|
1
|
Ruiz P, Valdivieso A, Palomares I, Prieto M, Ventoso A, Salvador P, Senosiain M, Fernandez JR, Testillano M, Bustamante FJ, Gastaca M. Similar Results in Liver Transplantation From Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death Donors With Normothermic Regional Perfusion and Donation After Brain Death Donors: A Case-Matched Single-Center Study. Liver Transpl 2021; 27:1747-1757. [PMID: 34455694 DOI: 10.1002/lt.26281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Although good results have been reported with the use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) liver transplantation (LT), there is a lack of evidence to demonstrate similar results to donation after brain death (DBD). We present a single-center retrospective case-matched (1:2) study including 100 NRP cDCD LTs and 200 DBD LTs and a median follow-up of 36 months. Matching was done according to donor age, recipient Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and cold ischemia time. The following perioperative results were similar in both groups: alanine transaminase peaks of 909 U/L in the DBD group and 836 U/L in the cDCD group and early allograft disfunction percentages of 21% and 19.2%, respectively. The 1-year and 3-year overall graft survival for cDCD was 99% and 93%, respectively, versus 92% and 87%, respectively, for DBD (P = 0.04). Of note, no cases of primary nonfunction or ischemic-type biliary lesion were observed among the cDCD grafts. Our results confirm that NRP cDCD LT meets the same outcomes as those obtained with DBD LT and provides evidence to support the idea that cDCD donors per se should no longer be considered as "marginal donors" when recovered with NRP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Ruiz
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Bask Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Andres Valdivieso
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Bask Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Ibone Palomares
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Bask Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Mikel Prieto
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Bask Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Alberto Ventoso
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Bask Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Patricia Salvador
- Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Basque Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Maria Senosiain
- Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Basque Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Jose Ramon Fernandez
- Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Basque Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Milagros Testillano
- Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Basque Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Bustamante
- Hepatology and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Basque Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Mikel Gastaca
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, University of the Bask Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion Versus Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Liver Transplantation From Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death: First International Comparative Study. Ann Surg 2020; 272:751-758. [PMID: 32833758 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000004268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare HOPE and NRP in liver transplantation from cDCD. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Liver transplantation after cDCD is associated with higher rates of graft loss. Dynamic preservation strategies such as NRP and HOPE may offer safer use of cDCD grafts. METHODS Retrospective comparative cohort study assessing outcomes after cDCD liver transplantation in 1 Swiss (HOPE) and 6 French (NRP) centers. The primary endpoint was 1-year tumor-death censored graft and patient survival. RESULTS A total of 132 and 93 liver grafts were transplanted after NRP and HOPE, respectively. NRP grafts were procured from younger donors (50 vs 61 years, P < 0.001), with shorter functional donor warm ischemia (22 vs 31 minutes, P < 0.001) and a lower overall predicted risk for graft loss (UK-DCD-risk score 6 vs 9 points, P < 0.001). One-year tumor-death censored graft and patient survival was 93% versus 86% (P = 0.125) and 95% versus 93% (P = 0.482) after NRP and HOPE, respectively. No differences in non-anastomotic biliary strictures, primary nonfunction and hepatic artery thrombosis were observed in the total cohort and in 32 vs. 32 propensity score-matched recipients CONCLUSION:: NRP and HOPE in cDCD achieved similar post-transplant recipient and graft survival rates exceeding 85% and comparable to the benchmark values observed in standard DBD liver transplantation. Grafts in the HOPE cohort were procured from older donors and had longer warm ischemia times, and consequently achieved higher utilization rates. Therefore, randomized controlled trials with intention-to-treat analysis are needed to further compare both preservation strategies, especially for high-risk donor-recipient combinations.
Collapse
|