1
|
Schmid-Mohler G, Beckmann S, Zala P, Huber L, Held U, Fehr T, Wüthrich RP, Petry H, Mueller TF. First Testing of Literature-Based Models for Predicting Increase in Body Weight and Adipose Tissue Mass After Kidney Transplantation. Prog Transplant 2022; 32:300-308. [PMID: 36053125 PMCID: PMC9660270 DOI: 10.1177/15269248221122961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Weight gain is a risk factor for poor clinical outcomes following kidney transplantation. Research Question: This study's aim was a first testing of 2 models to identify patients early after kidney transplantation who are at risk for weight gain and increase in adipose tissue mass in the first year after kidney transplantation. Design: The literature-based models were evaluated on longitudinal data of 88, respectively 79 kidney transplant recipients via ordinary and Firth regression, using gains ≥ 5% in weight and adipose tissue mass respectively as primary and secondary endpoints. Results: The models included physical activity, smoking cessation at time of kidney transplantation, self-reported health status, depressive symptomatology, gender, age, education, baseline body mass index and baseline trunk fat as predictors. Area under the curve was 0.797 (95%-CI 0.702 to 0.893) for the weight model and 0.767 (95%-CI 0.656 to 0.878) for the adipose tissue mass model-showing good, respectively fair discriminative ability. For weight gain ≥ 5%, main risk factors were smoking cessation at time of transplantation (OR 16.425, 95%-CI 1.737-155.288) and better self-reported baseline health state (OR 1.068 for each 1-unit increase, 95%-CI 1.012-1.128). For the adipose tissue mass gain ≥ 5%, main risk factor was overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25) at baseline (odds ratio 7.659, 95%-CI 1.789-32.789). Conclusions: The models have potential to assess patients' risk for weight or adipose tissue mass gain during the year after transplantation, but further testing is needed before implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Schmid-Mohler
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Gabriela Schmid-Mohler, PhD, RN, Center of
Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, CH-8091,
Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Sonja Beckmann
- Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrizia Zala
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Laura Huber
- Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike Held
- Department of Biostatistics at Epidemiology, Biostatistics and
Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Fehr
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Department of Internal Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Chur,
Switzerland
| | | | - Heidi Petry
- Center of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas F. Mueller
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ehrsam JP, Schuurmans MM, Laager M, Opitz I, Inci I. Recipient Comorbidities for Prediction of Primary Graft Dysfunction, Chronic Allograft Dysfunction and Survival After Lung Transplantation. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10451. [PMID: 35845547 PMCID: PMC9276940 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Since candidates with comorbidities are increasingly referred for lung transplantation, knowledge about comorbidities and their cumulative effect on outcomes is scarce. We retrospectively collected pretransplant comorbidities of all 513 adult recipients transplanted at our center between 1992–2019. Multiple logistic- and Cox regression models, adjusted for donor-, pre- and peri-operative variables, were used to detect independent risk factors for primary graft dysfunction grade-3 at 72 h (PGD3-T72), onset of chronic allograft dysfunction grade-3 (CLAD-3) and survival. An increasing comorbidity burden measured by Charleston-Deyo-Index was a multivariable risk for survival and PGD3-T72, but not for CLAD-3. Among comorbidities, congestive right heart failure or a mean pulmonary artery pressure >25 mmHg were independent risk factors for PGD3-T72 and survival, and a borderline risk for CLAD-3. Left heart failure, chronic atrial fibrillation, arterial hypertension, moderate liver disease, peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux, diabetes with end organ damage, moderate to severe renal disease, osteoporosis, and diverticulosis were also independent risk factors for survival. For PGD3-T72, a BMI>30 kg/m2 was an additional independent risk. Epilepsy and a smoking history of the recipient of >20packyears are additional independent risk factors for CLAD-3. The comorbidity profile should therefore be closely considered for further clinical decision making in candidate selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Peter Ehrsam
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Macé M. Schuurmans
- Division of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mirjam Laager
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ilhan Inci
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Ilhan Inci,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Christon LM, Smith PJ. Psychosocial Evaluation for Lung Transplantation: an Empirically Informed Update. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-022-00360-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
4
|
Bailey P, Vergis N, Allison M, Riddell A, Massey E. Psychosocial Evaluation of Candidates for Solid Organ Transplantation. Transplantation 2021; 105:e292-e302. [PMID: 33675318 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Transplant candidates should undergo an assessment of their mental health, social support, lifestyle, and behaviors. The primary aims of this "psychosocial evaluation" are to ensure that transplantation is of benefit to life expectancy and quality of life, and to allow optimization of the candidate and transplant outcomes. The content of psychosocial evaluations is informed by evidence regarding pretransplant psychosocial predictors of transplant outcomes. This review summarizes the current literature on pretransplant psychosocial predictors of transplant outcomes across differing solid organ transplants and discusses the limitations of existing research. Pretransplant depression, substance misuse, and nonadherence are associated with poorer posttransplant outcomes. Depression, smoking, and high levels of prescription opioid use are associated with reduced posttransplant survival. Pretransplant nonadherence is associated with posttransplant rejection, and nonadherence may mediate the effects of other psychosocial variables such as substance misuse. There is evidence to suggest that social support is associated with likelihood of substance misuse relapse after transplantation, but there is a lack of consistent evidence for an association between social support and posttransplant adherence, rejection, or survival across all organ transplant types. Psychosocial evaluations should be undertaken by a trained individual and should comprise multiple consultations with the transplant candidate, family members, and healthcare professionals. Tools exist that can be useful for guiding and standardizing assessment, but research is needed to determine how well scores predict posttransplant outcomes. Few studies have evaluated interventions designed to improve psychosocial functioning specifically pretransplant. We highlight the challenges of carrying out such research and make recommendations regarding future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pippa Bailey
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
- Renal and Transplant Service, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Nikhil Vergis
- Liver Services Department, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Metabolism Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Michael Allison
- Cambridge Liver Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amy Riddell
- Renal and Transplant Service, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Emma Massey
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Over the past two decades, lung transplant has become the mainstay of treatment for several end-stage lung diseases. As the field continues to evolve, the criteria for referral and listing have also changed. The last update to these guidelines was in 2014 and several studies since then have changed how patients are transplanted. Our article aims to briefly discuss these updates in lung transplantation. RECENT FINDINGS This article discusses the importance of early referral of patients for lung transplantation and the concept of the 'transplant window'. We review the referral and listing criteria for some common pulmonary diseases and also cite the updated literature surrounding the absolute and relative contraindications keeping in mind that they are a constantly moving target. Frailty and psychosocial barriers are difficult to assess with the current assessment tools but continue to impact posttransplant outcomes. Finally, we discuss the limited data on transplantation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID19 as well as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge to transplantation. SUMMARY The findings discussed in this article will strongly impact, if not already, how we select candidates for lung transplantation. It also addresses some aspects of lung transplant such as frailty and ARDS, which need better assessment tools and clinical data.
Collapse
|
6
|
Greer M, Welte T. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Transplantation. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 41:862-873. [PMID: 32726838 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1714250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Lung transplantation (LTx) has been a viable option for patients with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with more than 20,000 procedures performed worldwide. Survival after LTx lags behind most other forms of solid-organ transplantation, with median survival for COPD recipients being a sobering 6.0 years. Given the limited supply of suitable donor organs, not all patients with end-stage COPD are candidates for LTx. We discuss appropriate criteria for accepting patients for LTx, as well as contraindications and exclusionary criteria. In the first year post-LTx, infection and graft failure are the leading causes of death. Beyond this chronic graft rejection-currently referred to as chronic lung allograft dysfunction-represents the leading cause of death at all time points, with infection and over time malignancy also limiting survival. Referral of COPD patients to a lung transplant center should be considered in the presence of progressing disease despite maximal medical therapy. As a rule of thumb, a forced expiratory volume in 1 second < 25% predicted in the absence of exacerbation, hypoxia (PaO2 < 60 mm Hg/8 kPa), and/or hypercapnia (PaCO2 > 50 mm Hg/6.6 kPa) and satisfactory general clinical condition should be considered the basic prerequisites for timely referral. We also discuss salient issues post-LTx and factors that impact posttransplant survival and morbidity such as infections, malignancy, renal insufficiency, and complications associated with long-term immunosuppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Greer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Biomedical Research in End-Stage and Obstructive Lung Disease (BREATH), German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany
| | - Tobias Welte
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Biomedical Research in End-Stage and Obstructive Lung Disease (BREATH), German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Veit T, Munker D, Leuschner G, Mümmler C, Sisic A, Kauke T, Schneider C, Irlbeck M, Michel S, Eser-Valerie D, Huber M, Barton J, Milger K, Meiser B, Behr J, Kneidinger N. High prevalence of falsely declaring nicotine abstinence in lung transplant candidates. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0234808. [PMID: 32555678 PMCID: PMC7302701 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Tobacco use after lung transplantation is associated with adverse outcome. Therefore, active smoking is regarded as a contraindication for lung transplantation and should be excluded prior to placement on the waiting list. The aim of the study was to compare self-reporting with a systematic cotinine based screening approach to identify patients with active nicotine abuse. Nicotine use was systematically assessed by interviews and cotinine test in all lung transplant candidates at every visit in our center. Patients were classified according to the stage prior to transplantation and cotinine test results were compared to self-reports and retrospectively analyzed until June 2019. Of 620 lung transplant candidates, 92 patients (14.8%) had at least one positive cotinine test. COPD as underlying disease (OR 2.102, CI 1.110–3.981; p = 0.023), number of pack years (OR 1.014, CI 1.000–1.028; p = 0.047) and a time of cessation less than one year (OR 2.413, CI 1.410–4.128; p = 0.001) were associated with a positive cotinine test in multivariable regression analysis. The majority of non-COPD patients (n = 13, 72.2%) with a positive test had a cessation time of less than one year. 78 patients (84.7%) falsely declared not consuming any nicotine-based products prior to the test. Finally, all never smokers were test negative. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that active nicotine use is prevalent in transplant candidates with a high prevalence of falsely declaring nicotine abstinence. COPD was the main diagnosis in affected patients. Short cessation time and a high number of pack years are risk factors for continued nicotine abuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Veit
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Comprehensive Pneumology Center(CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Dieter Munker
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Comprehensive Pneumology Center(CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Gabriela Leuschner
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Comprehensive Pneumology Center(CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carlo Mümmler
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Comprehensive Pneumology Center(CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alma Sisic
- Transplant Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Teresa Kauke
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Michael Irlbeck
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Munich, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Michel
- Clinic of Cardiac Surgery, University of Munich, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniela Eser-Valerie
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Munich, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Huber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Munich, LMU, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Barton
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Comprehensive Pneumology Center(CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katrin Milger
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Comprehensive Pneumology Center(CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bruno Meiser
- Transplant Center, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Behr
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Comprehensive Pneumology Center(CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikolaus Kneidinger
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Comprehensive Pneumology Center(CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|