Monitoring of Donor-specific Anti-HLA Antibodies and Management of Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients: An Evidence-based Expert Paper

Unrepresented human leucocyte antigen alleles in single-antigen bead assays: A single-centre cohort study

Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) alleles may generate antibodies that are undetectable by routine single-antigen beads (SABs) assays if their unique epitopes are unrepresented. We aimed to describe the prevalence and explore the potential impact of unrepresented HLA alleles in standard SAB kits in our cohort. All individuals who had undergone two-field HLA typing (HLA-A/B/C/DRB1/DQA1/-DQB1/-DPA1/-DPB1) from February 2021 to July 2023 were included. Two-field HLA-DRB3/4/5 typing was imputed. Each unrepresented allele was compared with the most similar represented allele in the standard LABScreen, LABScreen ExPlex (One Lambda) and the LIFECODES (Immucor) SAB kits. Differences in eplet expression (HLA Eplet Registry) were identified. Differences in three-dimensional molecular structures were visualized using generated models (SWISS-MODEL). Two-field HLA typing was performed for 116 individuals. Overall, 16.7% of all HLA alleles, found in 36.2% of individuals, were unrepresented by all SAB test kits. Four eplets, found in 12.9% of individuals, were unrepresented in at least 1 SAB kit. Non-Chinese individuals were more likely to have unrepresented HLA alleles and eplets than Chinese individuals. There were differences in HLA allele and eplet representation amongst the different SAB test kits. Use of supplementary SAB test kits may improve HLA allele and eplet representation. Although some HLA alleles were unrepresented, most epitopes were represented in current SAB kits. However, some unrepresented alleles may contain epitopes which may generate undetectable antibodies. Further studies may be needed to investigate the potential clinical impact of these unrepresented alleles and eplets, especially in certain ethnic populations or at-risk individuals.

The Problem of Subclinical Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

Defined as histologic evidence of rejection on a protocol biopsy in the absence of kidney dysfunction, subclinical rejection has garnered attention since the 1990s. The major focus of much of this research, however, has been subclinical T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). Herein, we review the literature on subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which may occur with either preexisting donor-specific antibodies (DSA) or upon the development of de novo DSA (dnDSA). In both situations, subsequent kidney function and graft survival are compromised. Thus, we recommend protocol biopsy routinely within the first year with preexisting DSA and at the initial detection of dnDSA. In those with positive biopsies, baseline immunosuppression should be maximized, any associated TCMR treated, and adherence stressed, but it remains uncertain if antibody-reduction treatment should be initiated. Less invasive testing of blood for donor DNA or gene profiling may have a role in follow-up of those with negative initial biopsies. If a protocol biopsy is positive in the absence of detectable HLA-DSA, it also remains to be determined whether non-HLA-DSA should be screened for either in particular or on a genome-wide basis and how these patients should be treated. Randomized controlled trials are clearly needed.

Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized recipients

In kidney transplantation (KT), overcoming donor shortage is particularly challenging in patients with preexisting donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against human leukocyte antigen (HLA), called HLA-incompatible KT (HLAi KT), carrying the risk of rejection and allograft loss. Thus, it is necessary to accurately evaluate the degree of sensitization before HLAi KT, and undertake appropriate pretreatment strategies. To determine the degree of sensitization, complement-dependent cytotoxicity has been the only method employed; the development of a method using flow cytometry further improved the test sensitivity. However, these tests present disadvantages, including the need for living cells, with a solid-phase assay developed to resolve this problem. Currently, the method using Luminex (Luminex Corp.) is widely used in clinical practice. As this method measures DSAs using single antigen beads, it is possible to classify immunological risks by measuring the type and amount of DSAs. Furthermore, there have been major advances in methods that involve DSA removal before HLAi KT. In the early stages of desensitization, plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulins were the main treatment methods employed; however, the introduction of CD20 monoclonal antibody and proteasome inhibitors further increased the success rate of desensitization. Currently, HLAi KT has been established as an important transplant method, but an understanding of DSAs and a novel desensitization treatment are warranted.