HLA Alloimmunization Following Ventricular Assist Device Support Across the Age Spectrum

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

BSHI and BTS UK guideline on the detection of alloantibodies in solid organ (and islet) transplantation

Solid organ transplantation represents the best (and in many cases only) treatment option for patients with end-stage organ failure. The effectiveness and functioning life of these transplants has improved each decade due to surgical and clinical advances, and accurate histocompatibility assessment. Patient exposure to alloantigen from another individual is a common occurrence and takes place through pregnancies, blood transfusions or previous transplantation. Such exposure to alloantigen's can lead to the formation of circulating alloreactive antibodies which can be deleterious to solid organ transplant outcome. The purpose of these guidelines is to update to the previous BSHI/BTS guidelines 2016 on the relevance, assessment, and management of alloantibodies within solid organ transplantation.

Prospective examination of HLA sensitization after VAD implantation in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have improved survival to heart transplantation (HTx). However, VADs have been associated with development of antibodies against human leukocyte antigen (HLA-Ab) which may limit the donor pool and decrease survival post-HTx. Since HLA-Ab development after VAD insertion is poorly understood, the purpose of this prospective single-center study was to quantify the incidence of and evaluate risk factors for HLA-Ab development across the age spectrum following VAD implantation.

METHODS

Adult and pediatric patients undergoing VAD placement as bridge to transplant or transplant candidacy between 5/2016 and 7/2020 were enrolled. HLA-Ab were assessed pre-VAD and at 1-, 3-, and 12-months post-implant. Factors associated with HLA-Ab development post-VAD implant were explored using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

15/41 (37%) adults and 7/17 (41%) children developed new HLA-Ab post-VAD. The majority of patients (19/22) developed HLA-Ab within two months of implant. New class I HLA-Ab were more common (87% adult, 86% pediatric). Prior pregnancy was strongly associated with HLA-Ab development in adults post-VAD (HR 16.7, 95% CI 1.8-158, p = 0.01). Of the patients who developed new HLA-Ab post-VAD, in 45% (10/22) the HLA-Ab resolved while in 55% (12/22) the HLA-Ab persisted.

CONCLUSION

More than one-third of adult and pediatric VAD patients developed new HLA-Ab early after VAD implant with the majority having class I antibodies. Prior pregnancy was strongly associated with post-VAD HLA-Ab development. Further studies are needed to predict regression or persistence of HLA-Ab developed post-VAD, to understand modulation of individuals' immune responses to sensitizing events, and to determine whether transiently detected HLA-Ab post-VAD recur and have long-term clinical impact post-heart transplantation.

Heart transplantation across preformed donor-specific antibody barriers using a perioperative desensitization protocol

Heart transplantation across preformed donor-specific HLA-antibody barriers is associated with impaired short- and long-term survival. Therefore, in recipients with preformed anti-HLA antibodies, waiting for crossmatch-negative donors is standard practice. As an alternative strategy, recipients with preformed anti-HLA donor specific antibodies have been managed at our institutions with a perioperative desensitization regimen. A retrospective analysis was performed comparing heart transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific HLA-antibodies to recipients without donor-specific antibodies. Recipients with a positive virtual crossmatch received a perioperative desensitization protocol including tocilizumab intraoperatively, plasma exchange and rituximab followed by a six-month course of IgGAM. Among the 117 heart-transplanted patients, 19 (16%) patients underwent perioperative desensitization, and the remaining 98 (84%) patients did not. Cold ischemic time, posttransplant extracorporeal life support for primary graft dysfunction, and intensive care unit stay time did not differ between groups. At 1-year follow-up, freedom from pulsed steroid therapy for presumed rejection and biopsy-confirmed acute cellular or humoral rejection did not differ between groups. One-year survival amounted to 94.7% in the treated patients and 81.4% in the control group. Therefore, heart transplantation in sensitized recipients undergoing a perioperative desensitization appears safe with comparable postoperative outcomes as patients with a negative crossmatch.

Human Leukocyte Antigen Antibody Sampling in Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: Are We Talking?

BACKGROUND

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) are commonly used as a bridge to transplantation but may yield HLA sensitization. We evaluated the prevalence of HLA antibody (Ab) sampling pre- and post-VAD placement in pediatric and adult patients and notification of VAD status to the HLA laboratory.

METHODS

All pediatric and adult patients who received a first-time VAD between 2005 and 2013 were included in this single-center retrospective review. Data were collected from the University of Alberta Hospital histocompatibility laboratory's information system and a local VAD database.

RESULTS

In total, 106 patients were included (40 pediatric, median 3.0 years [interquartile range, 0.3-10.7]; 66 adult, 55.0 years [46.8-61.2]). HLA Ab sampling within 1-month pre-VAD occurred in 70% of pediatric and 79% of adult recipients (P = .215). Testing within 1 month of VAD placement occurred in 89% of pediatric and 67% of adult recipients (P = .012). For those with HLA Ab sampling within 30 days postimplant, notification to the HLA laboratory of VAD status occurred in 19 of 27 (70%) pediatric and 24 of 33 (73%) adult patients (P = .533). Of patients transplanted post VAD with HLA Ab samples collected, 12 of 28 (43%) and 13 of 38 (34%) adult recipients did not have notification of VAD status to the HLA laboratory (P = .322).

CONCLUSIONS

There were inconsistencies in HLA Ab sampling and communication to the HLA laboratory surrounding VAD placement. Standardization of both HLA Ab assessment frequency after VAD implantation and communication regarding changes in clinical status and the occurrence of key sensitizing events such as VAD placement are imperative as patients await transplantation.