1
|
de la Plaza Llamas R, Ortega Azor L, Hernández Yuste M, Gorini L, Latorre-Fragua RA, Díaz Candelas DA, Al Shwely Abduljabar F, Gemio del Rey IA. Quality-adjusted life years and surgical waiting list: Systematic review of the literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1155-1164. [PMID: 38690041 PMCID: PMC11056653 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality-adjusted life year (QALY) is a metric that is increasingly used today in the field of health economics to evaluate the value of different medical treatments and procedures. Surgical waiting lists (SWLs) represent a pressing problem in public healthcare. The QALY measure has rarely been used in the context of surgery. It would be interesting to know how many QALYs are lost by patients on SWLs. AIM To investigate the relationship between QALYs and SWLs in a systematic review of the scientific literature. METHODS The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. An unlimited search was carried out in PubMed, updated on January 19, 2024. Data on the following variables were investigated and analyzed: Specialty, country of study, procedure under study, scale used to measure QALYs, the use of a theoretical or real-life model, objectives of the study and items measured, the economic value assigned to the QALY in the country in question, and the results and conclusions published. RESULTS Forty-eight articles were selected for the study. No data were found regarding QALYs lost on SWLs. The specialties in which QALYs were studied the most in relation to the waiting list were urology and general surgery, with 15 articles each. The country in which the most studies of QALYs were carried out was the United States (n = 21), followed by the United Kingdom (n = 9) and Canada (n = 7). The most studied procedure was organ transplantation (n = 39), including 15 kidney, 14 liver, 5 heart, 4 lung, and 1 intestinal. Arthroplasty (n = 4), cataract surgery (n = 2), bariatric surgery (n = 1), mosaicplasty (n = 1), and septoplasty (n = 1) completed the surgical interventions included. Thirty-nine of the models used were theoretical (the most frequently applied being the Markov model, n = 34), and nine were real-life. The survey used to measure quality of life in 11 articles was the European Quality of Life-5 dimensions, but in 32 articles the survey was not specified. The willingness-to-pay per QALY gained ranged from $100000 in the United States to €20000 in Spain. CONCLUSION The relationship between QALYs and SWLs has only rarely been studied in the literature. The rate of QALYs lost on SWLs has not been determined. Future research is warranted to address this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto de la Plaza Llamas
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 19002, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lorena Ortega Azor
- Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marina Hernández Yuste
- Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ludovica Gorini
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 19002, Spain
| | - Raquel Aránzazu Latorre-Fragua
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 19002, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Farah Al Shwely Abduljabar
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 19002, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Antonio Gemio del Rey
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 19002, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ekser B, Goggins WC. Delayed kidney transplantation in combined liver-kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2021; 26:153-159. [PMID: 33595980 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the impact of delayed kidney transplantation approach in combined (simultaneous) liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT). RECENT FINDINGS CLKT offers a life-saving procedure for patients with both end-stage liver disease and chronic kidney disease or prolonged acute kidney injury. It is the most common multiorgan transplant procedure in the US accounting for 9-10% of all liver transplants performed. The number of CLKT has also been increasing in other countries with a better understanding of hepato-renal syndrome. US is the only country which implemented a national allocation policy for CLKT in 2017. Due to the different physiological needs of liver and kidney allografts immediately after transplantation, delayed kidney transplantation approach in CLKT has been introduced for the first time by the Indiana Group, naming it as 'the Indiana Approach'. Over the years, many other groups in the US and in Europe published better outcomes in CLKT using the delayed kidney transplantation approach with the support of hypothermic machine perfusion. SUMMARY Several groups have shown that delayed kidney transplantation in CLKT is a safe procedure with better outcomes in graft(s) and patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burcin Ekser
- Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Croome KP, Taner CB. Expanding Role of Donation After Circulatory Death Donors in Liver Transplantation. Clin Liver Dis 2021; 25:73-88. [PMID: 33978584 DOI: 10.1016/j.cld.2020.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Better understanding of how to utilize donation after circulatory death (DCD) liver grafts has resulted in improved national outcomes and expansion in the number of DCD liver transplants (LTs). This improvement has been driven by better donor and recipient matching, careful evaluation of hemodynamics during withdrawal of life support, and refinement of the procurement operation. Changes to liver allocation likely will result in increased utilization of DCD liver grafts. Ischemic cholangiopathy remains the Achilles heel of DCD LTs and, although rates have fallen with improved protocols, a certain rate likely is unavoidable. This review discusses contemporary issues with DCD LTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristopher P Croome
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
| | - C Burcin Taner
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foley DP. Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation Using Organs from Donation After Circulatory Death Donors in the Contemporary Era: We Are Getting Better! Liver Transpl 2020; 26:327-329. [PMID: 31991518 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David P Foley
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Croome KP, Mao S, Yang L, Pungpapong S, Wadei HM, Taner CB. Improved National Results With Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation Using Donation After Circulatory Death Donors. Liver Transpl 2020; 26:397-407. [PMID: 31599050 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Previous large registry studies have demonstrated inferior outcomes for simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) recipients of grafts from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors compared with those from donation after brain death (DBD) donors in the era from 2000 to 2010. Given the improving national results in liver transplantation alone using grafts from DCD donors, the present study aimed to investigate if results with DCD-SLKT have improved in the modern era. Patients undergoing SLKT between 2000 and 2018 were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Analysis and Research file and divided into 2 eras based on the date of SLKT: era 1 (2000-2010) and era 2 (2011-2018). Improvement in DCD-SLKT patient, liver graft, and kidney graft survival rates was seen between era 1 and era 2 (P < 0.001). Concurrently, there was a decrease in the proportion of critically ill (P = 0.02) and retransplant (P = 0.006) candidates undergoing DCD-SLKT. When DCD-SLKT in era 2 was compared with a propensity-matched cohort of DBD-SLKT in era 2, no differences in patient (P = 0.99), liver graft (P = 0.19), or kidney graft (P = 0.90) survival were observed. In addition, both bilirubin (0.5 versus 0.5 mg/dL; P = 0.86) and creatinine (1.2 versus 1.2 mg/dL; P = 0.68) at last follow-up were not different between the DCD-SLKT and DBD-SLKT patients in era 2. In conclusion, in the most recent era, patients undergoing DCD-SLKT were able to achieve similar outcomes compared with matched patients undergoing DBD-SLKT. DCD-SLKT represents a viable option for appropriately selected recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shennen Mao
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Liu Yang
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | | | - Hani M Wadei
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - C Burcin Taner
- Department of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ekser B, Contreras AG, Andraus W, Taner T. Current status of combined liver-kidney transplantation. Int J Surg 2020; 82S:149-154. [PMID: 32084547 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Combined liver-kidney transplantation is a life-saving procedure for patients with end-stage liver disease and underlying chronic kidney disease, or prolonged acute kidney injury. Due to physiologic changes secondary to portal hypertension in patients with end-stage liver disease, kidney injury is common, and combined liver-kidney transplantation accounts for 10% of all the liver transplants performed in the United States. Recently implemented policy in the United States standardizes the medical criteria for eligibility, and introduces a 'safety net' for those who are transplanted with a liver graft alone, in order to be able to receive a kidney graft later. Increasing number of combined liver-kidney transplants provides a large cohort of patients to be studied in detail for identification of factors (both donor and recipient-related) associated with better outcomes. Data regarding the safety and efficacy of delaying the kidney transplant part of the combined liver-kidney transplantation, and the immunologic benefits of the multi-organ transplantations including the liver are emerging. Here, we review the most recent analyses, and provide our opinion regarding the best practices in combined liver-kidney transplantation based on the evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burcin Ekser
- Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| | - Alan G Contreras
- Department of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Tlalpan, Mexico.
| | - Wellington Andraus
- Digestive Organs Transplant Division, Gastroenterology Department, Sao Paulo University School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Timucin Taner
- William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hobeika MJ, Menser T, Nguyen DT, Beal LL, Zajac S, Graviss EA. United States donation after circulatory death liver transplantation is driven by a few high-utilization transplant centers. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:320-321. [PMID: 31566876 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J Hobeika
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas.,Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Terri Menser
- Center for Outcomes Research and Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas.,Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Duc T Nguyen
- Department of Pathology & Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas
| | - Lauren L Beal
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephanie Zajac
- Houston Methodist Institute for Technology, Innovation & Education, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas
| | - Edward A Graviss
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas.,Department of Pathology & Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|