Pharmacokinetic Study of Conversion Between 2 Formulations of Once-daily Extended-release Tacrolimus in Stable Lung Transplant Patients

Comparative Study of 2 Extended-Release Tacrolimus Formulations in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

During the 1900s, tacrolimus became the mainstay immunosuppressive agent to prevent rejection after kidney transplant. Subsequently, an extended-release tacrolimus (ER-Tac) formulation was developed to improve adherence, and its generic version has been marketed over the last years. This study examines the differences in efficacy and safety between the generic ER-Tac (Conferoport) and the reference brand-name drug (Advagraf).

METHODS

Prospective, randomized and parallel single-center study (May 2020 to June 2021) with 52 kidney transplant recipients who were randomly assigned to 1 of the following groups: study group (Conferoport, n = 31) and control group (Advagraf, n = 21). The variables of interest were collected and analyzed to compare tacrolimus efficacy and safety between them. Demographic characteristics of the patients and clinical donor data were homogeneous in both groups (P > .05).

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found among treatments regarding dosage used, levels, creatinine, and proteinuria (P > .05), with these variables presenting a downward trend during follow-up and, consequently, the improvement of graft function. Analyses also revealed the absence of differences concerning the incidence of acute rejection and intrapatient variability (coefficient of variation) throughout the first year of evolution between both formulations (P > .05). A total of 5 graft losses occurred, 2 resulting from patient death.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, we found no significant differences between the measured parameters in relation to the efficacy and safety profile of both drugs, with generic ER-Tac being an alternative comparable with the reference brand-name ER-Tac.

Chronic kidney disease after lung transplantation in a changing era

Lung transplant (LTx) physicians are responsible for highly complex post-LTx care, including monitoring of kidney function and responding to kidney function loss. Better survival of the LTx population and changing patient characteristics, including older age and increased comorbidity, result in growing numbers of LTx patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). CKD after LTx is correlated with worse survival, decreased quality of life and high costs. Challenges lie in different aspects of post-LTx renal care. First, serum creatinine form the basis for estimating renal function, under the assumption that patients have stable muscle mass. Low or changes in muscle mass is frequent in the LTx population and may lead to misclassification of CKD. Second, standardizing post-LTx monitoring of kidney function and renal care might contribute to slow down CKD progression. Third, new treatment options for CKD risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus, proteinuria and heart failure, have entered clinical practice. These new treatments have not been studied in LTx yet but are of interest for future use. In this review we will address the difficult aspects of post-LTx renal care and evaluate new and promising future approaches to slow down CKD progression.