosis, is strongly associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome and is estimated to be present in one-quarter of the world population, making it the most common cause of the chronic liver disease (CLD). NAFLD spectrum varies from simple steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis. The burden of NAFLD has been predicted to increase in the coming decades resulting in increased rates of decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and liver-related deaths. In the current review, we describe the pathophysiology of NAFLD and NASH, risk factors associated with disease progression, related complications, and mortality. Later, we have discussed the changing epidemiology of HCC, with NAFLD emerging as the most common cause of CLD and HCC. We have also addressed the risk factors of HCC development in the NAFLD population (including demographic, metabolic, genetic, dietary, and lifestyle factors), presentation of NAFLD-associated HCC, its prognosis, and the issue of HCC development in non-cirrhotic NAFLD. Lastly, the problems related to HCC screening in the NAFLD population, the remaining challenges, and future directions, especially the need to identify the high-risk individuals, will be discussed. We will conclude the review by summarizing the clinical evidence for treating fibrosis and preventing HCC in those at risk with NAFLD-associated HCC.

Personalizing Diabetes Management in Liver Transplant Recipients: The New Era for Optimizing Risk Management

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients (LTRs). With concurrent comorbidities and use of various immunosuppression medications, identifying a safe and personalized regimen for management of PTDM is needed. There are many comorbidities associated with the post-transplant course including chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, allograft steatosis, obesity, and de novo malignancy. Emerging data suggest that available diabetes medications may carry beneficial or, in some cases, harmful effects in the setting of these co-existing conditions. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists have shown the most promising beneficial results. Although there is a deficiency of LTR-specific data, they appear to be generally safe. Effects of other medications are varied. Metformin may reduce the risk of malignancy. Pioglitazone may be harmful in patients combatting obesity or heart failure. Insulin may exacerbate obesity and increase the risk of developing malignancy. This review thoroughly discusses the roles of these extra-glycemic effects and safety considerations in LTRs. Through weighing the risks and benefits, we conclude that alternatives to insulin should be strongly considered, when feasible, for personalized long-term management based on risk factors and co-morbidities.

A Comprehensive Review on the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease after Liver Transplantation

Survival rates after liver transplantation have increased dramatically over the past 20 years. Cardiovascular disease is the most common extra-hepatic cause of mortality in the long-term post liver transplant. This is intimately linked with both the higher pre-existing rates of metabolic syndrome in these patients as well as increased propensity to develop de novo metabolic syndrome post-transplant. This unfavorable metabolic profile that contributes to cardiovascular disease is multifactorial and largely preventable. This review explores metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease and their contributory factors post liver transplantation to highlight areas for potential intervention and thus reduce the significant morbidity and mortality of patients due to metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease.

Prevalence of fatty liver disease after liver transplantation and risk factors for recipients and donors

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Fatty liver disease (FLD) may develop in liver transplant recipients. We investigated the recipient and donor risk factors for FLD development after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

A total of 108 liver transplant recipients (54 men [50.0%]; median age, 52 [20-68] years) treated from 2011-2020 was enrolled. Three recipients died at < 3 months as a result of infection or blood flow impairment, and were excluded from the long-term FLD study. On evaluation of 88 prospective living donors, fatty liver was observed in 21. The prevalence and risk factors for FLD and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

After LT, 28 of 105 recipients (26.7%) developed FLD. FLD was more common in patients with a high body mass index (BMI) and dyslipidemia (both p < 0.01), primary nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (p = 0.02), after living-donor LT (p = 0.03) and everolimus (EVL) use (p = 0.08). Factors predictive of FLD included EVL use and a high BMI (hazard ratios = 3.00 and 1.34; p = 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). Sixteen donors lost 6.5 kg (range: 2.0-16.0 kg) of body weight prior to LT. However, there were no cases of primary non-function, which did not affect the FLD prevalence. Development of FLD did not have a negative impact on LT outcome; the 5-year survival rate was 92.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Recipient factors were more important than donor factors for FLD onset after LT.

Management of Diabetes in Candidates for Liver Transplantation and in Transplant Recipients

Diabetes is common in patients waitlisted for liver transplantation because of end-stage liver disease or hepatocellular cancer as well as in posttransplant phase (posttransplantation diabetes mellitus). In both conditions, the presence of diabetes severely affects disease burden and long-term clinical outcomes; careful monitoring and appropriate treatment are pivotal to reduce cardiovascular events and graft and recipients' death. We thoroughly reviewed the epidemiology of diabetes in the transplant setting and the different therapeutic options, from lifestyle intervention to antidiabetic drug use-including the most recent drug classes available-and to the inclusion of bariatric surgery in the treatment cascade. In waitlisted patients, the old paradigm that insulin should be the treatment of choice in the presence of severe liver dysfunction is no longer valid; novel antidiabetic agents may provide adequate glucose control without the risk of hypoglycemia, also offering cardiovascular protection. The same evidence applies to the posttransplant phase, where oral or injectable noninsulin agents should be considered to treat patients to target, limiting the impact of disease on daily living, without interaction with immunosuppressive regimens. The increasing prevalence of liver disease of metabolic origin (nonalcoholic fatty liver) among liver transplant candidates, also having a higher risk of noncirrhotic hepatocellular cancer, is likely to accelerate the acceptance of new drugs and invasive procedures, as suggested by international guidelines. Intensive lifestyle intervention programs remain however mandatory, both before and after transplantation. Achievement of adequate control is mandatory to increase candidacy, to prevent delisting, and to improve long-term outcomes.

De novo and recurrence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease after liver transplantation

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a new acronym adopted from the consensus of international experts. Given the increasing prevalence of MAFLD in pre-transplant settings, de novo and recurrent graft steatosis/MAFLD are common in post-transplant settings. The impact of graft steatosis on long-term outcomes is unclear. The current knowledge of incidence rate, risk factors, diagnosis, long-term outcomes, and management of graft steatosis (both de novo and recurrent) is discussed in this review.

Fatty Liver through the Ages- Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

BACKGROUND

The global epidemic of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus is the main driver of the growing global prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to review the current literature on NAFLD and NASH as it impacts children and adults.

METHODS

We performed a literature search on fatty liver specifically non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) among children and adults.

RESULTS

The prevalence of NAFLD in children ranges from 8%-12% while the prevalence in adults ranges 25%-48%. The prevalence of NASH among children with NAFLD is 23% while it ranges from 13% to 65% in the adults. There are similar risk factors for NAFLD among children and adults. However, in children, the diagnostic tests in the studies of NAFLD are limited to elevation of ALT level or a liver biopsy. In adults, additional diagnostic modalities, including non-invasive tests (NITs), have been used. From the spectrum of NAFLD, those with NASH are predominantly at risk of progressive liver disease to cirrhosis and liver-related mortality. NAFLD is associated with impairment of health-related quality of life and substantial economic burden.

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive burden (clinical, HRQL and economic) of NAFLD is high and increasing.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Current therapeutic options

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease and has an estimated global prevalence of 25%. NAFLD is found in up to 80% of people with obesity and over 60% of patients with diabetes. Cardiovascular disease is the main cause of mortality, followed by extra-hepatic cancers and then liver-specific complications of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Lifestyle modification remains the primary intervention in NAFLD. Weight loss achieved through dietary modification and exercise can lead to histologic improvement and reversal of metabolic complications. Current drug therapy is limited to pioglitazone and vitamin E; however, several agents are currently under phase III development. This review summarises the current treatment options in NAFLD.

Metabolic Complications in Liver Transplantation Recipients: How We Can Optimize Long-Term Survival

Liver transplantation (LT) recipients have experienced a significant improvement in short-term survival during the past 3 decades attributed to advancements in surgical techniques, perioperative management, and effective immunosuppressive regimens. However, long-term survival is affected by a high incidence of metabolic disorders and their consequences, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and malignancies. Pretransplant metabolic impairments especially in those with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis cirrhosis are aggravated by the addition of posttransplant weight gain, physical inactivity, and reversal from catabolic to anabolic state. Moreover, although immunosuppressants are vital to avoid graft rejection, long-term exposure to these medications is implicated in metabolic impairments after LT. In this review, we summarize the molecular pathogenesis of different metabolic disorders after LT, including diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Furthermore, CVD, malignancies, and graft rejections were provided as significant complications of post-LT metabolic conditions threatening both the patient and graft survival. Ultimately, emerging preventive and treatment strategies for posttransplant diabetes mellitus are summarized. This review highlights the significant need for more clinical trials of antihyperglycemic agents in LT recipients. Also, translational studies will help us to better understand the molecular and genetic factors underlying these metabolic complications and could lead to more personalized management in this high-risk population.

Multidirectional facets of obesity management in the metabolic syndrome population after liver transplantation

The obesity pandemic has resulted in an increasing demand for liver transplantation and has significantly altered the profile of liver transplant candidates in addition to affecting posttransplantation outcomes. In this review, we discuss a broad range of clinical approaches that warrant attention to provide comprehensive and patient‐centred medical care to liver transplant recipients, and to be prepared to confront the rapidly changing clinical challenges and ensuing dilemmas. Adipose tissue is a complex and metabolically active organ. Visceral fat deposition is a key predictor of overall obesity‐related morbidity and mortality. Limited pharmacological options are available for the treatment of obesity in the liver transplant population. Bariatric surgery may be an alternative in eligible patients. The rapidly increasing prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global concern; NAFLD affects both pre‐ and posttransplantation outcomes. Numerous studies have investigated pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of NAFLD and some of these have shown promising results. Liver transplant recipients are constantly exposed to numerous factors that result in intestinal microbiota alterations, which were linked to the development of obesity, diabetes type 2, metabolic syndrome (MS), NAFLD, and hepatocellular cancer. Microbiota modifications with probiotics and prebiotics bring gratifying results in the management of metabolic complications. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is successfully performed in many medical indications. However, the safety and efficacy profiles of FMT in immunocompromised patients remain unclear. Obesity together with immunosuppressive treatment, may affect the pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic properties of coadministered medications. Individualized immunosuppressive regimens are recommended following liver transplantation to address possible metabolic concerns. Effective and comprehensive management of metabolic complications is shown to yield multiple beneficial results in the liver transplant population and may bring gratifying results in improving long‐term survival rates.

Management of Patients With Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis Undergoing Liver Transplantation: Considerations for the Anesthesiologist

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) currently affects more than 25% of the world population and is rising. NAFLD can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis that is associated with hepatic inflammation and fibrosis and can result in cirrhosis with subsequent liver failure. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has now emerged as one of the leading etiologies for a liver transplant among adults in the United States. Given the rising incidence of liver transplants in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis, it is essential for anesthesiologists to be familiar with this condition as well as with NASH-related comorbidities and perioperative complications. Not only is NASH linked to metabolic syndrome, but it also is independently associated with cardiovascular disease, renal and thyroid dysfunction, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and a hypercoagulable state. The association with these conditions can affect the perioperative outcome of these patients, particularly because of increased mortality from major adverse cardiovascular events and sepsis. In order to decrease the perioperative morbidity and mortality of patients with NASH undergoing a liver transplant, a multidisciplinary approach to their perioperative management is essential, along with careful preoperative evaluation and aggressive intraoperative and postoperative monitoring. The focus of this review article is to provide a comprehensive overview of challenges associated with liver transplants in patients with NASH and to provide suggestions for appropriate patient selection and perioperative management.

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease after Liver Transplant

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease in the world. The rising prevalence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has led to a 170% increase in NASH cirrhosis as the listing indication for liver transplantation from 2004 to 2013. As of 2018, NASH has overtaken hepatitis C as an indication for liver transplantation in the USA. After liver transplantation, the allograft often develops recurrent NAFLD among patients with known NASH cirrhosis. In addition to recurrent disease, de novo NAFLD has been reported in patients with other indications for liver transplantation. In this review, we will discuss the risk factors associated with recurrent and de novo NAFLD, natural course of the disease, and management strategies after liver transplantation.

Noninvasive markers of liver steatosis and fibrosis after liver transplantation - Where do we stand?

In the last two decades, advances in immunosuppressive regimens have led to fewer complications of acute rejection crisis and consequently improved short-term graft and patient survival. In parallel with this great success, long-term post-transplantation complications have become a focus of interest of doctors engaged in transplant medicine. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its individual components, namely, obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and hypertension, often develop in the post-transplant setting and are associated with immuno-suppressive therapy. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is closely related to MetS and its individual components and is the liver manifestation of MetS. Therefore, it is not surprising that MetS and its individual components are associated with recurrent or "de novo" NAFLD after liver transplantation (LT). Fibrosis of the graft is one of the main determinants of overall morbidity and mortality in the post-LT period. In the assessment of post-LT steatosis and fibrosis, we have biochemical markers, imaging methods and liver biopsy. Because of the significant economic burden of post-LT steatosis and fibrosis and its potential consequences, there is an unmet need for noninvasive methods that are efficient and cost-effective. Biochemical scores can overestimate fibrosis and are not a good method for fibrosis evaluation in liver transplant recipients due to frequent post-LT thrombocytopenia. Transient elastography with controlled attenuation parameter is a promising noninvasive method for steatosis and fibrosis. In this review, we will specifically focus on the evaluation of steatosis and fibrosis in the post-LT setting in the context of de novo or recurrent NAFLD.

Metabolic Consequences of Solid Organ Transplantation

Metabolic complications affect over 50% of solid organ transplant recipients. These include posttransplant diabetes, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, dyslipidemia, and obesity. Preexisting metabolic disease is further exacerbated with immunosuppression and posttransplant weight gain. Patients transition from a state of cachexia induced by end-organ disease to a pro-anabolic state after transplant due to weight gain, sedentary lifestyle, and suboptimal dietary habits in the setting of immunosuppression. Specific immunosuppressants have different metabolic effects, although all the foundation/maintenance immunosuppressants (calcineurin inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors) increase the risk of metabolic disease. In this comprehensive review, we summarize the emerging knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of these different metabolic complications, and the potential genetic contribution (recipient +/- donor) to these conditions. These metabolic complications impact both graft and patient survival, particularly increasing the risk of cardiovascular and cancer-associated mortality. The current evidence for prevention and therapeutic management of posttransplant metabolic conditions is provided while highlighting gaps for future avenues in translational research.

Assessment of Steatosis and Fibrosis in Liver Transplant Recipients Using Controlled Attenuation Parameter and Liver Stiffness Measurements

AIM

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of increased controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurements (LSM) as surrogate markers of liver steatosis and fibrosis in liver transplant recipient (LTR). Secondary objectives were to determine the predictors of increased CAP and LSM in population of LTR.

METHODS

In this prospective, cross-sectional study, we have evaluated 175 LTRs' mean age as 61 (53-65) with a functioning graft for more than one year who came for regular outpatient examinations to the Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital (UH) Merkur, Zagreb, Croatia.

RESULTS

Of 175 analyzed LTRs, 34.28% had obesity, 64.00% had hypertension, 38.28% had diabetes, and 58.85% had hyperlipidemia. The prevalence of liver steatosis was 68.57%, while the prevalence of severe liver steatosis was 46.85%. On multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with liver steatosis were male gender, total cholesterol as positive predictor, and HDL as negative predictor, and independent factors positively associated with severe liver steatosis were higher body mass index (BMI) and higher triglyceride levels. The prevalence of moderate liver fibrosis was 54.85%, while the prevalence of advanced liver fibrosis was 24%. On multivariate analysis, independent factors positively associated with moderate fibrosis were gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and CAP, while the independent factor positively associated with advanced fibrosis was GGT.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed high prevalence of increased CAP and LSM measurements as surrogate markers of liver steatosis and fibrosis. Metabolic syndrome components were highly present and were associated with CAP and LSM values as well as in the pretransplant setting. Due to high prevalence of metabolic comorbidities and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in LTRs and the lack of the abnormal liver test in a significant number of these patients, TE with CAP may be a reasonable initial assessment for LTRs with one or more components of the metabolic syndrome.

Clinical and Genetic Risk Factors of Recurrent Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease After Liver Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been increasingly reported among recipients of liver transplantation (LT). We aimed to identify clinical and genetic risk factors responsible for the development of early recurrent NAFLD in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis transplant recipients.

METHODS

Forty-six total single nucleotide polymorphisms with known association with NAFLD were tested among both recipient and donor liver samples in 66 LT recipients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis to characterize influences on NAFLD recurrence at ∼1 year post-LT (median interval from LT to biopsy: 377 days).

RESULTS

Recurrent NAFLD was identified in 43 (65.2%) patients, 20 (30.3%) with mild recurrence, and 23 (34.8%) with moderate to severe NAFLD. On adjusted analysis, change in the body mass index (BMI) (ΔBMI) was significantly associated with NAFLD recurrence, whereas post-LT diabetes mellitus was associated with increased severity of NAFLD recurrence. ADIPOR1 rs10920533 in the recipient was associated with increased risk of moderate to severe NAFLD recurrence, whereas the minor allele of SOD2 rs4880 in the recipient was associated with reduced risk. Similar reduced risk was noted in the presence of donor SOD2 rs4880 and HSD17B13 rs6834314 polymorphism.

DISCUSSION

Increased BMI post-LT is strongly associated with NAFLD recurrence, whereas post-LT diabetes mellitus was associated with increased severity of NAFLD recurrence. Both donor and recipient SOD2 rs4880 and donor HSD17B13 rs6834314 single nucleotide polymorphisms may be associated with reduced risk of early NAFLD recurrence, whereas presence of the minor allele form of ADIPOR1 rs10920533 in the recipient is associated with increased severity NAFLD recurrence.

Obesity Management of Liver Transplant Waitlist Candidates and Recipients

Obesity is increasing in prevalence in liver transplant candidates and recipients. The rise in liver transplantation for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis reflects this increase. Management of obesity in liver transplant candidates can be challenging due to the presence of decompensated cirrhosis and sarcopenia. Obesity may increase peritransplant morbidity but does not have an impact on long-term post-transplant survival. Bariatric surgery may be a feasible option in select patients before, during, or after liver transplantation. Use of weight loss drugs and/or endoscopic therapies for obesity management ultimately may play a role in liver transplant patients, but more research is needed to determine safety.

Long-term Management of the Adult Liver Transplantation Recipients

The survival of liver transplantation (LT) recipients has been improved remarkably in short-term. The major causes of mortality in long-term include nonimmunological causes such as cardiovascular, de novo malignancy, chronic kidney disease, and recurrence of primary disease. Rejection-related mortality is rare in the long-term after LT. We discuss nonrejection causes of long-term morbidity/mortality, risk factors, and management strategies in LT recipients. In addition, we discuss osteoporosis, contraception, and pregnancy in LT recipients.

Metabolic associated fatty liver disease: Addressing a new era in liver transplantation

Metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), previously termed non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, is the leading global cause of liver disease and is fast becoming the most common indication for liver transplantation. The recent change in nomenclature to MAFLD refocuses the conceptualisation of this disease entity to its metabolic underpinnings and may help to spur a paradigm shift in the approach to its management, including in the setting of liver transplantation. Patients with MAFLD present significant challenges in the pre-, peri- and post-transplant settings, largely due to the presence of medical comorbidities that include obesity, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk factors. As the community prevalence of MAFLD increases concurrently with the obesity epidemic, donor liver steatosis is also a current and future concern. This review outlines current epidemiology, nomenclature, management issues and outcomes of liver transplantation in patients with MAFLD.

NAFLD and liver transplantation: Disease burden, current management and future challenges

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), specifically its progressive form non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), represents the fastest growing indication for liver transplantation in Western countries. Diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity and cardiovascular disease are frequently present in patients with NAFLD who are candidates for liver transplantation. These factors require specific evaluation, including a detailed pre-surgical risk stratification, in order to improve outcomes after liver transplantation. Moreover, in the post-transplantation setting, the incidence of cardiovascular events and metabolic complications can be amplified by immunosuppressive therapy, which is a well-known driver of metabolic alterations. Indeed, patients with NASH are more prone to developing early post-transplant complications and, in the long-term, de novo malignancy and cardiovascular events, corresponding to higher mortality rates. Therefore, a tailored multidisciplinary approach is required for these patients, both before and after liver transplantation. Appropriate candidate selection, lifestyle modifications and specific assessment in the pre-transplant setting, as well as pharmacological strategies, adjustment of immunosuppression and a healthy lifestyle in the post-transplant setting, play a key role in correct management.

Changing trends of liver transplantation and mortality from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

The rising tide of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) associated with the obesity epidemic is a major international health concern. NAFLD is the leading global cause of liver disease with an estimated prevalence of 25% and is the fastest growing indication for liver transplantation (LT). The presence and severity of liver fibrosis is the only histologic predictor of clinical outcomes in this group. NAFLD poses several challenges in the peri-transplant setting including the management of multiple metabolic co-morbidities, post-transplant obesity and cardiovascular risk. However, post-LT outcomes in well-selected NAFLD patients appear similar to non-NAFLD indications, including in the setting of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The rising prevalence of NAFLD may impact potential liver graft donors, which may in-turn adversely affect post-LT outcomes. This review outlines the current epidemiology, natural history and outcomes of NAFLD with a focus on pre- and post-liver transplant settings.

Donor PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 Variant Alleles Confer Additive Risks for Graft Steatosis After Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The rs58542926 polymorphism in transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2) is a genetic factor predisposing to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. We aimed to explore the effect of recipient and donor TM6SF2 rs58542926 genotypes on liver graft fat content after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Steatosis was evaluated in liver biopsies from 268 adult recipients. The influence of recipient and donor TM6SF2 genotypes, patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing 3 (PNPLA3) rs738409 genotypes, and nongenetic factors on the steatosis grade assessed 6-30 months after transplantation was analyzed by ordinal logistic regression.

RESULTS

The presence of the TM6SF2 c.499A allele in the donor (P = 0.014), PNPLA3 c.444G allele in the donor (P < 0.001), posttransplant body mass index (P < 0.001), and serum triglycerides (P = 0.047) independently predicted increased liver fat content on multivariable analysis, whereas noncirrhotic liver disease, as an indication for liver transplantation, was associated with lower risk of steatosis (P = 0.003). The effects of the donor TM6SF2 A and PNPLA3 G alleles were additive, with an odds ratio of 4.90 (95% confidence interval, 2.01-13.00; P < 0.001), when both minor alleles were present compared with an odds ratio of 2.22 (95% confidence interval, 1.42-3.61; P = 0.002) when only one of these alleles was present.

CONCLUSIONS

The donor TM6SF2 c.499A allele is an independent risk factor of liver graft steatosis after liver transplantation that is additive to the effects of donor PNPLA3 c.444G allele.

De novo and recurrent liver disease

Decompensated cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) are the most common indications for liver transplantation (LT). AILD include autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). NASH and AILD share some peculiarities as they can recur in the new graft, compromising the quality of life, and graft and patient survival. De novo NASH or AIH connotes the development of these liver diseases in patients transplanted for other indications. The diagnosis of recurrent or de novo liver disease usually requires a liver biopsy aside from recurrent PSC, which can be diagnosed with compatible imaging studies and exclusion of other causes of biliary strictures. The treatment of recurrent NASH is lifestyle modifications aiming for weight loss. Recurrent and de novo AIH is usually treated with corticosteroids with or without azathioprine. Recurrent PBC should be treated with ursodeoxycholic acid. There are no proven treatment options for recurrent PSC. Patients with graft failure should be considered for repeat LT. Future investigations should use standardized diagnostic criteria for each disease, seek diagnostic biomarkers, and evaluate treatments that improve outcomes.

Pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and implications on cardiovascular outcomes in liver transplantation

Along with the obesity epidemic there has been a major increase in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) prevalence, paralleling a steady increase in cirrhosis of the liver and hepatocellular cancer (HCC) related to NAFLD. Currently, NAFLD (related HCC and cirrhosis) is the second most common cause for liver transplantation (LT) and it is projected to take the top spot in the next 3-5 years. Patients with NAFLD cirrhosis and HCC have a unique set of comorbidities which potentially increases their risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. However, a review of the published data in NAFLD patients who undergo LT, does not paint a clear picture. While CVD is the most common cause of non-graft related mortality over the long-term, the short and intermediate-term survival post LT in NAFLD cirrhosis appears to be on par with other etiologies when age and comorbidities are factored. The cardiovascular complications are increased in the immediate post-transplant period but there is a shift from ischemic complications to arrhythmias and heart failure (HF). NAFLD recurs in 80-100% patients and occurs de novo in about 50% after LT, potentially impacting their long-term morbidity and mortality. This review summarizes the available data on CVD in NAFLD patients before and after LT, explains what is currently known about the epidemiology and pathogenesis of CVD in NAFLD and posits strategies to improve wait-list and post-transplant survival.